FIRST photo
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Madeleine Beth McCann :: Photographs of Madeleine McCann's fateful holiday
Page 5 of 5 • Share
Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: FIRST photo
Whatever happened to this discussion about the First Photo?
Peter? Tigger?
Peter? Tigger?
____________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]MAGA [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]MBGA
A wise man once said:
"Be careful who you let on to your ship,
because some people will sink the whole ship
just because they can't be the Captain."
Re: FIRST photo
It is being conducted in private, between people who have specialised knowledge, deal in facts, and can control their emotions !Get'emGonçalo wrote:Whatever happened to this discussion about the First Photo?
Peter? Tigger?
EDITED TO ADD . . .
As incidentally is a lot more about this case. Much of what is finalised and agreed upon after rigorous analysis by those concerned, and after proper referencing,
is then submitted to the PJ, to GA, and to Grange.
One day it may come out.
Re: FIRST photo
Re the printer paper discussion. I'm pretty sure the item(s) in the cupboard are videos. Iirc the TV appears to have a video slot which is visible on some photographs.
In my opinion the 'abduction' wasn't meant to run for as long as it has done. I feel the initial plan/concept was that it would run for about 5/6 months or so in the media. It would be interesting to know when exactly Bell Pottinger got their half a million to keep the case on the front pages for a year.
Something changed early on and it may well have been the internet explosion of 50 million views. That may have turned TM's heads. Never mind the world, let's go for the entire Milky Way!
So as far as the photographs go, they could have been part of the initial publicity push and following that, the parents would have been the news, working for charities, European representative for Amber Alert, working tirelessly for all missing children in the world. At one point - certainly once they'd been made arguidos imo - it all turned back to Maddie.
So I'd imagine that there wouldn't be that many photographs of Maddie needed in the early days, The coloboma was the key ingrediënt in any photo: coloboma = Maddie. So by adding one small black stripe/dot almost any suitable baby or blondish child was identified as Maddie.
If anyone wants to lift the coloboma (The logic gates) post from my blog you're welcome. I only run the blog to put information and references in one place, I do not use cookies, make no money of the blog. It's for general information.
I still think the first photograph looked most like the girl the nannies thought was Maddie. Imo the playground photograph isn't Maddie. The last photo does show Maddie but imo at about 3 yrs old. That's just an opinion, I might be wrong or right, either way it is a step nearer the truth.
In my opinion the 'abduction' wasn't meant to run for as long as it has done. I feel the initial plan/concept was that it would run for about 5/6 months or so in the media. It would be interesting to know when exactly Bell Pottinger got their half a million to keep the case on the front pages for a year.
Something changed early on and it may well have been the internet explosion of 50 million views. That may have turned TM's heads. Never mind the world, let's go for the entire Milky Way!
So as far as the photographs go, they could have been part of the initial publicity push and following that, the parents would have been the news, working for charities, European representative for Amber Alert, working tirelessly for all missing children in the world. At one point - certainly once they'd been made arguidos imo - it all turned back to Maddie.
So I'd imagine that there wouldn't be that many photographs of Maddie needed in the early days, The coloboma was the key ingrediënt in any photo: coloboma = Maddie. So by adding one small black stripe/dot almost any suitable baby or blondish child was identified as Maddie.
If anyone wants to lift the coloboma (The logic gates) post from my blog you're welcome. I only run the blog to put information and references in one place, I do not use cookies, make no money of the blog. It's for general information.
I still think the first photograph looked most like the girl the nannies thought was Maddie. Imo the playground photograph isn't Maddie. The last photo does show Maddie but imo at about 3 yrs old. That's just an opinion, I might be wrong or right, either way it is a step nearer the truth.
____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Similar topics
» 60 Reasons why the McCanns should never have published THAT photo (the 'MAKE-UP '/ Lolita photo)
» The NEW Tennis Balls Photo Thread - 'Photoshopped photo created on 5th May', claims YouTube video
» 60 Reasons why the McCanns should never have published THAT photo (the 'MAKE-UP '/ Lolita photo)
» 60 Reasons why the McCanns should never have published THAT photo (the 'MAKE-UP '/ Lolita photo)
» The Last Photo was it one of many?
» The NEW Tennis Balls Photo Thread - 'Photoshopped photo created on 5th May', claims YouTube video
» 60 Reasons why the McCanns should never have published THAT photo (the 'MAKE-UP '/ Lolita photo)
» 60 Reasons why the McCanns should never have published THAT photo (the 'MAKE-UP '/ Lolita photo)
» The Last Photo was it one of many?
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Madeleine Beth McCann :: Photographs of Madeleine McCann's fateful holiday
Page 5 of 5
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum