FAKE NEWS! Can You Believe It?

by sallypelt 10.04.17 14:05

What follows is shocking evidence that crisis actors, green screens, CGI, and paid propagandists are being used to fake worldwide events in order to scare people nto giving up liberties and sending us into war.

To say this was shocking would be to put it lightly.
From video proof showing “dead soldiers” killed by “chemical weapons” walking around after they thought the videos stopped recording, to digitally altering sounds to add in “explosions” that never happened, this segment demonstrates some of the most damming evidence against the media ever shown on television.
In this brave segment, it’s shown that CNN, MSNBC, BBC are all guilty and need to be exposed and punished.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Roxyroo 10.04.17 14:21

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Dunno whether this been posted before, remove if need be. Think it was the Daily Mail used it here

by Samcaddick 10.04.17 16:12

Looks like an insurance scam to me. Lol.

by ChippyM 10.04.17 18:52

I hate this term 'fake news', propaganda has been going on forever. If you watch the footage that these people claim has been 'digitally altered' to change a word from napalm to chemical weapons you'll actually see it's not the exact same footage as the men in the background are in different places, So it's a different take and the doctor has probably just substituted one word for another. I wouldn't say that's uncommon in TV.

I don't have any problem believing the media is used by governments to indoctrinate and sway public feeling but these claims of 'proof' that footage has been altered etc. when it hasn't necessarily are going too far the other way, showing a bias in favour of disbelieving everything.

by MRNOODLES 11.04.17 19:25

Roxyroo wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Dunno whether this been posted before, remove if need be. Think it was the Daily Mail used it here

Richard D Hall showed this at his lecture. First time I'd seen it.

by Samcaddick 11.04.17 19:30

Richard d hall thinks anti gravity weapons brought down the twin towers!!!!!!!

by Roxyroo 11.04.17 19:46

Samcaddick wrote:Richard d hall thinks anti gravity weapons brought down the twin towers!!!!!!!

Actually he thinks it was directed energy that brought them down and i tend to agree with him after watching the evidence presented by Doc Judy Wood. And some explosions were added in. Take a look at the concrete dissolving in mid air. Also take a look at John Lear of LearJet fames vids about 9/11. He shows military tech, thats been around since the forties, that uses holograms for the purpose, of among other things, psycological ops

by Phoebe 11.04.17 19:47

ChippyM wrote:I hate this term 'fake news', propaganda has been going on forever. If you watch the footage that these people claim has been 'digitally altered' to change a word from napalm to chemical weapons you'll actually see it's not the exact same footage as the men in the background are in different places, So it's a different take and the doctor has probably just substituted one word for another. I wouldn't say that's uncommon in TV.

I don't have any problem believing the media is used by governments to indoctrinate and sway public feeling but these claims of 'proof' that footage has been altered etc. when it hasn't necessarily are going too far the other way, showing a bias in favour of disbelieving everything.

Absolutely! I see one of these exposes (sorry no accent mark) comes from R.T, or Russia Today which itself is quite capable of manipulation of news and propaganda. What's to say they didn't set up this fake report, of a fake report, themselves for their own agenda? I trust none of them.

by polyenne 11.04.17 19:48

I subscribe to the theory that it was definitely a false flag event by the US government (or rather those that run it).
Have you read Dr Judy Woods book ? Interesting theory.

by petunia 11.04.17 21:45

If the news channels or the MSM report It as fake news you can bet your bottom Dollar It's got some truth to It.

by MRNOODLES 11.04.17 22:56

petunia wrote:If the news channels or the MSM report It as fake news you can bet your bottom Dollar It's got some truth to It.

Like the McCanns. What they as fact, think the opposite.

by Guest 12.04.17 10:19

Pat Buchanan calls fake news.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Are we certain Assad personally ordered a gas attack on civilians?
For it makes no sense. Why would Assad, who is winning the war and had been told America was no longer demanding his removal, order a nerve gas attack on children, certain to ignite America’s rage, for no military gain?
Like the gas attack in 2013, this has the marks of a false flag operation to stampede America into Syria’s civil war.

I totally agree with him.
They faked it in 2013 and they faked it in 2017.
How many times are the American people going to get sold the Brooklyn Bridge?

Patrick Joseph "Pat" Buchanan (/bjuːˈkænᵻn/; born November 2, 1938) is an American paleoconservative^[1] political commentator, author, syndicated columnist, politician and broadcaster. Buchanan was a senior advisor to U.S. Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan, and was an original host on CNN's Crossfire. He sought the Republican presidential nomination in 1992 and 1996. He ran on the Reform Party ticket in the 2000 presidential election.

by MRNOODLES 13.04.17 20:24

Did anybody catch this doing the rounds on twitter

From Jan 2013 but was deleted, but good old wayback machine grabbed it.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by polyenne 13.04.17 20:44

it as, IMO, the Powers that control the US Government are capable of murdering over 5000 in their own back yard on 9/11 then they're quite capable of other atrocities thousands of miles away.
The great unread can't quite grasp that it can possibly be true but when they gave birth to "al Queda" and the "War on Terror", they (and other countries) need regular false flag events to keep it current and keep "us" under control and "safe" from those goddam terrorists.
Take everything you're fed with a handful of salt.........

by mootle 16.04.17 9:15

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Five minutes on Google proved this to be utter ****, well before I saw it had been picked up by Snopes

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by lj 16.04.17 16:26

Don't put your faith in snopes. They have been caught several times faking their story.

by **Hobs** 17.04.17 8:28

It is a fake story and has been around for a while.

The British media being lazy were searching the internet for news and came across this.

The original story comes from a non existent newspaper website Mississippi Herald.

The Mississippi Herald website was only registered in November, and contains no reporter bylines, physical address or contact details beyond an online form.

All this does is point out how gullible and lazy the media is and the piss poor journalism used.
The mail is currently on a spot the hidden object spree whilst ignoring spelling.

by Amy Dean 17.04.17 10:20

I personally haven't found the Snopes site to be unreliable. I think that it's great for weeding out all the nonsense stories and urban myths that get passed off elsewhere as factual.

by **Tony Bennett** 17.04.17 11:10

Amy Dean wrote:I personally haven't found the Snopes site to be unreliable. I think that it's great for weeding out all the nonsense stories and urban myths that get passed off elsewhere as factual.

Agreed that it has 'successfully weeded out many nonsense stories', BUT...

It has a strong left-liberal-Marxist bias. And that's a fact:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Guest 17.04.17 14:37

Snopes is a gatekeeper.

Enough truth to maintain a veneer of credibility but dodgy when it really matters.

by **Jill Havern** 08.05.17 11:02

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Facebook publishes fake news ads in UK papers - BBC News
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Adverts contain a list of ten things to look out for when deciding whether a story is genuine.

Facebook's ten steps for spotting fake news

Be sceptical of headlines . They often bear little relationship to the content
Look closely at the URL [web address]
Investigate the source . If it is from Mitchell or Kandohla it is FAKE
Watch for unusual formatting
Consider the photos . If they bear a false date - they are FAKE
Check the date If it is wrong - it is FAKE
Check the evidence . If there is no evidence, or there is evidence of something else - it is FAKE
Look at other reports . For example Police files, and independent sources
Is the story a joke? Not this one
Some stories are intentionally false [satirical] . This is not satire. This is conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice.

by sallypelt 13.09.17 0:15

by Liz Eagles 13.09.17 13:46

The extraordinary branding of the BBC as 'Aunty' says quite a lot (understatement there) of how easy it is to manipulate the masses into thinking that some sort of public financed - enforced public finance - speaks the truth and speaks the truth.

Alan Yentob, he of the Kids Company/Batmanghelidjh scandal holds a position so powerful that he continues to make programmes for the BBC and indulges his passion for the arts. Nothing much has been heard about an inquiry into Kids Company. Why? because Aunty is a safe old bird akin to Mrs Doubtfire and the BBC is a government mouthpiece.

The BBC's agenda is a government agenda. What's the alternative though? Is it good to have a Murdoch empire? There's no difference.

by sar 13.09.17 17:03

...yeah so much for criminal charges, someone being nicked for fraud!! eff it, Let's make a musical out of it and further line our pockets!!!!

by **sharonl** 13.09.17 19:40

Email received from 38 Degrees today

Dear Sharon,

Rupert Murdoch will be fuming today. The government just announced a full-blown investigation into his media empire. [1] The dirt it digs up will make it even more difficult for the government to approve his Sky takeover deal.

38 Degrees-ers like you helped make this happen. Hundreds of thousands of us signed petitions, sent letters to the government, and chipped in to fund investigations and reports into the Murdoch empire. Politicians repeatedly mentioned 38 Degrees by name as they discussed the Sky takeover in parliament. [2]

Murdoch's been trying to spread his fake news, bias and hate-filled stories across the UK for years. This is his second attempt at seizing control at Sky. [3] We're fighting him every step of the way, but right now he's plotting his next steps. Murdoch will be back with his army of lobbyists and lawyers in a last-ditch effort to skew the investigation.

The next few months will be a final test for whether the Sky takeover goes ahead. So Sharon, can you chip in today to a fighting fund so we can beat whatever Murdoch throws at us next? Murdoch's got big pockets. But there are thousands of us. If each of us chip in a few pounds, we'll have enough to take on whatever he's got planned next.

Democracy only works if voters get the facts. But Murdoch's media empire is notorious for spreading misinformation, sowing divisions and creating a distorted picture of reality. [4] His Sky takeover would spell disaster for British democracy.

38 Degrees members - like you and me - know this. That's why we've opposed his deal from the very beginning. When he first tried to take over Sky in 2011, it was public outrage about the phone-hacking scandal that stopped his deal in its tracks. 38 Degrees members were at the forefront of that battle. [5]

Together, we're proving in our millions that we're more than a match for Murdoch. Now it's time for us to gear up for the final stage. Will you chip in now so we can stop the Sky takeover for good? It's probably the last thing Rupert Murdoch would like you to do today.

Thanks for being involved,

Maggie, Megan, David, Trish and the 38 Degrees team