Sunday Express tomorrow BRING THEM ALL BACK TO PORTUGAL
Page 12 of 12 • Share
Page 12 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12
Re: Sunday Express tomorrow BRING THEM ALL BACK TO PORTUGAL
Portia wrote:Newintown wrote:rainbow-fairy wrote:Infeef that. May be true Portia; but you would think that 'innocent' parents who unwittingly come under suspicion would want to prove their innocence if at all possible.Portia wrote:Lest we forget: they do not have to prove anything.
It is the Judiciary that had to charge them.
Untill proven otherwise in a Court of Law, they are innoncent.
That's how the system works; the democratic system.
But back to the main article - it keeps saying Murat and McCanns 'cleared' - how?
Their arguido status was lifted is all surely, plus they never appeared before a jury to BE 'cleared'?
Confused!
I thought it was said sometime ago, can't remember by who (whom?), that if the PJ reopen the case they could be made arguidos again, or have I got that wrong.
Absolutely. But I do not think the PJ will do that, unless payrolled by SY.
Because of the more complex judiciary systems in Portugal, it might be better if the two countries Police Forces can come to an agreement to have the case transferred to UK for trial since the crime of Fraudulent Fund inevitably has to be tried in UK.
It will make economical sense to have the prosecution done in UK as their incarceration will undoubtedly be in UK.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: Sunday Express tomorrow BRING THEM ALL BACK TO PORTUGAL
Not long now to wait to see if libel case goes ahead in Portugal.
I think that they will settle on Mr. A's terms as I believe they do not want to have a court case and questions asked about the night Maddie disappeared. Lying under oath would open them up to a custodial sentence possibly.
If they do settle then it will look very bad for them imo as I cannot see the some papers not following and printing any court case in Portugal
If they settle in Portugal I think the newspapers will not be afraid to print as I think it will indicate a reluctance to see the inside of a court room. Threaten to sue then settle, maybe one of the newspapers will go the whole hog and have a showdown in a court room in UK?
I think that they will settle on Mr. A's terms as I believe they do not want to have a court case and questions asked about the night Maddie disappeared. Lying under oath would open them up to a custodial sentence possibly.
If they do settle then it will look very bad for them imo as I cannot see the some papers not following and printing any court case in Portugal
If they settle in Portugal I think the newspapers will not be afraid to print as I think it will indicate a reluctance to see the inside of a court room. Threaten to sue then settle, maybe one of the newspapers will go the whole hog and have a showdown in a court room in UK?
plebgate- Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: Sunday Express tomorrow BRING THEM ALL BACK TO PORTUGAL
Or alternatively "insufficient evidence to have a reasonable prospect of conviction. . . " which isn't quite the same thing.russiandoll wrote:They were not charged with any crime due to there being no evidence that they had committed any. I think it is the case that the couple are, in the eyes of the law, as innocent as you and me. Their status is just as it would have been had they never come under suspicion/scrutiny.
Re: Sunday Express tomorrow BRING THEM ALL BACK TO PORTUGAL
PeterMac wrote:Or alternatively "insufficient evidence to have a reasonable prospect of conviction. . . " which isn't quite the same thing.russiandoll wrote:They were not charged with any crime due to there being no evidence that they had committed any. I think it is the case that the couple are, in the eyes of the law, as innocent as you and me. Their status is just as it would have been had they never come under suspicion/scrutiny.
I know, I know...but the wording in the archiving report was not as above, was it? It was this :
there are no indications of the practise of any crime under the dispositions of article 277 number 1 of the Penal Process Code.
There had been and continues to be a very clever cover-up. It has been successful for 6 years, but I believe that we are witnessing the beginning of the end. Gerry McCann is not as clever as he thinks he is. The truth will come out eventually, of that I am confident.
____________________
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate,
contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and
unrealistic.
~John F. Kennedy
russiandoll- Posts : 3942
Activity : 4058
Likes received : 15
Join date : 2011-09-11
Re: Sunday Express tomorrow BRING THEM ALL BACK TO PORTUGAL
russiandoll wrote:PeterMac wrote:Or alternatively "insufficient evidence to have a reasonable prospect of conviction. . . " which isn't quite the same thing.russiandoll wrote:They were not charged with any crime due to there being no evidence that they had committed any. I think it is the case that the couple are, in the eyes of the law, as innocent as you and me. Their status is just as it would have been had they never come under suspicion/scrutiny.
I know, I know...but the wording in the archiving report was not as above, was it? It was this :
there are no indications of the practise of any crime under the dispositions of article 277 number 1 of the Penal Process Code.
There had been and continues to be a very clever cover-up. It has been successful for 6 years, but I believe that we are witnessing the beginning of the end. Gerry McCann is not as clever as he thinks he is. The truth will come out eventually, of that I am confident.
Not quite but when you put the words you've quoted in context i.e. with the bit about them missing the chance to clear their name, then it's not far off from PM's comment.
ShuBob- Posts : 1896
Activity : 1983
Likes received : 67
Join date : 2012-02-07
Re: Sunday Express tomorrow BRING THEM ALL BACK TO PORTUGAL
russiandoll wrote:PeterMac wrote:Or alternatively "insufficient evidence to have a reasonable prospect of conviction. . . " which isn't quite the same thing.russiandoll wrote:They were not charged with any crime due to there being no evidence that they had committed any. I think it is the case that the couple are, in the eyes of the law, as innocent as you and me. Their status is just as it would have been had they never come under suspicion/scrutiny.
I know, I know...but the wording in the archiving report was not as above, was it? It was this :
there are no indications of the practise of any crime under the dispositions of article 277 number 1 of the Penal Process Code.
There had been and continues to be a very clever cover-up. It has been successful for 6 years, but I believe that we are witnessing the beginning of the end. Gerry McCann is not as clever as he thinks he is. The truth will come out eventually, of that I am confident.
But that is a public prosecutor's (i.e bureaucrat's) interpretation of the evidence and not a firm court judgement. Also remember this Government lawyer also said they had failed to prove their innocence.
How cam they be in the clear when this same report states they have not proven their innoncence in the case?
Let's not also forget that when (indeed the only time so far) the evidence came to a court (in the book case) then the Judge's in the case validated Amaral's thesis of a crime being commited as a valid interepretation of the evidence gather equal to the assumptions of the archving report.
____________________
What is certain is that since the start of the investigation there were incongruent and even contradictory situations concerning the witness statements; the telephone records of calls that were made and received on mobile phones that belonged to the couple and to the group of friends that were on holidays with them; the movements of people right after the disappearance of the little girl was noticed, concerning the state in which the bedroom from where the child disappeared from was found (closed window? open window? partially open window?) etc., and the mystery would only become even thicker due to the clues that were left by the already mentioned sniffer dogs. - The Words of a JUDGE in relation to the McCanns
Me- Posts : 683
Activity : 698
Likes received : 3
Join date : 2011-05-22
Page 12 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12
Similar topics
» Sunday Express - tomorrow's front page
» Sunday Express tomorrow - Yard face a network of evil
» Police hunt gives McCanns fresh hope - Daily Express tomorrow 12/7/13
» U-turn of Sunday Express?
» Sharon Osbourne blasted by missing Madeleine McCann's parents after she brands them "insane" for leaving girl alone
» Sunday Express tomorrow - Yard face a network of evil
» Police hunt gives McCanns fresh hope - Daily Express tomorrow 12/7/13
» U-turn of Sunday Express?
» Sharon Osbourne blasted by missing Madeleine McCann's parents after she brands them "insane" for leaving girl alone
Page 12 of 12
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum