The dogs and CI de Almeida's report.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
A report by Chief Inspector Tavares de Almeida to the Coordinator of the Criminal Investigation10 September 2007
(Processo: VOL ,X, p. 2587-2602)

[.....]
Despite everything, until a certain time in the investigation the family sustained the thesis of kidnapping. However, in a date that cannot be precise it was suggested to the family that they should consult a person that could, eventually, indicate the probable place where the cadaver of little Madeleine could be found.

This fact became inexplicable to the elements of the investigation once it were the members of the family that raised the hypothesis of death of little Maddie.


Nevertheless, before the Media they kept (and keep) declaring their hope on finding their daughter alive: the first time that the hypothesis of the death of the little girl was raised it was, effectively, suggested by the McCann.

(This probably refers to the phone call and possibly the letter Kate wrote to the PJ - especially the phonecall in which she said she'd seen Maddie lying dead on a hillside. This call took place when Gerry was away.)


Although maintaining all the lines of the investigation opened it was, nevertheless, decided to advance in the direction of a new inspection to the local where the girl disappeared.
The inspection technique is frequently used in the United Kingdom and consists on the use of dogs especially trained.


As it's natural it is the dog's olfact the 'sense' used. In the case of this 'sense' the difference between the human and the dog is 5 million cells to 200 millions.

It must be highlighted that the resource to this kind of inspection is frequent in the UK and the success rate is 100%.

One of the dogs is trained to detect the odour of cadaver and the other to identify vestiges of human blood.


We refer now that the location of the cadaver odours signifies that physically the body (cadaver) is not on the place, marked by the dog, but certainly it has been there, as long as the dog signals it.



As it can be verified from the 'Autos', in the inquiry, the dogs inspected the locales and objects with the results described below.

All the inspections were recorded in sound and image and were directed by our British colleagues that accompanied the dogs.


Among the great number of objects and locales inspected, the dogs marked the following places:


1. Apartment 5 A, Ocean Club resort, the place from where the child disappeared
1.1. Cadaver odour
* Master bedroom, in a corner, by the wardrobe
* Living room, behind the sofa, by the side window

1.2. Blood dog: 
* Living room behind the sofa, close to the lateral window (on the same spot signalled by the cadaver dog);

2. Front garden to the apartment 5A

2.1. Cadaver dog
* Flower bed (the dog handler commented on the 'lightness' of the odor)

3. Apartments where the rest of the group were staying
* NOTHING was detected by the dogs

4. Actual residence of the McCann
* NOTHING was detected on the house by any of the dogs

5. At Aldeia da Luz
* NOTHING was detected by any of the dogs

6. Clothes and belongings of McCann family
6.1. Cadaver dog:
* 2 pieces of clothing of Kate McCann
* One piece of Madeleine McCann
* Madeleine's soft toy
* The odour was detected when the toy was still in the interior of the actual residence of the McCann
* It was confirmed in out of the house conditions

7. Vehicle used by the McCann family

7.1. Cadaver dog:
* Marked the key of the car
* Marked the interior of the booth

7.2. Blood dog
* Marked the car key
* Marked the interior of the booth

8. Car used by a family friend that was staying in the same resort, in some of the same days 
* Nothing was detected by any of the dogs.

9. All the cars used by the arguido Robert Murat and the people that are close to him
* Nothing was detected by any of the dogs.

(In a total of 10 cars the cadaver dog and the blood dog only marked the car of the McCann family, rented at May 27th)

Unquote

The whole report is well worth a (re)read.

Very interesting article, thank you.

This is new to me but I know others have questioned whether any check was done. Am I right in thinking this means Rothley ?

"
4. Actual residence of the McCann
* NOTHING was detected on the house by any of the dogs
"

Angelique wrote:Very interesting article, thank you.

This is new to me but I know others have questioned whether any check was done. Am I right in thinking this means Rothley ?

"
4. Actual residence of the McCann
* NOTHING was detected on the house by any of the dogs
"

I think he means the villa they'd moved to after leaving OC.
I also think - please correct if wrong - that Aldeia de Luz is the actual name of the town, Praia meaning beach I believe.
It's clear that many more locations were checked by the dogs but not all are listed in his report.

I like the bit where he mentions the 30 seconds to 30 minutes 'window' during which a third party could testify seeing Maddie alive. David Payne.

Just bumping this topic up again as now the Investigation is running in two countries, and SY and the Portugese collaborating and CPS involved, I hope Martin Grime will provide an expert witness statement. Also many more murderers have been convicted on the strength of cadaver dog evidence since 2007, so will the continued success of these dogs, and increasing proof of their efficiency be enough to move the case along?

Interested whether the charges and successful convictions brought in other cases without the actual discovery of a cadavar, have a greater significance to SY?

Get 'em Gonçalo wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
THE HYPOTHESIS OF DEATH IS CONSIDERED.
THE ARRIVAL OF THE SPECIALISTS

After Krugel's unsuccessful visit, our English colleagues vaunt the work of their specialist dog team from the South Yorkshire Police Department of Criminal Investigation. Their dogs are specially trained to locate the most minute traces of blood and are capable of outstanding performance in the search for human remains and bodily fluids.

THE FORENSIC SPECIALISTS

It's July. The hypothesis of death, including by the parents, is being seriously considered. However, no lead has yet come to anything, and we find ourselves in a cul-de-sac. We have to re-centre the investigation around its point of departure, apartment 5A at the Ocean Club, in Vila da Luz. We officially request the help of the best experts in criminology and forensics but also the specialist dog team from the English police. A few days later, we welcome Mark Harrison, a specialist in murder, and the search for missing persons and victims of natural disasters. National advisor to the British police, he is well known for his exceptional professional experience. He has already participated in dozens of international criminal investigations.

His work consists of defining new strategies for research. He gets to work immediately, supported by the Portuguese PJ and the investigators from Leicester and Scotland Yard. On his arrival, we place at his disposal details of the case, as well as all our material and human resources. Harrison reads up on the statements and interviews from the principal witnesses - including, of course, those of the parents and friends -, all the analyses, simulations, hypotheses and cross-checking already carried out. He carries out a reconnaissance on the ground, by helicopter and then on foot. He paces the streets and the access roads to Vila da Luz and compares them to the diagrams created in the course of the investigation. Nothing is left to chance: measurement and timing of possible routes between buildings, apartments and restaurants; analyses, with the help of the best specialists, of weather, geological and maritime factors in relation to the investigation; consultation with the best forensic anthropologist in the country, who indicates for us what would be the actual state of the body in the hypothesis of death occurring on May 3rd; study of the region's natural carrion predators. All the research already conducted by hundreds of people - GNR, civil defence, firemen and other volunteers - is re-examined in detail and re-analysed.

After a week of intense work, Harrison presents the results of his study to my coordinating group. Even if we were expecting it, his conclusions confirm our worst fears. The most plausible scenario is the following: there is no doubt that Madeleine is dead, and her body is hidden somewhere in the area around Praia da Luz. He praises the quality of the work carried out by the Portuguese authorities in trying to find the little girl alive. According to him, the time has come to redirect the searches in order to find, this time, a body hidden in the surrounding area.

AMAZING STATISTICS

Great Britain has at its disposal the world's biggest data bank on homicide of children under five years old. Since 1960, the count is 1528. Harrison is well acquainted with its contents. He often draws information from there which helps him to resolve similar cases. Valuable information can be found there on on various criminal modus operandi, places where bodies are hidden, techniques used to get rid of a body. He relates that on one occasion, thanks to the data, he was able to deduce the maximum distance a body might be found in relation to where the crime had been committed.

The figures quoted in the report he hands over give us the shivers. The crimes, including those of a sexual nature, are committed by the parents in 84% of cases; 96% are perpetrated by friends and relatives. In only 4% of them is the murderer or abductor a total stranger to the victim. In this roundabout way, Mark Harrison points out that the guilty party may be a person close to Madeleine, and even her own parents. From now on, we have to explore this track, especially as the others have proved fruitless.

Harrison also suggests that we use the skills of two totally remarkable dogs: the first an EVRD (Enhanced Victim Recovery Dog), achieves outstanding performance in the detection of human cadaver odour; the second, a CSI dog (Crime Scene Investigation) is capable of smelling the tiniest trace of blood, knowing how to recognise its human origin. To convince us of their capability and the extraordinary work carried out by these very special detectives in the course of over 200 investigations, he screens a video for us, showing their training and their intervention on the ground.

He suggests that we start the operations with the inspection of apartment 5A, then those occupied by the McCanns' friends. Robert Murat's house will also be subjected to thorough examination. In addition, all the vehicles used by all of them will be sniffed by the dogs.

Meanwhile, we were supposed to receive American electronic equipment that detects human bodies thanks to the odour that emanates from them (Scent Transfer Unit 100). But the equipment, blocked by customs, arrived late. We didn't need to use it, having obtained very concrete results, thanks to the dogs.

THE ENGLISH SPECIALIST DOG TEAM

The heat is scorching on this thirtieth day of July 2007 when two Springer Spaniels, Eddie and Keela, get off the British Airways plane, accompanied by their trainer, Martin Grime. An air-conditioned vehicle is waiting to take them to their accommodation. A vet, who will be on hand during their stay, has been brought in to intervene in case of illness or if the dogs get bitten by a snake. Their mission: to find Madeleine's body and expose those responsible.

Eddie has been involved in a great number of cases, helping the police to resolve a good many riddles, thanks to his sense of smell. Even if the body has been moved, objects the body has touched have been contaminated by its odour, especially porous materials, fabrics, the upholstery in cars, etc. And that odour, Eddie knows how to recognise out of a thousand.

Keela, a scenes of crime specialist, is capable of locating particles of blood even after a place has been cleaned with chemical products or bleach. Sometimes, the residues are so microscopic they are missed by the instruments of the forensic police, as sophicticated as they are, and it's impossible to harvest them without taking all of what they are on.

Eddie is always the first to be brought onto a site. Once he has discerned the odour that he knows so well, it's Keela's turn to go into action, on the lookout for the slightest whiff of blood. The simultaneous presence of the two elements in a given place - blood and cavaver odours - is taken to indicate that a body has been there and that it's probably there that the death occurred.

The dogs' CV is impressive. Besides collaborating in hundreds of investigations, they passed the practical tests brilliantly at the FBI's "Body Farm," the only place in the world where human cadavers are used to simulate homicide scenarios and concealment of bodies.

Amongst the most media-covered cases, which they contributed to resolving, is that of the disappearance in Northern Ireland of Attracta Harron, who was last seen when she was returning home on foot, after having been to church. All searches carried out by the police were unsuccessful. The main suspect's car having been totally burnt out in a mysterious fire, couldn't be examined. They called in Eddie, who examined the charred remains of the vehicle and immediately picked out the characteristic odour. Human tissue was found amongst the debris, the DNA of which corresponded to the missing woman. Later, the dog indicated the place - close to a river - where the victim's body had been abandoned. At the home of the suspect, where the police were searching for incriminating evidence, Eddie identified cadaver odour in one of the bedrooms. The man confessed to having killed the woman then moving her body to the banks of the river.

The case of Amanda Edwards, reported missing, is also very impressive. The police, who conducted a search of her ex-partner's home, found small bloodstains there, but no trace of a body. The dog, who was brought in for the examination of the man''s vehicle, alerted to cadaver odour on the tools stored in the boot (a shovel, a level and a compactor). The police went to the building site where the suspect had worked a few days before and discovered the body, buried in a garage. The murderer had made efficient use of his tools to carry out his task.

It's also thanks to the help of the dogs that the case of Charlotte Pinkley, a missing British woman, who had been imprisoned by her ex-partner, was resolved. The police requested the help of the specialist dog team to try to find the young woman's body. Eddie picked out a place where the abductor had provisionally left his victim. In the surrounding area, the investigators found the button from a dress that had belonged to Charlotte. That clue exposed the murderer, who ended up showing the police the place where he had hidden the body.

More recently, it's Eddie who helps to find a body buried under a flagstone at the former orphanage, Haut-de-la-Garenne, in Jersey, setting for a terrible case of paedophilia and child murder.

The achievements of the dog detectives are the result of a very long apprenticeship. It all starts with the selection of the best puppies when they are only a few months old. The most talented breed for this unusual "profession," is the Springer Spaniel. The trainer, Martin Grime, and his pupils undergo aptitude tests every year in order to obtain certificates proving their capability. In Great Britain, the police have no hesitation in calling in the specialist dog teams to assist in certain criminal investigations. Their skills are nowadays recognised by journalists, police and courts all over the world.

EXAMINATION OF THE OCEAN CLUB APARTMENTS BY THE SPECIALIST DOGS

On August 3rd 2007, I am having dinner in Praia da rocha, near Portimão, with my friend Gaivota. Unable to hide my anxiety, I keep looking at my watch and my telephone. Gaivota asks me if everything is OK: I respond with an absent-minded "Yes." A few kilometres away one of the most important search operations ever carried out in Portugal has begun. Perhaps we will finally manage to clear up the mystery of Madeleine's disappearance.

The investigation starts in apartment 5A. The grey jeep transporting the dogs pulls into the car park in front of the building. There is hope and anxiety on people's faces. Martin Grime gets out of the car, holding Eddie on a tight leash. He takes it off and orders Eddie to sit down. Instead of obeying as would be expected of such a well-trained dog, Eddie immediately rushes into the building. He then goes to and fro between the lounge and the bedroom in an agitated manner. Martin wonders what could be making his animal so nervous and calls him back to give precise orders. An investigator is filming the entire scene. A little later, Eddie is examining the floor in the parents' bedroom, near the wardrobe, when he lets out a strident howl, indicating that he has detected a cadaver odour. The investigators have hardly recovered from their amazement, when another, equally impressive, howl startles them. This time, Eddie has picked out that same odour under the window, just behind the sofa, on one of the walls in the lounge. That evening, in apartment 5A, the investigators begin to glimpse what might have happened.

At around 10pm, police officers see Gerry McCann, going past the apartment at the wheel of his hire car, a Renault Mégane Scenic, an impenetrable look on his face.

Then it's Keela's turn to intervene. She points her muzzle at the same place where Eddie gave the alert: traces of blood are found on the tiling between the window and the sofa. Outside, Eddie barks twice: on the veranda at the back of the building and in the garden, just below it. At this place, the dog's bark is weaker and might mean "maybe, who knows....". Thus from the indications provided by Eddie, we can pinpoint the places where the body was moved around. Apartments 5B, 5D and 5H, where the McCanns' friends stayed, are examined that same night. The investigators are expecting new developments. However, nothing happens. Eddie does not show the slightest reaction. Therefore, Keela does not get involved.

From then on, we are sure that, at a given moment, there was a body in apartment 5A. We now have to interview firemen, medical services personnel, previous tenants and employees of the Ocean Club to make sure that no death has taken place in this accommodation, which they confirm. So, we can conclude that the odour discovered is certainly that of Madeleine Beth McCann.

SEARCHES IN THE AREA AROUND VILA DA LUZ

As planned, the searches with Eddie go ahead in and around the village. To leave nothing to chance, he is also put to inspecting the area outlined by Krugel.

Mark Harrison organises a big meeting to direct the work of the search teams. He has conceived the idea of iron bars, whose production he has consigned to a local company. They will be used to sink holes into the ground which will facilitate the possible release of gas emanating from a decomposing body.

Martin, Eddie, the PJ inspectors and members of the GNR, go over with a fine-tooth comb, all the areas where the body of a child might be found. Eddie runs his nose over kilometres of waste ground, ruins, buildings abandoned or under construction, waterways, pipework, along the beach, under every bush, not forgetting the famous Rocha Negra. No evidence of the presence of a body, no cadaver odour anywhere.

EXAMINATION OF THE McCANNS' HOUSE.

"The moment of truth has arrived." That's what everybody is thinking when searching begins at the accommodation the family is occupying from now on: either we find evidence of their responsibility in Madeleine's disappearance, or they will definitely be cleared of all suspicion.

Being convinced of having made a mistake in not placing either the couple or their friends under surveillance, we decided to rectify it. We ask the Public Minister for authorisation to search and, at the same time, authorisation for phone taps. Our request is sent to the judge. He being absent, his deputy is called upon. Finally, after 24 hours of anxious waiting, we learn that authorisation is refused. The disappointment is enormous because we will never have access to conversations the McCanns have away from the microphones, and this not least because the McCanns are preparing to return to England. We cannot count on any more than the search of the house they have occupied since May 3rd, 27 Rue das Flores, which they have been able to rent thanks to money collected by the Madeleine Fund.

To avoid contamination of evidence that will be gathered at the McCanns', Mark Harrison has insisted on the availability of decontaminated premises exclusively set aside for this purpose. Julio Barroso, mayor of Lagos, agrees to lend us the garage of a new, unoccupied building in the centre of Lagos. The place is cleaned from top to bottom.

On August 2nd, at 6pm, the inspectors arrive at the McCanns' residence and present the search warrant. The principle of the examination by the specialist dogs is explained. Kate and Gerry are in the swimming pool in the garden with the twins. Contrary to all expectations, they allow us access to their house in a very natural way.

Eddie goes immediately to the lounge. He comes to a stop in front of a wicker armchair on which is lying Madeleine's small pink soft toy, which Kate was never without in the early days of the investigation. Nowadays, she wears a rosary and a green ribbon around her neck. Eddie barks to let us know that he has detected an odour: the soft toy has been in contact with a body.

The soft toy and all the clothes from the house are placed into boxes specially made to preserve evidence. These objects are then conveyed to the decontaminated premises. They are placed on the ground, a good distance apart for the dogs to examine.

At 8pm, Tavares de Almeida calls me to let me know that Mark Harrison requires another place because this one is not sufficiently clean.

- How do I find a place at this kind of time?

- Sort it out!

Julio Barroso offers us the new sports hall in Lagos which, finally, meets the required standards. The objects are once again laid out on the ground and the dogs can start. Eddie alerts us to a strong cadaver odour on some of Kate's clothes, but the CSI dog doesn't detect the slightest trace of blood.

EDDIE AND KEELA AT ROBERT MURAT'S HOUSE.

Robert Murat's residence and the adjacent grounds are gone over with a fine-tooth comb in their turn. Mark Harrison, rigorously professional, has planned to devote three days to this job. This seems long to us. We want to limit the duration of this operation to avoid having the media besiege the premises. Mark agrees not to prolong the search any longer than is necessary, and manages to finish it in two days.

PJ, GNR, Civil Defence: dozens of men are mobilised. They have to work their way through the jungle that's invaded the land all round the house - Murat will not recognise his garden any more once the investigators have been through. The ground is examined with radar, centimetre by centimetre, by a specialist from Aveiro university. In vain: the dogs detect nothing. No evidence is found anywhere within the area examined. All the same, the radar reveals that Murat's house is built over an ancient Roman villa.

EXAMINATION OF THE VEHICLES

Not having been able to find an available garage in Lagos, we appeal to the mayor of Portimão, Manuel da Luz. In this case as in others before, the police have been able to count on the practical support of the mayor's office.

Finally, on August 6th, in the unoccupied floors of an underground car park, opposite the PJ's offices, the inspection of the vehicles takes place. To be examined are those of Robert Murat, Michaela, Sergey Malinka, Luiz Antonio, the McCann couple, and one that Russell O'Brien may have used. Driven by the investigators, the cars are parked in the reserved areas, doors closed and windows raised, with a space of 10 metres from one to another to avoid contamination. According to planned procedure, Eddie goes in first; Keela will be brought in if necessary.

In the immense underground car park, Martin commands Eddie to begin the examination. The dog then intensively sniffs each of the first three cars, at tyre level, the side doors and the boot, then all round. When he gets close to the fourth, the McCanns' Renault, he becomes agitated, raises his nose while running around, as if he is trying to locate the source of the odour he has detected. Martin tells him to stop running around and concentrate on the search. Finally, he starts to growl, bark and wanting to bite the bottom of the driver's door and the boot. The odour is coming from inside. The PJ's experts examine the vehicle for hours with the help of Keela. At dawn, traces of human blood are found in places indicated by the female dog: the key and the boot. The harvested samples are packed, then sent to a forensic laboratory in Birmingham, Great Britain.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Eddie did not hesitate for a moment. He was only interested in the McCanns' automobile. No other attracted his attention or provoked any reaction whatsoever on his part. So, why would certain people want to minimise the evidence produced by this method?

Later, I am brought the witness statement of a neighbour, according to whom, the McCanns left their car boot open all the time. For Gerry's brother-in-law, the bad smell was explained by the fact that the McCanns transported their bins in it. As for the blood, it had been left by a piece of meat fallen out of a shopping bag. Kate's cousin explained that the unpleasant smells were due to the little ones' dirty nappies.

None of that stands up to scrutiny faced with the reactions of these dogs, who are thoroughly trained to detect only blood and cadaver odours.

HARVESTING OF THE SAMPLES DERIVED FROM THE SPECIALIST DOGS' INSPECTIONS.

So that the items of evidence might constitute admissible proof, the harvesting and packing must conform to the rules avoiding all risk of deterioration and contamination. It is experts from our police forensic laboratory who carry out the harvesting. The minuscule traces cannot be gathered in situ, so the tiling is gently lifted out before being transferred to the Forensic Science Laboratory in Birmingham. Photos bear witness to every stage of the operation. For added security, it is the expert responsible for the collection who takes them to FSS on the morning of August 7th. The choice of this laboratory is not insignificant. Apart from their use of cutting-edge technologies - LCN (Low Copy Number) a DNA identification test, used particularly when only microscopic samples are available -, the results, whatever they might be will not be able to be contested by the British since it's one of their most reliable laboratories. All other items of evidence gathered - the keys to the McCanns' car, hair and traces of blood found in the boot - are also sent to England.

INITIAL CONCLUSIONS

English and Portuguese police get together to analyse the results of Eddie and Keela's searches.

- What we can deduce at this stage is that only the McCanns are implicated. The dogs did not detect blood or cadaver odour other than with them.

- From now on we have the certainty that there was a body behind the sofa before being taken into the parents' bedroom.

- If the blood found behind the sofa is that of the little girl, we can assume that she died there.

- That could explain why the sofa was pushed up against the curtains.

- In Madeleine's bedroom and on her bed, there was no cadaver odour.

- On the other hand, the odour on the soft toy indicates that she was holding it when she died....

These conclusions do not, for the moment, constitute proof. If the laboratory results are positive, and only in that case, we will have our proof.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

(Eddie alerting to the odour he has detected from the McCanns' hired Renault Scenic)

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

From Goncalo Amarals book............Have SY ignored this from the English police?

Interesting that the dogs did NOT alert in the villa in which the family were, and had been living for some considerable time.
The twins were there, cuddle cat was there, dirty nappies and rotting meat were all there. Shaving cuts, splatted mosquitos, nosebleeds, tampons, haemorrhoids, and all the other possible excuses were there
but the dogs detected precisely NOTHING.
What was NOT there ?

Oh yes, Madeleine !

Re-reading this material has made it perfectly clear that it wasn't one or two indiscernible indications but a great many with both dogs, one cannot simply brush it off as false alerts, they match too often and the video shows the alerts are extremely strong/bold reactions.

Any new investigation will be a complete sham if these alerts do not feature as a key component.

I cannot see how two dogs can be wrong in exactly the same places.

Can anyone explain it?

Smokeandmirrors wrote:Re-reading this material has made it perfectly clear that it wasn't one or two indiscernible indications but a great many with both dogs, one cannot simply brush it off as false alerts, they match too often and the video shows the alerts are extremely strong/bold reactions.
Any new investigation will be a complete sham if these alerts do not feature as a key component.

It certainly does stand re-reading.   And everyone, supporters of the truth for Madeleine, or believers in the parent's various excuses and justifications and exculpations alike should give the findings cold and hard contemplation.
If only to remind ourselves that the dogs alerted to locations and items associated with the McCanns  AND TO NO OTHERS.
Not one.
No false positives
No other correct positives
Nothing.
No need for the police to have to explain that Madeleine might have bled on someone else's trousers,
or wiped her nose in someone else's car, or that her night-time nappy had been left under someone else's sofa.
NOTHING.
The places they alerted directly involved the McCanns and NO ONE ELSE.

AskTheDogsSandra wrote:I cannot see how two dogs can be wrong in exactly the same places.

Can anyone explain it?

 
GM can, as per your name

AskTheDogsSandra wrote:I cannot see how two dogs can be wrong in exactly the same places.
Can anyone explain it?

McMutts and McMongrels are notorious for this !

AskTheDogsSandra wrote:I cannot see how two dogs can be wrong in exactly the same places.

Can anyone explain it?

The only was to "explain it away" is if the dogs reacted correctly, but the evidence was planted.... either by the Mcs (to at least prove something had happened in that apartment) or by the PJ, in a kind of hardcore version of SY's "finding" of Tannerman.

Clay Regazzoni wrote:

AskTheDogsSandra wrote:I cannot see how two dogs can be wrong in exactly the same places.

Can anyone explain it?

The only was to "explain it away" is if the dogs reacted correctly, but the evidence was planted.... either by the Mcs (to at least prove something had happened in that apartment) or by the PJ, in a kind of hardcore version of SY's "finding" of Tannerman.

Why would the McCanns or the PJ plant cadaver scent?

AskTheDogsSandra wrote:

Clay Regazzoni wrote:

AskTheDogsSandra wrote:I cannot see how two dogs can be wrong in exactly the same places.

Can anyone explain it?

The only was to "explain it away" is if the dogs reacted correctly, but the evidence was planted.... either by the Mcs (to at least prove something had happened in that apartment) or by the PJ, in a kind of hardcore version of SY's "finding" of Tannerman.

Why would the McCanns or the PJ plant cadaver scent?

Not saying they would or could; it just strikes me as the only way of anybody discounting the dog's findings since I doubt a spaniel can be persuaded to lie. In other words, what the dogs say, goes.

Indeed - as many survivors of natural disasters, who've been found under rubble days after an earthquake will tell us, as well as the lags languishing in jail because they tried to smuggle Columbian marching powder over the border only to be thwarted by a pesky wet nose!

CR.
It really is a conspiracy too far for me that the PJ would hold onto a corpse for three months, and then go and smear it round the apartment and onto clothing they had seized that morning.
And then - one supposes - put it back in the fridge !
I loved the idea when it first came up some years ago. Now I find it hilarious.

(I realise that you are not suggesting this, but it was one of the funnier ones the pros put up.)

That is what Stephen Birch thinks; heaven help us!

PeterMac wrote:CR.
It really is a conspiracy too far for me that the PJ would hold onto a corpse for three months, and then go and smear it round the apartment and onto clothing they had seized that morning.
And then - one supposes - put it back in the fridge !
I loved the idea when it first came up some years ago.  Now I find it hilarious.

(I realise that you are not suggesting this, but it was one of the funnier ones the pros put up.)

And then the PJ took the corpse out of the fridge and came back with it 25 days later to smear it around the hire car.

And Kate's clothes.

AskTheDogsSandra wrote:

PeterMac wrote:CR.
It really is a conspiracy too far for me that the PJ would hold onto a corpse for three months, and then go and smear it round the apartment and onto clothing they had seized that morning.
And then - one supposes - put it back in the fridge !
I loved the idea when it first came up some years ago.  Now I find it hilarious.
(I realise that you are not suggesting this, but it was one of the funnier ones the pros put up.)

And then the PJ took the corpse out of the fridge and came back with it 25 days later to smear it around the hire car.
And Kate's clothes.

And then did not reveal they had it for 6 years . . . . Oh Hang on !

PeterMac wrote:CR.
It really is a conspiracy too far for me that the PJ would hold onto a corpse for three months, and then go and smear it round the apartment and onto clothing they had seized that morning.
And then - one supposes - put it back in the fridge !
I loved the idea when it first came up some years ago.  Now I find it hilarious.

(I realise that you are not suggesting this, but it was one of the funnier ones the pros put up.)

Have been following the forum for a while, and happy to let others do the talking. But if someone wanted to do such a thing, they wouldn't need a corpse - the chemicals that Eddie detected can be manufactured very easily, and then planted

aquila wrote:

AskTheDogsSandra wrote:

Dogs don't lie. They don't know how to lie. How can you train a dog to smell a certain scent and expect it to do anything else?

Bomb detection dogs don't lie. Narcotic dogs don't lie.

To quote Delboy: "What can't speak, can't lie"

I Love Satsumas wrote:

PeterMac wrote:CR.
It really is a conspiracy too far for me that the PJ would hold onto a corpse for three months, and then go and smear it round the apartment and onto clothing they had seized that morning.
And then - one supposes - put it back in the fridge !
I loved the idea when it first came up some years ago.  Now I find it hilarious.

(I realise that you are not suggesting this, but it was one of the funnier ones the pros put up.)

Have been following the forum for a while, and happy to let others do the talking. But if someone wanted to do such a thing, they wouldn't need a corpse - the chemicals that Eddie detected can be manufactured very easily, and then planted

Don't forget the sea bass. Gerry said Sean developed a liking for it around the same time as the death scent was sniffed by Eddie.

Funny thing is both the McCanns actually acknowledged there was a death scent because they made excuses for it - rotting meat, dirty nappies, taking Maddie's cuddlecat to work when Kate worked with dead bodies etc.  

But who would plant a chemical cadaverine stink? And why smear it on Kate's clothes?