The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

Please note that when you register your username must be different from your email address!


New Video: BEFORE Thursday? (Pt 1) - Did OC staff see Maddie or a SHY T7 Child?

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: New Video: BEFORE Thursday? (Pt 1) - Did OC staff see Maddie or a SHY T7 Child?

Post by Tony Bennett on 06.06.18 23:19

@HiDeHo wrote:

Intimidation is, and was, prevalent regarding why no-one (that we are aware of) has come forward)
Yes, well we can both agree on that one...

...and in case @Lossincasa is unaware of it, I post below the August 2009 article by Mark Hollingsworth in the Evening Standard in which specific reference is made to intimidation by McCann Team Head of Private Investigation, Brian Kennedy - so serious that witnesses were intimidated into silence - see bits in bold red below.

Intimidation or extreme pressure to conform would certainly provide Cat Baker an excuse for any lies she told.

The article is taken from the article on the blog of Portuguese journalist Paulo Reis:

------------------------------------------ 


Sunday, 27 September 2009

Mark Hollingsworth Investigates The McCann Files

Disillusioned with the Portuguese police, Gerry and Kate McCann turned to private detectives to find their missing daughter. Instead the efforts of the private eyes served only to scare off witnesses, waste funds and raise false hopes. Mark Hollingsworth investigates the investigators.

by Mark Hollingsworth*

It was billed as a ‘significant development’ in the exhaustive search for Madeleine McCann. At a recent dramatic press conference in London, the lead private investigator David Edgar, a retired Cheshire detective inspector, brandished an E-FIT image of an Australian woman, described her as ‘a bit of a Victoria Beckham lookalike’, and appealed for help in tracing her. The woman was seen ‘looking agitated’ outside a restaurant in Barcelona three days after Madeleine’s disappearance. ‘It is a strong lead’, said Edgar, wearing a pin-stripe suit in front of a bank of cameras and microphones. ‘Madeleine could have been in Barcelona by that point. The fact the conversation took place near the marina could be significant.’


But within days reporters discovered that the private detectives had failed to make the most basic enquiries before announcing their potential breakthrough. Members of Edgar’s team who visited Barcelona had failed to speak to anyone working at the restaurant near where the agitated woman was seen that night, neglected to ask if the mystery woman had been filmed on CCTV cameras and knew nothing about the arrival of an Australian luxury yacht just after Madeleine vanished.

The apparent flaws in this latest development were another salutary lesson for Kate and Gerry McCann, who have relied on private investigators after the Portuguese police spent more time falsely suspecting the parents than searching for their daughter. For their relations with private detectives have been frustrating, unhappy and controversial ever since their daughter’s disappearance in May 2007.

The search has been overseen by the millionaire business Brian Kennedy, 49, who set up Madeleine’s Fund: Leaving No Stone Unturned, which aimed ‘to procure that Madeleine’s abduction is thoroughly investigated’. A straight-talking, tough, burly self-made entrepreneur and rugby fanatic, he grew up in a council flat near Tynecastle in Scotland and was brought up as a Jehovah’s Witness. He started his working life as a window cleaner and by 2007 had acquired a £350 million fortune from double-glazing and home-improvement ventures. Kennedy was outraged by the police insinuations against the McCanns and, though a stranger, worked tirelessly on their behalf. ‘His motivation was sincere,’ said someone who worked closely with him. ‘He was appalled by the Portuguese police, but he also had visions of flying in by helicopter to rescue Madeleine.’

Kennedy commissioned private detectives to conduct an investigation parallel to the one run by the Portuguese police. But his choice showed how dangerous it is when powerful and wealthy businessmen try to play detective. In September 2007, he hired Metodo 3, an agency based in Barcelona, on a six-month contract and paid it an estimated £50,000 a month. Metodo 3 was hired because of Spain’s ‘language and cultural connection’ with Portugal. ‘If we’d had big-booted Brits or, heaven forbid, Americans, we would have had doors slammed in our faces’ said Clarence Mitchell, spokesperson for the McCann’s at the time. ‘And it’s quite likely that we could have been charged with hindering the investigation as technically it’s illegal in Portugal to undertake a secondary investigation.

The agency had 35 investigators working on the case in Britain, France, Spain, Portugal and Morocco. A hotline was set up for the public to report sightings and suspicions, and the search focussed on Morocco. But the investigation was dogged by over-confidence and braggadocio. ‘We know who took Madeleine and hope she will be home by Christmas,’ boasted Metodo 3’s flamboyant boss Francisco Marco. But no Madeleine materialised and their contract was not renewed.

