PM reopens Maddie files

beejay wrote:To answer my own question from earlier - why would the McCanns try to re-open the case if they are in fact guilty - the only logical reason I can think of is money.

If by their own admission the fund is running low prompting Kate to write a book then a massive front page splash in the Sun can only help sales of the book and an investigation should keep the money coming in for a while longer as the case stays in the public domain.

Still sounds risky but maybe they think that by now they are bullet proof or they have had assurances from on high that the review of the case will not result in another "embarrassing" investigation of them personally. They seem to have everything under control, even to the extent of setting the agenda for the investigation.

Or maybe they are innocent, I dunno.

Stella wrote:There was "no political will to solve this case".

tcat wrote:Jenny Jones of the Metropolitan Police Authority isn't happy with the Commissioner's decision - she was just on Sky News saying they will be asking him questions when they meet next week. "I suppose you can't say no to the person who signs you pay cheque, but to say you weren't instructed to open the inquiry is ridiculous", she said (or words to that effect) She thinks it's a waste of resources and/or preferential treatment for the McCanns.

candyfloss wrote:Well, I'm all for getting this case solved, but it is rather setting a dangerous precedent. How can they now refuse any other person with a missing child, or any adult's family, come to that, the same sort of help. Mr Cameron seems to have boxed himself into a corner now, no going back.

candyfloss wrote:Just seen this on MM, who in turn saw it on MCF,

FRIDAY, 13/05/2011, YEAR 12, No. 4122

abola.pt

Maddie Case: PJ denies involvement in research UK

The Judicial Police on Friday denied the existence of a collaboration with the British police in the research work of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, the British girl who was last seen in Praia da Luz, Algarve. The information is advanced by the Renaissance.

Recall that, on Thursday evening, the international media gave account of the British Government's decision to order further efforts in the investigation of the case Maddie. However, it was not advanced any information about an involvement of the Portuguese authorities in this case, only being revealed the involvement of Scotland Yard.

17:53 - 13/05/2011

http://www.abola.pt/mundos/ver.aspx?id=263036


I have hunted high and low for something about this in the Portuguese press, and they usually print everything to do with this case and nothing. Perhaps this is why. What's going on?

moroneylm03 wrote:probably not the best topic to put this under.. but not sure where else to post it!

• Glibness and Superficial Charm
  
• Manipulative and Conning
  They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.
  
• Grandiose Sense of Self
  Feels entitled to certain things as "their right."
  
• Pathological Lying
  Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests.
  
• Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt
  A deep seated rage, which is split off and repressed, is at their core. Does not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.
  
• Shallow Emotions
  When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.
  
• Incapacity for Love
  
• Need for Stimulation
  Living on the edge. Verbal outbursts and physical punishments are normal. Promiscuity and gambling are common.
  
• Callousness/Lack of Empathy
  Unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others' feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.
  
• Poor Behavioral Controls/Impulsive Nature
  Rage and abuse, alternating with small expressions of love and approval produce an addictive cycle for abuser and abused, as well as creating hopelessness in the victim. Believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, entitled to every wish, no sense of personal boundaries, no concern for their impact on others.
  
• Early Behavior Problems/Juvenile Delinquency
  Usually has a history of behavioral and academic difficulties, yet "gets by" by conning others. Problems in making and keeping friends; aberrant behaviors such as cruelty to people or animals, stealing, etc.
  
• Irresponsibility/Unreliability
  Not concerned about wrecking others' lives and dreams. Oblivious or indifferent to the devastation they cause. Does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.
  
• Promiscuous Sexual Behavior/Infidelity
  Promiscuity, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual acting out of all sorts.
  
• Lack of Realistic Life Plan/Parasitic Lifestyle
  Tends to move around a lot or makes all encompassing promises for the future, poor work ethic but exploits others effectively.
  
• Criminal or Entrepreneurial Versatility
  Changes their image as needed to avoid prosecution. Changes life story readily.
  

1. Contemptuous of those who seek to understand them
   
2. Does not perceive that anything is wrong with them
   
3. Authoritarian
   
4. Secretive
   
5. Paranoid
   
6. Only rarely in difficulty with the law, but seeks out situations where their tyrannical behavior will be tolerated, condoned, or admired
   
7. Conventional appearance
   
8. Goal of enslavement of their victim(s)
   
9. Exercises despotic control over every aspect of the victim's life
   
10. Has an emotional need to justify their crimes and therefore needs their victim's affirmation (respect, gratitude and love)
    
11. Ultimate goal is the creation of a willing victim
    
12. Incapable of real human attachment to another
    
13. Unable to feel remorse or guilt
    
14. Extreme narcissism and grandiose
    
15. May state readily that their goal is to rule the world
    

ufercoffy wrote:

moroneylm03 wrote:probably not the best topic to put this under.. but not sure where else to post it!

The forum owner wont mind you starting a new thread as it's a new topic

C.Edwards wrote:Hello all. I have been a long time lurker and recently registered. Have been active on Amazon discussion mainly.

Why are the McCanns badgering for a review? Simple. They're narcissists. They love the limelight (and say they don't, how modest). They love the attention, the money, the reflected importance and pseudo-fame (notoriety?) and they simply don't think they'll get caught. Sociopathic behaviour.

Why, indeed, do so many criminals return to the scene of the crime? It's a known trait...

By the way, I suspect Stella knows, but you do realise who "ringo" is, don't you? I won't say it yet unless it's not allowed on here, but happy to name him and wonder why he's trying an assumed identity... ;-)

candyfloss wrote:


Hi C Edwards and welcome

No, please don't reveal identities of people on the forum, but you can always PM admin.

niknaks08 wrote:i dont think km is a sociopath , but i certainly think gm displays sociopathic behaviour reguarly

ufercoffy wrote:

niknaks08 wrote:i dont think km is a sociopath , but i certainly think gm displays sociopathic behaviour reguarly

Kate McCann is a filthy cow talking about her daughter's genitals in a book that she wants her daughter and paedophile abductor to read.

ufercoffy wrote:

niknaks08 wrote:i dont think km is a sociopath , but i certainly think gm displays sociopathic behaviour reguarly

Kate McCann is a filthy cow talking about her daughter's genitals in a book that she wants her daughter and paedophile abductor to read.

C.Edwards wrote:Hello all. I have been a long time lurker and recently registered. Have been active on Amazon discussion mainly.

Why are the McCanns badgering for a review? Simple. They're narcissists. They love the limelight (and say they don't, how modest). They love the attention, the money, the reflected importance and pseudo-fame (notoriety?) and they simply don't think they'll get caught. Sociopathic behaviour.

Why, indeed, do so many criminals return to the scene of the crime? It's a known trait...

By the way, I suspect Stella knows, but you do realise who "ringo" is, don't you? I won't say it yet unless it's not allowed on here, but happy to name him and wonder why he's trying an assumed identity... ;-)

RBxHN wrote:

ufercoffy wrote:

niknaks08 wrote:i dont think km is a sociopath , but i certainly think gm displays sociopathic behaviour reguarly

Kate McCann is a filthy cow talking about her daughter's genitals in a book that she wants her daughter and paedophile abductor to read.

Sheesh you've got a weird way of looking at things. It is absolutely no wonder you have trouble understanding anything about this case without your prejudices kickin in.

Get some fresh air chap.