Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

by aiyoyo 18.12.14 10:40

That's the very basic the Inquest absolutely needs to ascertain ie whether the people calling for "trolls" to be made examples are in any shape or form associated to the peope compiling the dossier and handing it to the press.

by aiyoyo 18.12.14 10:43

aquila wrote: Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 25m 25 minutes ago
#BrendaLeyland inquest 20/3/2015 #MartinBrunt called for evidence. Coroner: "in sequence of events it starts after contact with Mr.Brunt"
0 replies 21 retweets 13 favorites

Go Sonia...we are behind you on this !

Martin Brunt needs to be made "example" of, to show the RatPack they can't door step innocent recklessly without regard for their privacy and safety.

by **PeterMac** 18.12.14 10:49

Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 14s 14 seconds ago
#BrendaLeyland Coroner: none of the witnesses are currently subject to criminal proceedings but that can change #mccann

by plebgate 18.12.14 11:02

I am thinking of Brenda today.

Please, to any would be "disruptors" today - this is a time for respect to be shown. roses

by Rogue-a-Tory 18.12.14 11:06

Am hoping that beyond everything else, that today brings an unambiguous outcome for Brenda.

by Liz Eagles 18.12.14 11:08

Rogue-a-Tory wrote:Am hoping that beyond everything else, that today brings an unambiguous outcome for Brenda.

There is no outcome for Brenda Leyland today. The inquest according to Sonia Poulton's tweet is scheduled for 20th March 2015.

by **PeterMac** 18.12.14 11:08

For details of how this works in England, for our overseas readers, see
http://www.coronerscourtssupportservice.org.uk/faq

Who decides which witnesses to call?
The Coroner decides who should be called to give evidence as a witness, and the order in which they give evidence, but the Coroner will listen to representations made to him by "properly interested persons" as to who should be called. Anyone who believes they may be of help or believes a particular witness should be called should inform the Coroner. The test is whether the witness is likely to provide evidence that is relevant to the matters that the Coroner has to investigate. The Coroner will decide whether the evidence is relevant to the investigation of the death.

Must a witness attend court? Witness summonses and contempt of court
If a witness lives in England and Wales and has evidence that the Coroner regards as relevant and important to help in establishing the facts of the death, he/she can be required to attend Court. A witness will usually be asked to attend the inquest voluntarily, but if they do not agree and their evidence is crucial, the Coroner may issue a witness summons to compel their attendance. If the witness then does not attend he/she may be arrested, brought before the Coroner and charged with contempt of Court. This is an offence that is punishable with a fine or a term of imprisonment.

Who can ask witnesses questions?
Witnesses will be first questioned by the Coroner and then by any properly interested person or their legal representative. Whether a question is relevant to the purpose of the inquest is something the Coroner decides. Where relevant, the Coroner will warn a witness that he or she is not obliged to answer any question which might incriminate him/herself.

Who is a properly interested person?
The categories of properly interested persons are set out in the Coroners Rules 1984 (as amended). They include: - a parent, spouse, child, civil partner or partner and any personal representative of the deceased; - any beneficiary of a life insurance policy on the deceased; - any insurer having issued such a policy; - a representative from a Trade Union to whom the deceased belonged at the time of death (if the death arose in connection with the person's employment or was due to industrial disease); - anyone whose action or failure to act may, in the Coroner's view, have contributed to the death;- the Chief Officer of Police (who may only ask witnesses questions through a lawyer);- any person appointed as an inspector or a representative of an enforcing authority or a person appointed by a Government Department to attend the inquest; or - anyone else who the Coroner may decide also has a proper interest. The Coroner decides who will be given properly interested person status.

Anyone who believes they may be of help or believes a particular witness should be called should inform the Coroner.

So if anyone has information about the Dossier of Death, or knowledge of who produced it, or of who handed it over to the Police
(Ooooops, BHH has already told us that the family handed it over . . .)
or of whose heroic ankles were seen on the film, or whose trademark turquoise sweater, or bangle on right wrist, or hair flick, or accent so distinctive it had to be dubbed, or who would refer to
“WE are talking about materials which are libellous, completely untrue.
WE were getting nowhere by reporting it to the sites
WE were finding people going on line . . .”
might lead HM Coroner to identify this person
They should contact her with the information.

