Re: Debbie Butler's false allegations against the Madeleine Foundation

by Guest 27.11.09 16:44

Saphire wrote:
justagrannynow 1 wrote:
Saphire wrote: Dont believe for 1 sec that shes gone, no such luck :evil: how many times, when someone asks her a straightforward question, does she flounce off, only for the 'big guns' Bren and Viv to wade in with their blinkered opinions and attack the horrible members who are being so cruel to poor misunderstood Debbie? David and Eddie seem to have the sense to stay out of it.

Me neither. Ms Butler has been flouncing off and coming back ever since she started this circus.

Oh what a surprise, Debbie has returned from her flounce - can we dare hope that the 'investigation' had been concluded (she did say that she would not be back until then)? :sleep:

She's just been on saying - there is more action pending!! roll

by Guest 27.11.09 16:47

Same old same old.

by Pussycat 27.11.09 16:48

Debs;

"I also think there may be further action pending"

Beat me to it candyfloss

She's off on one again....................

by Autumn 27.11.09 17:05

Looks like she gone into full 'bunny-boiler' mode - god, it's frightening to think this creature is walking the streets affraid

by Guest 27.11.09 17:06

And she complained to being labelled a stalker

by baconbutty 27.11.09 17:10

"I also think there may be further action pending"

Note how she chooses her words carefully.
Or, knowing how careless and incontinent she normally is with words, how someone else has chosen her words carefully.

Where is Stevo these days btw?

by Autumn 27.11.09 17:13

murat_fan wrote:And she complained to being labelled a stalker

LOCK UP YOUR RABBITS, TONY !!!!! affraid

:albino: :albino:

by Mike 27.11.09 17:14

looks like ms butler is allso envious of mr bennetts savings

by Guest 27.11.09 17:16

same as maybe a couple of JATYK posters.

by scrafen 27.11.09 17:48

Anonymous said...November 27, 2009 2:48 PM

And this afternoon on Twitter ---

# All information on Tony Bnennett gratefully received - thanks everyone - butler683@btinternet.com 17 minutes ago from web

link: comment on jills blog

by Guest 27.11.09 17:50

God she is desperate isnmt she..wonder if its indicative of her not having evidence of the fraud after all?

by Mike 27.11.09 17:52

yes sym,so now are they going to go off the fraud allegations,and start wondering abour mr bennetts savings and how he managed to save that up, did,nt mr bennett work may be thats how he managed to invest some of his wages for his retirement,like a lot of people

by Guest 27.11.09 17:57

Chris...I dont know why he answers them, whatever he answers thye will ask another question..but they wont answer anything..PM for you in your inbox.

by Guest 27.11.09 23:15

Question for Mr Bennett:

On the 17th September you said, in a joint statement issued with Debbie Butler on the Madeleine Foundation website, that you would not be using any of the funds from the Foundation to meet the costs of taking legal advice over your spot of bother with Carter Ruck.

You later reported that on the 2nd October you wrote a cheque for £500 to Kirwans from the Foundation bank account.

Can you reconcile those two statements?

by scrafen 27.11.09 23:37

yesterday, tony said, for the COURT FEES (different from the kirwans fees), he received donations link - tony bennett donations for court(!) fees

but he didnt answer questions on this link - unanswered questions tony re court(!) fees

by Guest 27.11.09 23:38

scrafen wrote:yesterday, tony said, for the COURT FEES (different from the kirwans fees), he received donations link - tony bennett donations for court(!) fees

but he didnt answer questions on this link - unanswered questions tony re court(!) fees

Maybe a fund was set up to help with fees amongst members or maybe people jsut sent money for that?

by scrafen 27.11.09 23:45

maybe he will eventually reply to the questions on this "court fees"...?

by Jolie 28.11.09 1:33

trunky wrote:Question for Mr Bennett:

On the 17th September you said, in a joint statement issued with Debbie Butler on the Madeleine Foundation website, that you would not be using any of the funds from the Foundation to meet the costs of taking legal advice over your spot of bother with Carter Ruck.

You later reported that on the 2nd October you wrote a cheque for £500 to Kirwans from the Foundation bank account.

Can you reconcile those two statements?

Trunky, that is not entirely accurate. In the statement, it said Kirwans was offered 500 pounds in payment for work done for Butler and Bennett on behalf of the Madeleine Foundation and that was a large chunk of the Foundation's fund. Whether the funds to pay the 500 pounds actually came from the Foundation's accounts remains to be answered by Mr. Bennett. It would be easy to assume this was so, but nowhere in that statement does it say that Mr. Bennett issued a check from the Madeleine Foundation account to pay this fee to Kirwans.

We must wait to see how Mr. Bennett answers this matter.

by Guest 28.11.09 1:42

Even if the £ 500 cheque did come from the Madeleine Foundation, Debbie would have also needed to sign the cheque and agree with the payment being made.

by Guest 28.11.09 10:00

Jolie wrote:
trunky wrote:Question for Mr Bennett:

On the 17th September you said, in a joint statement issued with Debbie Butler on the Madeleine Foundation website, that you would not be using any of the funds from the Foundation to meet the costs of taking legal advice over your spot of bother with Carter Ruck.

You later reported that on the 2nd October you wrote a cheque for £500 to Kirwans from the Foundation bank account.

Can you reconcile those two statements?

Trunky, that is not entirely accurate. In the statement, it said Kirwans was offered 500 pounds in payment for work done for Butler and Bennett on behalf of the Madeleine Foundation and that was a large chunk of the Foundation's fund. Whether the funds to pay the 500 pounds actually came from the Foundation's accounts remains to be answered by Mr. Bennett. It would be easy to assume this was so, but nowhere in that statement does it say that Mr. Bennett issued a check from the Madeleine Foundation account to pay this fee to Kirwans.

We must wait to see how Mr. Bennett answers this matter.

He says the cheque was written from the Foundation chequebook, doesn't he? Otherwise why did they both need to sign it?

He has been here since I started asking this question, but there is no reply.

perahps smithy would like to answer it :lol:

by Guest 28.11.09 11:02

Is smith Grenville? If he is ask him why only Butler took the rap for the posters and why he felt the need to get rid of Butler..It wasnt only Tony was it..if it happened as Butler says?
Have to say this, some people will champion any cause wether they believe in it or not, I have no qualms with pros or antis as long as thay believe what they are saying and arent just bandwagoning it for something to do.

by Mike 28.11.09 16:13

sym,i think mr bennett might tell more once the police investigation has finished then again he might not :D

by Guest 28.11.09 16:17

I think he is being pretty restrained but thne he has to I suppose and them loons know this and keep pushing...baiting..

by Guest 28.11.09 16:25

Bennett knows he is on dodgy ground. Everything he has put is wrong and libellous, thats why he cannot defend it.

He cannot answer the question about the Floundation paying the legal bills, so avoids it. Next step will be complaining to either Admin and Mods to get posters ot threads removed.

by scampi 28.11.09 16:35

Bennett avoids answering any question in a direct manner. Because he tells so many untruths he has to duck and evade.

Log in for more topics