Another look at Sergey Malinka

Phoebe wrote:Sergei, I think your proposed book is mistitled. In your 68 posts here (as I write) you have rarely mentioned Madeleine and then only when responding to a question. You have told us that you know nothing at all about what happened to her. I note that elsewhere much has been made of your connection with this "World famous case". In fact this description has been used twice in one passage.  It is clearly being used as a selling point. You keep posting but have nothing to tell us. I think its time for the forum to return to what it does so well i.e. investigating Madeleine's disappearance and seeking justice for her. I bid you adieu.

doisgaloes wrote:MayMuse you screamed IGNORE, yet only you who is writing right now.

doisgaloes wrote:Are you sure u want to mention my son?

doisgaloes wrote:Sorry, all haters look the same to me!

doisgaloes wrote:Clarence Mitchel is very well and threatening me with lawyers, haven't you read news fallout?

MayMuse wrote:continually broke forum rules!

April28th wrote:

MayMuse wrote:continually broke forum rules!

I would just like to say, publically, since I have been 'cast' in this thread - I commend Jill for how she has handled this as an admin. Ignoring my earlier comments about one person's conduct, Jill has shown some great restraint in not only overlooking and forgiving Sergei reacting strongly to certain comments - which I would venture anyone would in his position - but she has also been very much cordial with Sergei and given him a chance to say his piece.

Irrespective of what anyone takes away from these (two) threads, I hope it is noted that Jill has not been unfair, and has not wilted and banned Sergei when a certain person went overboard. I've never used the 'CP' term to describe this forum and Jill has given a solid example why it (the forum, not the term) persists. Despite the obvious attempt at goading me, I have no bad words to say about this forum at this point in time.

Certain posts towards Sergei have been caustic and unhelpful, but everyone has the right to be discerning on their own terms. It's those approaching blindfolded that offer nothing.

April28th wrote:

MayMuse wrote:continually broke forum rules!

I would just like to say, publically, since I have been 'cast' in this thread - I commend Jill for how she has handled this as an admin. Ignoring my earlier comments about one person's conduct, Jill has shown some great restraint in not only overlooking and forgiving Sergei reacting strongly to certain comments - which I would venture anyone would in his position - but she has also been very much cordial with Sergei and given him a chance to say his piece.

Irrespective of what anyone takes away from these (two) threads, I hope it is noted that Jill has not been unfair, and has not wilted and banned Sergei when a certain person went overboard. I've never used the 'CP' term to describe this forum and Jill has given a solid example why it (the forum, not the term) persists. Despite the obvious attempt at goading me, I have no bad words to say about this forum at this point in time.

Certain posts towards Sergei have been caustic and unhelpful, but everyone has the right to be discerning on their own terms. It's those approaching blindfolded that offer nothing.

MayMuse wrote:!

April28th wrote:

MayMuse wrote:!

MayMuse, although I quoted your post in my last one in this thread, it was not to imply that you accorded with my opinion or vice versa. Any reader of this thread will see that you do not trust Sergei; that's your prerogative and not mine to question. I simply lifted your comment as it made me think what a good job Jill has done here. I did not intend to misquote you or trivialise your opinions to one post, and I hope this post stands as testament to that.

MayMuse wrote:

April28th wrote:

MayMuse wrote:!

MayMuse, although I quoted your post in my last one in this thread, it was not to imply that you accorded with my opinion or vice versa. Any reader of this thread will see that you do not trust Sergei; that's your prerogative and not mine to question. I simply lifted your comment as it made me think what a good job Jill has done here. I did not intend to misquote you or trivialise your opinions to one post, and I hope this post stands as testament to that.

Thank you!
Although I fail to see now why you mention that I distrust Mr Malinka  it is irrelevant albeit I'm not the only one, and incidentally it's obvious he has brought that distrust upon himself by his actions here; so being as youve mentioned it, you are correct and I have good reason, so let's leave it at that!

April28th wrote:

MayMuse wrote:

April28th wrote:

MayMuse wrote:!

MayMuse, although I quoted your post in my last one in this thread, it was not to imply that you accorded with my opinion or vice versa. Any reader of this thread will see that you do not trust Sergei; that's your prerogative and not mine to question. I simply lifted your comment as it made me think what a good job Jill has done here. I did not intend to misquote you or trivialise your opinions to one post, and I hope this post stands as testament to that.

Thank you!
Although I fail to see now why you mention that I distrust Mr Malinka  it is irrelevant albeit I'm not the only one, and incidentally it's obvious he has brought that distrust upon himself by his actions here; so being as youve mentioned it, you are correct and I have good reason, so let's leave it at that!

Only mentioned to confirm that it was obvious, in the context of replying to you. I was not trying to suggest otherwise priorly or engange in debate on your opinion, which I say again, you, as anyone, are entitled to.

sar wrote:apropo nothing....there is usually a reason why someone on a forum has 2/3 thousand posts and someone else has <99

Admin, loving the Christmas Decorations esp the tree / star and the Stag, but the Snowman pointer? and festoon lighting I could live without xxxx!