Interesting [NO, NOT interesting and thread locked]

by Mandy40 14.07.15 14:48

I have followed this case from day 1 and wait every day for some break through.
I love the work on this forum and update myself every day.

I came across something earlier so I looked into it ,I'm not sure it means anything but hey we can always try .

The numbers above are from what a poster had posted a few months ago on another blog. She gave a very vivid dream of the night something happened and said that maddie gave her these numbers in this exact format .
I put this in google maps and it comes up with this

The AAPT is the professional body for anatomical pathology technologists employed in hospital and public mortuaries
They also help with life after death

by worriedmum 14.07.15 15:08

Sorry, what numbers?

by Mandy40 14.07.15 15:10

12-67=63

by Guest 14.07.15 15:24

This is the Debate Section, for purporting theories.

What theory are you purporting?

by Mandy40 14.07.15 15:35

I did not put this in the debate section ..... The moderators obviously have !

Joined this forum in the early days then left as people got to big for it . See nothing has changed .

Look into it yourself .

by The Rooster 14.07.15 16:12

Give the new girl a break, why the need for what is easily read as a hostile remark on your part. What good does it do one another and the forum as a whole. I've noticed you are often quick to step up and are pass-remarkable Lady in Red. Cool it...

by Liz Eagles 14.07.15 16:18

Well come on Rooster, give your thoughts and meaningful discussion on 12-67=63 that has or hasn't been put forward before.

You know it doesn't make sense.

by Mandy40 14.07.15 16:23

Thanks rooster ... I'm just here for justice for madeline as we all are and need and end

by Liz Eagles 14.07.15 16:27

Mandy40 wrote:Thanks rooster ... I'm just here for justice for madeline as we all are and need and end

You could begin by spelling Madeleine's name correctly, however I suspect you are not a very genuine poster.

Don't expect a reply from me. I'm out of this thread.

by The Rooster 14.07.15 16:32

I'm afraid I'm none the wiser regarding the numbers. Mandy 40 what is Aappt (if I recall from your post), thank you.

by Guest 14.07.15 16:35

The Rooster wrote:Give the new girl a break, why the need for what is easily read as a hostile remark on your part. What good does it do one another and the forum as a whole. I've noticed you are often quick to step up and are pass-remarkable Lady in Red. Cool it...

No, Rooster, I won't " cool it", who do you think you are?

Don't bother responding as I'm not interested.

I'm entitled to express an opinion. What is Mandy40's opening post meaning, is what I'm getting at. Oh yes, she wants justice for Madeleine.

by The Rooster 14.07.15 16:39

Well they seem a bonafide organisation. Not buying the life after death thing though. Gerry McCann was very into promoting mediums and their dreams and visions as valid investigative tools to the PJ I believe. I suspect he was taking the piss and being diversionary.

by Guest 14.07.15 16:39

Mandy40 wrote:12-67=63

This is amazing.

by Guest 14.07.15 16:43

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
I think we have it.

by The Rooster 14.07.15 16:53

I think you may have something there, possibly the start of a Hollywood screen play? Imagine the merchandising, the premieres and red carpet. Well the Da Vinci Code managed to do it by blagging Henry Lincolns book published in the early '80's!!!

by Knitted 14.07.15 20:23

I used to think 'psychics', peddling all their blatanly silly nonsense, were either (mainly) frauds or (the rest) self-deceiving fools... but I just tapped Kate's details into an online 'numerology convertor' and the accuracy of the reading is unbelievably uncanny! (or should that be un(Mc)canny??)

[url=[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]][/url]

[Thread locked. Got us nowhere except people arguing. Not good - Mod.]