The latest McCann suspect: Scotland Yard has revealed vital new information about a suspect wanted in connection with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.

Blackpied wrote:

Verdi wrote:

Does someone pay these people to come up with these statements,surely they know they are spouting pure
garbage,they must know people think they are as thick as mince.I’m not so generous , I think they are brain
dead or are certainly heading that way.

Verdi wrote:Aha, you can't copy paste either!

Why is the Olive Press so protective of it's reportage - I wonder.

You'd think it would love to have it's exclusive reports spread far and wide but not so it would seem.

And talking of selling your soul to the devil for want of a farthing, Sandra Felgeuira features heavily in this oily piece of news.

https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2020/06/27/maddie-exclusive-dna-clues-destroyed-by-brits-in-mccann-case-as-portuguese-media-finally-takes-shambolic-police-investigation-to-task/

Jezebel!

Jon Clarke is not the only journalist to risk all in the name of McCann.  In fact, as the editor of an English magazine based in Spain - for that is what it is, it can hardly be called a newspaper, his interference is hardly worthy of note.

If his career is at the heart of this - he's wee'ing up the wrong lamppost!

sharonl wrote:So neighbours who felt uneasy about Brueckner, obviously not friends, in his absence, entered his house after a burglary and cleaned it out, throwing out a lot of his belongings.

Sounds to me like the neighbours and the burglars were one and them.  In fact, the neighbours were worse.

LOL, are we supposed to believe that this is the reason that there is no DNA.

Good try Jon Clarke but were not that gullible and you're article doesn't stand up.  This just didn't happen, did it?

pauloalexandre wrote:I was appalled to see the lack of professionalism that the achorman who interviewed Gonçalo Amaral last night at CMTV demonstrated.

Always interrupting Amaral, asking poorly worded questions, putting words in his mouth, making value judgements about Amaral's opinions on the German police "investigation", etc.

When Amaral said to the interviewer that he hadn't criticized the German police, the interviewer immediately stated, "No Amaral, you did criticize them".

Don't these people learn how to conduct interviews at Journalism school?

Doug D wrote:And this from Textusa & Joana Morais regarding the latest GA interview:
 
            Tonight, we think he went full UFC on the official theory and wiped the floor with the “almost perfect suspect” of this latest circus.
            
            Joana Morais has summarised it very nicely in this tweet:
            
            https://twitter.com/JoanaAMorais/status/1276973606455705602
            Joana (A of Antifa) Morais@JoanaAMorais
            Muito bom, grande Gonçalo Amaral. Excelente entrevista. Se isto não leva a @PJudiciaria, a PGR, @justica_pta agir, nada o fará.Já basta de 13 anos de subserviência política, reconstituição já!. O caso têm que ser resolvido e os responsáveis identificados. #McCann
            JoanaAMorais retweeted:
            https://twitter.com/JoanaAMorais/status/1276946124113358848
            9:20 PM · Jun 27, 2020
            
            Translation:

            Very good, great Gonçalo Amaral. Excellent interview. If this does not lead the @PJudicaria, the PGR, @justica_pta to act, nothing will do. It is enough of 13 years of political subservience, reconstruction now!. The case must be resolved and those responsible identified.
 
 
            
Textusa27 Jun 2020, 23:36:00
            
As readers will understand, the transcription of a hour long interview will take some time.

            Thank you for understanding.

 

And GA’s new book came up as well according to Isabelle Mc, although being in Portuguese I can't understand it, but he certainly seems to talk about his publication.

Madeleine Case Tweets
@McCannCaseTweet
 

Goncalo Amaral has a new book that he is still working on that will be a combination of items from the case and an autobiography

 

Doug D wrote:FFS, what is it with these idiots. ‘destroyed vital DNA evidence……. a year before MM’s disappearance’


I wonder if she used her daughters toothbrush to scrub between the tiles?
 
The only DNA would have been CB’s and they have his already, or have we got time travelling DNA now?
 
Only truth in his article is ‘hack’ below the picture of Sandra.
 
Hack
 
a journalist (= writer for newspapers or magazines) whose work is low in  quality or does not have much imagination
 
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/hack

Mainline wrote:

Doug D wrote:FFS, what is it with these idiots. ‘destroyed vital DNA evidence……. a year before MM’s disappearance’


I wonder if she used her daughters toothbrush to scrub between the tiles?
 
The only DNA would have been CB’s and they have his already, or have we got time travelling DNA now?
 
Only truth in his article is ‘hack’ below the picture of Sandra.
 
Hack
 
a journalist (= writer for newspapers or magazines) whose work is low in  quality or does not have much imagination
 
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/hack

An IPSO complaint response I got in 2016 sums up their mentality -

'Dear Mr Salmon,

I write further to our earlier email regarding your complaint about an article headlined “Sick Brit trolls pay £50k to Portuguese cop who accused Madeleine McCann’s parents of lying about daughter’s abduction”, published by The Sun on 24 April 2016.

On receipt of a complaint, IPSO’s Executive staff reviews it to ensure that it falls within our remit, and represents a possible breach of the Editors’ Code of Practice. The Executive has now completed an assessment of your complaint under the terms of the Code. Having considered the points you have raised in full, we have concluded that your complaint does not raise a possible breach of the Code.

You complained under Clause 1 (Accuracy) that it was inaccurate of the article to refer to individuals who have contributed towards covering the legal costs of Goncalo Amaral as “trolls”. We note that this was the newspaper’s characterisation of the donors, representing its opinion that some of the donors were members of an anti McCann ‘fan club’”, which was made clear in the article. The newspaper was entitled to characterise the support of Mr Amaral in this manner and in doing so did not raise a possible breach of Clause 1.

You complained under Clause 1 that it was inaccurate for the article to report that Goncalo Amaral accused the McCann’s of lying about their daughter’s abduction because his book simply presented information included in police case files that were already publicly accessible.  The terms of Clause 1 (i) state that the Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information or images, including headlines not supported by the text. We note that the article reported that “Amaral made a fortune from The Truth of the Lie, a 2008 book containing the claims”. In circumstances where Mr Amaral attributed his name to a book entitled The Truth of the Lie which included claims that the McCann’s had lied about their daughter’s abduction, we did not consider the article to be inaccurate in the way that you suggest. As such we could not consider your complaint as a possible breach of Clause 1.

You are entitled to request that the Executive’s decision to reject your complaint be reviewed by IPSO’s Complaints Committee. To do so you will need to write to us within seven days, setting out the reasons why you believe the decision should be reviewed. Please note that we are unable to accept requests for review made more than seven days following the date of this email.

We would like to thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider the points you have raised, and have shared this correspondence with the newspaper to make it aware of your concerns.

 

Best wishes,

 

Isabel Gillen-Smith

Cc The Sun'

You complained under Clause 1 (Accuracy) that it was inaccurate of the article to refer to individuals who have contributed towards covering the legal costs of Goncalo Amaral as “trolls”. We note that this was the newspaper’s characterisation of the donors, representing its opinion that some of the donors were members of an anti McCann ‘fan club’”, which was made clear in the article. The newspaper was entitled to characterise the support of Mr Amaral in this manner and in doing so did not raise a possible breach of Clause 1.

You complained under Clause 1 that it was inaccurate for the article to report that Goncalo Amaral accused the McCann’s of lying about their daughter’s abduction because his book simply presented information included in police case files that were already publicly accessible.  The terms of Clause 1 (i) state that the Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information or images, including headlines not supported by the text. We note that the article reported that “Amaral made a fortune from The Truth of the Lie, a 2008 book containing the claims”. In circumstances where Mr Amaral attributed his name to a book entitled The Truth of the Lie which included claims that the McCann’s had lied about their daughter’s abduction, we did not consider the article to be inaccurate in the way that you suggest.