Including any Pro Child-Neglectors and McCann supporters, of course.

by **PeterMac** 18.12.14 11:18

aquila wrote:
Rogue-a-Tory wrote:Am hoping that beyond everything else, that today brings an unambiguous outcome for Brenda.
There is no outcome for Brenda Leyland today. The inquest according to Sonia Poulton's tweet is scheduled for 20th March 2015.

Which gives her Officer another three months to collect and collate evidence.
And another three months for people to sort out the filth from the Pro-McCanns, collate it and submit in a proper fashion.
Even if she does not use it, it will be in the archive, and yet another set of people will know know the extent of the depravity involved.
The date will also be AFTER the result of the damages hearing in Lisbon, and if the result is as normal people expect, the last vestige of "moral high ground" will have been eroded.

Let's Not Forget Brenda - Page 14 <a href=

Let's Not Forget Brenda - Page 14 <a href=

Let's Not Forget Brenda - Page 14 Brunt_10

" />

by Liz Eagles 18.12.14 11:19

@PeterMac,

I've snipped this from your above post. The underlining is my own

Must a witness attend court? Witness summonses and contempt of court
If a witness lives in England and Wales and has evidence that the Coroner regards as relevant and important to help in establishing the facts of the death, he/she can be required to attend Court.

......................................

It's interesting the person with the 'cankles' was viewed in Scotland. Can that person be summoned and forced to attend a Coroner's Court in England as a witness?

by Liz Eagles 18.12.14 11:21

PeterMac wrote:
aquila wrote:
Rogue-a-Tory wrote:Am hoping that beyond everything else, that today brings an unambiguous outcome for Brenda.
There is no outcome for Brenda Leyland today. The inquest according to Sonia Poulton's tweet is scheduled for 20th March 2015.

Which gives her Officer another three months to collect and collate evidence.
And another three months for people to sort out the filth from the Pro-McCanns, collate it and submit in a proper fashion.
Even if she does not use it, it will be in the archive, and yet another set of people will know know the extent of the depravity involved.
The date will also be AFTER the result of the damages hearing in Lisbon, and if the result is as normal people expect, the last vestige of "moral high ground" will have been eroded.

" />

So it's all hinging on March then!...interesting times.

ETA: I will eat my hat if there is a final outcome in March on the Lisbon Trial.

by aiyoyo 18.12.14 11:36

PeterMac wrote:The Brunt Confrontation of Death was rolling news for a whole day.
Anyone seen a single mention of the Inquest's opening today ?
No I thought not.

ETA
on the #mccann twitter, there are comments that not one shill or troll has posted this morning.
Have the McCanns and Mitchell imposed a Super-inaudible ?

All told to lie low or go out of town.
It's not simply coincidence they all happen to be super quiet when Inquest is ongoing. If anything, it's a clear sign the pro-McCanns trolls are associated to a "principal". This principal controlling agent needs to be outed.

by Rogue-a-Tory 18.12.14 11:56

aquila wrote:
Rogue-a-Tory wrote:Am hoping that beyond everything else, that today brings an unambiguous outcome for Brenda.
There is no outcome for Brenda Leyland today. The inquest according to Sonia Poulton's tweet is scheduled for 20th March 2015.

Thanks

by jeanmonroe 18.12.14 11:57

So, NO 'inquest' until AFTER libel 'case' erm, 'verdict'?

Hmmmm.

THAT'S 'convenient' isn't it?

Should they 'win' the libel claim 'case', which they shouldn't, we'll hear nothing about BL's 'inquest'

Should they 'lose' the libel claim 'case', which they should, all we'll hear is 'it was tthat 'troll's' FAULT, 'turning' people against us, by not believing, unquestionably, our 'version' of events'

imo, obviously.

by aiyoyo 18.12.14 12:02

PeterMac wrote:
aquila wrote:
Rogue-a-Tory wrote:Am hoping that beyond everything else, that today brings an unambiguous outcome for Brenda.
There is no outcome for Brenda Leyland today. The inquest according to Sonia Poulton's tweet is scheduled for 20th March 2015.

Which gives her Officer another three months to collect and collate evidence.
And another three months for people to sort out the filth from the Pro-McCanns, collate it and submit in a proper fashion.
Even if she does not use it, it will be in the archive, and yet another set of people will know know the extent of the depravity involved.
The date will also be AFTER the result of the damages hearing in Lisbon, and if the result is as normal people expect, the last vestige of "moral high ground" will have been eroded.

" />

Funny that. I was just thinking the date will be after the verdict of the damages trial.

By then, their "moral high ground" can't be used as tool anymore, it won't wash.
The press are free to report court proceedings without fear of CR, and all their lies and malice against Dr Amaral will get repeated airing.

And, if they don't come up squeaky clean in the BL Inquest....?

by aiyoyo 18.12.14 12:10

aquila wrote:So it's all hinging on March then!...interesting times.

ETA: I will eat my hat if there is a final outcome in March on the Lisbon Trial.

Bearing unforeseen circumstance, I think results might even be out in Feb.
If the Judge reading of the "facts" is in January, I believe the verdict has to be produced 30 days thereabout after that.

by jeanmonroe 18.12.14 12:17

Yet ANOTHER 'coincidence'?

All these MANY 'coincidences' ALWAYS 'CHIME', rather nicely, with ANY McCann 'event', don't they?

thinking

Nah! I'm being 'stoopid'!

It's ALL just pure 'LUCK'

I'm just surprised the McCann's don't appear to have 'won' a multi-million 'jackpot' on the Euro lottery! winkwink

There's still time, though, isn't there, for THAT to 'happen', BEFORE the libel claim 'case' verdict?

by aiyoyo 18.12.14 12:42

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-30532027
[size=32]McCann 'Twitter troll' Brenda Leyland inquest to hear from Sky News[/size]
Brenda Leyland was said to use the handle @sweepyface on Twitter
Continue reading the main story
Related Stories

McCann 'Twitter troll' inquest opens
McCann 'Twitter troll' found dead
McCann 'Twitter troll' found deadWatch

The inquest into the death of a woman accused of "trolling" the McCanns will hear evidence from two Sky journalists.
Brenda Leyland, from Leicestershire, was found dead in a hotel days after she was confronted over tweets about the family of Madeleine McCann.
A pre-inquest review was told it will hear evidence from a toxicology expert, police and the Sky News journalists.
The coroner said no criminal action was planned against any witnesses and adjourned the hearing until March.
Mrs Leyland, from Burton Overy, was confronted in October by Martin Brunt from Sky News over her use of Twitter.
Gerry McCann, with his wife Kate, previously told the BBC more needs to be done about online abuse
He questioned her about hate-filled messages about the McCanns on the social networking site.
The 63-year-old was found dead in a hotel several days later.
Mr Brunt, the crime correspondent, and Sky's head of newsgathering Jonathan Levy will both give evidence at her inquest.
Leicester Coroner Catherine Mason said: "I understand from my officers that, of all the witnesses who I have said that I will call to give oral evidence, there is nobody to which there is any foreseeability of any criminal action being taken."
Sky News's legal team attended the short hearing in Leicester, which was adjourned for the full inquest on 20 March.
The inquest will also hear written evidence from one of Mrs Leyland's sons and a pathologist.
Madeleine went missing while the Leicestershire family were on holiday in Portugal in 2007.

Shameful, media still refers to her as McCann troll.

Two sky journalists will be heard as witnesses.
No mention of sky camera man to be called witness. Was MB alone with her when he went into her house?
No mention of dossier compiler, nor of the person who orchestrated a hate campaign against McCanns skeptics.

by Joss 18.12.14 12:57

Ben Leyland, Martin Brunt & Jonathan Levy (director of news gathering at Sky) all called to give evidence 20/3/15 #sweepyface #mccann

by Joss 18.12.14 13:06

Brenda Leyland inquest: Sky News reporter to give evidence about 'McCann Twitter troll'

Read more: http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Brenda-Leyland-inquest-Sky-News-reporter-director/story-25733829-detail/story.html#ixzz3MFpPVVVA
Follow us: @Leicester_Merc on Twitter | leicestermercury on Facebook

The TV reporter who confronted a woman believed to have sent more than 4,000 abusive tweets about the parents of missing youngster Madeleine McCann is to give evidence at her inquest.
Martin Brunt, crime correspondent at Sky News, is to be called as a witness at the inquest into the death of Brenda Katheryn Gabrielle Leyland, of Burton Overy, who was found dead in a room at the Leicester Marriott Hotel in Enderby on October 4.
Mr Brunt questioned Ms Leyland, 63, at her home on Thursday October 2.
At a pre-inquest review at Leicester town hall today coroner Catherine Mason said that Mr Brunt and Jonathan Levy, director of news gathering operations at Sky News, would be called to give evidence.

by Joss 18.12.14 13:08

aiyoyo wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-30532027
[size=32]McCann 'Twitter troll' Brenda Leyland inquest to hear from Sky News[/size]
Brenda Leyland was said to use the handle @sweepyface on Twitter
Continue reading the main story

Related Stories

McCann 'Twitter troll' inquest opens
McCann 'Twitter troll' found dead
McCann 'Twitter troll' found deadWatch

The inquest into the death of a woman accused of "trolling" the McCanns will hear evidence from two Sky journalists.
Brenda Leyland, from Leicestershire, was found dead in a hotel days after she was confronted over tweets about the family of Madeleine McCann.
A pre-inquest review was told it will hear evidence from a toxicology expert, police and the Sky News journalists.
The coroner said no criminal action was planned against any witnesses and adjourned the hearing until March.
Mrs Leyland, from Burton Overy, was confronted in October by Martin Brunt from Sky News over her use of Twitter.
Gerry McCann, with his wife Kate, previously told the BBC more needs to be done about online abuse
He questioned her about hate-filled messages about the McCanns on the social networking site.
The 63-year-old was found dead in a hotel several days later.
Mr Brunt, the crime correspondent, and Sky's head of newsgathering Jonathan Levy will both give evidence at her inquest.
Leicester Coroner Catherine Mason said: "I understand from my officers that, of all the witnesses who I have said that I will call to give oral evidence, there is nobody to which there is any foreseeability of any criminal action being taken."
Sky News's legal team attended the short hearing in Leicester, which was adjourned for the full inquest on 20 March.
The inquest will also hear written evidence from one of Mrs Leyland's sons and a pathologist.
Madeleine went missing while the Leicestershire family were on holiday in Portugal in 2007.

Shameful, media still refers to her as McCann troll.

Two sky journalists will be heard as witnesses.
No mention of sky camera man to be called witness. Was MB alone with her when he went into her house?
No mention of dossier compiler, nor of the person who orchestrated a hate campaign against McCanns skeptics.

That could perhaps change as it is now being carried through to March 2015. And yes the McC troll BS is despicable.

by tiny 18.12.14 13:12

What does this mean.

there is nobody to which there is any foreseeability of any criminal action being taken."

by Joss 18.12.14 13:13

tiny wrote:What does this mean.

there is nobody to which there is any foreseeability of any criminal action being taken."

Not sure as they haven't really heard any evidence at an inquest yet have they?

by Guest 18.12.14 13:16

The police investigation is completed.

by tiny 18.12.14 13:19

Dee Coy wrote:The police investigation is completed.

do you mean that brunt will not be charged with anything

by jeanmonroe 18.12.14 13:23

Sorry for not 'replying'

"Mrs Leyland, from Burton Overy, was confronted in October by Martin Brunt from Sky News over her use of Twitter"
--------------------------------------------------------------

I was just sending my prospective 'tweets' to the SELF APPOINTED ~~TWATFINER~~ 'TWITFINDER' GENERAL, Martin B, to make sure they didn't contravene, HIS twitter 'regulations'

He's got some FRUNT, that BRUNT KUNT, don't he?

People's 'use' of Twitter, to be 'sanctioned' by HIM, first!

Oh, pleaseeeeee!

eta: What a 'pity' MB wasn't so 'keen' to 'confront' ardent McCANN SUPPORTER, Cindy Martin, about her 'vile, disgusting, tweets' TO Brenda, BEFORE her death, isn't it?

I wonder WHY he did NOT DARE 'confront' Cindy Martin, McCANN SUPPORTER as he is the self styled 'twit finder' general?

It was 'lovely' weather, in Hawaii, in October, 2014!

Missed a 'trick' there, 'TWATFINDER GENERAL' BRUNT!'!

Related Stories

Related Stories

Log in for more topics