The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

Please note that when you register your username must be different from your email address!

Opinions please

Page 9 of 10 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by tigger on 06.03.13 19:59

Jean wrote:
Châtelaine wrote:I do recall Madeleine's image as an artist's impression, based on published tennis photo. I've been looking for it, but it seems to have been wooshed from the net and only still exists in Himself's photoshop with Amaral. Pity, because the artist very well illustrated my own feelings, when I saw the tennis photo for the first time. As I said before: a child trying desperately to please the one who's taking the picture.

Here's a link to a Sun story about an artist's version (hideous in my opinion) of the tennis ball photo.

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/m/press/9dec7/Sun-14-12-2007.htm

Note the comment from the McCanns' spokesman - indeed it's wicked that anyone other than them should make money out of Madeleine!

He may have caught the inner feelings of his subjects spot on. Maddie no longer has a hunchback and Kate looks like she's had a bad oyster with the New Zealand white. Love it! laughat

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
avatar
tigger

Posts : 8114
Reputation : 48
Join date : 2011-07-20

View user profile http://fytton.blogspot.nl/

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by Guest on 06.03.13 21:03

Madeleine appears to have no neck though - a very strange image - and goodness knows what she has over her head in the other painting.

I'm sure they wouldn't have been described as twisted if all proceeds had been going to the Fund!
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by averageperson on 06.03.13 21:19

@plebgate wrote:Hello my lovlies you may have noticed I am a new member here and having scrutinised posts here I wondered if you would give me your views on this post.
Please do not pick on me and please try and avoid sarcasm in your replies.

I noted earlier in the thread that a poster asked if anybody knew who "himself" was.

Just to say that has anybody ever considered himself may in fact be a herself. Of course I do not know who the blogger is but I have been reading himselfs blogs and they intrigue me. Wondered what anybody else thought.

Thank you hun(s).



Please also remember as I a new member not to pm admin and "accuse" me of taking the P out of any posters on the forum as I can tell you now I am not. I am just a houseperson who is interested in your thoughts.



Sorry admin but I can sometimes be a bit naughty but I am nice.

Ridiculous! Himself could have been GA, that was my meaning. I have never read the blog, I just liked the picture, Infact I thought it was in GA's book..

Such a suspicious mind. too suspicious.
The message at the top of this forum asks "Why not join our forum and help search for the truth", yet new members are met with suspicion by some and made to feel unwelcome.
Maybe if you were a little less suspicious, more people would come and more would stay.

averageperson

Posts : 56
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-03-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by bobbin on 06.03.13 21:43

@averageperson wrote:
@plebgate wrote:Hello my lovlies you may have noticed I am a new member here and having scrutinised posts here I wondered if you would give me your views on this post.
Please do not pick on me and please try and avoid sarcasm in your replies.

I noted earlier in the thread that a poster asked if anybody knew who "himself" was.

Just to say that has anybody ever considered himself may in fact be a herself. Of course I do not know who the blogger is but I have been reading himselfs blogs and they intrigue me. Wondered what anybody else thought.

Thank you hun(s).



Please also remember as I a new member not to pm admin and "accuse" me of taking the P out of any posters on the forum as I can tell you now I am not. I am just a houseperson who is interested in your thoughts.



Sorry admin but I can sometimes be a bit naughty but I am nice.

Ridiculous! Himself could have been GA, that was my meaning. I have never read the blog, I just liked the picture, Infact I thought it was in GA's book..

Such a suspicious mind. too suspicious.
The message at the top of this forum asks "Why not join our forum and help search for the truth", yet new members are met with suspicion by some and made to feel unwelcome.
Maybe if you were a little less suspicious, more people would come and more would stay.
Serious posters like plebgate join and stay because they are interested in getting justice for Madeleine and contribute material and thoughts to the forum. People who just demand, but give nothing back, and complain about being unfairly treated must ask themselves if they are here to get justice for Madeleine or here to disrupt.

bobbin

Posts : 2052
Reputation : 142
Join date : 2011-12-05

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by Guest on 06.03.13 21:47

Bobbin.

Let's move on please; welcome to all new members who simply want to know more about this perplexing case.
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by Guest on 06.03.13 22:05

I second that, Jean. Asking questions, when not up to speed with all information available, is one thing. Demanding, is another one. And not attributing to a sensible debate, is yet another one.

