KM said she knows what happened

by maebee 27.02.13 0:46

Dr Kate McCann, in 2007, said: “I know that what happened is not due to the fact of us leaving the children asleep. I know it happened under other circumstances”.

Why has NOBODY asked her what these circumstances are? Not one single journo folllowed up on this after she was relieved of her arguido status. Surely this statement from KM speaks volumes. She said she knows it happened under certain circumstances. How does she know this? Why does she know something and not tell it to the police who are looking for her daughter?

by Inspectorfrost 27.02.13 0:54

Because there must be a secret injunction or something similar, something that prevents the press and the media do anything than fawn, it will be demolished I believe, if the Catholic Church Or Banks or Parliament or huge food giants or the BBc or police, or newspapers etc cant escape scrutiny and exposure, these two have no chance, just a matter of time IMO

Wherever there is corruption it is being exposed in the climate of the last few and coming years IMO

by maebee 27.02.13 1:13

Inspectorfrost wrote:Because there must be a secret injunction or something similar, something that prevents the press and the media do anything than fawn, it will be demolished I believe, if the Catholic Church Or Banks or Parliament or huge food giants or the BBc or police, or newspapers etc cant escape scrutiny and exposure, these two have no chance, just a matter of time IMO

Wherever there is corruption it is being exposed in the climate of the last few and coming years IMO

I see what you're saying Inspector but I just don't understand how not one single journalist in the UK has asked this one question to KM. How can every single journo in the UK be under some secret injunction? All of us here who are interested in the case and have no journalistic backround, understand the need for this question to be answered. It's a simple quesion "Kate, what do you mean by you KNOW it happened by
other circumstances?

by Inspectorfrost 27.02.13 1:23

I dunno Maebee

Perhaps that particular journalist didnt for x y z reasons, there HAVE been instances of journos putting them on the spot though, end of the day only a court can drag the truth out, its over to Portugal in conjunction with SY
pray2

They could make a new james bond film out of it, the world has had enough
liar

eta google mmcanns bbc breakfast sian wiliams 2008 and sky dermot murnahan sky mccanns may 2008, they didnt exactly get an easy ride

by lufc50337 27.02.13 9:52

Couldn't she not say because of judicial secrecy if I remember rightly

There's nothing to stop her now but not forthcoming

They say what gets them out of the s**t at the time forgetting it might come back round later, that's the problem with lying and twisting the truth

Typical narcissistic statement

by russiandoll 27.02.13 9:57

They could make a new james bond film out of it, the world has had enough
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

That has made me laugh.

Seriously, I think that when Kate started speaking she meant to launch into the usual mantra of "it was not our fault, yes we left her but the abductor is the criminal..." , "what happened did not happen because we left them asleep.........it happened because someone watching us knew our routine and planned to snatch Madeleine "

but then the truth was blurted out, she could not follow the script.......and it is that word KNEW that does it. Unequivocal. Simply answered. She knows for sure where Madeleine was at a particular time and what happened to her.

I wish she had said that to Paxman. He would have asked her.