Until now, few details have emerged about the private investigation during those crucial early months, but an investigation by ES shows that key mistakes were made, which in turn made later enquiries far more challenging.

ES has spoken to several sources close to the private investigations that took place in the first year and discovered that:

•The involvement of Brian Kennedy and his son Patrick in the operation was counter-productive, notably when they were questioned by the local police for acting suspiciously while attempting a 24-hour ‘stake out’.


•The relationship between Metodo 3 and the Portuguese police had completely broken down.

•Key witnesses were questioned far too aggressively, so much so that some of them later refused to talk to the police.

•Many of the investigators had little experience of the required painstaking forensic detective work.

By April 2008, nearing the first anniversary of the disappearance, Kennedy and the McCanns were desperate. And so when Henri Exton, a former undercover police officer who worked on M15 operations, and Kevin Halligen, a smooth-talking Irishman who claimed to have worked for covert British government intelligence agency GCHQ, walked through the door, their timing was perfect. Their sales pitch was classic James Bond spook-talk: everything had to be ‘top secret’ and ‘on a need to know basis’. The operation would involve 24-hour alert systems, undercover units, satellite imagery and round-the-clock surveillance teams that would fly in at short notice. This sounded very exiting but, as one source close to the investigation told ES, it was also very expensive and ultimately unsuccessful. ‘The real job at hand was old-fashioned, tedious, forensic police work rather than these boy’s own, glory boy antic,’ he said.

But Kennedy was impressed by the license-to-spy presentation and Exton and Halligen were hire for a fee of £100,000 per month plus expenses. Ostensibly, the contract was with Halligen’s UK security company, Red Defence International Ltd, and an office was set up in Jermyn Street, in St James’s. Only a tiny group of employees did the painstaking investigative work of dealing with thousands of emails and phone calls. Instead, resources were channelled into undercover operations in paedophile rings and among gypsies throughout Europe, encouraged by Kennedy. A five-man surveillance team was dispatched in Portugal, overseen by the experienced Exton, for six weeks.

Born in Belgium in 1951, Exton had been a highly effective undercover officer for the Manchester police. A maverick and dynamic figure, he successfully infiltrated gangs of football hooligans in the 1980’s. While not popular among his colleagues, in 1991 he was seconded to work on MI5 undercover operations against drug dealers, gangsters and terrorists, and was later awarded the Queen’s Police Medal for ‘outstanding bravery’. By all accounts, the charismatic Exton was a dedicated officer.

(*) - ERASED, WHILE WAITING FOR LEGAL ADVISE *

He later set up his own consulting company and moved to Bury in Lancashire.

While Exton, however flawed, was the genuine article as an investigator, Halligen was a very different character. Born in Dublin in 1961, he has been described as a ‘Walter Mitty figure’. He used false names to collect prospective clients at airports in order to preserve secrecy, and he called himself ‘Kevin’ or ‘Richard’ or ‘Patrick’ at different times to describe himself to business contacts. There appears to be no reason for all this subterfuge except that he thought this was what agents did. A conspiracy theorist and lover of the secret world, he is obsessed by surveillance gadgets and even installed a covert camera to spy on his own employees. He claimed to have worked for GCHQ, but in fact he was employed by the Atomic Energy Authority (AEA) as head of defence systems in the rather less glamorous field of new information technology, researching the use of ‘special batteries’. He told former colleagues and potential girlfriends that he used to work for MI5, MI6 and the CIA. He also claimed that he was nearly kidnapped by the IRA, was involved in the first Gulf War and had been a freefall parachutist.

Very little of this is true. What is true is that Halligen has a degree in electronics, worked on the fringes of the intelligence community while at AEA and does understand government communications. He could also be an astonishingly persuasive, engaging and charming individual. Strikingly self-confident and articulate, he could be generous and clubbable. ‘He was very good company but only when it suited him’ says one friend. He kept people in compartments.’

After leaving the AEA, Halligen set up Red Defence International Ltd as an international security and political risk company, advising clients on the risks involved in investing and doing business in unstable, war-torn and corrupt countries. He worked closely with political risk companies and was a persuasive advocate of IT security. In 2006, he struck gold when hired by Trafigura, the Dutch commodities trading company. Executives were imprisoned in the Ivory Coast after toxic waste was dumped in landfills near its biggest city Abidjan. Trafigura was blamed and hired Red Defence International at vast expense to help with the negotiations to release its executives. A Falcon business jet was rented for several months during the operation and it was Halligen’s first taste of the good life. The case only ended when Trafigura paid $197 million to the government of the Ivory Coast to secure the release of the prisoners.

