Twitter:"Sunday the 12th of October is T-DAY for the McCann´s"

PeterMac wrote:

Stillthinking wrote:

PeterMac wrote:
That is what Dr Amaral thought as well.

How interesting, I wasn't aware of that.  I had a few years not really following the case,  did he mention it in book or in interviews since?

Book IIRC
I'll look it up again

Brian Griffin wrote:

PeterMac wrote:

Stillthinking wrote:Huh? they're ignoring the more recent statement where Gerry said he'd gone through the patio doors.
Re Gerry and Jez not noticing Jane pass them... what could have happened is that Jane may have also been checking her kids via her patio doors but had to keep the official line at that point that they were all checking via locked front doors(same as Gerry originally said he did). If she was checking via her patio doors sh'ed have turned off down that alley way on the left after allegedly seeing the man at the top of the road, and would not have had to pass Gerry and Jez.

That is what Dr Amaral thought as well.

Why do you think none of the Tapas crowd wants anything else to do with this case, especially something that brings them under scrutiny like a reconstruction? Heaven forbid! A 5-year-old would be able to poke holes through the logic of the testimony. I'm starting to think this is a bit like a Ruth Rendell story 'A Fatal Inversion' in which a group of young individuals who conceal a crime for what they think is the best at the time, find that it ends up destroying their lives at a fundamental level.

In my opinion, of course. I wouldn't want to suggest a crime has been committed here or draw any parallels.

Bishop Brennan wrote:Article: Madeleine McCann Was Not Abducted

This is very good article with an excellent introduction from Dr Martin Roberts.  Here's just a a taste.  

"For seven years past a watching international community has been witness to a growing clamour of borrowed knowledge regarding the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, hearsay tearing repeatedly through the fabric of reason like a succession of tornados in America’s mid-west, and bringing us more recently to the most ludicrous of situations; one in which a UK police force is given a seemingly limitless budget, so as to review and pursue a case over which it has no legal jurisdiction, and in deliberate disavowal of the evidence collated by the original investigators. In an admitted collaboration with the UK government, they are acting ‘as if the abduction happened in the UK’ without first, or indeed ever, establishing whether ‘abduction’ happened at all."

http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2014/10/madeleine-mccann-was-not-abducted.html

Not a lot of new material in it, but a well-written article outlining the key points.  Points that bear repeating.  

brixham wrote:
I would like to remind you 2&2 that at the heart of this case there is a missing or dead child.  If you have information relevant to the case then put up or shut up. Do not use this case case just to get more facebook shares or likes for yourselves, this is not a game. Have some respect.

Daryl Dixon wrote:I may be wrong but didn't the witness statement by Jeremy Wilkins give the impression that Gerry had left via the patio doors and not the front door as claimed by 2and2?

brixham wrote:So October 12th came and went and now we are presented with video 4a two weeks later.  Nothing new so far, just a promise of more to come - in videos 4b and onwards I take it?
I would like to remind you 2&2 that at the heart of this case there is a missing or dead child.  If you have information relevant to the case then put up or shut up. Do not use this case case just to get more facebook shares or likes for yourselves, this is not a game. Have some respect.