The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hello!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™️ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann. Please note that your username should be different from your email address!

When posting please be mindful that this forum is primarily about the death of a three year old girl.

(Please note: if you register with the sole intention of disrupting or spamming, please don't expect to be a member for too long.)

Many thanks,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

White Flags

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

White Flags

Post by HelenMeg on 29.03.14 21:48

Things that would indicate that the Mc Canns are telling the truth - that their daughter was abducted. Now dont all rush at once.


Because their friends back them up
Because Madeleine is nowhere to be found? Actually no - if she'd been abducted - she'd have probably been located by now
Because the Mc Canns are still free and also the TAPAS guys

HelenMeg

Posts : 1782
Reputation : 208
Join date : 2014-01-08

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by whmon on 29.03.14 22:20

The only thing I can think of which would explain their innocence is something a poster said earlier today (or last night I forget which and I forget who said it) . Somebody mentioned necrophilia and that the only way somebody would steal a body was for that reason. Maybe. Doubt it though. But still, I wouldn't be surprised if TM went on this trajectory.

____________________
This message is confidential and the information must not be used, disclosed, or copied to any other person who is not entitled to receive it. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender and then delete it.
avatar
whmon

Posts : 434
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2013-04-04
Location : Back of Beyond

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by Woofer on 29.03.14 22:39

That they`re God fearing Catholics.  laughat

P.S. sorry to be facitious - this thread is actually a good idea.
avatar
Woofer

Posts : 3390
Reputation : 12
Join date : 2012-02-06

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by bodiddly on 29.03.14 23:39

The only way I can see them being innocent in MM's death is if it wasn't MM that died.

____________________
A lie cannot live...Martin Luther King, Jr.
avatar
bodiddly

Posts : 77
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-10-15

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by View-from-Ireland on 30.03.14 0:02

That they didn't just let the story die year ago. 

This is the one thing that plays on my mind.They have seemingly tried everything possible to keep it alive. Now I understand that it could be some psychological desire to be caught so that their intelligence would be revealed, but it is one to ponder.

____________________


View-from-Ireland

Posts : 145
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2013-05-13

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by jeanmonroe on 30.03.14 2:55

whmon wrote:The only thing I can think of which would explain their innocence is something a poster said earlier today (or last night I forget which and I forget who said it) . Somebody mentioned necrophilia and that the only way somebody would steal a body was for that reason. Maybe. Doubt it though. But still, I wouldn't be surprised if TM went on this trajectory.

Somebody would steal a body?

Is that 'body' alive or dead when it is stolen ?

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5815
Reputation : 1657
Join date : 2013-02-07

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by whmon on 30.03.14 3:07

That would be a dead body Jean.

____________________
This message is confidential and the information must not be used, disclosed, or copied to any other person who is not entitled to receive it. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender and then delete it.
avatar
whmon

Posts : 434
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2013-04-04
Location : Back of Beyond

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by jeanmonroe on 30.03.14 3:31

But still, I wouldn't be surprised if TM went on this trajectory.
-----------------------------------

Wouldn't that mean TM having to 'admit' that there was indeed a 'dead' body to actually 'steal' from their apartment, 5A?

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5815
Reputation : 1657
Join date : 2013-02-07

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by AskTheDogsSandra on 30.03.14 6:49

HelenMeg wrote:Things that would indicate that the Mc Canns are telling the truth - that their daughter was abducted. Now dont all rush at once.

I would believe the McCanns are telling the truth, that their daughter was abducted, IF both the British sniffer dogs WERE proved to be wrong (in exactly the same places) and that it wasn't really blood and death scent that was detected on Kate's clothes, on Maddie's cuddlecat toy, on the child's red tshirt, on the wall and floor behind the sofa, in the flowerbed, in the wardrobe and in the boot of the car that the McCann's hired 25 days AFTER Maddie was 'abducted'.

If both of these dogs were proved to be WRONG then I would believe the McCann's are 100% INNOCENT of any wrongdoing and they should be allowed to continue begging for money forever.

But the dogs have NEVER been wrong in more than 200 cases.

 wow

avatar
AskTheDogsSandra

Posts : 132
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2011-05-22

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by Watching on 30.03.14 7:03

If there are any white flags they must be buried beneath the red ones as they're not showing!

Watching

Posts : 289
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2014-02-13

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by tigger on 30.03.14 7:09

Woofer wrote:That they`re God fearing Catholics.  laughat

P.S. sorry to be facitious - this thread is actually a good idea.

Not so much 'fearig' as 'bothering'.

See the book and Dr.Roberts' 'A tense situation'.

Kate had asked God  for protection in specific situations and God had protected the family from bumps on the head and car accidents. but not from abduction, because Kate had failed to specify that contingency.

i believe that she's also said -  possibly in the radio interview with Aled Jones - that she was annoyed with God. Making the Almighty  more like a supermarket where one can expect whatever is ordered to arrive.
So specific protection asked for: bumps on the head and car accidents. We can be fairly sure that the protection from car accident was delivered as demanded, the bump on the head  protection may not have been. No wonder Kate was annoyed with God for not listening to her. She should have lodged a complaint with the representative in Rome.

If it was a bump on the head it's a white flag, somebody else's fault. God in this case.

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
avatar
tigger

Posts : 8114
Reputation : 47
Join date : 2011-07-20

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by Watching on 30.03.14 8:23

tigger wrote:
Woofer wrote:That they`re God fearing Catholics.  laughat

P.S. sorry to be facitious - this thread is actually a good idea.

Not so much 'fearig' as 'bothering'.

See the book and Dr.Roberts' 'A tense situation'.

Kate had asked God  for protection in specific situations and God had protected the family from bumps on the head and car accidents. but not from abduction, because Kate had failed to specify that contingency.

i believe that she's also said -  possibly in the radio interview with Aled Jones - that she was annoyed with God. Making the Almighty  more like a supermarket where one can expect whatever is ordered to arrive.
So specific protection asked for: bumps on the head and car accidents. We can be fairly sure that the protection from car accident was delivered as demanded, the bump on the head  protection may not have been. No wonder Kate was annoyed with God for not listening to her. She should have lodged a complaint with the representative in Rome.

If it was a bump on the head it's a white flag,  somebody else's fault. God in this case.


Mr & Mrs leave no stone unturned when it comes to blame game from bin men to God! No heavenly protection policy with the big man he only guarantees a hearing... but they could 'get the strength of the insurance companies around them'...at least they'll be compensated. Compensation always closest to their hearts...
some oldies:
Legal & General insurance, c.1980)
Legal & General cover the things you care for.
General Accident Insurance: 1985
When it comes to Life Insurance you can’t afford to take risks — so talk to General Accident. In an uncertain world, it could well be your best policy!
Commercial Union Insurance: early 1980s
We won’t make a drama out of a crisis.

Watching

Posts : 289
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2014-02-13

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by tigger on 30.03.14 9:11

Watching wrote:
tigger wrote:
Woofer wrote:That they`re God fearing Catholics.  laughat

P.S. sorry to be facitious - this thread is actually a good idea.

Not so much 'fearig' as 'bothering'.

See the book and Dr.Roberts' 'A tense situation'.

Kate had asked God  for protection in specific situations and God had protected the family from bumps on the head and car accidents. but not from abduction, because Kate had failed to specify that contingency.

i believe that she's also said -  possibly in the radio interview with Aled Jones - that she was annoyed with God. Making the Almighty  more like a supermarket where one can expect whatever is ordered to arrive.
So specific protection asked for: bumps on the head and car accidents. We can be fairly sure that the protection from car accident was delivered as demanded, the bump on the head  protection may not have been. No wonder Kate was annoyed with God for not listening to her. She should have lodged a complaint with the representative in Rome.

If it was a bump on the head it's a white flag,  somebody else's fault. God in this case.


Mr & Mrs leave no stone unturned when it comes to blame game from bin men to God! No heavenly protection policy with the big man he only guarantees a hearing... but they could 'get the strength of the insurance companies around them'...at least they'll be compensated. Compensation always closest to their hearts...
some oldies:
Legal & General insurance, c.1980)
Legal & General cover the things you care for.
General Accident Insurance: 1985
When it comes to Life Insurance you can’t afford to take risks — so talk to General Accident. In an uncertain world, it could well be your best policy!
Commercial Union Insurance: early 1980s
We won’t make a drama out of a crisis.

H, that brings us to Clarence Mitchell's statement on the blue bag: (not litt. quote) 'they came back with everything they took, except Madeleine'.
So what do you think, does that come under travel insurance?

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
avatar
tigger

Posts : 8114
Reputation : 47
Join date : 2011-07-20

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by Bishop Brennan on 30.03.14 12:15

Returning to the op question about white flags - things that might suggest innocence. I would put forward the fact that the body has never been found. If Amaral was right and they did conceal a body, this was a tough task. Unfamiliar with PDL, no transport, little time.  

Of course this particular white flag became somewhat muddied with Gerry's infamous snarl to the world to "find the body and prove we killed her."   

PS.  Perhaps another possible thread there?  Things I bet they wish they had never said...
avatar
Bishop Brennan

Posts : 695
Reputation : 217
Join date : 2013-10-27

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by tigger on 30.03.14 15:50

Bishop Brennan wrote:Returning to the op question about white flags - things that might suggest innocence. I would put forward the fact that the body has never been found. If Amaral was right and they did conceal a body, this was a tough task. Unfamiliar with PDL, no transport, little time.  

Of course this particular white flag became somewhat muddied with Gerry's infamous snarl to the world to "find the body and prove we killed her."   

PS.  Perhaps another possible thread there?  Things I bet they wish they had never said...

Many of those can be found in the Forensic Linguistics thread, but to see motormouth Gerry in full flow, the transcript of the Vanity Fair interview is favourite. E.g. In sept 07 he admits to interviewer that Madeleine could well be dead.
Forensic Linguistics page one start with a slip-up  from that interview.  

As to other things they wish they'd never said -   'I do?'  Or 'we're doctors - of course the sardine munchers are going to believe us..'

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
avatar
tigger

Posts : 8114
Reputation : 47
Join date : 2011-07-20

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by sharonl on 30.03.14 16:46

tigger wrote:
Watching wrote:
tigger wrote:
Woofer wrote:That they`re God fearing Catholics.  laughat

P.S. sorry to be facitious - this thread is actually a good idea.

Not so much 'fearig' as 'bothering'.

See the book and Dr.Roberts' 'A tense situation'.

Kate had asked God  for protection in specific situations and God had protected the family from bumps on the head and car accidents. but not from abduction, because Kate had failed to specify that contingency.

i believe that she's also said -  possibly in the radio interview with Aled Jones - that she was annoyed with God. Making the Almighty  more like a supermarket where one can expect whatever is ordered to arrive.
So specific protection asked for: bumps on the head and car accidents. We can be fairly sure that the protection from car accident was delivered as demanded, the bump on the head  protection may not have been. No wonder Kate was annoyed with God for not listening to her. She should have lodged a complaint with the representative in Rome.

If it was a bump on the head it's a white flag,  somebody else's fault. God in this case.


Mr & Mrs leave no stone unturned when it comes to blame game from bin men to God! No heavenly protection policy with the big man he only guarantees a hearing... but they could 'get the strength of the insurance companies around them'...at least they'll be compensated. Compensation always closest to their hearts...
some oldies:
Legal & General insurance, c.1980)
Legal & General cover the things you care for.
General Accident Insurance: 1985
When it comes to Life Insurance you can’t afford to take risks — so talk to General Accident. In an uncertain world, it could well be your best policy!
Commercial Union Insurance: early 1980s
We won’t make a drama out of a crisis.

H, that brings us to Clarence Mitchell's statement on the blue bag: (not litt. quote) 'they came back with everything they took, except Madeleine'.
So what do you think, does that come under travel insurance?  

They came back with EVERYTHING that that they took, really?

What about that old picture of Madeleine that they gave to the police shortly after the "abduction"? They may not have brought it back but did they take it with them? If so, why? If not, how did they get hold of it at short notice?

____________________
"WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER" - Rebekah Brooks to David Cameron
avatar
sharonl


Posts : 4103
Reputation : 717
Join date : 2009-12-29

http://www.cold2012.org.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by sharonl on 30.03.14 17:18

One of the greatest white flags is that we have heard directly from a well respected government official, the former head of the governments' media monitoring unit, that:

Kate and Gerry McCann were not responsible for Madeleines' death

This is backed up by Gerry saying the exact thing, and both Kate and Gerry declaring that they were certain of each other's innocence.

____________________
"WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER" - Rebekah Brooks to David Cameron
avatar
sharonl


Posts : 4103
Reputation : 717
Join date : 2009-12-29

http://www.cold2012.org.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by PeterMac on 30.03.14 17:39

sharonl wrote:One of the greatest white flags is that we have heard directly from a well respected government official, the former head of the governments' media monitoring unit, that:
Kate and Gerry McCann were not responsible for Madeleines' death
This is backed up by Gerry saying the exact thing, and both Kate and Gerry declaring that they were certain of each other's innocence.

That for me is one of the greatest RED flags.
Not many people think they were responsible for Madeleine's death - (in the sense of homicide / murder / manslaughter and so on.
Though clearly involved in the negligence aspects / failing to prevent accident / failing to prevent "abduction" and so on.)

And then to use the strange expression "convinced of each other's 'innocence" ! ! ! Begging the question - Of What, precisely ?

Yo can not be innocent of an accident, be innocent of not having done something,
YO can only be innocent of a specific crime or offence.

____________________

avatar
PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 171
Join date : 2010-12-06

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by tungsten tel on 30.03.14 17:51

The only white flag im interested in is the one waved by this obnoxious group of people when they grow a pair and hold their hands up and admit the truth of what happened in PDL .

tungsten tel

Posts : 71
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2014-02-27
Location : walsall

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by kimHager on 31.03.14 1:40

by tigger Yesterday at 8:09 am



Woofer wrote: “ That they`re God fearing Catholics.

P.S. sorry to be facitious - this thread is actually a good idea.



Not so much 'fearig' as 'bothering'.

See the book and Dr.Roberts' 'A tense situation'.

Kate had asked God for protection in specific situations and God had protected the family from bumps on the head and car accidents. but not from abduction, because Kate had failed to specify that contingency.

i believe that she's also said - possibly in the radio interview with Aled Jones - that she was annoyed with God. Making the Almighty more like a supermarket where one can expect whatever is ordered to arrive. So specific protection asked for: bumps on the head and car accidents. We can be fairly sure that the protection from car accident was delivered as demanded, the bump on the head protection may not have been. No wonder Kate was annoyed with God for not listening to her. She should have lodged a complaint with the representative in Rome.

If it was a bump on the head it's a white flag, somebody else's fault. God in this case.

I believe she prayed no bumps on the head because it MAY be the way a child would die from complications.... And a car accident because you wouldn't want to explain the body in the boot if you're in an accident. Also accidents=breathalizer and/or drug test

White flags? The only way I'd believe them is if a very alive Maddy is found. I don't see it happening.. But hey to the alleged abductor... Let Maddy come home now so we can prove there innocence.,...... Silence.....

