The 48 Questions

by HelenMeg 05.03.15 11:56

I was just looking through the 48 questions that Kate refused to answer. The following questions, in particular, are so damning that it is absurd that they still walk uncharged...

43.   In the case files you were SHOWN CANINE forensic testing films, where you can see them marking due to detection of the scent of human corpse and blood traces, also human, and only human, as well as all the comments of the technician in charge of them.
After watching and after the marking of the scent of corpse in your bedroom beside the wardrobe and behind the sofa, pushed up against the sofa wall, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
44.   When the sniffer dog also marked human blood behind the sofa, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
45. When the sniffer dog marked the scent of corpse coming from the vehicle you hired a month after the disappearance, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
46. When human blood was marked in the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
47.   When confronted with the results of Maddie’s DNA, whose analysis was carried out in a British laboratory, collected from behind the sofa and the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
48.   Did you have any responsibility or intervention in your daughter’s disappearance?

by Bayonne 28.02.17 20:09

I've been searching and can't find the information that I'm looking for so I'm putting my question here. Please move it to the appropriate thread or point me in the right direction please Admin.
Kate McCann was asked and refused to answer:
"Is it true that in England you even considered handing over Madeleine's custody to a relative?"
What information were the PJ given to ask this and by whom? Which relative were they referring to? Or was it a stab in the dark?

by Philip Anders 01.03.17 14:42

Bayonne wrote:I've been searching and can't find the information that I'm looking for so I'm putting my question here. Please move it to the appropriate thread or point me in the right direction please Admin.
Kate McCann was asked and refused to answer:
"Is it true that in England you even considered handing over Madeleine's custody to a relative?"
What information were the PJ given to ask this and by whom? Which relative were they referring to? Or was it a stab in the dark?

The exact wording is as shown below.

41. Is it true that in England you considered the possibility of handing over Madeleine’s guardianship to a relative?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by jeanmonroe 01.03.17 15:07

Q49: "Are you aware that the fact of your not answering the questions put to you jeopardise the investigation that was aimed at finding out what happened to your daughter?"

KM answered: "Yes, if the investigation thinks that."

Q50: "Do you have anything to add?"

KM said: "No."
-----------------------------------------------

If I've asked it once, I've asked it a thousand times!

WHAT MOTHER, ANYWHERE IN THE 'WORLD', WOULD, CONSCIOUSLY, SEEK TO 'JEOPARDISE' A POLICE INVESTIGATION, INTO HER 'MISSING' DAUGHTER?

NO 'mother', or 'relative', associated with 'Missing People' charity, i'll wager!

by Bayonne 01.03.17 16:06

Philip Anders wrote:
Bayonne wrote:I've been searching and can't find the information that I'm looking for so I'm putting my question here. Please move it to the appropriate thread or point me in the right direction please Admin.
Kate McCann was asked and refused to answer:
"Is it true that in England you even considered handing over Madeleine's custody to a relative?"
What information were the PJ given to ask this and by whom? Which relative were they referring to? Or was it a stab in the dark?
The exact wording is as shown below.

41. Is it true that in England you considered the possibility of handing over Madeleine’s guardianship to a relative?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Any ideas as to why they asked this question and who the relative is?