Facebewk threads
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Latest News and Debate :: Debate Section - for purporting theories
Page 1 of 1 • Share
Facebewk threads
I thought I would create a thread for posts I've seen on Facebewk...
Some of the posts we've chewed over before, but I'll hijack some we haven't seen before so we can add some more to the debate...
The McCanns are guilty of neglect (by their own admission)! I believe they risked this admission to mask the real truth. I believe they gave all 3 children drugs to make them sleep. They tried to convince their audience that they received hundreds of messages saying that there was nothing wrong leaving 3 children alone while they went out to eat and drink bottles of wine.
Kate risked leaving her twins to then run to the dining table announcing Maddie had been abducted!? How did she know the abductor wasn't going to take this opportunity to take the twins!? If the dining area was so close like Gerry and Kate push down our throats why couldn't Kate shout it from the balcony!
A mum's first instinct would be to stay with her children. The twins didn't wake up and that in itself is blizzare! They were never tested for drugs.
Furthermore why was the first thought abduction, when by the McCanns admission & justification of why they left the children was because they felt so safe. The area was so safe and relaxed.
So it seems an odd conclusion to make so quickly.
The possibility of Maddie wandering out of the unlocked apartment is totally feasible for a child who is very nearly 4. But not even considered.
Some of the posts we've chewed over before, but I'll hijack some we haven't seen before so we can add some more to the debate...
The McCanns are guilty of neglect (by their own admission)! I believe they risked this admission to mask the real truth. I believe they gave all 3 children drugs to make them sleep. They tried to convince their audience that they received hundreds of messages saying that there was nothing wrong leaving 3 children alone while they went out to eat and drink bottles of wine.
Kate risked leaving her twins to then run to the dining table announcing Maddie had been abducted!? How did she know the abductor wasn't going to take this opportunity to take the twins!? If the dining area was so close like Gerry and Kate push down our throats why couldn't Kate shout it from the balcony!
A mum's first instinct would be to stay with her children. The twins didn't wake up and that in itself is blizzare! They were never tested for drugs.
Furthermore why was the first thought abduction, when by the McCanns admission & justification of why they left the children was because they felt so safe. The area was so safe and relaxed.
So it seems an odd conclusion to make so quickly.
The possibility of Maddie wandering out of the unlocked apartment is totally feasible for a child who is very nearly 4. But not even considered.
____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern- Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
- Posts : 29108
Activity : 41844
Likes received : 7716
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : Parallel universe
Re: Facebewk threads
From facebewk:
I’ve watched this video a few times, but I have never took in this bit before.
At 1:20 Kate says “I would like to say a few words to the person WHO WAS WITH Madeleine” Gerry in a split second realises what Kate has just said, panics, squeezes her shoulder, not very subtly....WRONG WORDS Kate !!Gerry looks like he’s going to [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]himself !!
Kate tries to correct herself by saying “the person who HAS BEEN with her”, which is nonsensical... HAS is past tense, shouldn’t she have said “WHO IS WITH HER” ?
They’re supposed to be appealing for Madeleine’s safe return from a pedo abductor who hasn’t asked for a ransom, so why are they assuming she’s still alive ?
“WHO WAS WITH”
“THEY’VE TAKEN HER”
“A COUPLE HAVE TAKEN HER”
Both of them sitting there In their Emperors new clothes !!
I’ve watched this video a few times, but I have never took in this bit before.
At 1:20 Kate says “I would like to say a few words to the person WHO WAS WITH Madeleine” Gerry in a split second realises what Kate has just said, panics, squeezes her shoulder, not very subtly....WRONG WORDS Kate !!Gerry looks like he’s going to [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]himself !!
Kate tries to correct herself by saying “the person who HAS BEEN with her”, which is nonsensical... HAS is past tense, shouldn’t she have said “WHO IS WITH HER” ?
They’re supposed to be appealing for Madeleine’s safe return from a pedo abductor who hasn’t asked for a ransom, so why are they assuming she’s still alive ?
“WHO WAS WITH”
“THEY’VE TAKEN HER”
“A COUPLE HAVE TAKEN HER”
Both of them sitting there In their Emperors new clothes !!
____________________
PeterMac's FREE e-book
Gonçalo Amaral: The truth of the lie
CMOMM & MMRG Blog
Jill Havern- Forum Owner & Chief Faffer
- Posts : 29108
Activity : 41844
Likes received : 7716
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : Parallel universe
Re: Facebewk threads
That's horrendous. They had deliberately left her and the twins with somebody? The reasons for that don't bear thinking about.
CaKeLoveR- Posts : 4362
Activity : 4425
Likes received : 71
Join date : 2022-02-19
Re: Facebewk threads
At 1:20 Kate says “I would like to say a few words to the person WHO WAS WITH Madeleine” Gerry in a split second realises what Kate has just said, panics, squeezes her shoulder, not very subtly....WRONG WORDS Kate !!Gerry looks like he’s going to [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]himself !!
I said exactly the same thing a while ago. ^^^
I've seen him do the same thing before, he's a nervous wreck when Kate opens her mouth.
I said exactly the same thing a while ago. ^^^
I've seen him do the same thing before, he's a nervous wreck when Kate opens her mouth.
crusader- Posts : 5252
Activity : 5568
Likes received : 310
Join date : 2019-03-12
Similar topics
» Threads deleted
» Requests to see old 3A Threads - Hideho
» 10th Anniversary threads now moved to various other sections
» Reading some of the www threads which appear in the headlines of this forum.
» Mail permitting adverse comments on both threads
» Requests to see old 3A Threads - Hideho
» 10th Anniversary threads now moved to various other sections
» Reading some of the www threads which appear in the headlines of this forum.
» Mail permitting adverse comments on both threads
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Latest News and Debate :: Debate Section - for purporting theories
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum