Christian Brueckner: To be or not to be

Vera Krista wrote:

who on earth kidnaps an elder child while there were 2 young sleeping in the beds?

If Bruckner didn't give them to court yet either he's waiting for the right timing or he's paid in advanced to play the patsy until they find another one. 

Maybe the next one will be the milk man, dry cleaner who knows at this point.

There's one thing for sure that Maddie never left that room. 

The most apt in this case would be the recycling man 

I'll give until the next anniversary of Madeleines' reported disappearance or just after, they will have milked the CB story for all its worth by then and there will be a fresh appeal, a new lead (recycled), Operation Strange requesting more funding, followed by yet another mockumentary and some other clown attempting to write a book on the case.

PeterMac wrote:And that is always assuming that a child WAS abducted from her apartment
A proposition for which there is no evidence
At All.

Of course.
What I meant was that's the hypothesis the Germans are trying to establish



PM reply.
I got that,  I just wanted to make it clear on the forum lest the lurkers deliberately tried to misunderstand

Exactly so.

Only a churned article in New Zealand

Even the twitterati seem more reserved – with the exception of the three usual suspects, of course –

JC hasn't bothered correcting his FB page where he says he got there in the "early hours of that morning"
ABC's journalist Madueño hasn't amended his Muckrack page which directly quotes JC as saying he "arrived at one thirty in the morning".
(Both of which are very probably untrue, but in the world of Journalism no one seems to care much about truth or facts any more.)

Are they re-grouping for the final Push, sharpening pencils ready to go over the top and be on "Unter den Linden" by Wednesday tea-time
with the final killer blow . . .?
Like a single piece of evidence to point to an abduction.   
That really would be a new type of weapon the world had never seen before ?

Or are they still, after 15 years, holding it back.
Perhaps they think it is unfair, or unsporting, or against the Geneva Convention to use it.

‘Clinching piece of evidence’ still needed in Maddie case after latest revelations– expert

INVESTIGATORS still need to find a "clinching piece of evidence" in the Madeleine McCann disappearance that "seals the deal" against the prime suspect, despite the latest revelations, a missing persons expert has said.

By Aleks Phillips
08:00, Sat, Feb 19, 2022 | UPDATED: 11:09, Sat, Feb 19, 2022

Charlie Hedges, a former member of the UK police who previously was head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection unit at the National Crime Agency, explained that all the evidence against Christian B appeared circumstantial – a possible reason why German prosecutors have yet to bring charges. However, the new evidence coming to light about Christian B “are pieces of the jigsaw puzzle”.

Madeleine went missing when she was three years old, while her family were on holiday in the Algarve in 2007.

Convicted rapist and child sexual abuser Christian B was identified as the prime suspect in Madeleine’s disappearance by investigators in Braunschweig in June 2020.

They believe he is responsible for the killing of Maddie. Christian B has always denied all allegations in relation to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

A recent documentary by German TV channel Sat.1 claimed it had evidence that Christian B had “repeatedly worked” at the Ocean Club resort where the McCanns were staying.

It also spoke to former acquaintances, who claimed they found a gun and child pornography at his addresses.

Despite these striking revelations, Mr Hedges – who is now a missing persons specialist at Amber Alert Europe – noted the evidence that has so far come out against Christian B has been circumstantial.

He said: “It’s not unheard of for things to be proven on circumstantial evidence if there’s enough of it.

“But, again, you’ve got the challenge of any evidence that comes forward.

“Any witnesses that come forward now, the defence would have a lovely time talking to them and challenging their memory and why they’ve only come forward now and what have you.

“It just creates so many more difficulties the older case gets.”

“Any witnesses that come forward now, the defence would have a lovely time talking to them and challenging their memory and why they’ve only come forward now and what have you.

“It just creates so many more difficulties the older case gets.”

Mr Hedges added: “The difficulty with a case as old as this is getting reliable evidence, because people’s memories aren’t always true after this period of time.

“And in any case, the best chance of solving is from getting it right from the outset and being able follow up on the leads when they're still hot.

“But that’s not to say it’s unsolvable, it just makes it more difficult.”

The progression of the case may have been hindered by moves made by the police.

German newspaper Der Spiegel reported in 2020 that Christian B had been invited in for questioning in 2013 via a letter which stated the matter was in reference to Madeleine McCann.

Officers told the paper that this had been a blunder, as such a high-profile case would have required more evidence to be gathered before approaching a potential suspect.

When asked to comment, Mr Wolters told Express.co.uk: “In 2013, Christian B was questioned by the police as a witness. At that time there were no suspicions against him.

“Therefore, an interrogation of the accused was not justified at the time.”

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1568264/madeleine-mccann-news-clinching-piece-evidence-latest-revelations-Christian-b-suspect
....................

Regurgitated waffle ....

MADDIE SHOCK Madeleine McCann suspect’s ex-lover may have helped snatch her, father fears

Ryan Parry

22:05, 19 Feb 2022Updated: 22:05, 19 Feb 2022

THE dad of Madeleine McCann suspect Christian B's ex-lover fears his daughter may have helped snatch the child.

Nicole Fehlinger, 45, was dating Christian B in 2007 when he is thought to have kidnapped and murdered Madeleine.

Her dad Dieter, 67, says he recently confronted her over the issue, adding: “I asked her directly what she had to do with the Madeleine case.

"Did she do any crooked business with him?”

Nicole screamed her denial at him, he says.

But Dieter, a former ambulance driver, added: “I want to speak to Christian man-to-man.

"I want to know first-hand what my daughter has to do with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.”

Dieter first met Christian B in 2007, the year Madeleine vanished.

A recent German TV documentary said Nicole rang Christian B's mobile on the day Madeleine, then three, vanished from Praia da Luz in Portugal.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/17705672/madeleine-mccann-christian-b-lover-snatch/

Stuff 'n fluff!  

Who will rid us of this turbulent pest.

Shall we grow up or shall we remain under the playground slide?

Watch my lips .... Madeleine McCann was not abducted - if you can prove otherwise then bring it on !!!

Until then..



Still, it's weekend so vot the hell.

"A recent German TV documentary said Nicole rang Christian B's mobile on the day Madeleine, then three, vanished from Praia da Luz in Portugal."


And the day before, and the day before that, and the day after – twice, and . . .  They were living together for heaven's sake, [of possibly for Hell's sake, since it was theologically IN SIN !]   and ringing to remind each other not to forget the potatoes and the shaving foam is – sort of – normal between couples.]

The gibbering idiocy of the anti-CB camp seems to my untrained eye to be ratcheting up, with all the signs of desperation.

herrrr dieter, that must have been after the sat1 docu, because we was just telling he was not in contact with his daughter. 
he was not shy to get a free holiday in the sun, that was he told the reason he was there on a unknown time, and now it looks like 'the sun we pay for our stories' is a nice little earner too.

no word about his granddaughter who must have been under siege of cb. it is another child he has his mind set to. and these are things that make me think, just the next porky teller in this saga.

so even the reporters of the sun did not see a chance to let grandpa waiting 15 years to get from his closet, because cb and nicole f. met at a christmas party after his release in december 2006, to think a very long line of nasty words, because the monster was there, just next to his own grand daughter, even the british would not believe that. 

i'm still waiting for the bunch of old acquaintances of cb, who would, as promised by the pr team of jutta rabe, tell us where cb was that evening and how they now that. 
i'm not surprised it is just a round up of other very shady figures, who never had a minute for madeleine at all, during the almost 15 years after. 
but he ho they know of course, like some others do, all of it, because they were a sort of there. these so called former friends of cb, do have just their priorities in place, they do not mind about children, not their own children, nor any others, it is about them. cb is their pension fund. that is a bit getting empty, because crime does hardly pay in the end. 

so we get into these stories, cb did break in, so called former friend says horrible things, i do not want to do something with such a person, but he presto, he did not mind doing it himself. but it is still telling only.

there is never proven cb's former finca, very small cottage was actually robbed, there is never been any proof the video's of cb torturing woman were ever there, we only have the words of two criminals and the stories both tell are very different. 
cb's former lawyer does have to do a better job, talking cb had that finca to go back to, that can not fit in the latest story, it needed to get robbed, and cleaned out before cb was on his feet again. not the best advertisement also, telling thingies about your clients is not what is in the job description. must already have been on his pension also. if he is paid for that sayings he is just the next criminal too.

and please do not think the former trafficker of people, and other criminal affairs helge b is not payed, he is not payed by the press, but payed with his freedom. there is no law that can be used to keep someone silent, all this talk about crown witnesses is just stupid, this are people who have always profit for their own person.
crown witness means in serious crime nothing different than a bargain is reached between the police and a criminal. 

i have a bit of a problem with that, because we got for now one criminal behind bars, they have an urge to keep him there, and i agree that would be a good thing, but it means a human trafficker, yes that is the edible term for getting illegal immigrants into the criminal world within our own borders, with occupations in working drugs operation, slavery, the dirty side of the sex industry, break in and it does not have age limits at all, no laws, so they do not mind a nice set of young children for that market. 
anyone who is part of the human traffic rings is just a dirty bastard. a criminal. and i do not like it at all this one gets a freeby from it. or all those others, who never paid for what they done. just a life of me, me and me, and still me. they never are able to care of others.

i do not like it at all to see the partners in crime of cb, because that is the real term for it, end up nice and cosy shining on a tv screen. they are never been friends, or acquainted like not criminal people see these terms. just profiting of others, not even cb, but just from that one little girl, who we still find important enough to look into this case. the words of these people have their price!

and all those reporters and docu makers are doing nothing other than white washing of these criminals, former, or still be ones. there is not even a nice warning, that these people are from a criminal past, that they can hardly be trusted in what they say. 

and do not mind, the abduction part is already written out of the play called cb the monsterman. and that will make the mccanns not very buoyed of course, they just let madeleine walk out of her own, and walk into the arms of her killer. no 5a needed.
the dogs will be kept out of court, the mccanns also, their declarations that could not be truthful also. 
just a complete rewrite of this screen play, nicely sliding around the old evidence and biting the patsy. 
full of freshly dressed up witnesses, who just had to keep silent for 15 years, but now will act what they can, to look like just very nice people, wo have to get rid of a burden, they could not tell of course while the monster was still on the loose. well a sort of. 

it is of course a way to get rid of a case, the paper way to solve a case, it has one very nasty implication, the true culprits would never pay the price they own to a certain very young girl called madeleine mccann. 

the next on screen chapter, the mark wt show must be getting to air soon, they already sold it to germany, that will screen it from the second week of march on. they have only 2 parts listed, the third is of course a bit of a problem because of the patsy who will be in play.

In my opinion the needle got stuck in the middle of the symphony for it to be a means to an end. If there was any intention of a satisfactory conclusion, it would have happened long ago.

Raymond Hewlett would have been the ideal candidate for the ultimate scapegoat - as he lay rotting in the earth.

I can't help but think this whole scenario is an act, Brueckner being the top billing.

We shall see - or not as the case maybe. Never know, Jon Clarke might pen a sequel and thus reveal all.

Madeleine McCann mystery blown open with Christian B accomplice fears

THE father of Madeleine McCann suspect Christian B's ex-lover fears she may have been involved in the three-year-old's disappearance, according to reports.

By Katie Harris
14:43, Sun, Feb 20, 2022 | UPDATED: 17:14, Sun, Feb 20, 2022

Nicole Fehlinger was dating Christian B in 2007, the year Madeline vanished during a family holiday in Praia da Luz in Portugal. The Sun reports that her father Dieter Fehlinger recently confronted her about the child's disappearance.

He said: “I asked her directly what she had to do with the Madeleine case.

"Did she do any crooked business with him?”

According to The Sun, Ms Fehlinger denied any involvement to her father.

Mr Fehlinger added: “I want to speak to Christian man-to-man.

"I want to know first-hand what my daughter has to do with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.”

Ms Fehlinger reportedly first met Christian B in 2007.

A recent documentary on German TV claimed she rang his mobile the day Madeline went missing.

Christian B was named in June 2020 as the main suspect in the case as German and UK police made a fresh appeal for information about the child's disappearance.

However it is understood there is not enough evidence to charge him.

The three-year-old vanished while on holiday with her parents and twin siblings in May 2007 shortly before her fourth birthday.

Christian B is currently serving a seven-year sentence in a German prison for the rape of a 72-year-old American woman in Praia da Luz in 2005.

In letters from jail in January, he said he was not caught for drug dealing because he was careful and it would have been "absurd" for him to abduct Madeleine.

