Police blamed for McCann and Jefferies media mistakes

20 March 2012

By PA Mediapoint

Police could have reduced negative media coverage in the cases of Madeleine McCann's disappearance and Joanna Yeates's murder if they had given journalists off-the-record guidance, Daily Star crime correspondent Jerry Lawton told the Leveson Inquiry.

Lawton praised the way many UK forces share information with reporters, in particular West Yorkshire Police and Greater Manchester Police.

But he criticised Leicestershire Police, who assisted Portuguese detectives in investigating what happened to Madeleine, and Avon and Somerset Police, who led the Joanna Yeates investigation.

"Unusually both forces refused to give any guidance on any of the multiple lines of inquiry that came in to most newspapers during those on-going investigations," he said in a written statement.

Madeleine's parents Kate and Gerry McCann, and Christopher Jefferies, who was wrongly arrested over Joanna Yeates's murder, have told the Leveson Inquiry of their distress at a series of damaging newspaper articles about them.

Lawton noted in his statement: "It is surely of significance that the cases in which individual police forces have chosen not to engage with the press have resulted in some of the most vociferous complaints about coverage.

"Had Leicestershire Police chosen to give off-the-record guidance to the press about the state of the Madeleine McCann investigation then coverage may have been markedly different.

"Instead Leicestershire greeted every query with, 'It is a Portuguese police investigation, you need to contact the Portuguese police', in full knowledge - as you have previously heard in the inquiry - of the fact the Portuguese police refused to comment officially on any aspect of the case due to that country's official secrecy laws."

He added: "Had Avon and Somerset Police chosen to give discreet off-the-record guidance regarding Mr Jefferies' background and the nature of his arrest it is possible he may have been spared the ordeal he described to the inquiry.

"In my experience journalists, news desks and editors listen to, respect and react to police guidance."

'Unbelievable that a newspaper should go to those lengths'

Earlier in the day the inquiry heard claims from retired criminal investigator Dave Harrison that the News of the World potentially jeopardised the Suffolk Strangler investigation by spying on a surveillance team from the Serious Organised Crime Agency

Daily Express crime correspondent John Twomey, who is chairman of the Crime Reporters' Association, said it was "shocking" that the paper followed a police surveillance team.


"It's just quite unbelievable, really, that a newspaper should go to those lengths," he told the inquiry.

"I think it would have taken most reporters - certainly most crime reporters - by surprise."

Twomey denied a suggestion that journalists paid for meals in top restaurants with senior police officers as an "inducement".

He said former Metropolitan Police counter-terrorism chief Andy Hayman was "freer in the way he expressed himself" after having a glass or two of wine over lunch but never gave away any secrets.

The crime reporter also voiced concerns about a proposal that police officers should have to record all contacts with journalists.

He said: "If, say, a Detective Chief Inspector is anxious to get promotion in the future, and a rule like that is introduced, should it be, then he or she will probably cease all contact.

"Because when they go for promotion or maybe a selection board for a specialist CID unit, they don't want anyone to access the details and say 'Well, hang on, that person on the list three years ago, for instance, has seen crime reporters every now and again'."

Sunday Express associate editor James Murray, meanwhile, warned that The Guardian’s July 2011 revelation that NoW journalists listened to Milly Dowler’s voicemail messages could “fatally” damage relationships between journalists and the police.

He also told the inquiry he had heard stories in the past about the NoW employing former detectives or ex-special forces troops to carry out investigations.

He said he understood that the now-defunct Sunday tabloid used its resources to conduct surveillance to find out, for example, whether two celebrities were having an affair.

"There's a general appreciation that the News of the World - pretty much a lone wolf - was carrying out that sort of activity," he said.

The journalist also said that police officers could become less likely to divulge a good story after drinking alcohol.

"Some of the best information I've got is over a cup of tea when everyone is very sober," he said.
To contact the Press Gazette newsdesk call 020 7936 6433 or email pged@pressgazette.co.uk

http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=48973&c=1

'Madeleine McCann's disappearance'...

Is it just me, or does the 'abduction' word seem to be hitting the missing list itself rather a lot lately?

The Press.
You either tell them, or they make it up. That is how it works. I had years of dealing with the press, and they have you over a barrel.
My favourite of all time, against me, was when a small handmade plane crashed after the pilot did some aerobatics not authorised in a plane of that construction and the wing came off. Another light aircraft from the local airfield circled the site, giving directions to the control tower for the assistance of the emergency services, and then left.
The press tried to draw me on the "other plane" in the area, and would not leave it alone - they wanted near miss, collisions, anything to sell the paper - except the truth.
Exasperated, and late into the shift, I said "It just fell out of the sky !!!" and put the phone down.

Next days paper, headlines,- full board of enquiry - experts from Farnborough - experts from the local airfield - experts from the manufacturer - Coroners officer - Coroner - full and detailed enquiry into the circumstances - etc etc.

Chief Inspector PeterMac said " It just fell out of the sky !!!"

petermac wrote
The Press.
You either tell them, or they make it up.

Inevitably it has got to be one or the other, no two ways about it.
They are in the business to sell papers and without stories they will eventually go bust so any crime incident is a serialize story in the making either of facts or fabrications.

In the mccanns case the Police probably said too little; while in Chris Jefferies' case they said too much and either extreme can backfire.

In the mccanns case the Police said too little and the mccanns said too much resulting in this sorry state of affair where the public are so badly misled that when the truth is known it will be like a nuclear bomb with chain reactions where casualties will be claimed from quite a wide area.

That slightly contradicts the previous claims that the Portuguese police leaked information about the investigation to British reporters. Or did that only apply to selective tabloids?