____________________
Kim
avatar
kimHager

Posts : 465
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2014-01-29

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by kimHager on 31.03.14 1:42

Admin can you fix my post please as uneasy my first attempt at copying quotes like this and it didn't work Sad sorry!

____________________
Kim
avatar
kimHager

Posts : 465
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2014-01-29

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by tigger on 31.03.14 7:03

kimHager wrote:Admin can you fix my post please as uneasy my first attempt at copying quotes like this and it didn't work :(sorry!

You just click on the 'quote' in top right corner. I now have to wait a bit before the quote turns yellow in the answer box. Must be iPad as it was quicker on laptop.

So that's probably it. Thanks for pointing it out -  roses 

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
avatar
tigger

Posts : 8114
Reputation : 47
Join date : 2011-07-20

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by Gillyspot on 31.03.14 7:33

View-from-Ireland wrote:That they didn't just let the story die year ago. 

This is the one thing that plays on my mind.They have seemingly tried everything possible to keep it alive. Now I understand that it could be some psychological desire to be caught so that their intelligence would be revealed, but it is one to ponder.
One thing that bothered me too, but I came to the conclusion that they need to keep it high profile (feed the tabloids with their side) to stop the red tops sharing FACTS eg Gaspar Statement, Changing Timelines etc.  IMO if the McCanns stop feeding the media they will carry their OWN stories and not toe the McCann party line.

____________________
Kate McCann "I know that what happened is not due to the fact of us leaving the children asleep. I know it happened under other circumstances"
avatar
Gillyspot

Posts : 1470
Reputation : 6
Join date : 2011-06-13

Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by Guest on 31.03.14 9:35

The one thing which really stood out for me that was a bit of a high risk thing to have done, was for Gerry, not Kate to have telephoned and spoken first to the frail and sick Brian Healey, rather than convey the message to Susan Healey) at an unforgiving time of night. This might suggest that Kate truly was unable to do this at that time, athough admittedly, she recovered later sufficiently to telephone friends and tell them herself. Surely the shock could have had a bad effect on Brian? What if he had had a heart attack or it had worsened his Parkinsons Disease. I think even in a hysterical state most people would think twice about ringing such a sick and fairly elderly person. For someone to have done that does this smack of genuine desperation and perhaps indicate that Kate and Gerry were both not functioning normally or rationally due to shock?
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: White Flags

Post by j.rob on 31.03.14 15:35

I think it is astonishing beyond belief that Kate and Gerry were calling for an independent investigative review (Kate's book - May 2011). 

"We are still pressing the British and Portugese governments to do more, or at least something."


Still, the fact that the review was not carried out meant - "we will be left with no alternative but to seek disclosure of all information possessed by the authorities relating to Madeleine's disappearance."

"And as we know there is no evidence whatsoever to suggest she has come to any harm, other than as a result of being separated from her family."

What planet is this women on?  I think a psychiatrist could have a field day with her. 

Still, as she writes: "There are many examples of abducted children being recovered years later......How many more children are out there waiting to be found?"

I really do think that Kate's stance can only make an ounce of sense (although she is incredibly narcissistic, imo)  if one considers the scenario that the intention was for Madeleine to 'disappear' alive - in other words the intention to fake an abduction of an alive but sedated Madeleine (a more elaborate Shannon Matthews plot). 

But there was an accident and Madeleine either died in the apartment or near the apartment and her body was brought back while they decided what to do with it (sniffer dogs).

They did not admit to the accident as to have done so would have uncovered things they wished to conceal, imo (and not just neglect as that was self-evident which ever way the story went). Plus it would have de-railed their 'wider agenda'. Gerry was too greedy, imo, and narcissistic enough to think he would get away with it. 

This would explain - to a point - the folie de grandeur that they are exhibiting. They simply cannot let go of a certain script. 

Hence both Kate and Gerry's obsession with the idea that, one day, their daughter might return.  They will not even admit to themselves that this will not happen, let alone anyone else.

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 232
Join date : 2014-02-02

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum