They must be 'fuming' right?

by jeanmonroe 19.09.13 12:32

That is the main stream red top MADIA in the UK.
Not being allowed, imo, to report on the case of the Century and the libel trial connected to it!
What will really make them fume is that all the 'internet nutters' are getting it almost instantly!
Imo, there are super journos sitting in UK offices READING ours and other forums to just keep abreast of what is actually happening.
Oh the irony.
Rreporting on news given first to internet nutters
So no chance for the MADIA to say 'they didn't say that'
I can visualise it now.
BANG ( journo head hitting desk) 'did that expert really just say that'?
BANG (ditto) ' you gotta be kidding me they told us all along they never did that'
Bang (ditto) 'OMG just said something we have been barred from saying'
Bang 'anyone got any sedatives?'

by ultimaThule 19.09.13 14:32

jeanmonroe wrote:That is the main stream red top MADIA in the UK.
Not being allowed, imo, to report on the case of the Century and the libel trial connected to it!
What will really make them fume is that all the 'internet nutters' are getting it almost instantly!
Imo, there are super journos sitting in UK offices READING ours and other forums to just keep abreast of what is actually happening.
Oh the irony.
Rreporting on news given first to internet nutters
I can visualise it now.
BANG ( journo head hitting desk) 'did that expert really just say that'?
BANG (ditto) ' you gotta be kidding me they told us all along they never did that'
Bang (ditto) 'OMG just said something we have been barred from saying'
Bang 'anyone got any sedatives?'

As I see it, the fate of the McCanns is hanging by a thread.

By and large the wordsmiths of Fleet Street/Docklands/Kensington are a ~~cynical~~ pragmatic bunch; in common with the police officers they frequently fraternise with, they have seen and heard it all before but, regardless of their personal opinons, they are constrained to ~~write fiction~~ produce articles which are in accordance with the dictat of whatever press baron they are ~~enslaved to~~ employed by.

Hitherto the McCanns have been ~~cossetted~~ championed by certain publications whose hacks ~~and their paymasters~~ are ~~hacked off~~ a tad disgruntled that this pair, whose mobile phones/records have not, as far as can be ascertained, been accessed by any individual/organisation outside of the PJ/British police, sought to further ~~big themselves up~~ demonstrate the unassailability of their unsullied (by the Brtish press) reputation by joining a certain elite group ~~of millionaires~~ who are campaigning for restrictions on the type of ~~salacious~~ reporting that boosts sales and circulation.

In effect, the McCanns have bitten the hands that feed them and they are destined to become yet another statistic of the biter bit adage.

Precisely when the McCanns' hubris will lead to their inevitable nemesis remains to be seen, but I suspect headlines ~~and profuse explanations of how they did it~~ such as 'They Made Fools Of Unsuspecting PJ/SY/Generous British Public', 'They Made Fools Of Blair/Brown/Cameron/May', ''Got Ya Bang to Rights', and others of the type that no doubt haunt Gerry's dreams and cause him to wake up sweating with the clammy feeling of a hand on his shoulder, are ready to roll at the click of a mouse.

It's just a matter of time... and timing.

They must be 'fuming' right?

They must be 'fuming' right?

Re: They must be 'fuming' right?

Log in for more topics