Re: Faith in Op Grange

by Liz Eagles 05.04.15 14:31

What a load of old hogwash.

by scrants 05.04.15 14:48

aquila wrote:What a load of old hogwash.

Why is it a 'load of old hogwash'?

Everyone on here is entitled to their opinion and just because it does not 'follow the party line' does not mean it doesn't have validity.

I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.

New posters with new ideas are in no way 'disruptive'.

by Liz Eagles 05.04.15 14:51

scrants wrote:
aquila wrote:What a load of old hogwash.
Why is it a 'load of old hogwash'?

Everyone on here is entitled to their opinion and just because it does not 'follow the party line' does not mean it doesn't have validity.

I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.

New posters with new ideas are in no way 'disruptive'.

Roger Rabbit isn't a new poster on this forum, he's a reinvented member. He's a member of the other forum to which you subscribe. If Roger Rabbit had anything really interesting wouldn't you think he'd have done it on that forum?

It's hogwash. Wake up and smell the coffee.

by String 05.04.15 15:17

aquila wrote:
scrants wrote:
aquila wrote:What a load of old hogwash.
Why is it a 'load of old hogwash'?

Everyone on here is entitled to their opinion and just because it does not 'follow the party line' does not mean it doesn't have validity.

I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.

New posters with new ideas are in no way 'disruptive'.
Roger Rabbit isn't a new poster on this forum, he's a reinvented member. He's a member of the other forum to which you subscribe. If Roger Rabbit had anything really interesting wouldn't you think he'd have done it on that forum?

It's hogwash. Wake up and smell the coffee.

How on earth do you know this aquila? Do you have the ability to track IP addresses or maybe you're relying upon gut instinct? If its the latter - which I suspect - then I suggest you seek help.

I have been reading this forum for a few years and I thoroughly enjoy reading people's views. You however - put the fear of god into anyone who does not support your own beliefs. I feel that many new members will not post their views in the fear that you will enter with your sledgehammer!

I'm not being rude or disruptive - just saying how it is on here. sad

by Liz Eagles 05.04.15 15:20

String wrote:
aquila wrote:
scrants wrote:
aquila wrote:What a load of old hogwash.
Why is it a 'load of old hogwash'?

Everyone on here is entitled to their opinion and just because it does not 'follow the party line' does not mean it doesn't have validity.

I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.

New posters with new ideas are in no way 'disruptive'.
Roger Rabbit isn't a new poster on this forum, he's a reinvented member. He's a member of the other forum to which you subscribe. If Roger Rabbit had anything really interesting wouldn't you think he'd have done it on that forum?

It's hogwash. Wake up and smell the coffee.
How on earth do you know this aquila? Do you have the ability to track IP addresses or maybe you're relying upon gut instinct? If its the latter - which I suspect - then I suggest you seek help.

I have been reading this forum for a few years and I thoroughly enjoy reading people's views. You however - put the fear of god into anyone who does not support your own beliefs. I feel that many new members will not post their views in the fear that you will enter with your sledgehammer!

I'm not being rude or disruptive - just saying how it is on here.

more hogwash.

by scrants 05.04.15 15:39

aquila wrote:
scrants wrote:
aquila wrote:What a load of old hogwash.
Why is it a 'load of old hogwash'?

Everyone on here is entitled to their opinion and just because it does not 'follow the party line' does not mean it doesn't have validity.

I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.

New posters with new ideas are in no way 'disruptive'.
Roger Rabbit isn't a new poster on this forum, he's a reinvented member. He's a member of the other forum to which you subscribe. If Roger Rabbit had anything really interesting wouldn't you think he'd have done it on that forum?

It's hogwash. Wake up and smell the coffee.

I don't care if he is a new poster or not nor do I care if he is re-invented. He still has interesting things to say.

You may not agree with him and that's your perogative.

by rainbow-fairy 05.04.15 15:48

Please can posters refrain from attacking each other and please mind the language.
I know things can get heated with differing opinions especially re Grange, but please debate respectfully!
thanks

by Guest 05.04.15 15:49

pack it in you guys or I'm going to lock this thread for a while.

by Liz Eagles 05.04.15 15:52

admin wrote: pack it in you guys or I'm going to lock this thread for a while.

It's not a drama on my part. It's pretty obvious to people on this forum who have been here for a few years that this is disruption. It's been seen so many times before. I'm surprised the personal insults towards myself have been condoned.

by Guest 05.04.15 16:04

aquila wrote:
admin wrote: pack it in you guys or I'm going to lock this thread for a while.
It's not a drama on my part. It's pretty obvious to people on this forum who have been here for a few years that this is disruption. It's been seen so many times before. I'm surprised the personal insults towards myself have been condoned.

I've been here longer than everybody since it was me who created the forum.

Please pm me with your concerns about disruptors.

by RogerRabbit 05.04.15 16:04

aquila wrote:
scrants wrote:
aquila wrote:What a load of old hogwash.
Why is it a 'load of old hogwash'?

Everyone on here is entitled to their opinion and just because it does not 'follow the party line' does not mean it doesn't have validity.

I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.

New posters with new ideas are in no way 'disruptive'.
Roger Rabbit isn't a new poster on this forum, he's a reinvented member. He's a member of the other forum to which you subscribe. If Roger Rabbit had anything really interesting wouldn't you think he'd have done it on that forum?

It's hogwash. Wake up and smell the coffee.

I'm not a member of another forum and I don't post on another forum.

I have a minor and long-passed history on other forum where people just like Aquila and with the exact same ingrained one-track agenda hounded me out for expressing the exact same rational objectivity as I have here. Sadly the treatment I received was not isolated to being hounded off a forum and got very personal, very ugly and very frightening. And sadly involved characters who actively identify as McCann Skeptics or Detractors. Frankly, I had worse than I've seen others receive from McCann supporters.

That's ancient history, and doesn't need reliving. It highlights the shameful truth of agendism and cliques on groups like this, and the utter resistance to the very wide range of intelligent speculation that this subject elicits.

Its a sad reality that I was introduced to this world of speculation and discourse by a colleague and real world friend who is now no longer active on the internet as a result of being stalked, bullied and blackmailed by some claiming to be allies.

Seems these places become Animal Farm. We're all in it together, but some have more rights and entitlement than others.

by Liz Eagles 05.04.15 16:07

RogerRabbit wrote:
aquila wrote:
scrants wrote:
aquila wrote:What a load of old hogwash.
Why is it a 'load of old hogwash'?

Everyone on here is entitled to their opinion and just because it does not 'follow the party line' does not mean it doesn't have validity.

I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.

New posters with new ideas are in no way 'disruptive'.
Roger Rabbit isn't a new poster on this forum, he's a reinvented member. He's a member of the other forum to which you subscribe. If Roger Rabbit had anything really interesting wouldn't you think he'd have done it on that forum?

It's hogwash. Wake up and smell the coffee.
I'm not a member of another forum and I don't post on another forum.

I have a minor and long-passed history on other forum where people just like Aquila and with the exact same ingrained one-track agenda hounded me out for expressing the exact same rational objectivity as I have here. Sadly the treatment I received was not isolated to being hounded off a forum and got very personal, very ugly and very frightening. And sadly involved characters who actively identify as McCann Skeptics or Detractors. Frankly, I had worse than I've seen others receive from McCann supporters.

That's ancient history, and doesn't need reliving. It highlights the shameful truth of agendism and cliques on groups like this, and the utter resistance to the very wide range of intelligent speculation that this subject elicits.

Its a sad reality that I was introduced to this world of speculation and discourse by a colleague and real world friend who is now no longer active on the internet as a result of being stalked, bullied and blackmailed by some claiming to be allies.

Seems these places become Animal Farm. We're all in it together, but some have more rights and entitlement than others.

yet more hogwash....keep going.

by RogerRabbit 05.04.15 16:11

Can someone explain what is meant by 'disruption.'

The concept would seem to indicate that the place has a single purpose, measurable progress, a credible goal, and complete agreement, in order to be capable of being' disrupted'. If it is a discussion group, why are alternative perspectives so readily shot down as 'disruption?' That would suggest a carefully defended singular agenda. This forum had no statement of belief or agreement on accepted opinion to sign, so how exactly can discussion, debate and defence of a variety of supportable ideas be deemed 'disruptive.?'

by RogerRabbit 05.04.15 16:12

aquila wrote:
RogerRabbit wrote:
aquila wrote:
scrants wrote:
aquila wrote:What a load of old hogwash.
Why is it a 'load of old hogwash'?

Everyone on here is entitled to their opinion and just because it does not 'follow the party line' does not mean it doesn't have validity.

I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.

New posters with new ideas are in no way 'disruptive'.
Roger Rabbit isn't a new poster on this forum, he's a reinvented member. He's a member of the other forum to which you subscribe. If Roger Rabbit had anything really interesting wouldn't you think he'd have done it on that forum?

It's hogwash. Wake up and smell the coffee.
I'm not a member of another forum and I don't post on another forum.

I have a minor and long-passed history on other forum where people just like Aquila and with the exact same ingrained one-track agenda hounded me out for expressing the exact same rational objectivity as I have here. Sadly the treatment I received was not isolated to being hounded off a forum and got very personal, very ugly and very frightening. And sadly involved characters who actively identify as McCann Skeptics or Detractors. Frankly, I had worse than I've seen others receive from McCann supporters.

That's ancient history, and doesn't need reliving. It highlights the shameful truth of agendism and cliques on groups like this, and the utter resistance to the very wide range of intelligent speculation that this subject elicits.

Its a sad reality that I was introduced to this world of speculation and discourse by a colleague and real world friend who is now no longer active on the internet as a result of being stalked, bullied and blackmailed by some claiming to be allies.

Seems these places become Animal Farm. We're all in it together, but some have more rights and entitlement than others.
yet more hogwash....keep going.

You #really# need help.

by Guest 05.04.15 16:14

That's enough RogerRabbit

by Liz Eagles 05.04.15 16:19

admin wrote:That's enough RogerRabbit

It took a bloody long time to slap this person's wrist.

by Guest 05.04.15 16:25

aquila wrote:
admin wrote:That's enough RogerRabbit
It took a bloody long time to slap this person's wrist.

I'm so sorry aquila. I'd not long come home from work to be told there was trouble brewing on this thread. Had I known this was happening between TWO ADULTS I'd have come home earlier.

by Liz Eagles 05.04.15 16:34

admin wrote:
aquila wrote:
admin wrote:That's enough RogerRabbit
It took a bloody long time to slap this person's wrist.
I'm so sorry aquila. I'd not long come home from work to be told there was trouble brewing on this thread. Had I known this was happening between TWO ADULTS I'd have come home earlier.

I hope the thread can continue without interruption and personal insults.

by **Tony Bennett** 05.04.15 16:44

scrants wrote:
I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.

@ scrants

Then don't waste your time popping over here

by Liz Eagles 05.04.15 16:48

Tony Bennett wrote:
scrants wrote:
I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.
@ scrants

Then don't waste your time popping over here

It is as simple as that Tony.

The ones who object to my comments on this forum and bank each other up are all from....over there.

A foot in two camps isn't a good place to be.

by Guest 05.04.15 16:51

There's nothing happening over there, TB. One post during the past 24 hours, at 4.20 pm today, and that was about Jill Dando.

by plebgate 05.04.15 16:52

aquila wrote:More bullshit baffles brains but with a 'twist'.

Yep, the twist being the £1 million spent to baffle the general public. titter

by scrants 05.04.15 16:54

Tony Bennett wrote:
scrants wrote:
I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.
@ scrants

Then don't waste your time popping over here

Well 'here' is where RogerRabbit chose to post and I found it interesting. So what?

I don't expect he will make the same mistake again.

by scrants 05.04.15 16:56

aquila wrote:
Tony Bennett wrote:
scrants wrote:
I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.
@ scrants

Then don't waste your time popping over here
It is as simple as that Tony.

The ones who object to my comments on this forum and bank each other up are all from....over there.

A foot in two camps isn't a good place to be.

Two camps? Is there a loyalty thing going on? I thought we were both on the side of Madeleine.

by **Tony Bennett** 05.04.15 17:00

scrants wrote:
Tony Bennett wrote:
scrants wrote:
I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.
@ scrants

Then don't waste your time popping over here
Well 'here' is where RogerRabbit chose to post and I found it interesting. So what?

I don't expect he will make the same mistake again.

I don't follow.

99% of what takes place on this forum is 'going round in circles'?

It must be truly awful - coming here day after day after day, seeing circles going round and round and round all the time -

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

- 7 weeks of unremitting boredom since you last posted here, yet all of a sudden Roger Rabbit's ramblings about how Operation Grange is a sincere, no-holds-barred investigation into the truth draws you in...

...fascinating!

by Liz Eagles 05.04.15 17:03

scrants wrote:
Tony Bennett wrote:
scrants wrote:
I think that what Roger Rabbit has to say is very interesting and is certainly a relief from the usual going round in circles that makes up 99% of what is debated on here.
@ scrants

Then don't waste your time popping over here
Well 'here' is where RogerRabbit chose to post and I found it interesting. So what?

I don't expect he will make the same mistake again.

Roger Rabbit will post and post and post and disrupt and disrupt and disrupt. He's a member of your other forum, the forum that boasts a little area dedicated to annihilating Tony Bennett and being 'outcasts' of this forum. The other forum has little to offer other than join us and you'll be allowed to see other areas of discussion. The largest view they have to date is 56 members.

The 'other' forum has welcomed just about everyone who was booted off CMOMM and yet remarkably they have little to say....they come back onto this forum to create havoc whilst being soothed by banal comments from their admins.

This is a lesson to me.