Latest topics» Professor Gerry McCann Inaccurate Heart Testing
by plebgate Today at 17:59
» Britain’s top cop Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe quits without seeing through pledge
by aquila Today at 17:13
» KATIE HOPKINS: 'LEFT TO BE FOUND'?
by sallypelt Today at 17:10
» Media Mayhem - MCCANN MEDIA NONSENSE OF THE DAY
by sandancer Today at 16:24
» OPERATION FERNBRIDGE: Timebomb at Elm Guest House: [***NEW***] ..and the Edward Heath > Cyril Smith > Clement Freud > McCanns connections
by sallypelt Today at 15:53
» *NEW* - IS THERE A GOVERNMENT COVER-UP? And if so, why? - POLL ADDED (was: Why are they being protected?)
by JRP Today at 15:36
» 'QUOTE OF THE DAY'
by jeanmonroe Today at 15:31
by mootle Today at 15:02
» 'VIDEO OF THE DAY'
by JRP Today at 13:20
» Picture Gallery
by Verdi Today at 13:02
» copeland By Election-Rigged?
by willowthewisp Today at 12:43
» Katie Hopkins "Maddie will never come home"
by Lands_end Today at 11:29
» Celebrity breaks ranks on Madeleine McCann > @JodieMarsh tweets her 611,000 followers to watch Richard Hall's 'EMBEDDED CONFESSIONS' and says there's been 'a giant cover-up'
by willowthewisp Today at 11:18
» Under TRUMP, over 1,500 paedophiles arrested in 1 month - way above what was happening under Obama
by Roxyroo Today at 6:42
» Next Police Commissioner about to be Named.
by jeanmonroe Yesterday at 23:39
» When was Bell Pottinger brought in?
by Yvie Han Yesterday at 23:37
» APARTMENT 5A NO LONGER 'FOR LET' - ANOTHER TRACEY KANDOHLA / SUN STORY
by Praiaaa Yesterday at 19:59
» CRIME THAT ROCKED BRITAIN A mother’s betrayal and comparisons with Madeleine McCann: How the ‘disappearance’ of Shannon Matthews sparked a class war
by tinkier Yesterday at 13:55
» Threatening Gestures by Dr. Martin Roberts
by Verdi Yesterday at 12:11
» Helen Bailey murder: Fiance Ian Steward guilty of killing author as police re-examine death of first wife
by Philip Anders Yesterday at 11:26
» If the TWINS were not at their creche Thursday morning why did the McCanns LIE and what were they doing between 9am and 12.30PM?
by What's_up_doc? Yesterday at 10:24
» WHAT HAPPENED TO MADELEINE AFTER THESE PICTURES WERE TAKEN?
by Waynetta 25.02.17 19:22
» THE JO COX MURDER & THE EU REFERENDUM
by Waynetta 25.02.17 17:50
» A Quick Question
by Waynetta 25.02.17 17:29
» Grandma Healy: Where were you that night, Kate? Updated: 09:18, 30 April 2008
by tnb 25.02.17 15:42
» Twitter (News and important information only please)
by melisande 25.02.17 15:41
» Textusa: The Complaint (to the Supreme Justice Court)
by MayMuse 25.02.17 9:53
» Why have the McCanns lied about Maddie's coloboma for 4 years?
by Verdi 24.02.17 23:16
» What my sister in law use to do
by What's_up_doc? 24.02.17 18:42
» Prime Suspect: Jane Tennison - 'Lost Child'
by What's_up_doc? 24.02.17 15:13
» Hobs' theory: What I believe may have happened to Madeleine McCann
by nglfi 24.02.17 14:34
» CMOMM Membership now tops 6,900
by garfy 24.02.17 12:40
» If anyone is interested this is my review of Kate's book
by Roxyroo 24.02.17 0:38
» MWT Blasted by Kate & Gerry
by suzyjohnson 23.02.17 23:34
» McCanns and MWT on ITV 'This Morning' at 11.45 (21 Feb) VIDEO Added
by plebgate 23.02.17 22:36
» Jon Corner doing nicely
by rubendogel 23.02.17 21:33
» McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)
by Doug D 23.02.17 17:01
» Complaint correspondence to Independent Press Standards Organisation re: Mail and Sun and their use of the word "trolls" for describing McCann-sceptics
by MayMuse 23.02.17 16:07
» Forerunner: ‘Other’ Call records Pt.1
by MayMuse 23.02.17 1:49
» The sitting room curtains
by MayMuse 22.02.17 23:41
Most Viewed Topics
Most active topics
StatisticsWe have 6943 registered users
The newest registered user is Amber
Our users have posted a total of 315689 messages in 11550 subjects
Who is online?In total there are 450 users online :: 24 Registered, 6 Hidden and 420 Guests :: 2 Bots
Amber, aquila, BlueBag, Cmaryholmes, Doug D, Findlay1926, hawkmoth, interestedobserver, Irene 2, jhansigirl, Judex, Latetothecase, Masterblaster, melisande, Mirage, Miss Pandora, mootle, Rothley1, sallypelt, scotuk, statsman, Suzi, What's_up_doc?, wjk
Most users ever online was 2583 on 14.10.13 22:33
Philomena McCann: "..one greedy, unscrupulous character.."
27.11.10 19:03 by Get'emGonçalo
Posted by AnnaEsse on her blog: http://frommybigdesk.blogspot.com/2010/11/philomena-mccann-one-greedy.html
The above was in relation to the reward on offer at the time: £3.2 million, according to the 28th July 2007 article featured in the Daily Mail. After more than three years, I am still utterly gobsmacked by Phil McCann's choice of words to describe someone who might come forward to help find her niece.
'Greedy': did she think this was someone who had already received payment of some kind? Greedy for more? Someone who is greedy is a person who takes more than their fair share. So, she thought that someone who could help find Madeleine would be getting more than they deserved? So, what would such a person deserve?
'Unscrupulous': having no scruples, ethics or principles. What? This makes even less sense than 'greedy'. For someone to have no scruples, ethics or principles in claiming a reward for helping to find a missing child, they would, by definition, be behaving in an underhand and devious manner. Towards whom and about what? Towards the McCanns, who only wanted to find their daughter? Wouldn't the parents of a missing child be delighted for the information, wherever it came from if they could get their daughter back unharmed? And 'one greedy, unscrupulous character'. Does that mean that Auntie Phil thought there was more than one person who could possibly have come forward? Someone who would unscrupulously grass up the abductor? Wouldn't any close relative of a missing child be eternally grateful to such a person? But, no, Phil McCann would view that person as being a 'greedy, unscrupulous character.'
To be continued!
AnnaEsse's post has interested me because I remember emailing Phenomenal McScam in June 2007 with some information I found on Brian's Dreams blog (in the days when I believed anything) and she told me I was nasty and should go back to my coven.
She then emailed me again and copied the email to Stu 'hope you are well' Prior.
I found it odd that she put in her email "If you or even he is so convinced by his 'dream predictions' then go and find her here" - she was emailing me from Glasgow.
Legal Defence for Gonçalo Amaral
Gonçalo Amaral 1 Feb 2017
Yesterday, it became known that the Supreme Court in Lisbon ruled in favour of Gonçalo Amaral, in the long running lawsuit that was filed against him over his book "Maddie: A Verdade da Mentira".
This is the culmination of a costly, difficult process that caused a lot of pain and distress, not only to the persons directly involved, but also to many who refused to be silenced, both on the internet and 'offline'.
Nonetheless, it also brought out the very best in so many people who have shown their support, both morally and materially, over so many years. It has been tremendously encouraging and heartening, and it must unequivocally be stated that without you, it would simply not have been possible to walk this road towards Justice.
We await the publication of the Court's decision and will update you soon with relevant information.
In the meantime, there are simply no words that even remotely match the strength and the tenacity that you have dedicated to this process.
So a mere "Thank you" will have to do.
Projecto Justiça Gonçalo Amaral