Writing to reporter Jetta Rabe of the Sat1 TV entertainment channel, Christian B said: "I was never caught by the police because I followed a few key principles.

"Where possible, only driving during the day so that my battered 'hippy bus' didn't attract attention, only driving on the roads I needed to and, most importantly, never provoking the police.

"So that means not committing any crimes, certainly not abducting anyone."

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1569022/madeleine-mccann-disappearance-christian-b-Nicole-Fehlinger-german


[/b]

Mark Williams-Thomas, another former police officer prepared to sell his soul to the devil for want of a farthing.



No honour amongst thieves? I think no honour amongst some ex-police officers ....

Verdi wrote:Mark Williams-Thomas, another former police officer prepared to sell his soul to the devil for want of a farthing.



No honour amongst thieves?  I think no honour amongst some ex-police officers ....

I took part in the Jutta Rabe documentary.

I took part in the MWT documentary.  As to whether I appear or not, who knows. Try 9th March on German TV.

I spent 4.5 hours with those teams.

What I got paid was precisely zero.  Not so much as a farthing.

ShiningInLuz wrote:

Verdi wrote:Mark Williams-Thomas, another former police officer prepared to sell his soul to the devil for want of a farthing.



No honour amongst thieves?  I think no honour amongst some ex-police officers ....

I took part in the Jutta Rabe documentary.

I took part in the MWT documentary.  As to whether I appear or not, who knows. Try 9th March on German TV.

I spent 4.5 hours with those teams.

What I got paid was precisely zero.  Not so much as a farthing.

That sounds intriguing.

I think the Express have lost the plot - more tripe..

Madeleine McCann revelations ‘beg questions’ but leave ‘opportunities’ for investigators

REVELATIONS concerning the prime suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann "beg some questions" but leave "opportunities for further investigation", a missing persons expert has said.

By Aleks Phillips
18:09, Wed, Feb 23, 2022 | UPDATED: 20:34, Wed, Feb 23, 2022

Charlie Hedges, a former member of the UK police who previously was head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection unit at the National Crime Agency, said the latest evidence that had come to light on convicted rapist and child sexual abuser Christian B “doesn’t actually give us any conclusions”. German prosecutors, who believe Christian B is responsible for the killing of Madeleine, have yet to bring charges with all publicly known evidence so far being circumstantial.

Christian B has always denied all allegations in relation to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

A recent documentary by German TV channel Sat.1 claimed it had evidence that Christian B had “repeatedly worked” at the Ocean Club resort where the McCanns were staying.

It also spoke to former acquaintances, who claimed they found a gun and child pornography at his addresses.

In a recent interview, Nicole Fehlinger, Christian B’s lover at the time of Madeleine’s disappearance, said he would occasionally visit her at her home in the Algarve.

Ms Fehlinger recalled the suspect phoning her on the evening of Madeleine’s disappearance to say he would drive from Tomas to her home in Foral, 38 miles from Praia da Luz.

While the most direct route would not have taken him through the town where Madeleine and her family were staying, Ms Fehlinger could not recall him arriving at her house that night.

She told the Mail on Sunday: “I don’t know if he came late that night and parked his vehicle outside and slept in there, and left that morning again, or he did not turn up.”

Asked about these claims, Mr Hedges, now a missing person specialist at Amber Alert Europe, commented: “Well, it certainly doesn't help to draw [the case] to a conclusion because it leaves more open questions about what his intentions are and what he actually did.”

Charlie Hedges, a former member of the UK police who previously was head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection unit at the National Crime Agency, said the latest evidence that had come to light on convicted rapist and child sexual abuser Christian B “doesn’t actually give us any conclusions”. German prosecutors, who believe Christian B is responsible for the killing of Madeleine, have yet to bring charges with all publicly known evidence so far being circumstantial.

Christian B has always denied all allegations in relation to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

A recent documentary by German TV channel Sat.1 claimed it had evidence that Christian B had “repeatedly worked” at the Ocean Club resort where the McCanns were staying.

It also spoke to former acquaintances, who claimed they found a gun and child pornography at his addresses.

In a recent interview, Nicole Fehlinger, Christian B’s lover at the time of Madeleine’s disappearance, said he would occasionally visit her at her home in the Algarve.

Ms Fehlinger recalled the suspect phoning her on the evening of Madeleine’s disappearance to say he would drive from Tomas to her home in Foral, 38 miles from Praia da Luz.

While the most direct route would not have taken him through the town where Madeleine and her family were staying, Ms Fehlinger could not recall him arriving at her house that night.

She told the Mail on Sunday: “I don’t know if he came late that night and parked his vehicle outside and slept in there, and left that morning again, or he did not turn up.”

Asked about these claims, Mr Hedges, now a missing person specialist at Amber Alert Europe, commented: “Well, it certainly doesn't help to draw [the case] to a conclusion because it leaves more open questions about what his intentions are and what he actually did.”

Investigators would now have to corroborate what she said, he said, but “this far down the road, that’s quite difficult to do.

“So it begs some questions and leaves some opportunities for further investigation, but it doesn't actually give us any conclusions.”

Asked about the chances of a conviction, Mr Hedges said: “Nothing should be ruled out, as you never know what might be out there, but if the evidence hasn't been captured now then it makes it increasingly difficult to do much with it.

“If you look at it with a cold view and look at the knowledge of other cases, […] the chances of resolving it are diminishingly small, but that doesn't mean you can completely dismiss that. Because there is that possibility, and surprising things do happen.”

He added that it had been his “crusade” to make reverse the trend “in all areas and a lot in policing” of missing persons cases not being looked at “with enough concern from the outset”.

Mr Hedges said: “Sadly, its missing person cases that so often are dismissed as ‘oh they’ll turn up’ or ‘they’re not that important’. […] We see children go on to be harmed in lots of ways because the case isn’t treated seriously from the outset.”

Aagje Ieven, secretary general of Missing Children Europe, said that while the McCanns had received “absolutely no support” when Maddie when missing in 2007, in the 15 years since things had improved.

On February 15, Missing Children Europe marked the 15th anniversary of the 116 000 missing children hotlines.

However, Ms Ieven noted that even though they had been reserved in February 2007, they were not operational by the time Madeleine went missing in May that year.

She said: “When you look back at that case, there was a lot that wasn't in place then that is in place now.

“For example, something these parents did not have and did all by themselves was navigating the situation with the police, which was not easy in their case, because they have been treated as suspects at some point.

“Navigating the whole system, navigating relationships with the media, and that is something that currently is in place […] those are all things that the hotlines for missing children do.”

Ms Ieven said that cooperation between services and cooperation across borders have improved in the 15 years since.

She added: “It’s usually when one of these high-profile cases happens when progress is made.

“I’m afraid, this high-profile case: every time it comes in the in the picture, it reminds people of the urgency.”

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1570847/madeleine-mccann-news-revelations-beg-questions-but-investigation-opportunities-expert

Aagje Ieven, secretary general of Missing Children Europe, said that while the McCanns had received “absolutely no support” when Maddie when missing in 2007, in the 15 years since things had improved.

yeah, aagje leven, aagje means a nosey one, but this one better keeps her words in.

no assistance, a very nice compliment to the people of praia da luz and holidaymakers that did search for a missing child.

the rest of the resistance forces that arrives in praia da luz can do without compliments of course. 

and dear aagje, it are not the parents in a missing children case that have a need to attention, but the victim, nice a hotline, but how in the world a nearly 4 years old will find that out?

can we please learn it is about a child, not his or her carers, it is the same mistake in all those busy and nosey official bodies made, all attention to parents, well in this case there was something dodgy from the start, telling you just leave not only the 3 under 4 years old of the mccanns at their own, but next door even a 9 months old in a nasty bout of diarrhea. by telling those parents have a need to attention is bullshit.
daddy lies his heart out in his first statement. 

how many attention do you want dear aagje, for such parents, because it sounds as if your agency is never about missing children, but an organisation for parents. how many parents did you find back each year in the last 15, o, they never been missing, no, it is about missing children, and you did not find one back also. 
nice that means we could do without your job, just another moneymaker over the back of children. 

stop making business models from children. you are not the part of a solution, but part of the problems of children. a nice warm salary and pension, without helping even one child ever. no cent ends up in a child.

https://missingchildreneurope.eu/?wpdmdl=2557 

the law never can do it right, you have to make parents suspects immediately, o, no, you can't do that. you have to help them, assist them, in what exactly, becoming a better criminal? 

every time we see crawling them out of the woodwork, money eating agencies and helping hands, that have zero influence on children going missing. they could even write themselves up into a runaway case of a 17 years old. have you any idea why children become runaways.... and that just serve them on a plate that is called parents hardly does something substantial. o dear, they helped in a parental abduction, they think, o, you mean it is not always good to assist parents. 

well lady, parents are the highest ranked predators to bring actual harm to their own offspring. and the reality will become when a child says help me, you are not the one to help it. and you know it.

you are not law enforcement, of army, stop misusing titles as general and officer. you are just bureaucrats.
assisting parents who are named as suspects, means you choose to assist criminals.  the law calls them suspects for a reason, and the law still do not say they are innocent. 

you just are moody because you missed out on the big fat opportunity to became a known name. and this was an excellent case, again, over the back of a child, but who cares, to make name for the next agency that does do nothing for a real, living and existing child in need.  

these so called experts, they can not even say the name of a child. 

“It’s usually when one of these high-profile cases happens when progress is made.


so we see, being a missing child is far better, than the found ones. she must have said more the citation is never ended, must have bee even to stupid for the express, the editor said stop point. 
the best progress to be made is that of some missing jobs. 

Post of the week ^^^ thank you for taking us back to basics.



Poor little Madeleine McCann was lost in the myths of time - starting on or around 3rd May 2007.

Addendum: I thought Aagje leven to be a product of the Great British Bake-Off!

I've not yet seen the latest Madeleine McCann production, said to be the work of former police officer Mark Williams-Thomas, ready and awaiting a release date in the UK.  From what I've read, the filming centres around the life and times of Christian Brueckner culminating in his probable involvement in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

This I find rather worrying.  I know he's not a lone wolf, others have followed the same trail - Jon Clarke for example, Discovery+ and more.

I can't understand where Mark Williams-Thomas is coming from.

I was half watching a programme on ITV last evening, 'Yorkshire Ripper the Secret Murders'.  As far as I could see, the show was comprehensive -  adhering to police records.  I was reminded that Mark Williams-Thomas produced a grande exposé on the subject of Peter Sutcliffe, as he also claimed to be the one person who eventually exposed Jimmy Savile for past crimes. Later proven to be a falshood.

Is this postive commitment in pursuance of truth and justice or is it purely a money making venture and/or career advancement?  If the former well done - if the latter .... shame on you!!!

As an aside, during last nights ITV show quite a lot of archive footage was shown, photographs and videoed interviews with bereaved family members of the murder victims - always emphasis on female relatives like mothers.

A Silent February.

Some time ago, and upthread, Silentscope observed that since Brückner had issued some form of legal process against SAT1 and the journalist involved, everything had gone quiet.

We are now out of February and nothing has changed.
This is from  https://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/?search=Madeleine+McCann&lang=a



Apart from one churned article in New Zealand, which is cut off from the rest of the world by their politicians, there has been nothing.
The machine seems to have ground to a halt.
We are waiting for the ECHR to deliver their decision on whether The President of Portugal and the Assembly of Portugal should unite to re-draw their Constitution because the McCanns don't like it.
And we are waiting for any response to the action taken by Brückner.

We are waiting for Wolters to come out with something new, or even just a repeat of something old.
But even Kandohla and Clarke seem to have gone quiet.  In public anyway. No recent sightings.  No stories of children murdered by their parents acting to "Buoy" them up.

Are they re-grouping for the final Putsch; the final assault; the BlitzKrieg to wipe away all the opposition?

Are they ready to unleash their deadly weapon, and to provide the killer piece of evidence that Madeleine WAS abducted ?
Are they ready to explain in detail how it happened ?
Are they going to decide on ONE definitive "Version of the Truth" and declare all the others to be null and void ?

If so, we would all welcome it.
But I fear we may be in for a lean March as well.

PeterMac wrote:We are waiting for the ECHR to deliver their decision on whether The President of Portugal and the Assembly of Portugal should unite to re-draw their Constitution because the McCanns don't like it.

 <<< I was going to use that, but then remembered the McCanns don't like the dogs either.

Silentscope wrote:Strange that Brückner can object to someone saying he let his Dogs alone in the Kiosk, and left them to die of thirst there.

But no objection to anything else?

Wierd.

Media spin or a willing patsy?