The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  Mm11

Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  Regist10
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  Mm11

Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  Regist10

Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  Empty Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?

Post by HiDeHo 10.07.17 4:11

We know the McCanns have manipulated the media and paid HUGE amounts  to stop the UK press from reporting the details in the files but I would like to ask if Gerry was able to stop the reports from the Lisbon hearing to have Goncalo Amaral's book ban overturned.

(Visit this page to see info about Half Million pounds given to Lord Bell to put them on Front Pages for a year and 30,000 paid to Hanover to change public opinion from hostility to sympathy after they were declared arguidos and more...

HDH Wordpress Blog - 2 – McCanns Manipulated the Media
https://hidehocontroversyofmadeleinemccann.wordpress.com/2015/07/09/mccanns-manipulated-the-media/ )


Court Appeal Hearing - Live Text Jan 12th 2010.
Tavares de Almeida and Ricardo Paiva took the stand yo explain about the dogs. Under oath and official. The following day there were more than 50 news articles. Gerry excused himself from court at 4pm and claimed to be returning to UK for work commitments. 






A few days later there was NOT ONE article about the McCanns! Had they been prevented from publishing? Is that why Gerry returned so swiftly back to UK leaving Fiona to accompany Kate at day 3 of the hearing Jan 14th.
Kate sounds particularly troubled in this interview....








