Letter to Transworld from The Madeleine Foundation inviting the McCanns to answer 163 key questions in their forthcoming 'very truthful' book

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1458615/Psychiatrist-used-paedophile-site.html

Psychiatrist used paedophile site

By Sandra Laville 12:01AM BST 06 Apr 2004

A psychiatrist treating victims of child abuse paid for 90 hours' viewing of a paedophile website called "sweet early age", the General Medical Council was told yesterday.

The doctor, who accessed a site that showed images of naked children, was caught in a sweep by British police after the smashing of a worldwide child pornography ring based in America.

Julian Morrell, 41, was sacked as a consultant in child and adolescent psychiatry in Berkshire after his arrest last year. He did not appear before the hearing at the GMC in London yesterday saying he felt "unable" to attend after an experience that had caused the "world to crash in" on him.

Mr Morrell, a married father of two from Oxford, claimed he had accessed the site for research to help him during difficult therapy sessions with an adult victim of child abuse who had physically attacked her own daughter.

But he admitted he had taken no notes from the viewing or told any of his superiors that he was going to look at the site for research. He was arrested by Thames Valley Police, but never charged.

Mr Morrell's patients and their families were informed of the pending GMC hearing only last Friday, 15 months after his suspension. Child protection experts said yesterday they were amazed that parents were kept in the dark for so long.

Kidscape,the child welfare charity, said: "This really flies in the face of what you should do in these situations."

Mr Morrell has admitted accessing the sites in 1999, while a senior registrar at the Park Hospital for Children, Oxford, and accepts that his actions amounted to serious professional misconduct.

Ian Stern, for the GMC, said Mr Morrell was caught in Operation Ore, an investigation by British police after the discovery in America.

Philippa Stringer, chief executive of Berkshire NHS Trust, said all 176 of Mr Morrell's past and present patients had been informed of the GMC hearing. The trust had no reason to believe that he had put any child patients at risk.

The hearing continues.

http://www.exmouthpeople.co.uk/news/Paedophile-anaesthetist-learn-fate/story-6364543-detail/story.html

By Exmouth-People | Tuesday, August 10, 2010, 11:00
.
SEX offender Andrew Morris will find out is he is to be struck off the medical register for good in a hearing before the General Medical Council.

The former anaesthetist, 48, was caught in 2002 as part of a police crackdown on internet child porn.

Close to 180 photos of young girls were found at his Exmouth home and he was later sacked from the Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital.

Morris has been unable to find work since March 2003 despite working with a medical mentor, the GMC heard yesterday.

His case is now back before his governing body who will have to decide whether to continue restricting his licence or to strike him off the medical register.

But the doctor has not turned up to his central London hearing to explain himself and has provided no evidence of any effort to find work.

Richard Tyson for the GMC said: “Dr Morris has not attended so he can be asked about things so you can assess matters as far as his insight.

“I certainly have not been presented with any testimonials.

“We would submit that there is not proper evidence that he has in fact reconsidered his career or in fact done anything at all since the last hearing.”

Morris was arrested after he had accessed websites containing child porn.

It was also discovered that he kept photos of naked girls on a computer disk.

In March 2003, Morris pleaded guilty to inciting distribution of child pornography by paying for images from Landslide Productions.

He also confessed to eight sample charges of possessing indecent images of children.

He was ordered to undergo a three-year community rehabilitation order and sign the Sex Offenders Register for five years.

In December 2003, Morris was suspended for eight months by the GMC.

In September 2004, his case was reviewed and conditions were imposed on his licence to allow him to return to work.

But he was banned from having any contact with patients and was ordered to complete his sex offenders’ rehabilitation programme.

Morris returned in front of a panel again in February 2008 to ease the restrictions on his licence to require him to work under supervision.

“He was seeking to return to anaesthetics but his previous hospital did not feel able to support an attachment there,” said Mr Tyson.

“He was also looking at alternative careers.

“It does not appear that he is very much further advanced in that field now.

“He indicates that he is now building an alternative career in medical writing and journalism, but we know nothing more about that.”

Conditions on his licence in February 2008 required Morris to provide a personal development plan with details of training and learning.

He was also to provide experience of clinical placements. But he has not done so, the GMC was told.

Morris, a married father-of-one, now living in Edinburgh, has also been referred to the Independent Safeguarding Authority, ISA, which could ban him from working with children or vulnerable adults.

The GMC will now decide whether the doctor’s fitness to practise is still impaired and what sanction, if any, to impose.

The hearing continues

Mr Morrell, a married father of two from Oxford, claimed he had accessed the site for research to help him during difficult therapy sessions with an adult victim of child abuse who had physically attacked her own daughter.


Now where have we heard that before, claiming to be on paedophile sites for research purposes! This guy should have been banged up and they should have thrown away the key imo

http://www.bmj.com/content/328/7446/973.1.extract

BMJ 2004; 328 : 973 doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7446.973 (Published 22 April 2004)
News
GMC sees rise in doctors charged with accessing child pornography websites
Caroline White
+ Author Affiliations

London
The UK doctors' regulatory body, the General Medical Council, has been forced to amend its sanctions guidance, in the light of the rapid rise in referrals of doctors who have been charged with accessing child pornography.
Between 1980 and 2002, just one case involving child pornography was referred to the GMC. But in 2003, the council's Professional Conduct Committee heard eight cases, resulting in six suspensions and two doctors being struck off the register.
So far this year, two doctors have been struck off and two suspended.

One has only removed the name from this extract to avoid distracting readers from the content, which is more or less showing how paedophile doctors are treated with ''tweezers''. (To quote a word used by Amaral)

Dr X satisfied the Panel that he has a sophisticated insight into what brought about his criminal behaviour, its seriousness, its ramifications for child victims and the damage that he has done to the standing of his profession by his conduct. The view of the experts who appeared to assist the Panel is that by the measures which he has set in place under professional guidance, he has made substantial progress in his self-initiated rehabilitation. They have asserted without reservation that there is adequate protection for the public against Dr X relapsing and re-offending. Thus far the measures put in place have been successful and Dr X has been responsive to all recommendations made to him by mental health professionals. He understands that any further inappropriate behaviour on his part would be overwhelmingly likely to lead to his medical registration being cancelled.

Even this man's wife wished for him to be struck off.

http://www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk/news.php?start=3220&end=3240&view=yes&id=4279#newspost

General Medical Council Urges 'Abhorrent Sexual Deviant' Doctor To Carry On Working Share |

04th February 2010
'Abhorrent sexual deviant' GP allowed to work on after downloading child-sex stories
By Daily Mail Reporter

A family doctor described as a 'deviant' for downloading child-sex stories has escaped being struck off.

Dr Nicholas Spicer, 55, read the paedophile fantasies on his home computer between 2003 and 2007 while working with children as a GP.

He was hauled before a General Medical Council disciplinary hearing, where he was described as 'a sexual deviant with an interest in children'.


Dr Nicholas Spicer was cleared by a General Medical Council
disciplinary hearing after downloading child-sex stories

But he was cleared of misconduct and banned from practising for just six months 'on grounds of health'.

He was removed from NHS Herefordshire's list of GPs but is free to return to work in another area of the country from as early as July.

Spicer, who worked at the Nunwell surgery in Bromyard, Herefordshire, has also evaded criminal charges because the stories are legally available on the internet.

Child safety groups and even Spicer's wife yesterday condemned the GMC's decision not to strike him off the medical register.

Spicer's disgusted wife Patricia has started divorce proceedings.

She said: 'People and professionals that I have spoken to are mystified about the decision.

'The GMC's mission statement is "protecting doctors, protecting people", but they are not living up to it.'

Spicer is unrepentant and claims his behaviour was down to a medical condition.

He said: 'I have never been accused of being a paedophile, but it is obvious that people might wonder.

'I was examined by seven experts in the field of child-sex offences and six out of seven concluded that I'm not a paedophile.

'They concluded that I was suffering from a mild, well-capsulated medical condition, exacerbated by domestic problems.'

Michael May, spokesman for sexual abuse charity Survivors UK, said: 'I'm appalled by the actions of the GP and the response of the GMC.

'I find it extremely concerning that an educated professional, with intimate access to the most vulnerable members of our community, has been able to exploit a shameful loophole in the law.'

At the hearing, Jason Macadam, solicitor for the GMC, branded Spicer 'a sexual deviant' and said the material was 'abhorrent and repugnant'.

Judge Mental

Thank you for posting all these cases - I fear it is a very small "tip of the iceberg" though.

I would like to thank Tony Bennett for his commitment to exposing the inadequate response of our Government and Child Welfare Organisations to the Madeleine McCann case by writing his letter to Transworld and The Sun. It may well not have the effect we wish on the media - but every attempt is a step nearer to bringing justice for Madeleine.

''Julian Morrell, 41, was sacked as a consultant in child and adolescent psychiatry in Berkshire after his arrest last year. He did not appear before the hearing at the GMC in London yesterday saying he felt "unable" to attend after an experience that had caused the "world to crash in" on him.''

Bless.

'''I was examined by seven experts in the field of child-sex offences and six out of seven concluded that I'm not a paedophile. They concluded that I was suffering from a mild, well-capsulated medical condition, exacerbated by domestic problems.'

A mild well-capsulated medical condition? This sounds like a rather intriguing condition. Ah well, that's alright then! Nothing quite like being judged by one's peers is there?



''Michael May, spokesman for sexual abuse charity Survivors UK, said: 'I'm appalled by the actions of the GP and the response of the GMC.''

Somebody such as Michael May should come along and tell us how he feels concerning McCann saying that he was acting well within the bounds of good parenting, after having trotted off out for the evening with his wife and their friends. (Albeit, the door was left open in case of a fire, it is most unreasonable to leave a three years old child to look after two much younger siblings.)

One is terribly concerned that we have still to find out who told McCann this. One would certainly hope they have been sacked from whichever post they held, or were more likely leaning on. Surely somebody would have had to be very drunk or coerced into agreeing that leaving these children all alone was reasonable? One of the Tapas' children was only a matter of months old and allegedly terribly ill and regularly leaving its nappy in a rather terrible state.

How old was her babysitter? Not very much older than Madeleine. How would such a tiny child cope with a very sick baby?

and a typical selfish comment for this kind of person to make imo, what about the world crashing in on the kids who are being abused. He thinks just of himself, which is typical of paedophiles imo

Cherry wrote:and a typical selfish comment for this kind of person to make imo, what about the world crashing in on the kids who are being abused. He thinks just of himself, which is typical of paedophiles imo

Any paedophile will tell you, that it is the child who causes the situation that they find theirself in. Nothing to do with the paedophile. It is the child's fault and the child's responsibility. Should any paedophiles be found expressing remorse and regret at their heinous and fiendish behaviour, we can rest assured that it is only a veiled plea for mercy from the police and the courts.

I know of a case of a paedophile who abused a 4 year old child and said.......

but the child led me into the bedroom!!!

that says it all!

Utterly shocking, but true. I have a friend who works in a secure unit for mental health patients which has some peadophiles. He says no matter what the treatment, it can never work as they never, ever take responsibility for their actions and do not recognise that they have a problem.

Very few of the staff ever want to work with them, mainly for this reason, other than the obvious one of disgust at the crime. And yet, there are constant new programmes implemented to 'cure' them, futile.

Since the Mccanns had been asking (and still asking) people TO GIVE and TO LOOK, it is
only fair that they GIVE people answers to plenty unanswered questions,
but they are not going to do that - not in a million years. If they
hadnt given the LAW ENFORCERS those answers the last thing they will do
is to give people answers in their book.

They had made it SO CLEAR their book will ONLY ' an account of the
truth' and not the total truth. You can bet your bottom dollar their
'an account' will not include GM's account of '

"I know more than you do. I know what I saw" ..........Kate Mccann

"Not as bad as the night we found her....." Gerry Mccann

"Kate and Gerry knew Madeleine didnt wander out of the apartment" Clarence Mitchell

Well, well ,well, at least those three people know for sure what happened to Madeleine.


KM even admitted in that statement 'she knew because she saw.....' If it was an abduction how could she possibly know more
than anyone (the public and police for instance) because an abduction which happened in her absence could only mean she would be as much in the
dark as anyone else. To quantify that she know more because she saw can only mean she knew because saw Maddie died in her presence.
In other words Kate's subconscious is telling us she was at
the scene when Maddie met her fate -- whether the accident was caused
by KM or not is a $64M question.

If people were to deduce logically, people will find that even GM's
subconscious manifested THAT he too was present when Maddie had her accident and met her fate
by his statement of "not as bad as the night we found her".
How can
the experience and trauma of an allegedly abducted missing child not be as bad as something else. What could be WORST? The pertinent question is- why did he make a comparison - a comparison with what exactly? to quantify that it was 'badder' (so to speak)? means he was comparing. By that statement he admitted something WORST had already happened.
And the hidden meaning in his statement bears both the mccanns sublime message ie subconscious admission: they knew it was bad because they found her...in that state - a Worst
(a badder) state. What can be worst than abduction? The answer is
obvious: they knew because they were with Maddie - either they found her after she met her self caused accident or they were the indirect or direct cause - in any case they saw DEFINITELY - they knew she
is died. Sure, nothing can be as bad as that ie a death and hence KM's statement
she knows more than us because she saw. errmmm very interesting.

It's a shame the case didnt go to trial or experts in diciphering (sp) hidden messages in mccanns language would be able to reach the mccanns' hidden psychic - would be able to decode their hidden meanings or trip or catch them out during the trial.

Let's face it their above statements (including that of CM) cant
possibly mean anything else.
How can KM "know more than you" (her own words) that Maddie was taken just by
looking at Maddie's 'unslept bed'...that she didnt wander off. And what
did GM find that was SO BAD? an empty bed too? and that was not as
BAD? as what?

Their statements say it all - they knew she is died.

Will peopole learn anything in their book about the absolute truth? I think NOT.
The book is about lining their pockets - it will be their one account of the truth.
At most it will contain details of the circumstances after the FACT and nothing else. People already know the 'after the fact' circumstances are but mccanns and friends manufactured crime scene and charade, and nothing about the 'Truth about Madeleine'.

I just wonder how long they are going to get keep it up and get away with it - this lining their pockets with blood money!