A handy 'Telegraph' guide to the 9 abductors and 2 abductresses we are supposed to be looking for

Kololi wrote:Hi
It calls them suspects not abductors but I only looked at number 5 and didn't look further as he was creepy enough so maybe the others were called something else.

Take care

Autumn wrote:Perhaps some of you abduction believes, could help us out here - you insist that Maddie was abducted so anyone in this rogues gallery we should be looking closely at?

Kololi wrote:Hi
It calls them suspects not abductors

Suspects of what? Abducting? Or something else? Clarence Mitchell was very crafty on this. He kept saying: "This is someone we wish to eliminate from our enquiries" or "This is someone we are interested in". Muddying the waters all the time.

but I only looked at number 5 and didn't look further as he was creepy enough

Creepier than No. 4?

so maybe the others were called something else.

Artist's sketch No. 1 is the Victoria Beckham lookalike who, er, according to the sketch, doesn't look anything like Victoria Beckham. As she was looking for her 'new daughter', or 'a quarter', on downtown dockland Barcelona (er, Spain, hundreds of miles from Praia da Luz) at 2am (and talking to a hard-drinking British businessman who had agonisingly agonised for two years before revealing this conversation), and supposedly about to board a boat to Australia, three days after Madeleine was reported missing, it's hard to see how she could be connected to the prison lair '10 miles' from Praia da Luz, in the 'lawless hills around', where Dave Edgar is convinced that Madeleine is being kept.

Take care.

That's a quote from Clarence Mitchell. He said it direct to Goncalo Amaral after Amaral told him his book was about to be published. Amaral took it to mean 'watch out'. What a silly detective to so misunderstand cuddly Clarence.

Tony
Suspects of what? Abducting? Or something else? Clarence Mitchell was very crafty on this. He kept saying: "This is someone we wish to eliminate from our enquiries" or "This is someone we are interested in". Muddying the waters all the time.

I needed to that sketch that first night, I
mean, they took me in to do the sketch, but they only had, erm, front facing software,
so you know, and at that point I said, you know, is there, can I do, because the clothes
and everything was the thing was the thing that was the most in my mind then and I
can remember saying to the chap I met on the stairs earlier, I think it’s (inaudible), is
it?”
4078 “Yeah”.
Reply “Because he took me in the car back and forth and I can remember saying to him on
the way back ‘Look, is there a way I can do a sketch with clothes, you know, do you
have software or any way that I can do a sketch of the clothes or a side, a side view’.
And he sort of said ‘No, we don’t have that feasible, you know, feasibility or
availability’. And I said then ‘Can I do that when I go back to the UK’, you know,
because at that point it was in my head and it would have been, and they were the bits
that I think would have been recognisable to get down on paper. But at that point it
was like ‘Oh no, we can’t do that, we don’t work in that way’. Which I can
understand and, you know, now obviously I think ‘Oh I should have pushed and
really pushed’, but at that point you rely on, you don’t, you know, you’re just in such
shock and you just think ‘Okay that’s the way things do’, but”.
4078 “Yeah”.