Live text: Morning session Sky News
By Jon di Paolo
Tuesday January 12, 2010
8:40-- Good morning, i’m outside the palacio da justica in lisbon where the mcann libel trial will take place.
9:03-- Camera crews and photographers are gathering outside the court.
9:05-- The police have put barriers up outside the court entrance - they're obviously expecting large crowds.
9:52-- The McCanns have arrived at court. Word so far is that Goncalo Amaral is still yet to get here.
10:20-- We're in court awaiting the arrival of the judge and legal teams. The McCanns are sitting in the front row at the centre.
10:23-- We're sitting two rows behind the McCanns. The benches at the back of the courtroom are full of journalists from the UK and Portugal.
10:25-- The legal teams have arrived. Goncalo Amaral is sitting on one of the benches at the side of the court, around 15ft away from the McCanns.
10:28-- On the wall above the judge's chair is a large 3D frieze depicting the judgement of Solomon - complete with baby being held up by swordsman.
10:36-- A clerk carrying a large bundle of files has just come in, but we're still waiting for the judge.
10:39-- The judge has arrived - a young woman! Proceedings should now be able to get under way.
10:41-- One of the policemen set to give evidence will do so by video link tomorrow, we are told.
10:46-- Mr Amaral's lawyer addresses the court, speaking very slowly and deliberately.
10:47-- Mr Amaral's lawyer has said that the McCanns should take the stand in order to answer questions.
10:47-- He is declaring the 'principle of contradiction' - the legal basis for Mr Amaral's argument to be made.
10:51-- The McCanns' lawyer replies that the couple are prepared to give evidence but only after Mr Amaral has done so.
10:52-- The McCanns are having proceedings translated by interpreters seated either side of them.
11:00-- A new witness, Luis Frois, is being called by the McCanns' legal team on a date to be scheduled on the 14th.
11:01-- The mention of 'a date to be scheduled on the 14th' indicates proceedings are set to last longer than the three days set for them.
11:07-- Mr Amaral's lawyers want a CD containing police case files to be submitted as evidence because it would corroborate the claims in his book.
11:11-- The McCanns' lawyer is arguing against allowing the police CD to be submitted to the court.
11:20-- The first witness is being called by videoconference.
11:23-- It is the attorney who was in charge of the original inqury into Madeleine's disappearance, Jose Magalhaes e Menezes.
11:25-- His testimony is marred by a high-pitched whine of feedback from the microphone - and the fact the screen can't be seen by the public.
11:26-- The McCanns can't see the person giving evidence. Mr Amaral can, but doesn't seem to be looking at him.
11:26-- Mr Amaral's lawyer is cross-examining the witness.
11:37-- Mr Menezes is saying that English police sniffer dogs were brought to Portugal to help in the search for Madeleine.
11:38-- He says that the decision to make the McCanns 'arguidos' - suspects - was taken by the police and then confirmed by the public attorney.
11:39-- The decision to designate Kate and Gerry as 'arguidos' was taken after the sniffer dogs carried out their searches.
11:40-- There were several possible charges that could have been brought against the McCanns: kidnapping and selling a child were among them.
11:48-- The witness was asked what the probability was of Madeleine still being alive. He replied that he thought it was 50/50.
11:55-- Mr Menezes said that a claim made by the McCanns on the first day after Madeleine's disappearance was not true.
11:56-- The witness said that Kate and Gerry's report that they had been checking on their daughter every half an hour was inaccurate.
11:57-- He claimed that although the parents had been checking on Madeleine, it was not as often as every 30 minutes.
12:01-- Police intercepted text messages sent by the McCanns because they were suspicious of the parents' role in Madeleine's disappearance.
12:02-- The text messages sent by Kate and Gerry were never admitted as evidence gathered as part of the investigation.
12:08-- Mr Menezes said he has not read the book written by Mr Amaral that triggered this case, Maddie: The Truth Of The Lie.
12:18-- A report signed by Chief Inspector Tavares De Almeida said that Madeleine died in the flat in Praia da Luz, the witness adds.
12:19-- Now it's the turn of the McCanns' legal team to cross-question the witness.
12:24-- The McCanns' lawyer makes the point that 'evidence' usually sightings - has suggested Madeleine is still alive.
12:25-- He says that the McCanns are not responsible for generating any of this 'evidence' that their daughter is not dead.
12:26-- Another of the McCanns' lawyers moves to quiz the witness - literally. She gets out of her seat and walks right up to the video screen.
12:33-- She says that the McCanns were always totally prepared to come back to Portugal to take part in a reconstruction of the disappearance.
12:34-- The McCanns' lawyer asks the witness whether he understands the title of Mr Amaral's book to imply some sort of dishonesty by the McCanns.
12:38-- Who suggested the checking of the McCanns' text messages, Mr Menezes is asked. The police, he replies.
12:39-- The text messages were never considered as part of the investigation because the judge did not allow it, the court hears.
12:45-- The senior lawyer for the McCanns has approached them on the front bench of the public gallery for a quick huddled conversation.
12:48-- He was involved in the case from the beginning, but taken off it in September 2007.
12:48-- Tavares de Almeida, chief inspector of police at the time of Madeleine's disapperance, has taken the stand to give evidence.
12:51-- Mr de Almeida tells the court that he is still working as member of the Portuguese police.
12:52-- He tells the court that British police took an active part in the investigation.
12:53-- He said the Portuguese detectives found the co-operation given by their British counterparts useful.
12:54-- The British police told the Portuguese officers what the capabilities of the sniffer dogs being used in the investigation were.
12:56-- One of the dogs used to search the apartment in Praia da Luz identified blood and another identified the smell of a human body.
12:58-- The dogs detected the traces inside the dining room of the holiday flat and in the car the McCanns were using.
1:02-- The animals also found a scent on a piece of cloth in a flat rented by the McCanns after they left the apartment where Madeleine vanished.
1:11-- A report by the British police stated that one of the sniffer dogs was in a nervous, excitable state, and wanted to get into the room.
1:34-- British police would have found it very difficult to charge the mccanns.
1:35-- De almeida: we were controlled by the british police.
1:36-- De almeida: british police kept information about the mcanns to themselves.
1:39-- De almeida: Forensic lab technicians from birmingham came to portugal so it is strange concerns were raised about contamination.
1:53-- De almeida: british authorities other than police hindered investigation by withholding information.
1:54-- De almeida: when we asked uk for info on mccanns we got a single side of a4.
2:05-- The mcanns' lawyer is getting quite worked up in her cross examination of de almeida
2:09-- The mcanns' lawyer is rebuked for saying de almeida was accused of torturing suspects - he was never charged.
2:10-- The court is adjourning for lunch. Back at 3pm
Live text: Afternoon session Sky News
By Jon di Paolo
Tuesday January 12, 2010
3:28-- We're back in court. The mcanns are here but mr amaral is missing.
3:29-- Mr amaral has just walked in and we're under way.
3:33-- Inspector ricardo paiva, of the portuguese police, has taken the stand.
3:34-- Insp paiva says he was the family liaison officer for the case but was taken off at the mcanns' request.
3:45-- Paiva is asked whether he ever got the impression from the mccanns they thought maddie could be dead. He says yes.
3:47-- Kate whispers something in gerry's ear and gives him a little smile. He stays looking straight in front.
3:52-- Gerry has put his arm round kate as they listen to paiva's testimony
4:03-- Paiva also says the mccanns were made suspects after the british sniffer dogs were brought in.
4:04-- Paiva: there was total collaboration between british and portuguese police on the case
4:09-- Paiva: it was scotland yard who first thought it could be a murder case.
4:09-- Paiva: amaral's theories are based on the facts of the investigation.
4:12-- Paiva: amaral's thesis has prevented other theories from being investigated.
4:13-- Paiva: mccanns never pointed me towards any evidence that maddie was still alive.
4:16-- Mr amaral looks like he's dozing off.
4:29-- Paiva: we found the 'merchandising' operation with wristbands and so on very strange.
4:31-- Paiva: if she was being held somewhere publicity would be more likely to hasten her death.
4:55-- The mcanns' lawyer is taking an aggressive tone as she cross-examines mr paiva.
5:08-- Proceedings have ended for today.
5:11-- Some confusion here- that wasn't the end of proceedings, just a break before today's final witness.
5:29-- Ok, that's all we have time for. Back tomorrow morning.





CLICK HERE for remaining two days text report:



Gerry left the courthouse at 4pm Tuesday and returned to UK for (what he tells us) 'Business Commitments'. But WAS that the reason?

Did he return to STOP the media reports from the court witnesses from the day before?

Thanks to Maddie Case Files for compiling a FULL  list in chronological order of ALL news articles from May 3rd 2007 INCLUDING DELETED ARTICLES!
http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic5313-10.html


MEDIA NEWS REPORTS WED JAN 13th 2010
Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  Jan_1310Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  List_210Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  List_j10
Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  List_j11


CLICK HERE TO SEE: MEDIA NEWS REPORTS THURSDAY Jan 14th, FRIDAY Jan 15th, SATURDAY Jan 16th:


A few days later NO MEDIA REPORTS ABOUT THE INFO FROM THE COURT WITNESS STATEMENTS GIVING THE INFO ON THE DOGS!

By Jan 20th  there were NO reports on the McCanns in the media


MEDIA REPORTS SUNDAY  Jan 17th, MONDAY Jan 18th TUESDAY Jan 19th 2010

Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  Jan_1710Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  Jan_1810

Did Gerry McCann return to UK during the trial to STOP uk reports and if so WHAT WAS THE COST  and WAS THE FUND USED?

More importantly, if he DID return to UK for that purpose, was it to STOP the UK from finding the truth in the files?

Their effort seems to be to prevent the UK from finding the truth and to stop media reporting or to SUE anyone that tries to show the UK public the TRUTH!


I believe that is what they FEAR THE MOST!


Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  No_new10




Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  Lord_b10



Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  Hanove10
HiDeHo
HiDeHo
Researcher

Posts : 3324
Activity : 5076
Likes received : 1065
Join date : 2010-05-07

http://forum2.aimoo.com/MadeleineMcCann

Back to top Go down

Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  Empty Re: Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?

Post by Rogue-a-Tory 10.07.17 9:33

I don’t believe the Mcs needed a separate fund to conceal legal expense payments from the public eye. Whilst No Stone Unturned is a limited liability company it can file very brief annual reports with Companies House since its size makes it eligible to file abridged account or even micro-entity accounts. Thank successive Tory & Labour Governments for that and their noble efforts to cut red tape by denying the public invaluable information on the activities of innumerable unscrupulous businesses.
 
This means NSU doesn’t have to disclose any info as to what it’s spent all that hard-earned, publicly donated money on. So long as the company funds are spent in accordance with its stated objectives and authorised in accordance with the processes laid down by its board, its directors and auditors won’t give a damn about disclosure.
Rogue-a-Tory
Rogue-a-Tory

Posts : 633
Activity : 1101
Likes received : 454
Join date : 2014-09-10

Back to top Go down

Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  Empty Was this another hidden Fund

Post by willowthewisp 12.10.17 17:17

Rogue-a-Tory wrote:I don’t believe the Mcs needed a separate fund to conceal legal expense payments from the public eye. Whilst No Stone Unturned is a limited liability company it can file very brief annual reports with Companies House since its size makes it eligible to file abridged account or even micro-entity accounts. Thank successive Tory & Labour Governments for that and their noble efforts to cut red tape by denying the public invaluable information on the activities of innumerable unscrupulous businesses.
 
This means NSU doesn’t have to disclose any info as to what it’s spent all that hard-earned, publicly donated money on. So long as the company funds are spent in accordance with its stated objectives and authorised in accordance with the processes laid down by its board, its directors and auditors won’t give a damn about disclosure.
Hi Rogue-a-Tory, So if the said"Directors"of the fund are close family relatives or from the"Good Old Boy"network,the ruse can continue,tis a pity that mouthpiece Clarence Mitchell never ever conveyed the Fund that way though,it must have slipped his PR preoccupied mind(He Lies with as many Teeth he has in his Head)Carlos anjo spotted our Clarence, precisely,Now wheres them pliers?
willowthewisp
willowthewisp

Posts : 3392
Activity : 4912
Likes received : 1160
Join date : 2015-05-07

Back to top Go down

Was this ANOTHER hidden 'Fund' expense to prevent UK learning the truth?  Empty Was this another hidden Fund

Post by willowthewisp 12.10.17 17:19

Rogue-a-Tory wrote:I don’t believe the Mcs needed a separate fund to conceal legal expense payments from the public eye. Whilst No Stone Unturned is a limited liability company it can file very brief annual reports with Companies House since its size makes it eligible to file abridged account or even micro-entity accounts. Thank successive Tory & Labour Governments for that and their noble efforts to cut red tape by denying the public invaluable information on the activities of innumerable unscrupulous businesses.
 
This means NSU doesn’t have to disclose any info as to what it’s spent all that hard-earned, publicly donated money on. So long as the company funds are spent in accordance with its stated objectives and authorised in accordance with the processes laid down by its board, its directors and auditors won’t give a damn about disclosure.
Hi Rogue-a-Tory, So if the said"Directors"of the fund are close family relatives or from the"Good Old Boy"network,the ruse can continue,tis a pity that mouthpiece Clarence Mitchell never ever conveyed the Fund that way though,it must have slipped his PR preoccupied mind(He Lies with as many Teeth he has in his Head)Carlos anjo spotted our Clarence, precisely,Now wheres them pliers,Sit still Clarence,you'll only make it worse,taking out all those Bad Teeth?
willowthewisp
willowthewisp

Posts : 3392
Activity : 4912
Likes received : 1160
Join date : 2015-05-07

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum