The submission to the Attorney-General calling for a fresh inquest into the killing of Stuart Lubbock
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Other Crimes and Mysteries :: Truth and justice for murdered Stuart Lubbock and Lee Balkwell
Page 2 of 2 • Share
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: The submission to the Attorney-General calling for a fresh inquest into the killing of Stuart Lubbock
Disappointing for Mr. Lubbock, who has been brave and tenacious over the years. I hope he has support to come to terms with this development.
Bravo to TB for all his work on the case.
Bravo to TB for all his work on the case.
Ladyinred- Posts : 1164
Activity : 1357
Likes received : 189
Join date : 2017-11-25
Re: The submission to the Attorney-General calling for a fresh inquest into the killing of Stuart Lubbock
Yes, Tony's been away all week, so not good news for him to come back to.
I feel so sad for Terry Lubbock that he hasn't, so far, got justice for his son in all these years, and the toll it's taken on him must be immense.
But it's a prime example of how the police and justice system will do whatever needs to be done to cover up a murder despite evidence.
I feel so sad for Terry Lubbock that he hasn't, so far, got justice for his son in all these years, and the toll it's taken on him must be immense.
But it's a prime example of how the police and justice system will do whatever needs to be done to cover up a murder despite evidence.
____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern- Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
- Posts : 28213
Activity : 40916
Likes received : 7691
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : Parallel universe
Re: The submission to the Attorney-General calling for a fresh inquest into the killing of Stuart Lubbock
Yes, Terry Lubbock was bitterly disappointed to learn of the Attorney-General's decision, which I am now able to reproduce below:
I am pleased to report that Terry Lubbock is already coming to terms with his disappointing news ,and we are already planning some new action - not seeking a fresh inquest - which I may be able to report on here in due course.
I would like to thank @Ladyinred for her kind comments above but most especially on this occasion thank Jill who has kindly allowed me over the years to report all the ups and downs in the struggles of Terry Lubbock and Les Balkwell for justice.
The agony of this case is knowing that Stuart Lubbock was definitely killed by a violent sexual assault by two or more people, yet the Coroner and the Attorney-General say this can't be proved.
And also we can be certain that a minimum of six, and probably all eight of those who visited Michael Barrymore's home that fateful night, and of course Barrymore himself, know fine well what caused Stuart's death. They then successfully conspired, with the help of Essex Police after the event, to cover up his gruesome death by a tissue of lies about an alleged drowning.
The entire original inquest, and all the pathologists, were misled by the conspirators into believing that Stuart Lubbock went to swim that night in an ice cold pool that had not been opened all winter. It was a classic case of 'muddying the waters'. I can all but prove that only after Stuart's death did Barrymore open the pool cover and pretend that he had drowned. And to cap it all, the officer in charge of the case, Kevin Macey, allowed Barrymore's personal manager, Mike Browne, to remain within the crime scene and take the temperature of the pool - which to this day I say was faked.
Now, to add insult to injury, as per this Daily Mail report this week, Barrymore is trying to claim £20 million 'damages' for 'lost earnings' because, he says, of the police wrongly arresting him on suspicion of murder:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5320947/Michael-Barrymore-sue-police-20m-lost-earnings.html Michael Barrymore to sue police for £20 million lost earnings
In a world where justice always prevailed, those who killed Stuart would have got life or have been hanged for murdering Stuart, and the conspirators handed down the stiffest penalties available for 'perverting the course of justice'. Instead, Essex Police might have to end up paying Barrymore £20 million - at taxpayers' expense.
It is a gross perversion of justice
If in any small way I may have contributed to Barrymore's loss of earnings, then...hooray! - I would regard it as a feather in my cap
.
I am pleased to report that Terry Lubbock is already coming to terms with his disappointing news ,and we are already planning some new action - not seeking a fresh inquest - which I may be able to report on here in due course.
I would like to thank @Ladyinred for her kind comments above but most especially on this occasion thank Jill who has kindly allowed me over the years to report all the ups and downs in the struggles of Terry Lubbock and Les Balkwell for justice.
The agony of this case is knowing that Stuart Lubbock was definitely killed by a violent sexual assault by two or more people, yet the Coroner and the Attorney-General say this can't be proved.
And also we can be certain that a minimum of six, and probably all eight of those who visited Michael Barrymore's home that fateful night, and of course Barrymore himself, know fine well what caused Stuart's death. They then successfully conspired, with the help of Essex Police after the event, to cover up his gruesome death by a tissue of lies about an alleged drowning.
The entire original inquest, and all the pathologists, were misled by the conspirators into believing that Stuart Lubbock went to swim that night in an ice cold pool that had not been opened all winter. It was a classic case of 'muddying the waters'. I can all but prove that only after Stuart's death did Barrymore open the pool cover and pretend that he had drowned. And to cap it all, the officer in charge of the case, Kevin Macey, allowed Barrymore's personal manager, Mike Browne, to remain within the crime scene and take the temperature of the pool - which to this day I say was faked.
Now, to add insult to injury, as per this Daily Mail report this week, Barrymore is trying to claim £20 million 'damages' for 'lost earnings' because, he says, of the police wrongly arresting him on suspicion of murder:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5320947/Michael-Barrymore-sue-police-20m-lost-earnings.html Michael Barrymore to sue police for £20 million lost earnings
In a world where justice always prevailed, those who killed Stuart would have got life or have been hanged for murdering Stuart, and the conspirators handed down the stiffest penalties available for 'perverting the course of justice'. Instead, Essex Police might have to end up paying Barrymore £20 million - at taxpayers' expense.
It is a gross perversion of justice
If in any small way I may have contributed to Barrymore's loss of earnings, then...hooray! - I would regard it as a feather in my cap
.
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 16903
Activity : 24767
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 76
Location : Shropshire
Re: The submission to the Attorney-General calling for a fresh inquest into the killing of Stuart Lubbock
Hi Mr Bennett,perhaps when and if Mr Barrymore(strikes it Lucky, £20 Million compensation)Mr Lubbock Snr should seek redress in a civil case,at least having Mr Barrymore to explain his actions?
willowthewisp- Posts : 3392
Activity : 4912
Likes received : 1160
Join date : 2015-05-07
Re: The submission to the Attorney-General calling for a fresh inquest into the killing of Stuart Lubbock
Hi willow good to see you posting again. Now there's a good thought awright.willowthewisp wrote:Hi Mr Bennett,perhaps when and if Mr Barrymore(strikes it Lucky, £20 Million compensation)Mr Lubbock Snr should seek redress in a civil case,at least having Mr Barrymore to explain his actions?
Look forward to hearing more from Tony soon
____________________
Judge Judy to shifty witnesses - LOOK AT ME - Um is not an answer.
If I forget to add it to a post everything is In My Opinion and I don't know anything for sure.
plebgate- Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Terry Lubbock hands in to the Attorney-General a request for a fresh inquest into the killing of his son Stuart, 27 June 2017 - The PHOTOS - and A LETTER
» NEW - Terry Lubbock & Tony Bennett to attend Attorney-General's office TUESDAY 27 June, in London, to hand in formal request for permission to approach the High Court for authority to hold a fresh Inquest into the killing of Stuart Lubbock
» Barrymore 10 years on from the killing of Stuart Lubbock
» The killing of Stuart Lubbock at Michael Barrymore's home on 1 April 2001 - Discussion on what really happened
» Stuart Lubbock's father, Terry, is to demand a second inquest...looks for homicide verdict - Daily Mirror, 23 December 2016
» NEW - Terry Lubbock & Tony Bennett to attend Attorney-General's office TUESDAY 27 June, in London, to hand in formal request for permission to approach the High Court for authority to hold a fresh Inquest into the killing of Stuart Lubbock
» Barrymore 10 years on from the killing of Stuart Lubbock
» The killing of Stuart Lubbock at Michael Barrymore's home on 1 April 2001 - Discussion on what really happened
» Stuart Lubbock's father, Terry, is to demand a second inquest...looks for homicide verdict - Daily Mirror, 23 December 2016
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Other Crimes and Mysteries :: Truth and justice for murdered Stuart Lubbock and Lee Balkwell
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum