***LATEST NEWS AND UPDATES FROM THE TRIAL HERE*** See page 40 for news of the date and time of the judgment

listener wrote:Will be interesting to see what changes, due entirely to Leveson listening (acting for) his 'witnesses' !

russiandoll wrote:from an earlier post...." The Mccanns have never been cleared. It is a cold case "

exactly and for all the supporters who say case closed..........err, no it was not.

archiving report :

8.30. Finally, it should be noted that an archiving decision may
be a fair decision, although of the possible justice, and, especially,
to underline heavily that the archiving of the present files does not
equal a definite and irreversible closing of the process. This process,
as long as the prescription deadline for the possibly committed crimes
does reach its term, and if new evidence that justifies it, appears, can
always be reopened, officiously or through the request of an assistant,
again ordinate to a final decision of accusation or non accusation.

Inspectorfrost wrote:

listener wrote:Will be interesting to see what changes, due entirely to Leveson listening (acting for) his 'witnesses' !

Dont understand, I think the govt has decided on how papers are to be regulated, the royal charter thing, leveson and mccanns irrelevant

listener wrote:? Are you saying you don't think that Leveson is the politicians man?

To IF!

Inspectorfrost wrote:

listener wrote:? Are you saying you don't think that Leveson is the politicians man?

To IF!

____________________________I do not understand all the crap that is politics_________Cameron is a total slimeball______________

listener wrote:

Inspectorfrost wrote:

listener wrote:? Are you saying you don't think that Leveson is the politicians man?

To IF!

____________________________I do not understand all the crap that is politics_________Cameron is a total slimeball______________

Sorry, couldn't help it

Miraflores wrote:From the BBC 'Finding Bennett guilty of contempt of court, the judge said: "I am sure
that he intended to allege that the claimants are to be suspected of
causing the death of their daughter, and did in fact dispose of her
body, lie about what happened and covered up what they had done."'

So the judge is allowed to put words into Tony's mouth, and these are now being broadcast all round the internet? Wasn't he going a bit too far?

There are those who will say agree with the judge. Others just say that they don't know what happened, but there is something dodgy about the McCann's behaviour which brings the abduction into question. BTW in reports 'abduction' now seems to have been quietly forgotten in favour of 'disappearance', which no-one can argue with.

joyce1938 wrote:i have read a piece in daily mail today page 12,good read .it says that what leverson wants to do ,is illegal in european union to silence all news .cant find way toput it here.be good if someone read it and get the whole article onto here. joyce1938

• Top lawyers say regulations would be 'unjustifiable' and law breach 'obvious'
  
  
• Lord Leveson had recommended the threat of exemplary damages
  

plebgate wrote:Great news thanks joyce and candy.

All that time and money spent - all those lovely can't do anything wrong celebs called to give evidence and turns out to be a right shambles. ha ha.
You couldn't make it up.

candyfloss wrote:

joyce1938 wrote:i have read a piece in daily mail today page 12,good read .it says that what leverson wants to do ,is illegal in european union to silence all news .cant find way toput it here.be good if someone read it and get the whole article onto here. joyce1938

Here it is joyce....

Leveson proposals to penalise the press 'are against the law and would have chilling effect on free speech'

• Top lawyers say regulations would be 'unjustifiable' and law breach 'obvious'
  
  
• Lord Leveson had recommended the threat of exemplary damages
  

By Jason Groves

PUBLISHED:01:09, 22 February 2013



A key plank of Lord Justice Leveson’s plans for Press regulation breaches European human rights laws, leading barristers have warned.

The joint opinion by three QCs concludes the judge’s proposal to punish newspapers that refuse to join a new Press regulator with exemplary damages would violate Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects freedom of expression.

Lord Pannick, Desmond Browne and Antony White found that the proposals would have a ‘chilling effect’ on free speech which was ‘obvious and unjustifiable’







Read more: [url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2282612/Leveson-proposals-penalise-press-law-chilling-effect-free-speech.html#ixzz2LdHXQlv1

candyfloss wrote:

joyce1938 wrote:i have read a piece in daily mail today page 12,good read .it says that what leverson wants to do ,is illegal in european union to silence all news .cant find way toput it here.be good if someone read it and get the whole article onto here. joyce1938

Here it is joyce....

Leveson proposals to penalise the press 'are against the law and would have chilling effect on free speech'

• Top lawyers say regulations would be 'unjustifiable' and law breach 'obvious'
  
  
• Lord Leveson had recommended the threat of exemplary damages
  

By Jason Groves

PUBLISHED:01:09, 22 February 2013



A key plank of Lord Justice Leveson’s plans for Press regulation breaches European human rights laws, leading barristers have warned.

The joint opinion by three QCs concludes the judge’s proposal to punish newspapers that refuse to join a new Press regulator with exemplary damages would violate Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects freedom of expression.

Lord Pannick, Desmond Browne and Antony White found that the proposals would have a ‘chilling effect’ on free speech which was ‘obvious and unjustifiable’







Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2282612/Leveson-proposals-penalise-press-law-chilling-effect-free-speech.html#ixzz2LdHXQlv1[/quote]



I think perhaps there are some who will not be too pleased with that, in fact quite hacked off!!

parapono wrote:Just letting you know that I just arrived home and my cat is waiting, tail up against my leg, for a cuddle.
But first let me thank all of you who were in Court yesterday as well as two weeks earlier.
For me it was a once in a lifetime experience. It has given me hope. Thank all of you, whom I met, with whom I have spoken on Tony's blue telephone but first of all Mr B himself.
Proud I met you Tony Bennett and thank you for all you have done for Madeleine McCann.
God bless you

parapono

off to cuddle Jelle now
ta all