The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Mm11

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Regist10

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by willowthewisp on 12.06.19 13:22

@Verdi wrote:
@NickE wrote:I've also asked him why CEOP became involved from the very beginning but has he refused to answer and it's a bit pathetic because I know and we all knows he has the answer to that simple question.
Snipped from PJ files..


Letter from Dr Amaral to Detective Chief Superintendent Robert Hall - 7th May 2007

2. In the spirit of Police to Police Cooperation we request the presence of a British Criminal Analyst who may be able to assist the enquiry.

Also the collaboration of the UK's "Child Exploitation Online Protection" may be useful if they wish to send one of their officers to provide assistance to the investigation,

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t14767p125-documented-evidence#403329

Personally, I think anyone in the public eye with a reputation to uphold, are crazy to engage in twittering.  I don't understand why they do it.
Hi Verdi, perhaps Big Jim is a paid shill, like Clarence, Brunt, Billy Ocean Song, "when the Going Gets Tough, the Tough get going" hot footing it back to Blighty, Tapas 7/9 style, "Hold a chicken in the air, stick a deck chair up your nose, buy a jumbo jet" "Spitting Image", proper entertainment for kids and adults, even the Politicians dared Not to ban it, due to how bad it would make them look, Vanity?
willowthewisp
willowthewisp

Posts : 3213
Join date : 2015-05-07

Back to top Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by Verdi on 12.06.19 15:52


____________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi
Verdi
Moderator/Researcher

Posts : 13387
Join date : 2015-02-02

Back to top Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by PeterMac on 12.06.19 16:25

@aquila wrote:It must have been a few years ago when I had a bit of a bee in my bonnet on CMoMM about Jimmy two flags and his new business venture as the overlord of an associate based 'global' company which depicted him spearheading child protection with the oddest photograph of himself standing on a podium between the Union flag and the US flag, microphone to his mouth.  . . .
Gamble took the said photograph and removed the flags to show himself still standing on the same podium, microphone to his mouth with a blacked out background.
. . .
I never pretend to be clever. I found it completely bizarre.
There is a history of altering photos in this case.

We remember the "Curious case of the missing elbow and the missing sibling . . ."
Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 0003_l10
where the "Last Photo" was clearly tampered with before being published across the world.

Now we find that Jim "send me all your photos - over here, not to the PJ over there" Gamble has also been playing around
Now you see them . . .

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Gamble10
Now you don't.
Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Gamble11

____________________

PeterMac
PeterMac
Investigator

Posts : 10504
Join date : 2010-12-06

http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by AlexBG on 12.06.19 16:47

@PeterMac wrote:There is a history of altering photos in this case.

We remember the "Curious case of the missing elbow and the missing sibling . . ."
Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 0003_l10
where the "Last Photo" was clearly tampered with before being published across the world.

Any other images showing the wall in the background? I'd be curious as to whether the pattern/arrangement of additional stones visible on the image showing M alone matched those of the actual wall.
avatar
AlexBG

Posts : 70
Join date : 2014-10-23

Back to top Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by PeterMac on 12.06.19 17:01

Lots, but we did this over a decade ago.

____________________

PeterMac
PeterMac
Investigator

Posts : 10504
Join date : 2010-12-06

http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by AlexBG on 13.06.19 14:42

And what did you conclude?
avatar
AlexBG

Posts : 70
Join date : 2014-10-23

Back to top Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by aquila on 13.06.19 18:40

Hello AlexBG,

I've been reading over your posts today. You've been a member of the forum for almost five years.

As you haven't posted much I forgot that you introduced yourself as a law student. I was reminded of how long people are on the leading forum and how the years pass so quickly.

How did it all go? Did you take up law? Did you choose a discipline?
aquila
aquila

Posts : 9343
Join date : 2011-09-03

Back to top Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by PeterMac on 14.06.19 9:58

We concluded that someone had tampered with the original image to remove the elbow and the sibling.

We also concluded that the original photo could not possibly have been taken at lunchtime on Thursday 3rd May 2007, as the world was being told, but on the available evidence can only have been taken during the luncheon interval on Sunday 29th April 2007.
From that we deduced that someone had altered the EXIF Metadata attached to the image, and
from that we deduced that there must have been a motive for so doing.

We then looked into the proven skills and abilities of various people closely associated with the family, and
discovered people with the necessary knowledge.
From there having established Means and Motive, we looked for the third of the necessary Trinity in criminal law - Opportunity -
And found it.

A simple series of logical steps.
So far no one has been able to argue convincingly, based on proper evidence, that this is flawed.  Many have tried.
But as always a single piece of credible refutational evidence will be enough to alter this analysis.

____________________

PeterMac
PeterMac
Investigator

Posts : 10504
Join date : 2010-12-06

http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by kaz on 15.06.19 10:55

@PeterMac wrote:We concluded that someone had tampered with the original image to remove the elbow and the sibling.

We also concluded that the original photo could not possibly have been taken at lunchtime on Thursday 3rd May 2007, as the world was being told, but on the available evidence can only have been taken during the luncheon interval on Sunday 29th April 2007.


I suppose you could argue that the image of Madeleine has been 'isolated ' to give clarity . Having said that, I do find it odd that the deep shadow on the grass in between Madeleine's hat and the vanished elbow has also been removed. I guess shadows CAN tell timely  tales.
avatar
kaz

Posts : 496
Join date : 2014-08-18

Back to top Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by PeterMac on 15.06.19 11:43

I am sure they would argue that.

The fact remains that the photo was tampered with.
It was not merely cropped, but some extra "stuff' was added, most probably by copying and pasting from elsewhere.

If we look again at the original and the one we were then presented with . . .

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 0003_l11

We see that it is possible to carefully crop Madeleine out of the original, removing the elbow and the sibling, without recourse to any trickery or addition or "photoshopping"

Like this.   

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 0006_c10

The picture will not win prizes for "Composition" but would score highly on
"Spontaneity", "Emotional response", and "Intrigue".

Not to mention that it could have been produced to the PJ and the search parties, and the Press across the world at any time from about 11pm Thursday 3rd May 2007.
But it wasn't.

____________________

PeterMac
PeterMac
Investigator

Posts : 10504
Join date : 2010-12-06

http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by plebgate on 17.06.19 19:12

aquilaAre wrote:Hello AlexBG,

I've been reading over your posts today. You've been a member of the forum for almost five years.

As you haven't posted much I forgot that you introduced yourself as a law student. I was reminded of how long people are on the leading forum and how the years pass so quickly.

How did it all go? Did you take up law? Did you choose a discipline?
Oh yes.  That's jogged my memory.   Would be interesting to know if AlexBG took up law.  Any response AlexBG?

____________________
Judge Judy to shifty  witnesses   -    LOOK AT ME  -   Um is not an answer.

If I forget to add it to a post everything is In My Opinion and I don't know anything for sure.
roll
avatar
plebgate

Posts : 6470
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by BlueBag on 18.06.19 7:07

There was once a long thread about the isolated photo-shopped pool picture of Madeleine.

It was clearly demonstrated where repeated patches of the stonework behind were used to cover over various other parts of the photo.

The grass as well if I remember correctly.

There were people arguing that the isolated picture was the original and it was photo-shopped into the group "last" photo.

Ridiculous.
BlueBag
BlueBag

Posts : 4966
Join date : 2014-06-06

Back to top Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by AlexBG Yesterday at 19:57

@aquila wrote:Hello AlexBG,

I've been reading over your posts today. You've been a member of the forum for almost five years.

As you haven't posted much I forgot that you introduced yourself as a law student. I was reminded of how long people are on the leading forum and how the years pass so quickly.

How did it all go? Did you take up law? Did you choose a discipline?
Completed Law degree and Masters, thanks for asking. Currently in Seoul on a gap year.
I teach ESL here part time, but I've yet to enter the 'real world' of full time employment.
avatar
AlexBG

Posts : 70
Join date : 2014-10-23

Back to top Go down

Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action - Page 2 Empty Re: Jim Gamble slams trolls for harming tot's siblings – calls for police action

Post by AlexBG Yesterday at 20:00

@PeterMac wrote:We concluded that someone had tampered with the original image to remove the elbow and the sibling.

We also concluded that the original photo could not possibly have been taken at lunchtime on Thursday 3rd May 2007, as the world was being told, but on the available evidence can only have been taken during the luncheon interval on Sunday 29th April 2007.
From that we deduced that someone had altered the EXIF Metadata attached to the image, and
from that we deduced that there must have been a motive for so doing.

We then looked into the proven skills and abilities of various people closely associated with the family, and
discovered people with the necessary knowledge.
From there having established Means and Motive, we looked for the third of the necessary Trinity in criminal law - Opportunity -
And found it.

A simple series of logical steps.
So far no one has been able to argue convincingly, based on proper evidence, that this is flawed.  Many have tried.
But as always a single piece of credible refutational evidence will be enough to alter this analysis.
I seem to recall people investigating the weather, in order to narrow it down to 29th April - was there any other reason?
So the original image contained EXIF Metadata - what about the one showing M alone?
The 'tampering' aka 'photoshopping' has been done quite meticulously; not beyond the realms of an amateur, but above average. I noticed also that the background on the latter image has had a 'blurring' effect added.
I guess it's even possible that both images are 'photoshopped' and M wasn't really in either of them...
avatar
AlexBG

Posts : 70
Join date : 2014-10-23

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum