ABOVE THE LAW - by Dr Martin Roberts -mccannfiles
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Research and Analysis :: Dr Martin Roberts - mccannfiles
Page 1 of 1 • Share
ABOVE THE LAW - by Dr Martin Roberts -mccannfiles
ABOVE THE LAW
26th February 2012
by Dr Martin Roberts
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
------
Related reading: The cancelled reconstruction - Shocking emails between the Tapas 9 and Stu 'hope you are well' Prior
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
26th February 2012
by Dr Martin Roberts
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
------
Related reading: The cancelled reconstruction - Shocking emails between the Tapas 9 and Stu 'hope you are well' Prior
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Guest- Guest
thanks for posting
wonderful stuff as always. Is this man being sued??!!
the following beggars belief:
"We're not going to sit here and lie and be totally naïve and say she's one hundred per cent alive."
I could be really generous and say give her the benefit of the doubt, Kate muddled her words when under stress..and meant that with 100% certainty Maddie was alive....but that is stating the obvious, she is clearly 100% uncertain of her daughter's fate if she has been abducted.
But no matter how I try and how often I re-read this sentence, I can't logically infer that meaning.
And in bold.. she and her husband would be telling porkies if they were to state that Madeleine was alive. She can only be totally alive or totally dead.
It would not be a lie to say she might be alive, if she were truly abducted.
I can only infer from this that they would be truthful if they were to state that Maddie was 100% not alive.
please move to forensic linguistics !!!
____________________
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate,
contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and
unrealistic.
~John F. Kennedy
russiandoll- Posts : 3942
Activity : 4058
Likes received : 15
Join date : 2011-09-11
Re: ABOVE THE LAW - by Dr Martin Roberts -mccannfiles
russiandoll wrote:
wonderful stuff as always. Is this man being sued??!!
the following beggars belief:
"We're not going to sit here and lie and be totally naïve and say she's one hundred per cent alive."
I could be really generous and say give her the benefit of the doubt, Kate muddled her words when under stress..and meant that with 100% certainty Maddie was alive....but that is stating the obvious, she is clearly 100% uncertain of her daughter's fate if she has been abducted.
But no matter how I try and how often I re-read this sentence, I can't logically infer that meaning.
And in bold.. she and her husband would be telling porkies if they were to state that Madeleine was alive. She can only be totally alive or totally dead.
It would not be a lie to say she might be alive, if she were truly abducted.
I can only infer from this that they would be truthful if they were to state that Maddie was 100% not alive.
please move to forensic linguistics !!!
Good question. If not - why not? Is it because his analyses only reach a comparatively few people on the Internet whereas Tony Bennett is an activist whose actions are more widely reported and Sr. Amaral is dangerous because he is not only an activist but the real detective who headed the initial part of the investigation and dared to publish his views? Or perhaps because they are simply afraid to have all Dr. Robert's analyses aired and discussed by a wider public as they most certainly would be if they as much as even attempted to shut him up? IMO it's the latter. I wonder who Dr. Roberts is - I bet the parents and their legal team know.
T4two- Posts : 166
Activity : 171
Likes received : 5
Join date : 2012-01-22
Age : 76
Location : Germany
Re: ABOVE THE LAW - by Dr Martin Roberts -mccannfiles
T4two wrote:russiandoll wrote:
wonderful stuff as always. Is this man being sued??!!
the following beggars belief:
"We're not going to sit here and lie and be totally naïve and say she's one hundred per cent alive."
I could be really generous and say give her the benefit of the doubt, Kate muddled her words when under stress..and meant that with 100% certainty Maddie was alive....but that is stating the obvious, she is clearly 100% uncertain of her daughter's fate if she has been abducted.
But no matter how I try and how often I re-read this sentence, I can't logically infer that meaning.
And in bold.. she and her husband would be telling porkies if they were to state that Madeleine was alive. She can only be totally alive or totally dead.
It would not be a lie to say she might be alive, if she were truly abducted.
I can only infer from this that they would be truthful if they were to state that Maddie was 100% not alive.
please move to forensic linguistics !!!
Good question. If not - why not? Is it because his analyses only reach a comparatively few people on the Internet whereas Tony Bennett is an activist whose actions are more widely reported and Sr. Amaral is dangerous because he is not only an activist but the real detective who headed the initial part of the investigation and dared to publish his views? Or perhaps because they are simply afraid to have all Dr. Robert's analyses aired and discussed by a wider public as they most certainly would be if they as much as even attempted to shut him up? IMO it's the latter. I wonder who Dr. Roberts is - I bet the parents and their legal team know.
Very good points, it's very hard to stop your brain interfering when you're lying.
I agree that they probably know who Dr. Roberts is and no, way too dangerous to take him to court, besides he can argue it's only a logical interpretation of their own words.
"We're not going to sit here and lie and be totally naïve and say she's one hundred per cent alive." Means to me she isn't at best - 100% alive. We would be telling a lie if we said so. So the conclusion is that Maddie is NOT 100% alive. There is the possibility of a coma or vegetative state - but how could they know that? If they knew that, they would know where she is. No, they are trying NOT to tell us that she is 100% dead.
____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
Similar topics
» Dr Martin Roberts latest from mccannfiles
» IN PURSUIT OF DEFAME AND FORTUNE by Dr Martin Roberts - mccannfiles.com
» THE LONELINESS OF THE LONG DISTANCE RUNNER by Dr Martin Roberts - mccannfiles
» DR MARTIN ROBERTS BLOG ON MCCANNFILES DATED 16TH JULY, 2012.
» You can bet on the law - Dr Martin Roberts
» IN PURSUIT OF DEFAME AND FORTUNE by Dr Martin Roberts - mccannfiles.com
» THE LONELINESS OF THE LONG DISTANCE RUNNER by Dr Martin Roberts - mccannfiles
» DR MARTIN ROBERTS BLOG ON MCCANNFILES DATED 16TH JULY, 2012.
» You can bet on the law - Dr Martin Roberts
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Research and Analysis :: Dr Martin Roberts - mccannfiles
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum