A question for Mike Gunnill, alias \'petert\' on JATYK, alias Peter Tarwin, alias Jason Peters

Laffin Assasin wrote:Tony, IIRC, I emailed you the messages I received, they were almost word for word the same as those you received. The messages I recieved came from Andy Griffins "Chaos Engine" account on the old 3A's.

vaguely1 wrote:I'm at a loss as to why anyone would listen to word that comes out of Majics mouth.

the man/woman is a nutter.

Tony Bennett wrote:

Pascal wrote:Uffer for the sake of my sanity; are you suggesting that Amber and DB are in cohorts with Majic? Who the F is Jo please? One of us is barking at the wrong dog and I think for all our sakes we should know. Ta.

If I may but in, 'Uffer' was referring to Mike Gunnill, not Majic, in his last post, as I'm sure s/he will clarify. For information, it is generally understood that 'Jo' is one of Mike Gunnill's many aliases.

Here, for information, is a list of some of them:

1. Mike Gunnill - real name. or is it??

2. mgunnill - current username on here - if it is him?

3. Peter Tarwin - when writing to The Madeleine Foundation with disinformation

4. Jason Peters - ditto

5. Michael Sangerte - when trying to buy a book from me under orders from Carter-Ruck

6. petert - when posting with his mates 'muratfan', 'Majic' and others on bonnybraes and MsMarbles' forum, JATYK

7. JoMc or 'Jo' for short on here.

'Uffer' was referring to strange alliances between Menez, Butler and Gunnill.

It must be clearly remembered at all times here that Butler's separation from The Madeleine Foundation came only after she admitted to one long late-night conversation with Clarence Mitchell - and from reading between the lines, quite a few others. As I've posted elsewhere, she has openly admitted to long talks with Adrian Upshon ('Deuce') and 'sabot' among other pros.

It is also relevant that during September two other things happened; Brenda Ryan became an active contributor and close to Menez, and Brenda Ryan, who lives very close to Butler, began having many conversations with each other. I advised Butler against this at the time. [By the way, one of Butler's admitted talents is one of mimicry, she would give Rory Bremner a run for his money. After having spoken a time or two to Ryan in the earlier days, she did an absoluletely brilliant imitation of her speaking in Estuary English after a glass or two of Bacardi and coke. I'm deprived of that now].

'Uffer' is right, Gunnill is embraced on Menez' forum as a welcome contributor.

To look at Menez' and Butler's current agendas, you only have to look at all the times the MM Forum is referred to on the net as 'The Tony Bennett hate forum'. And the post count gives the game away: 3,500-plus posts on the anti-Tony Bennett threads, under 2,500 on their 'Main Maddie' thread.

The words 'lsot the plot' spring to mind.

But for the past two-and-a-half years, I don't think I've lost the plot.

Pascal wrote:Who is attacking Candyfloss? I'm asking questions some are too scared to ask is all.

Staight as a dye, I am

From: ANTHONY BENNETT [mailto:ajsbennett@btinternet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:12 AM
To: admin@truthformadeleine.com
Subject: The U.S. Edition of '60 Reasons' (was: 60-reasons)



Steve,



I've given lengthy consideration to this and this would be my working
proposal regarding the content of '60 Reasons', over which I hold copyright
as you know.



I've taken on board all points you've raised including all that you say
about getting it ready for the U.S. market, indexing, updating etc.



1. The copyright will be formally i.e. in writing released to you, or shall
we say waived, subject to the folllowing:



2. If the content is substantially the same as '60 Reasons', the title be
retained but with a sub-heading to make it clear that this is an American
edition or version and with a new author i.e. not m name to appear as the
author.



Here is a suggestion: 'The U.S. edition, by Brian Johnson'.



3. There is prominently ...

twinkle wrote:If Tony does have dealings with Majic then I certainly think it is in all our interests to know the truth.

twinkle wrote:Am I the only one who finds it rather odd that there is no history of posts by Tony prior to Feb 14th, yet mine go back to my joining date?

vaguely1 wrote:Twinkle, I think it was pre-February and for some reason post pre-February don't come up on a search.


ETA, obviously Tony will remember.

vaguely1 wrote:lol Twinkle, you're not posting enough!! :iconbiggrin:

vaguely1 wrote:

vaguely1 wrote:Twinkle, I think it was pre-February and for some reason post pre-February don't come up on a search.


ETA, obviously Tony will remember.

as if my majic magic :iconbiggrin:

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/madeleine-foundation-issues-f1/how-majic-obtained-a-brief-report-on-the-madeleine-fondation-conference-t645.htm#21179