Re: Madeleine McCann 10 years on: It’s incredible that Gerry and Kate are still together

by Guest 06.02.19 15:38

I would like to think that they are miserable, and dare not be out of sight or sound of each other for a nano second. Normal people would be nervous wrecks, but these are the McCanns. Their egotism cannot be dented; what they have done puts Piltdown Man, the Hitler Diaries and the Cottingley Fairies combined, in the shade.

by **PeterMac** 07.02.19 7:16

VERY strange that a trained medic who specialised in Gynae did not recognise endometriosis in herself - if we can believe that..

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Roidininki 07.02.19 10:18

PeterMac wrote:VERY strange that a trained medic who specialised in Gynae did not recognise endometriosis in herself - if we can believe that..

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Endermetriosis is not something one recognises oneself . It has to be diagnosed via investigative procedures.
She only went briefly into obstetrics and gynae anyway .

by Phoebe 07.02.19 12:04

While endometriosis is generally CONFIRMED via laparoscopy the symptoms are widely known, even to lay-women. Acute pain during menstruation, pain with bowel movements in the days leading up to menstruation and irregular or heavy bleeding are all signs which automatically prompt a suspicion of the condition. Any medic would immediately suspect a possible diagnosis of endometriosis with these symptoms. It is a cumulative condition which becomes progressively more painful and serious over the course of of the fertile years from the onset of menstruation. How Kate could have had no inkling of her condition until the age of thirty two is beyond me. Her condition was serious enough to seriously impact her fertility so she must have been symptomatic for quite some time.

by Roidininki 07.02.19 13:25

In the great scheme of things does it really matter?
She doesn’t seem to be the sharpest knife in the box in respect of a few other things like the most important one , “ never leave small children alone”

by Guest 07.02.19 14:09

Roidininki, I doubt very much that they ever left their small children alone. Especially so, having struggled to conceive . . . . but publicly admitting they left their small children alone is preferable in their minds to admitting the possibly far worse scenario.

by Roidininki 07.02.19 16:41

JimbobJones , sorry I didn't look for an icon for sarcastic

[that one doesn't immediately signify it to me] which is what I was indicating when I mentioned her admitting leaving the children alone . winkwink

by Jonal 07.02.19 20:51

Roidininki wrote:In the great scheme of things does it really matter?

If the great scheme is Madeleine’s Fund: Leaving No Stone Unturned Ltd., then yes.

by **sharonl** 07.02.19 22:41

Roidininki wrote:JimbobJones , sorry I didn't look for an icon for [that one doesn't immediately signify it to me] which is what I was indicating when I mentioned her admitting leaving the children alone .

Admitting leaving the children alone? Many of us are now leaning towards the "claiming" that the children were left alone, rather than "admitting".

If we were to believe that Madeleine was abducted from the apartment, as they have claimed, then we would also have to believe that the parents were away from the apartment at the time of the alleged abduction.

They could not really claim this abduction if they were there. Therefore, they have a choice, tell the truth or make out that they were not present at the time. Notice how they tried to minimise their alleged wrong doing by saying that it was like eating in your own garden and claiming that they checked regularly.

Besides, if Madeleine did disappear earlier in the week, no way would the group risk the safety of another child by leaving them un-attended.

by **PeterMac** 09.02.19 8:37

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Latest topics