Halligen made a fortune from Trafigura and was suddenly flying everywhere first-class, staying at the Lansborough and Stafford hotels in London and The Willard hotel in Washington DC for months at a time. In 2007 he set up Oakley International Group and registered at the offices of the prestigious law firm Patton Boggs, in Washington DC, as an international security company. He was now strutting the stage as a self-proclaimed international spy expert and joined the Special Forces Club in Knightsbridge, where he met Exton.

During the Madeleine investigation, Halligen spent vast amounts of time in the HeyJo bar in the basement of the Abracadabra Club near his Jermyn Street office. Armed with a clutch of unregistered mobile phones and a Blackberry, the bar was in effect his office. ‘He was there virtually the whole day,’ a former colleague told ES. ‘He had an amazing tolerance for alcohol and a prodigious memory and so occasionally he would have amazing bursts of intelligence, lucidity and insights. They were very rare but they did happen.’

When not imbibing in St James’s, Halligen was in the United States, trying to drum up investors for Oakley International. On 15 August 2008, at the height of the McCann investigation crisis, he persuaded Andre Hollis, a former US Drug enforcement agency official, to write out an $80.000 cheque to Oakley in return for a ten per cent share-holding. The money was then transferred into the private accounts of Halligen and his girlfriend Shirin Trachiotis to finance a holiday in Italy, according to Hollis. In a $6 million lawsuit filed in Fairfax County, Virginia, Hollis alleges that Halligen ‘received monies for Oakley’s services rendered and deposited the same into his personal accounts’ and ‘repeatedly and systematically depleted funds from Oakley’s bank accounts for inappropriate personal expenses’.

Hollis was not the only victim. Mark Aspinall, a respected lawyer who worked closely with Halligen, invested £500,000 in Oakley and lost the lot. Earlier this year he filed a lawsuit in Washington DC against Halligen claiming $1.4 million in damages. The finances of Oakley International are in chaos and numerous employees, specialist consultants and contractors have not been paid. Some of them now face financial ruin.
Meanwhile, Exton was running the surveillance teams in Portugal and often paying his operatives upfront, so would occasionally be out-of-pocket because Halligen had not transferred funds. Exton genuinely believed that progress was being made and substantial and credible reports on child trafficking were submitted. But by mid-August 2008, Kennedy and Gerry McCann were increasingly concerned by an absence of details of how the money was being spent. At one meeting, Halligen was asked how many men constituted a surveillance team and he produced a piece of paper on which he wrote ‘between one and ten’. But he then refused to say how many were working and how much they were being paid.

While Kennedy and Gerry McCann accepted that the mission was extremely difficult and some secrecy was necessary, Halligen was charging very high rates and expenses. And eyebrows were raised when all the money was paid to Oakley International, solely owned and managed by Halligen. One invoice, seen by ES, shows that for ‘accrued expenses to May 5, 2008’ (just one month into the contract), Oakley charged $74,155. The ‘point of contact’ was Halligen who provided a UK mobile telephone number.

While Kennedy was ready to accept Halligen at face value, Gerry McCann – sharp, focused and intelligent – was more sceptical. The contract with Oakley International and Halligen was terminated by the end of September 2008, after £500,000-plus expenses had been spent.

For the McCanns it was a bitter experience, Exton has returned to Cheshire and, like so many people, is owed money by Halligen. As for Halligen, he has gone into hiding, leaving a trail of debt and numerous former business associates and creditors looking for him. He was last seen in January of this year in Rome, drinking and spending prodigiously at the Hilton Cavalieri and Excelsior hotels. He is now believed by private investigators, who have been searching for him to serve papers on behalf of creditors, to be in the UK and watching his back. Meanwhile, in the eye of the storm, the McCanns continue the search for their lost daughter.

in ES Magazine (London Evening Standard)– Paper edition only, 28 August 2009

*Mark Hollingsworth is best known for his investigations into Mark Thatcher and also MI5. He worked for Granada TV’s ‘World In Action’ programme for five years. He is the author of nine books, notably ‘Thatcher’s Fortunes: The Life and Times of Mark Thatcher’, ‘Defending the Realm: MI5 and International Terrorism’ and ‘Saudi Babylon: Torture, Corruption and Cover-Up Inside the House of Saud’. His new book, ‘Londongrad: From Russia with Cash, The Inside Story of the Oligarchs’, will be published in July 2009. He also contributes regularly to the London Evening Standard and most national newspapers

Note: This story, published by the Evening Standard (and later erased...) was also published here and here. Speaking about books (and the old habit of burning those considered "dangerous") a sugestion of a good (and also old...) movie: "Fahrenheit 451". Take a look at the trailer of this movie, based on the novel of the same name by Ray Bradbury. It's a fiction movie, about firemen that are called not to extinguish fires, but to burn books...

(*) These lines were erased, while I'm waiting for detailed legal advise, after I received a letter from Bindmans LLP (see this post, in order to get more information about it)


https://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/2009/09/mark-hollingsworth-investigate

____________________

The amazing symbiosis between bees and flowers:

https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-for-creation/god-created-plant-pollinator-partners/  

avatar
Tony Bennett
Researcher

Posts : 14977
Reputation : 3029
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 70
Location : Shropshire

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New Video: BEFORE Thursday? (Pt 1) - Did OC staff see Maddie or a SHY T7 Child?

Post by HiDeHo on 06.06.18 23:59

Although I agree there are many examples of intimidation and pressure that may have happened afterwards and certainly Catriona's visit to Rothley may have been a good time to 'remind' her of some of the circumstances.... I see absolutely no indication that the details she told police immediately after the disappearance show any suggestion of lying.




Catriona's EARLY and INFORMAL statements:






I believe Catriona was CONNED like the rest of the staff into believing that Maddie had been one of the tapas children.

It was a simple exercise to arrive at the creche together with Russell and often sign for two children but only send one in (or pick one up) and for Gerry to make himself known as if HE was the father of the little girl that just came in or just left... and the CRECHE RECORDS show this could have been likely. 

I suggest to ANYONE to phone a regular nursery and ask approximately how long it would take for childcare workers to remember each child individually and remember their names.  I was told by an owner of the nursery (which takes more care and is rarely faced with 14 new children coming and going at random times) that it takes her a few days and it takes a while for her to allow her child care workers to pass the children to the parents until she has authorised it.

Names are not as important as keeping the children occupied and added to that a nursery is all day, every day and has strict rules in place.

Mark Warner Creche was looked after by a few teenage girls on a holiday job.  Not to say they werent good at caring for the children but we know from Whistlbower that Mark Warner did not necessarily give good (if any) training for their creche staff....




I think its clear that Gerry would have found it relatively easy to have the nannies believe his child was in the creche...even when she wasn't.

I find it far more credible than to consider Catriona was complicit (especially without proof).
avatar
HiDeHo
Researcher

Posts : 3184
Reputation : 956
Join date : 2010-05-07

View user profile http://forum2.aimoo.com/MadeleineMcCann

Back to top Go down

Re: New Video: BEFORE Thursday? (Pt 1) - Did OC staff see Maddie or a SHY T7 Child?

Post by Hobs on 07.06.18 1:40

Keeping it simple

Who has the most to gain  by Maddie being seen in the creche mornings and afternoons, every day till the Thursday night when Maddie was allegedly abducted by a paedophile stranger?

Who has the most to lose by Maddie not being seen in the creche mornings and afternoons, every day till the Thursday night when Maddie was allegedly abducted by a paedophile stranger?

____________________
The little unremembered acts of kindness and love are the best parts of a person's life.
avatar
Hobs
Researcher/Analyst

Posts : 893
Reputation : 585
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 54
Location : uk

View user profile http://tania-cadogan.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: New Video: BEFORE Thursday? (Pt 1) - Did OC staff see Maddie or a SHY T7 Child?

Post by Jill Havern on 07.06.18 7:24

I found this on Paulo's blog:

Wednesday, 2 January 2008


A good question about babysitters, from "thentherewere4"

We know the Mccanns did not like to use the creche according to Patricia McCann who said: 'They felt it was better than leaving them with a babysitter as you don't know who you are going to get with a stranger.' We know that Catriona Baker, CharlottePennington, Kirsty Mayran and Lianne Wagstaf were employed as baby sitter at the creche and we also know that there were a total of 5 babysitters at the Ocean Club.They have all made statements to the PJ except one that is.

Who was the fifth nanny and why hasn't she come forward to clear her name?

https://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/2008/01/good-question-about-babysitters-from.html
avatar
Jill Havern


Posts : 12085
Reputation : 5668
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

View user profile http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: New Video: BEFORE Thursday? (Pt 1) - Did OC staff see Maddie or a SHY T7 Child?

Post by skyrocket on 07.06.18 9:10

'A good question' is confusing.

We are told by Shinead Vine that all the creche staff had shifts working in the evening drop in creche, and she confirms that there are 15 of them in total. Elsewhere we are told 14.

Has anyone seen reference to just 5 babysitters? I have always assumed the babysitters (working in the guests apartments) were again a subset of the 15 creche workers on any given evening. I know Margaret Hall X-employee is described as a babysitter, which has always niggled, but as her statement is particularly daft I have always side stepped it.

The fifteenth woman on the nanny list is Hayley May Crawford, who despite being interviewed makes no mention at all of being involved in any babysitting. Her 10am until 6pm job in the Adult Pool Bar would give her the time to earn a bit extra cash in the evenings. She had been at the resort for 4 years - before MarkWarner purchased the OC. What we are told is that she was driving around on the evening of the 3 May and was passing Block 5 at around 9pm.

Note: Hayley doesn't appear to be on the nanny list solely as a virtue of her being a British female worker i.e. a mistake. There were other female Brits e.g. Tiffany Horner was a waitress in the Millenium.
avatar
skyrocket

Posts : 689
Reputation : 670
Join date : 2015-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

New Video

Post by willowthewisp on 07.06.18 14:05

@skyrocket wrote:'A good question' is confusing.

We are told by Shinead Vine that all the creche staff had shifts working in the evening drop in creche, and she confirms that there are 15 of them in total. Elsewhere we are told 14.

Has anyone seen reference to just 5 babysitters? I have always assumed the babysitters (working in the guests apartments) were again a subset of the 15 creche workers on any given evening. I know Margaret Hall X-employee is described as a babysitter, which has always niggled, but as her statement is particularly daft I have always side stepped it.

The fifteenth woman on the nanny list is Hayley May Crawford, who despite being interviewed makes no mention at all of being involved in any babysitting. Her 10am until 6pm job in the Adult Pool Bar would give her the time to earn a bit extra cash in the evenings. She had been at the resort for 4 years - before MarkWarner purchased the OC. What we are told is that she was driving around on the evening of the 3 May and was passing Block 5 at around 9pm.

Note: Hayley doesn't appear to be on the nanny list solely as a virtue of her being a British female worker i.e. a mistake. There were other female Brits e.g. Tiffany Horner was a waitress in the Millenium.
Hi Skyrocket,better not inform Operation Grange of a certain person who may have been in a certain vicinity on 3 May 2007,this is only applicable to Non Tourists and especially if you are a (Bungled burglar) Pig Farmer or a Drug addict which only enhances their chances to have been involved in Madeleine McCann's disappearance?

Which can only be confirmed by the Control Risk Group,Sheree Dodd,John Buck,Clarence Mitchell and major UK Government departments,the McCann Family kindly thank you for all help and assistance?
avatar
willowthewisp

Posts : 2358
Reputation : 893
Join date : 2015-05-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: New Video: BEFORE Thursday? (Pt 1) - Did OC staff see Maddie or a SHY T7 Child?

Post by HiDeHo on 07.06.18 14:32

Regarding the topic of whether one of the tapas children was mistaken for Maddie and the possibility that Gerry and Russell arrived at the creche at the same time, possibly with only one child sent into the creche, so GERRY would chat to the nannies and have them believe the child was HIS (Maddie)


They would note nothing at the time, but after Maddies disappearance it would be GERRY they remember and recall Russells child as 'Maddie' 

Here is the graphic I put together that explains how this could have happened....





Bringing this new video to this page to assist in explaining the scenarios...


McINFO: Locations & Routes of Creche etc Used by McCanns


avatar
HiDeHo
Researcher

Posts : 3184
Reputation : 956
Join date : 2010-05-07

View user profile http://forum2.aimoo.com/MadeleineMcCann

Back to top Go down

Re;New Video

Post by willowthewisp on 07.06.18 15:45

@HiDeHo wrote:Regarding the topic of whether one of the tapas children was mistaken for Maddie and the possibility that Gerry and Russell arrived at the creche at the same time, possibly with only one child sent into the creche, so GERRY would chat to the nannies and have them believe the child was HIS (Maddie)


They would note nothing at the time, but after Maddies disappearance it would be GERRY they remember and recall Russells child as 'Maddie' 

Here is the graphic I put together that explains how this could have happened....





Bringing this new video to this page to assist in explaining the scenarios...


McINFO: Locations & Routes of Creche etc Used by McCanns


Hi,HiDeHo, you do know this is only a "thesis" which you are allowed to have,what you are not allowed to have is the "Free Thought analysis",this must be removed from your Neurological process indefinitely?

PS keep up the excellent videos and time researching the files on Madeleine McCann's disappearance.

As,"Doctor Payne insists,its No One elses business!" A pact of silence,eh Dave,what do you have to hide eh Dave,"Its Not the right forum" DC 1485 Ivor Messaih April 2008,Leicestershire Police Force, Okay,end of interview?

So it seems Doctor Payne is beyond reproach?
avatar
willowthewisp

Posts : 2358
Reputation : 893
Join date : 2015-05-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum