How Much Money Should Amaral Sue The McCanns For?

candyfloss wrote: fatbill, and welcome. Sorry missed your post earlier.

fatbill wrote:

candyfloss wrote: fatbill, and welcome. Sorry missed your post earlier.

Thanks for the welcome.
It's going to take me a long time to read through all this forum, but I will, lol.
Having read through all the PJ files, and lots of other stuff, I'm well-read on the subject, lol.
I still can't get my head round the fact that with all that is known, not one decent journalist in the UK has delved and dug and come up with anything to keep the British public better-informed.
All the original lies are still quoted as 'truth'. Does nobody really care but us ?

fatbill wrote:

kathyBelle wrote:

fatbill wrote:Amaral should sue them for the same amount (€1.2 million) that they are seeking from him.
Should it go ahead, their libel trial would seem to be on very shaky ground, as the facts that they are basing their action on are now the facts that have seen the book-ban overturned.
Mr. A should then take his costs out of the settlement, and give the rest to The Fund.
He doesn't need to shame them, they do that themselves.
As a good Catholic, he can show them for what they really are.
I hope, and believe, that Justice for Madeleine will come about eventually, and that Amaral will be shown to be right.

Hi Fatbill, if Dr Amaral is paid damages from the McCanns and after he takes his expenses from the money, he wants to donate the rest, he should not donate to the fund to find Madeleine. Written in the terms of the fund is a clause to say the McCanns are able to use the fund money to aid their finances. As if that wasn't bad enough the McCanns wider family are being aided by the fund.

If Dr Amaral wants to donate to a children's charity, he should find a charity in Portugal.

I'm sorry, I don't know what I was thinking.
Seeing Mr Pink has brought me crashing back to Earth.
Where the hell did he get that hair?
You'd have thought he could get fifty quid out of the Fund for a decent rug.

Oh, how I hope that their defamation action goes ahead.
Or will Carter-Ruck advise them to slink away quietly?

Judge Mental wrote:fatbill has one trying to think of a name for the somewhat foppish cut of Mitchell's hair. Scarcely Eton is it?

Mitchell's brand of thinking has often made me believe that his head would be a safe place for homeless cobwebs to reside. However, one was never expecting him to display them on top of his head.

fatbill wrote:I still can't get my head round the fact that with all that is known, not one decent journalist in the UK has delved and dug and come up with anything to keep the British public better-informed.

Shibboleth wrote:Fortunately some people, in particular Ufercoffy, saw right through him and he was out before any real harm was done.

Shibboleth wrote:I suppose you could loosely label Mike Gunnill as a "journalist", much as you could label Crippen a "doctor". He also spent a while grubbing round the MM forum, trying to find out information about some of the posters there. Fortunately some people, in particular Ufercoffy, saw right through him and he was out before any real harm was done.

Judge Mental wrote:Did he ever come back to tell us what he has made of the police files?

jkh wrote:

Judge Mental wrote:Did he ever come back to tell us what he has made of the police files?

No...he sent me a message asking me to delete his account here as he felt it was time for him to move on. :lol:

He also blocked me from following him on twitter

ufercoffy wrote:Jo, Jason, Peter, Mike et al have gone?

candyfloss wrote:

kathyBelle wrote:Hi Judge Mental, I've just been looking at the archives on Joana's (Morais) forum, for a thread that gave information about the court case in Lisbon, early on this year. One report said that the PJ had been advised by the British Police to make the McCanns suspects.

At the moment I'm reading a transcript of an interview, where Clarence Mitchell is spinning for the McCanns along with his usual drivel, he is just talking about the fund. He says the fund is there to assist Kate and Gerry, in whatever way necessary. He says that the bulk, in fact all of the public money, that came in, in the early stages, was spent entirely properly in the search for Madeleine. He goes on to say that the money that is left in the fund is from the settlements from media outlets that defamed the McCanns. As well as money from fund raising events.

He goes on to say that the fund raisers will be more than happy to see the money assisting Kate and Gerry and their wider family, as well as their investigators. I wonder why the McCanns wider family need assistance, from money that was raised to find Madeleine.

If you or anyone else wants to read this transcript, it is dated the 19th of February 2010. There is also a video where you can watch and listen to Clarence "spinning." In fact if you're having a bad hair day, take a look at Clarence's hair and you will see that your hair isn't as bad as you thought it was. Then again you might like Clarence's hairstyle.

I think this is the one you mean. A caution - this video should be x rated on account of Clarence's hair! Listen where he says K & G didn't start this action.................err well who did. According to him the public money was spent some time ago, and this is the "suing" money left in the fund. Where on earth did over 2 million pounds go?