***LATEST NEWS AND UPDATES FROM THE TRIAL HERE*** See page 40 for news of the date and time of the judgment

sherlock wrote:

jeanmonroe wrote:"..........and have spoken about the possibility of purchasing a transcript from the court, but we believe that the price of that could be quite substantial."

How much is it to get a transcript?
Is it a complete transcript of BOTH days?

Where do you get it from?

You use the services of an authorised member of the tape transcription panel. A request is put into the court (form EX107)and the tape is then sent to the member you are using who will produce the transcript.

There are maximum fees set that these bodies can charge for producing a transcript. This ranges from 82p per folio* if from disk or £1.56 from tape/reel to reel or hard copy.

*72 words

Humanist wrote:Another brilliant piece by Textusa.
A must read.

sally66 wrote:Is this finally the beginning of the end for the McCanns?

I feel the full story of what happened in PDL might never come out but some sort of Justice will be delivered. GA. gave them a way out in September 2007 but they were too arrogant to take it IMO

But thanks to GA, TB, Joana, forum hosts and other bloggers and all of you who have worked hard on the files and supporting the above in the fight for truth and justice, it is within reach.

In the current climate of VIP sex rings being outed IMO those who protected the McCanns will no longer do so as they have bigger fish to protect and the McCanns could be collateral damage.

Humanist wrote:

sally66 wrote:Is this finally the beginning of the end for the McCanns?

I feel the full story of what happened in PDL might never come out but some sort of Justice will be delivered. GA. gave them a way out in September 2007 but they were too arrogant to take it IMO

But thanks to GA, TB, Joana, forum hosts and other bloggers and all of you who have worked hard on the files and supporting the above in the fight for truth and justice, it is within reach.

In the current climate of VIP sex rings being outed IMO those who protected the McCanns will no longer do so as they have bigger fish to protect and the McCanns could be collateral damage.

I will not be satisfied with the prosecution of Kate and Gerry alone.
Every single person who lied and manipulated events to the police is guilty of a crime and need to be taken to court.
Of course Kate and Gerry are going to be collateral damage.
Which makes me more than ever want to find out who is being protected as the bigger fish.

Jean wrote:Maybe this one?

http://textusa.blogspot.co.uk/

Mirage wrote:

Humanist wrote:

sally66 wrote:Is this finally the beginning of the end for the McCanns?

I feel the full story of what happened in PDL might never come out but some sort of Justice will be delivered. GA. gave them a way out in September 2007 but they were too arrogant to take it IMO

But thanks to GA, TB, Joana, forum hosts and other bloggers and all of you who have worked hard on the files and supporting the above in the fight for truth and justice, it is within reach.

In the current climate of VIP sex rings being outed IMO those who protected the McCanns will no longer do so as they have bigger fish to protect and the McCanns could be collateral damage.

I will not be satisfied with the prosecution of Kate and Gerry alone.
Every single person who lied and manipulated events to the police is guilty of a crime and need to be taken to court.
Of course Kate and Gerry are going to be collateral damage.
Which makes me more than ever want to find out who is being protected as the bigger fish.

Nor will I be satisfied until every stone has been turned and every worm dragged out to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. And that includes ALL who lied and bullied and perverted the course of justice - from the big money to the keyboard bully. Until that day comes we all know this country has a dark underbelly it THINKS it is hiding from the world. When it breaks it will be bigger than Savile. Those who have had any part in it had better think about damage limitation now. The dénouement has commenced.

tiny wrote:

Bob Southgate wrote:
Some of the loonies have found their way over to Anna Racoon's blog looking at some of the comments and how they are bowing at her feet.

anne racoon must be thrilled that she has all these billy no brains following her,you reap what you sow,eh anne.

jeanmonroe wrote:

sherlock wrote:

jeanmonroe wrote:"..........and have spoken about the possibility of purchasing a transcript from the court, but we believe that the price of that could be quite substantial."

How much is it to get a transcript?
Is it a complete transcript of BOTH days?

Where do you get it from?

You use the services of an authorised member of the tape transcription panel. A request is put into the court (form EX107)and the tape is then sent to the member you are using who will produce the transcript.

There are maximum fees set that these bodies can charge for producing a transcript. This ranges from 82p per folio* if from disk or £1.56 from tape/reel to reel or hard copy.

*72 words

Thanks.
The press will be queing up in droves to get their hands on the full transcript, just to see what the Mccanns don't want released into the public domain.
(performance of £32 grand lady who wouldn't even support them in their 'abduction' claim)
Has that £32 grand person commited 'perjury'? (swore on oath and claimed there was an abduction knowing it not to be 100% true?)
You'd have thought that she would have, at the very least, got her people to read the statements from her clients and 'friends, to see there were no descrepancies in their accounts that she would have been asked to confirm.
But THAT'S a whole different 'can of worms'!(to open)

Still, she probably didn't know that the MCcANNS WOULD ' HANG ANYONE OUT TO DRY' IF IT BENEFITTED THEM IN ANY WAY.
POOR LADY, BRIGHT, BUT NAIVE I'D SAY.
Will she be representing them again, given that it seems she is only repeating what they have told her, regardless of whether it is true or not?
Do you think she and her colleagues are feverishly going through the legally, publicly available, T9 'statements' to see if anything is 'amiss'?
So she won't be possibly perjurying herself in future.
Let's hope she got paid 'up front' LOL.
She might need her 'fee' to defend herself!

sardinehater wrote:

Is there a way of contributing to the Cold Campaign? I tried the link under your post but the website seems dead.

sharonl wrote:

sardinehater wrote:

Is there a way of contributing to the Cold Campaign? I tried the link under your post but the website seems dead.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention, it would seem that the web hosts are currently updating their servers. We are trying to sort this out will let you know when the website is up and running again.

Jean wrote:Dr Amaral would need an interpreter and I don't think it would be possible to have one in court. Let's hope that he is being kept up-to-date with events over here.

olipet wrote:Blacksmith - another one of interest.
Sums up the hideous twitters very well.

aquila wrote:I attended the court. I have already posted that I am not commenting on the hearing. I believe we should await the ruling.

I have already received a PM from someone I don't know on the forum asking me when the ruling will be and in what format as they will be in London next Thursday. This PM came very soon after I posted I would not be commenting on the case. What made that person think I had extra special or secret information I have no idea.

I do wish to say one thing that deeply affected me in the court. Madeleine's name was mentioned several times. This little girl who was so badly let down by her own parents and went missing has her name mentioned in a British civil court case. I felt sick each time her name was mentioned. The only time Madeleine's name should be mentioned in any court is to bring to justice those who harmed her and that's a criminal court.

Nina wrote:

aquila wrote:I attended the court. I have already posted that I am not commenting on the hearing. I believe we should await the ruling.

I have already received a PM from someone I don't know on the forum asking me when the ruling will be and in what format as they will be in London next Thursday. This PM came very soon after I posted I would not be commenting on the case. What made that person think I had extra special or secret information I have no idea.

I do wish to say one thing that deeply affected me in the court. Madeleine's name was mentioned several times. This little girl who was so badly let down by her own parents and went missing has her name mentioned in a British civil court case. I felt sick each time her name was mentioned. The only time Madeleine's name should be mentioned in any court is to bring to justice those who harmed her and that's a criminal court.

Well said Aquila