And this is one of the most "uniformed" and derailing comments I've seen so far: "Ridiculous! Himself could have been GA, that was my meaning. I have
never read the blog, I just liked the picture, Infact I thought it was
in GA's book.."
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by Nina on 06.03.13 23:10

Châtelaine wrote:Seems we're talking two different subjects, JD

Anyway, I'm happy Jean found the picture I was looking for.

Yes and look at her thin little legs and pinchy toes in those blooming sandles that Kate thought were so very suitable for running around a tennis court. I bet she didn't wear anything similar when she was playing tennis.
That painting is, imo, a very realistic reproduction of the sweet child with a nervous smile and a hunched tight body posture. And don't anyone try to say she was rigid so as not to drop the balls, she has the same look as she does on other photos, lost.

____________________
Not one more cent from me.
avatar
Nina

Posts : 2861
Reputation : 334
Join date : 2011-06-16
Age : 74

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by bobbin on 06.03.13 23:24

@Nina wrote:
Châtelaine wrote:Seems we're talking two different subjects, JD

Anyway, I'm happy Jean found the picture I was looking for.

Yes and look at her thin little legs and pinchy toes in those blooming sandles that Kate thought were so very suitable for running around a tennis court. I bet she didn't wear anything similar when she was playing tennis.
That painting is, imo, a very realistic reproduction of the sweet child with a nervous smile and a hunched tight body posture. And don't anyone try to say she was rigid so as not to drop the balls, she has the same look as she does on other photos, lost.
I so agree, lost, in so many different senses. Such a sad little life, but I think that's why we are still here, and will be, until she is given what she so rightly deserves, acknowledgment, full and complete.

bobbin

Posts : 2052
Reputation : 142
Join date : 2011-12-05

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by averageperson on 06.03.13 23:50

@bobbin wrote:
@averageperson wrote:
@plebgate wrote:Hello my lovlies you may have noticed I am a new member here and having scrutinised posts here I wondered if you would give me your views on this post.
Please do not pick on me and please try and avoid sarcasm in your replies.

I noted earlier in the thread that a poster asked if anybody knew who "himself" was.

Just to say that has anybody ever considered himself may in fact be a herself. Of course I do not know who the blogger is but I have been reading himselfs blogs and they intrigue me. Wondered what anybody else thought.

Thank you hun(s).



Please also remember as I a new member not to pm admin and "accuse" me of taking the P out of any posters on the forum as I can tell you now I am not. I am just a houseperson who is interested in your thoughts.



Sorry admin but I can sometimes be a bit naughty but I am nice.

Ridiculous! Himself could have been GA, that was my meaning. I have never read the blog, I just liked the picture, Infact I thought it was in GA's book..

Such a suspicious mind. too suspicious.
The message at the top of this forum asks "Why not join our forum and help search for the truth", yet new members are met with suspicion by some and made to feel unwelcome.
Maybe if you were a little less suspicious, more people would come and more would stay.
Serious posters like plebgate join and stay because they are interested in getting justice for Madeleine and contribute material and thoughts to the forum. People who just demand, but give nothing back, and complain about being unfairly treated must ask themselves if they are here to get justice for Madeleine or here to disrupt.

I am misguided. I thought this place was to help discover the truth. How can that be done without asking. Yet to come here to do so, means you are tarnished as disruptive, or that you have other motives. I did not make demands, what am I, a blackmailer or something now. I asked for opinions. I thought I may have contributed in some small way, but I am still learning or trying to learn myself.
I do not know what sick people you know, but most that I encounter are not that devious and so unkind as to decide to "disrupt" a forum, based on the fate of a little 3 year old girl.. As a mother I find this not just insulting to be accused of this, but as a normal human with a kind heart, I find it abhorrent. I found that picture on what I thought was a different site. Someone else stayed it was from "Himself".
I simply looked at google images.

What is happening here is a normal eager to understand the facts, person, coming into this very late granted, is searching for aid & knowledge to learn more & from some here getting it and helping me so thank you.

It almost seems to me that others are purposely trying to force newcomers out.

averageperson

Posts : 56
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-03-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by saltnpepper on 07.03.13 0:15

candyfloss wrote:Please no more arguments. The mods and admin are here to decide who is who, if anyone has problems then take it to pm with admin or mods, and let's keep this forum free from all this. Thank you for your co-operation.

Good advice
avatar
saltnpepper

Posts : 154
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2012-04-30
Location : wales

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by Smokeandmirrors on 07.03.13 6:15

[quote="Jean"]Madeleine appears to have no neck though - a very strange image - and goodness knows what she has over her head in the other painting.

I'm sure they wouldn't have been described as twisted if all proceeds had been going to the Fund![/quote]

Agreed!

But it would be twisted if someone bought a really bad painting of KM and hung it on their living room wall.

____________________
The truth will out.
avatar
Smokeandmirrors
Moderator

Posts : 2428
Reputation : 8
Join date : 2011-07-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by tigger on 07.03.13 6:38

@averageperson wrote:
@bobbin wrote:
@averageperson wrote:
@plebgate wrote:Hello my lovlies you may have noticed I am a new member here and having scrutinised posts here I wondered if you would give me your views on this post.
Please do not pick on me and please try and avoid sarcasm in your replies.

I noted earlier in the thread that a poster asked if anybody knew who "himself" was.

Just to say that has anybody ever considered himself may in fact be a herself. Of course I do not know who the blogger is but I have been reading himselfs blogs and they intrigue me. Wondered what anybody else thought.

Thank you hun(s).



Please also remember as I a new member not to pm admin and "accuse" me of taking the P out of any posters on the forum as I can tell you now I am not. I am just a houseperson who is interested in your thoughts.



Sorry admin but I can sometimes be a bit naughty but I am nice.

Ridiculous! Himself could have been GA, that was my meaning. I have never read the blog, I just liked the picture, Infact I thought it was in GA's book..

Such a suspicious mind. too suspicious.
The message at the top of this forum asks "Why not join our forum and help search for the truth", yet new members are met with suspicion by some and made to feel unwelcome.
Maybe if you were a little less suspicious, more people would come and more would stay.
Serious posters like plebgate join and stay because they are interested in getting justice for Madeleine and contribute material and thoughts to the forum. People who just demand, but give nothing back, and complain about being unfairly treated must ask themselves if they are here to get justice for Madeleine or here to disrupt.

I am misguided. I thought this place was to help discover the truth. How can that be done without asking. Yet to come here to do so, means you are tarnished as disruptive, or that you have other motives. I did not make demands, what am I, a blackmailer or something now. I asked for opinions. I thought I may have contributed in some small way, but I am still learning or trying to learn myself.
I do not know what sick people you know, but most that I encounter are not that devious and so unkind as to decide to "disrupt" a forum, based on the fate of a little 3 year old girl.. As a mother I find this not just insulting to be accused of this, but as a normal human with a kind heart, I find it abhorrent. I found that picture on what I thought was a different site. Someone else stayed it was from "Himself".
I simply looked at google images.

What is happening here is a normal eager to understand the facts, person, coming into this very late granted, is searching for aid & knowledge to learn more & from some here getting it and helping me so thank you.

It almost seems to me that others are purposely trying to force newcomers out.

Try the Samaritans. I hear they're very understanding.

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
avatar
tigger

Posts : 8114
Reputation : 48
Join date : 2011-07-20

View user profile http://fytton.blogspot.nl/

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by tigger on 07.03.13 6:42

@Nina wrote:
Châtelaine wrote:Seems we're talking two different subjects, JD

Anyway, I'm happy Jean found the picture I was looking for.

Yes and look at her thin little legs and pinchy toes in those blooming sandles that Kate thought were so very suitable for running around a tennis court. I bet she didn't wear anything similar when she was playing tennis.
That painting is, imo, a very realistic reproduction of the sweet child with a nervous smile and a hunched tight body posture. And don't anyone try to say she was rigid so as not to drop the balls, she has the same look as she does on other photos, lost.

Insecure and lost, exactly what I've always felt about that little girl. On many pictures she looks as if she doesn't know what's expected of her.
That's why I thought - although the artwork isn't to my taste - the artists' conceptual take on the images is spot on.
A lost little girl - a certain fury in her mother.
roses for Maddie.

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
avatar
tigger

Posts : 8114
Reputation : 48
Join date : 2011-07-20

View user profile http://fytton.blogspot.nl/

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by plebgate on 07.03.13 14:00

Thank you bobbin

Moving on - as Tigger posted for Maddie. A little girl lost and her parents put the search on hold as many posters have said because of a SY review. What?

plebgate

Posts : 6124
Reputation : 1795
Join date : 2013-02-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by rainbow-fairy on 07.03.13 15:44

@jd wrote:
@rainbow-fairy wrote:
@jd wrote:
@rainbow-fairy wrote:A million thank you's jd! Takes so long to go through everything, but I have mentioned this several times.
I think it proves something is very wrong that so many people claimed to have taken it and on different days.
You are a star! roses

roses RF....They are not inconsistent on an hour or so time, but different days!! All of them!!
I know! And anyone with the nous to notice and dare question it we are 'haters', or worse for some, gagged and sued...

Trying to put myself in KMcC's shoes, had I been so touched by that photo and had taken it on my camera, that is what I would have released!
But not Kate because it appears they had plenty of copies of an old photo to hand.....

How all these FACTS are not red flags to some people I will NEVER understand... nah

If I remember correctly, gerry mccann says in interviews that the poolside photo is his most precious memory photo of Maddie. Yet when the wallet was snatched at Waterloo station, it was a photo taken from a Christening a month or 2 earlier that was his most sacred photo of Maddie!!! (the photo nobody has ever seen & could have been used for the photos of who to look for)...The fact he had no sacred photos of the twins in his wallet is another issue!!
Oh yes I'd forgotten about that one! Your most cherished memory isn't of a photo fgs! I have a beautiful picture of my Dad, holding a carp he'd caught, in a metal frame. Would I EVER refer to that as my 'last memory' or 'cherished memory' - no way! You remember silly things that were said and done.

That and the fact it appeared so late! WHY? And why did pool pic appear AFTER Gerry had returned to the UK?
I'm sure I have NO idea winkwink

____________________
"Ask the dogs, Sandra" - Gerry McCann to Sandra Felgueiras



Truth is artless and innocent - like the eloquence of nature, it is clothed with simplicity and easy persuasion; always open to investigation and analysis, it seeks exposure because it fears not detection.

NORMAN MACDONALD, Maxims and Moral Reflections.
avatar
rainbow-fairy

Posts : 1971
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2011-05-26
Age : 43
Location : going round in circles

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by Newintown on 07.03.13 17:09

@rainbow-fairy wrote:
@jd wrote:
@rainbow-fairy wrote:
@jd wrote:
@rainbow-fairy wrote:A million thank you's jd! Takes so long to go through everything, but I have mentioned this several times.
I think it proves something is very wrong that so many people claimed to have taken it and on different days.
You are a star!

RF....They are not inconsistent on an hour or so time, but different days!! All of them!!
I know! And anyone with the nous to notice and dare question it we are 'haters', or worse for some, gagged and sued...

Trying to put myself in KMcC's shoes, had I been so touched by that photo and had taken it on my camera, that is what I would have released!
But not Kate because it appears they had plenty of copies of an old photo to hand.....

How all these FACTS are not red flags to some people I will NEVER understand...

If I remember correctly, gerry mccann says in interviews that the poolside photo is his most precious memory photo of Maddie. Yet when the wallet was snatched at Waterloo station, it was a photo taken from a Christening a month or 2 earlier that was his most sacred photo of Maddie!!! (the photo nobody has ever seen & could have been used for the photos of who to look for)...The fact he had no sacred photos of the twins in his wallet is another issue!!
Oh yes I'd forgotten about that one! Your most cherished memory isn't of a photo fgs! I have a beautiful picture of my Dad, holding a carp he'd caught, in a metal frame. Would I EVER refer to that as my 'last memory' or 'cherished memory' - no way! You remember silly things that were said and done.

That and the fact it appeared so late! WHY? And why did pool pic appear AFTER Gerry had returned to the UK?
I'm sure I have NO idea

Looking back on the pool pic I have thought for a while that the child's body with Madeleine's head on it is not Madeleine's body. What Mother of a cherished missing daughter wouldn't even remember what colour the dress was when it was especially bought for the holiday as K McCann went into detail about, the only reason I can think of is because Kate McCann didn't even buy the dress with the white frilly lace shorts but it was another Mother who bought them for her own child.

Wouldn't the dress now be hanging up in Madeleine's wardrobe at home as it would have been packed up with the families clothes brought back from PDL. How can she not remember what colour it is????

Could someone else have put the photo together and therefore Kate Mcann didn't look at it in much detail if it was not actually Madeleine in the photo, therefore she didn't know that the dress was peach and put pink in her book?

____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........

"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"

avatar
Newintown

Posts : 1597
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2011-07-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by rainbow-fairy on 07.03.13 17:30

@Newintown wrote:Looking back on the pool pic I have thought for a while that the child's body with Madeleine's head on it is not Madeleine's body. What Mother of a cherished missing daughter wouldn't even remember what colour the dress was when it was especially bought for the holiday as K McCann went into detail about, the only reason I can think of is because Kate McCann didn't even buy the dress with the white frilly lace shorts but it was another Mother who bought them for her own child.

Wouldn't the dress now be hanging up in Madeleine's wardrobe at home as it would have been packed up with the families clothes brought back from PDL. How can she not remember what colour it is????
IIRC, the clothes description didn't make an appearance until 'the bewk', like the 'out searching at 4am'
IMO, when Kate goes to great lengths to tell us something really unimportant, eg the clothes were 'an extravagance but worth it' it is because she is papering over cracks that would blow their story open.
The 4am was because I believe they had been seen out and HAD to provide an explanation. The clothes - same. So that is a red flag re last photo. Was it Maddie but taken at a different time? Different child? Its odd because AMELIE is the one wearing 'peach' in pool pic. 'Maddie' v clearly light pink.
So. SOMETHING important there, Kate covering their butts - but what???

As an aside, I find the description of Maddie in her new clothes utterly bad

ETA: Just notice your edit Newintown - that could well explain it!
If she really HAD been wearing that outfit that afternoon, where did it go? Why was it not given to PJ rather than a generic towel that couldve been anybodys.

Just a thought - could it (IF it existed ON that holiday) have been seized and kept by the PJ? We know they have files withheld? Possibly not BUT imho Kate is trying to divert here.

____________________
"Ask the dogs, Sandra" - Gerry McCann to Sandra Felgueiras



Truth is artless and innocent - like the eloquence of nature, it is clothed with simplicity and easy persuasion; always open to investigation and analysis, it seeks exposure because it fears not detection.

NORMAN MACDONALD, Maxims and Moral Reflections.
avatar
rainbow-fairy

Posts : 1971
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2011-05-26
Age : 43
Location : going round in circles

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by Newintown on 07.03.13 17:41

@rainbow-fairy wrote:
@Newintown wrote:Looking back on the pool pic I have thought for a while that the child's body with Madeleine's head on it is not Madeleine's body. What Mother of a cherished missing daughter wouldn't even remember what colour the dress was when it was especially bought for the holiday as K McCann went into detail about, the only reason I can think of is because Kate McCann didn't even buy the dress with the white frilly lace shorts but it was another Mother who bought them for her own child.

Wouldn't the dress now be hanging up in Madeleine's wardrobe at home as it would have been packed up with the families clothes brought back from PDL. How can she not remember what colour it is????
IIRC, the clothes description didn't make an appearance until 'the bewk', like the 'out searching at 4am'
IMO, when Kate goes to great lengths to tell us something really unimportant, eg the clothes were 'an extravagance but worth it' it is because she is papering over cracks that would blow their story open.
The 4am was because I believe they had been seen out and HAD to provide an explanation. The clothes - same. So that is a red flag re last photo. Was is Maddie but taken at a different time period? Different child? Its odd because AMELIE is the one wearing 'peach' in pool pic. 'Maddie' v clearly light pink.
So. SOMETHING important there, Kate covering their butts - but what???

As an aside, I find the description of Maddie in her new clothes utterly

That's what I was thinking. I love Monsoon clothes but didn't even buy them for myself even when I was working and was earning a good salary, I would only think about it if it was for a special occasion i.e. a birthday or wedding "do". They were too damn expensive and not very robust. Which Mother in their right mind would buy a Monsoon outfit for a 3 year old to wear on a sun/sand/sea holiday in Portugal. Most Mothers would go to somewhere cheap and cheerful so it didn't matter whether the clothes got damaged, dirty etc. The sort of outfit on the girl in the pool pic would be something brought as a bridesmaid outfit or for a special function, definitely not a seaside holiday, especially when the poor kid was actually stuck in the play group all day and was supposedly put to bed at 7.30 every night.

____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........

"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"

avatar
Newintown

Posts : 1597
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2011-07-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by rainbow-fairy on 07.03.13 18:06

@Newintown wrote:
@rainbow-fairy wrote:
@Newintown wrote:Looking back on the pool pic I have thought for a while that the child's body with Madeleine's head on it is not Madeleine's body. What Mother of a cherished missing daughter wouldn't even remember what colour the dress was when it was especially bought for the holiday as K McCann went into detail about, the only reason I can think of is because Kate McCann didn't even buy the dress with the white frilly lace shorts but it was another Mother who bought them for her own child.

Wouldn't the dress now be hanging up in Madeleine's wardrobe at home as it would have been packed up with the families clothes brought back from PDL. How can she not remember what colour it is????
IIRC, the clothes description didn't make an appearance until 'the bewk', like the 'out searching at 4am'
IMO, when Kate goes to great lengths to tell us something really unimportant, eg the clothes were 'an extravagance but worth it' it is because she is papering over cracks that would blow their story open.
The 4am was because I believe they had been seen out and HAD to provide an explanation. The clothes - same. So that is a red flag re last photo. Was is Maddie but taken at a different time period? Different child? Its odd because AMELIE is the one wearing 'peach' in pool pic. 'Maddie' v clearly light pink.
So. SOMETHING important there, Kate covering their butts - but what???

As an aside, I find the description of Maddie in her new clothes utterly

That's what I was thinking. I love Monsoon clothes but didn't even buy them for myself even when I was working and was earning a good salary, I would only think about it if it was for a special occasion i.e. a birthday or wedding "do". They were too damn expensive and not very robust. Which Mother in their right mind would buy a Monsoon outfit for a 3 year old to wear on a sun/sand/sea holiday in Portugal. Most Mothers would go to somewhere cheap and cheerful so it didn't matter whether the clothes got damaged, dirty etc. The sort of outfit on the girl in the pool pic would be something brought as a bridesmaid outfit or for a special function, definitely not a seaside holiday, especially when the poor kid was actually stuck in the play group all day and was supposedly put to bed at 7.30 every night.
Good point! I know if I'd spent £'s on a Monsoon top and Gap shorts, I wouldn't want my kids near chlorinated water!!!
Also, the description in the book doesn't match the photo - colour wrong and the shorts don't look 'broderie anglaise' to me - ALSO, she looked a right rumpled rag-bag in the 'tennis pic' - normally kids clothes look 'quality' or 'otherwise' and those tennis ones scream more 'Primark' than 'pricey'.
Nothing seems quite 'right' about it - like a bum note in a tune.....

____________________
"Ask the dogs, Sandra" - Gerry McCann to Sandra Felgueiras



Truth is artless and innocent - like the eloquence of nature, it is clothed with simplicity and easy persuasion; always open to investigation and analysis, it seeks exposure because it fears not detection.

NORMAN MACDONALD, Maxims and Moral Reflections.
avatar
rainbow-fairy

Posts : 1971
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2011-05-26
Age : 43
Location : going round in circles

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by tigger on 07.03.13 18:28

I can't find it just now, but someone posted not long ago about the line in Kate's book :

.'... I was following her with my eyes, admiring her. I wonder now, the nausea rising in my throat, if someone else was doing the same.'

This is Kate seeing her daughter from her point of view 'admiring' her (weird description again but we're used to that) but why is she now intimating that a paedophile is doing the same - thinking the same as she was?
She would be 'admiring' her daughter in quite a different way one hopes than a paedophile would.

The whole thing about this outfit - it was used extensively in the press - was that Kate thought it was because of that outfit that she was abducted.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1385707/Kate-McCann-says-Madeleine-McCanns-outfit-tempted-kidnapper.html

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
avatar
tigger

Posts : 8114
Reputation : 48
Join date : 2011-07-20

View user profile http://fytton.blogspot.nl/

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by Guest on 07.03.13 18:39

Tigger, you may be thinking of this post from Mirage at 2.16 on 8th February.

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t4559p110-the-controversial-gaspar-statement#143638

She gives Kate excellent advice on the correct way to express one's motherly pride!

