The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hello!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann. Please note that your username should be different from your email address!

When posting please be mindful that this forum is primarily about the death of a three year old girl.

(Please note: if you register with the sole intention of disrupting or spamming, please don't expect to be a member for too long.)

Many thanks,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

How did newspaper lawyers allow editors to publish Jefferies' libels?

View previous topic View next topic Go down

How did newspaper lawyers allow editors to publish Jefferies' libels?

Post by ROSA on 30.07.11 2:26

How did newspaper lawyers allow editors to publish Jefferies' libels?

It was an open and shut case. There was not the least surprise in Christopher Jefferies having won his libel actions against eight newspapers.

He was demeaned and defamed in the coverage following his arrest - a wrongful arrest, in my view - "on suspicion" of murdering Joanna Yeates.

There are questions for the police to answer about how they handled the matter, of course. Once again, the relationship between police and press should come under scrutiny.

But leaving that aside, let's just concentrate on the papers themselves. What were editors thinking in publishing material that was so obviously libellous?

Did they not learn from the very similar case of Robert Murat, the Englishman who just happened to live near the Portuguese town from where Madeleine McCann vanished?

Mr Murat got his just desserts when he sued papers for destroying his reputation. But that didn't stop editors doing it all over again by assassinating the character of the innocent Mr Jefferies.

Soon after his arrest, I wrote a piece for the London Evening Standard, Joanna Yeates case demonstrates 'casual cruelty of journalism, in which I pointed to crass examples of coverage in several papers.

Over a period of three days, the heavily slanted, often inaccurate, stories painted a grotesque picture of a respectable retired school master.

He was alleged to have acted in an inappropriate, over-sexualised manner with his pupils in the past. Untrue.

He was alleged to have invaded the privacy of his tenants who occupied the two flats he let. Untrue.

It was suggested that he was an associate of a convicted paedophile and that there were grounds to investigate whether he was responsible for an unsolved murder dating back to 1974. Untrue in every respect.

And, of course, it was suggested he was responsible for the murder of Ms Yeates. Untrue.

What were the office lawyers in some of Britain's major national newspapers doing to allow this stuff into print?

They were seriously defamatory allegations. Did they turn a blind eye? Or did editors ignore their advice?

Anyone got a clue?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2011/jul/29/joanna-yeates-national-newspapers1
avatar
ROSA

Posts : 1189
Reputation : 33
Join date : 2011-04-19
Location : Lakemba Sydney Australia

Back to top Go down

A busy lawyer

Post by Guest on 30.07.11 9:16

Louis Charalambous who acted for Chris Jefferies was also the lawyer for Robert Murat, apologies if anyone has mentioned that already. I feel that one of his clients deserved his award, I won't say which one!



avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
McCanns apt & hire car


Blood and cadaver alerts
dismissed by UK Government


Retired DCI Gonçalo Amaral: "The English can always present the conclusions to which they themselves arrived in 2007. Because they know, they have the evidence of what happened - they don't need to investigate anything. All this is now a mere 'show off'."

Retired murder DCI Colin Sutton: "I would also like to make the point that Operation Grange was so restricted from the start as to be destined to fail."

Assistant Commissioner Mark Rowley made public on national TV that Operation Grange is a complete fraud.

Ex-DCI Andy Redwood had a "revelation moment" on BBC's Crimewatch on 14th October 2013 when he announced that Operation Grange had eliminated the Tanner sighting - which opened up the 'window of opportunity', in accordance with their remit, to allow the fake abduction to happen.

Despite "irrelevant behaviour" from blood and cadaver dogs in the McCann's apartment, on Kate McCann's clothes, and in the car they hired three weeks after Maddie disappeared, Ex-Chief Inspector, Ian Horrocks, said: "The thought that Kate and Gerry McCann had anything to do with the death of their daughter is frankly preposterous."

Gerry McCann called for example to be made of 'trolls'. SKY News reporter Martin Brunt doorstepped Brenda Leyland on 2 October 2014. She was then found dead in a Leicester hotel room. Brenda paid the price. She paid with her life.

Ex-Deputy Chief Constable, Jim Gamble QPM, congratulated SKY reporter, Martin Brunt, on twitter for doorstepping Brenda Leyland on behalf of Gerry McCann.

Prime Minister Theresa May introduces Prime Suspect Kate McCann to Royalty: The Duchess of Gloucester.

Good Cop Down: The reality of being a police whistleblower
https://goodcopdown.wordpress.com/