What have we not been allowed to see
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Latest News and Debate :: Debate Section - for purporting theories
Page 1 of 1 • Share
What have we not been allowed to see
Missing on the 29th April
Tennis list
Tapas list
Jellyfish crèche list for the morning session
OC daily run report
Missing on the 30th April
Tennis list
Tapas list
OC daily run report
Missing on the 2nd May
OC daily run report
Missing on the 3rd May
Jellyfish crèche list for the morning session
Tennis list
Tapas list
Jellyfish crèche list for the morning session
OC daily run report
Missing on the 30th April
Tennis list
Tapas list
OC daily run report
Missing on the 2nd May
OC daily run report
Missing on the 3rd May
Jellyfish crèche list for the morning session
Guest- Guest
Re: What have we not been allowed to see
I think that all the missing pieces of information from the 29th and the 30th, at the very least means something very significant happend very early on in that holiday.
Remember Kiko's theory of death on the 28th/29th. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Remember Kiko's theory of death on the 28th/29th. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Guest- Guest
Re: What have we not been allowed to see
I don't think that the records were ever taken for Tennis for the other days. They are not on the missing records section. The pages go from 656 to 658 and 655 & 659 relate to other OC documents. There is a conflict between Katie's book & Dan's statement for Thursday.
Guest- Guest
Re: What have we not been allowed to see
The missing list as seen on PJfiles, is a compilation of what various people have noticed missing. It is not a factual account of what is really missing, as only the PJ will know this.
Guest- Guest
Re: What have we not been allowed to see
Isn't the list of guests at the resort from May 2nd also missing?
This is the one which I'd like most to see as it could be very revealing with who I think is booked in on this date
This is the one which I'd like most to see as it could be very revealing with who I think is booked in on this date
____________________
Who pulled the strings?...THE SYMINGTONS..And the Scottish connections...Look no further if you dare
jd- Posts : 4151
Activity : 4400
Likes received : 45
Join date : 2011-07-22
Re: What have we not been allowed to see
jd wrote:Isn't the list of guests at the resort from May 2nd also missing?
This is the one which I'd like most to see as it could be very revealing with who I think is booked in on this date
Yes jd, the report that should have been 'printed' on the 2nd is missing. But if someone checked in on that date and stayed, it would show up on the 3rd.
What we cannot tell at the moment, is who was already booked in when they arrived on the 28th and checked out before the 1st, which could be interesting.
Guest- Guest
Re: What have we not been allowed to see
From the lists I have seen, it looks as though there are only part of all guests at the resort. mainly because they are just one page and my understanding is that OC is quite a big resort
I think I will study them again!
I think I will study them again!
____________________
Who pulled the strings?...THE SYMINGTONS..And the Scottish connections...Look no further if you dare
jd- Posts : 4151
Activity : 4400
Likes received : 45
Join date : 2011-07-22
Re: What have we not been allowed to see
jd wrote:From the lists I have seen, it looks as though there are only part of all guests at the resort. mainly because they are just one page and my understanding is that OC is quite a big resort
I think I will study them again!
Hey jd, I found this blog useful in filling in some of the pieces about the OC/Mark Warner set-up.
So who REALLY owns the Ocean Club? A Complex Question Revisited.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Daisy- Posts : 1245
Activity : 1312
Likes received : 11
Join date : 2011-06-15
Location : Yorkshire, England
Re: What have we not been allowed to see
Thanks Daisy. I will read it through with great interest. Maybe it find a few more pieces of the jigsaw
____________________
Who pulled the strings?...THE SYMINGTONS..And the Scottish connections...Look no further if you dare
jd- Posts : 4151
Activity : 4400
Likes received : 45
Join date : 2011-07-22
Re: What have we not been allowed to see
jd wrote:From the lists I have seen, it looks as though there are only part of all guests at the resort. mainly because they are just one page and my understanding is that OC is quite a big resort
I think I will study them again!
This is a link to all the lists available in our Research & Analysis Library on page 1. Each day consists of 4 pages.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Guest- Guest
Re: What have we not been allowed to see
Having both of these reports missing from the files, it is impossible to determine who might have been staying out there and checked out of the resort, by the end of the day on the 30th.Stella wrote:Missing on the 29th April
Tennis list
Tapas list
Jellyfish crèche list for the morning session
OC daily run report
Missing on the 30th April
Tennis list
Tapas list
OC daily run report
This is crucial information, if Madeleine died on the night of the 28th, or in the early hours of the 29th.
Possible suspects and accomplices will have gone under the radar...
Guest- Guest
Portugese PM on reasons for archiving:
"The other element that led the McCanns to being made arguidos, an email that was considered as compromising, would also end up being discarded as an element of evidence.
According to the document, even if the couple was responsible for their daughter's death, it would have to be explained under which circumstances that happened, namely, how, when, what for and with what help."
Also interestingly:
"Among the motives to consider that the couple had no responsibilities in their daughter's disappearance, the PM points out, in the archiving dispatch, that none of them was in the apartment when the child disappeared."
"The other element that led the McCanns to being made arguidos, an email that was considered as compromising, would also end up being discarded as an element of evidence.
According to the document, even if the couple was responsible for their daughter's death, it would have to be explained under which circumstances that happened, namely, how, when, what for and with what help."
Also interestingly:
"Among the motives to consider that the couple had no responsibilities in their daughter's disappearance, the PM points out, in the archiving dispatch, that none of them was in the apartment when the child disappeared."
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» We are still allowed to laugh, aren't we?
» Liz Jones, not allowed to name her 'troll'
» In the press but no comments allowed
» FACE OF MADDIE SUSPECT- MIRROR 4/11/13
» Does anyone know if the PJ allowed requests for info via Madeleines website?
» Liz Jones, not allowed to name her 'troll'
» In the press but no comments allowed
» FACE OF MADDIE SUSPECT- MIRROR 4/11/13
» Does anyone know if the PJ allowed requests for info via Madeleines website?
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Latest News and Debate :: Debate Section - for purporting theories
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum