Ambersuz and Debbie gloat over the possibility that Tony Bennett will be in trouble from Carter-Ruck

murat_fan wrote:Didn't you say Bennett that you would kill your own child if you had to?

murat_fan wrote:ALSO IT WAS HER BRIEF WHO TOLD HER NOT TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. SHE WAS TAKING HER LAWYERS ADVICE LIKE YOU SHOULD DO.

SYM* wrote:

murat_fan wrote:

Tony Bennett wrote:

Raffle wrote:If God forbid anything happened to your grandchild...[/b][/font]

For a start, if the police asked me 48 questions to try to establish what had happened to him, I think I'd answer them.

Wouldn't you?[/quote


Didn't you say Bennett that you would kill your own child if you had to?

LOL wont answer will you...I think he asked would you answer the police questions...its simple like you, yes or no?
Your quick enough to point out he wont answer....

No i would not answer the questions, especially as the questions were leading questions.

Raffle wrote:Mr Bennett

Do you take on board that a lot of people think you are sticking up 2 fingers at a missing child with some of your activities? Or do you dismiss them without a second thought?

Tony Bennett wrote:

murat_fan wrote:ALSO IT WAS HER BRIEF WHO TOLD HER NOT TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. SHE WAS TAKING HER LAWYERS ADVICE LIKE YOU SHOULD DO.

Tell me something.

Is it the innocent or the guilty whose lawyers tell them to answer 'no comment' to everything?

murat_fan wrote:Sorry my mistake it was you who said you would hide the body if he died in a accident

Tony Bennett wrote:

Raffle wrote:Mr Bennett

Do you take on board that a lot of people think you are sticking up 2 fingers at a missing child with some of your activities? Or do you dismiss them without a second thought?

I'm well aware that many people consider I am wrong, insensitive and cruel by writing the book and distributing the leaflet.

But an awful lot of people appreciated what I told them and do not believe I am wrong, insensitive or cruel.

One day, in this life or the next, we will know the truth about what really happened to Madeleine McCann.

Raffle wrote:Is it the innocent or guilty whose lawyers tell them not to even attempt defending a possible court case because those lawyers agree that they are indeed breaking the law and wouldn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of keeping thier shirt on their back?

Raffle wrote:

Tony Bennett wrote:

Raffle wrote:Mr Bennett

Do you take on board that a lot of people think you are sticking up 2 fingers at a missing child with some of your activities? Or do you dismiss them without a second thought?

I'm well aware that many people consider I am wrong, insensitive and cruel by writing the book and distributing the leaflet.

But an awful lot of people appreciated what I told them and do not believe I am wrong, insensitive or cruel.

One day, in this life or the next, we will know the truth about what really happened to Madeleine McCann.

I think it's irrelevant if people appreciated what you told them. You were told on many many occasions that some of the "facts" in your leaflets were far from factual, indeed you took offence to being told so. Yet you went ahead and distributed them.

What good did the leaflets do? Nothing at all, nada, zilch. The ONLY thing they achieved was more people thinking that Madeleine was dead and unfindable. And that I find callous in the extreme.

You don't know if what you think is what really happened or not, it's your opinion, no more. You'll never know how much your actions have damaged the search for that child Mr Bennett.

Raffle wrote:You'll never know how much your actions have damaged the search for that child Mr Bennett.

Madeleine is someone's child, someone's cousin, someone's sister, someone's niece. She is NOT a charachter in a book. She is a real, FINDABLE littler girl.

Tony Bennett wrote:

Raffle wrote:You'll never know how much your actions have damaged the search for that child Mr Bennett.

Can you name me ONE PERSON on his whole earth who was actively looking for Madeleine, then read my booklet, and then stopped looking?

ONE?

Raffle wrote:

Autumn wrote:Tony, have you considered reporting the MM forum as I would have thought this is harrassment at the very least? If Debbie is behaving like this out of revenge, you need to take it seriosly and register your concerns with the appropriate authorities - its bad enough that she is threatening you on the internet but, given she knows your whereabouts, might she pose a serious danger to you. Apart from her allies on MM, does Ms Butler have friends and family who can talk to her and, if needs be, get her to the medical help she may require?

Touching to show such concern about people's safety. Shame nobody thought about safety of the McCann twins when thier neighbours were leafleted accusing their parents of being involved in her disappearnace and death. And please, before you say it, everyone in the world is well aware the twins were left in the apartment with thier sister.

SYM* wrote:Any more than creating false time lines re the checks did? Delaying calling the P.J? Anymore than washing cuddlecat? Lying about where cuddlecat was when alarm raised? Not answering wether they knew murat? Not doing a reconstrction? Not giving their credit card detail,Madeleines health records their phones BEFORE they deleted a quantity of textx and calls?

Sabot wrote:

SYM* wrote:Any more than creating false time lines re the checks did? Delaying calling the P.J? Anymore than washing cuddlecat? Lying about where cuddlecat was when alarm raised? Not answering wether they knew murat? Not doing a reconstrction? Not giving their credit card detail,Madeleines health records their phones BEFORE they deleted a quantity of textx and calls?

This is all bullshit. There is not one word of actual truth in it. It is a mixture of myth and distortion designed purely to mislead people.

It is these sort of posts that perpetuate the damage being done to the search for Madeleine. And I am quite certain that it is done with malicious aforethought.