Talking about the nausea rising in your throat, Kate, I know exactly what you mean - that's the effect your creepy skin-crawling comments have on me.......

Quick, pass the sick bucket!
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by rainbow-fairy on 07.03.13 21:37

@tigger wrote:I can't find it just now, but someone posted not long ago about the line in Kate's book :

.'... I was following her with my eyes, admiring her. I wonder now, the nausea rising in my throat, if someone else was doing the same.'

This is Kate seeing her daughter from her point of view 'admiring' her (weird description again but we're used to that) but why is she now intimating that a paedophile is doing the same - thinking the same as she was?
She would be 'admiring' her daughter in quite a different way one hopes than a paedophile would.

The whole thing about this outfit - it was used extensively in the press - was that Kate thought it was because of that outfit that she was abducted.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1385707/Kate-McCann-says-Madeleine-McCanns-outfit-tempted-kidnapper.html
Yep tigger, it was plastered everywhere.
Seems utterly perverse to me that it was suggested she was 'abducted' because of a very run-of-the-mill girls outfit.
Kates description of 'following her with my eyes' I can't read without gagging. I've often had my boys dressed up nice, but I can honestly say I've NEVER 'admired them and followed them with my eyes' and wondered if a paedophile may be doing that also! I've looked at my boys and felt proud, but that's it!
Tbh imo Kates description shows a very disturbed, if not sick, mind. Thank you for the link tigger.

ETA: please excuse my spelling and typo's in my post before this one - if an admin could alter them that'd be fantastic. That'll teach me to try and do 100 things at once! Noticed too late to edit myself Wink

____________________
"Ask the dogs, Sandra" - Gerry McCann to Sandra Felgueiras



Truth is artless and innocent - like the eloquence of nature, it is clothed with simplicity and easy persuasion; always open to investigation and analysis, it seeks exposure because it fears not detection.

NORMAN MACDONALD, Maxims and Moral Reflections.
avatar
rainbow-fairy

Posts : 1971
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2011-05-26
Age : 43
Location : going round in circles

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by aquila on 07.03.13 21:44

receipts/proof of purchase would be interesting wouldn't they!
avatar
aquila

Posts : 8699
Reputation : 1687
Join date : 2011-09-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by Guest on 07.03.13 21:49

@rainbow-fairy wrote:
@tigger wrote:I can't find it just now, but someone posted not long ago about the line in Kate's book :

.'... I was following her with my eyes, admiring her. I wonder now, the nausea rising in my throat, if someone else was doing the same.'

This is Kate seeing her daughter from her point of view 'admiring' her (weird description again but we're used to that) but why is she now intimating that a paedophile is doing the same - thinking the same as she was?
She would be 'admiring' her daughter in quite a different way one hopes than a paedophile would.

The whole thing about this outfit - it was used extensively in the press - was that Kate thought it was because of that outfit that she was abducted.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1385707/Kate-McCann-says-Madeleine-McCanns-outfit-tempted-kidnapper.html
Yep tigger, it was plastered everywhere.
Seems utterly perverse to me that it was suggested she was 'abducted' because of a very run-of-the-mill girls outfit.
Kates description of 'following her with my eyes' I can't read without gagging. I've often had my boys dressed up nice, but I can honestly say I've NEVER 'admired them and followed them with my eyes' and wondered if a paedophile may be doing that also! I've looked at my boys and felt proud, but that's it!
Tbh imo Kates description shows a very disturbed, if not sick, mind. Thank you for the link tigger.

ETA: please excuse my spelling and typo's in my post before this one - if an admin could alter them that'd be fantastic. That'll teach me to try and do 100 things at once! Noticed too late to edit myself Wink


I've done that RF
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Opinions please

Post by rainbow-fairy on 07.03.13 22:09

Thank you very much candyfloss roses
There may be more to come - babybrain is in full swing at the moment!!! smilie

____________________
"Ask the dogs, Sandra" - Gerry McCann to Sandra Felgueiras



Truth is artless and innocent - like the eloquence of nature, it is clothed with simplicity and easy persuasion; always open to investigation and analysis, it seeks exposure because it fears not detection.

NORMAN MACDONALD, Maxims and Moral Reflections.
avatar
rainbow-fairy

Posts : 1971
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2011-05-26
Age : 43
Location : going round in circles

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 9 of 10 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum