Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1

by sallypelt 29.10.13 10:35

Have they found the body *thinking out loud*

by nailofwit 29.10.13 10:37

Thanks for posting this and yes it is odd to see this on today's web page. Interesting article and can't imagine this being there even weeks ago. Something is happening in the media circles as once they would have been afraid to present any thing like this .

This is will most likely be your cookies and the telegraph website actually serving you page suggestions based on previous articles you may of read on their and other news organisations websites. When you click a link on website you'll often see the link as something like 'traffic.outbrain.com'

http://www.outbrain.com/

'Outbrain is a content recommendation service whose widget offers to help internet publishers increase web traffic at their websites. It does so by presenting them with links to articles and other content. Outbrain uses behavioral targeting to recommend interesting articles, blog posts, photos or videos to a reader, rather than relying on a more basic 'related items' widget.'

by sweetex 29.10.13 10:38

sallypelt wrote:Have they found the body *thinking out loud*

I keep on having the same thought. Especially with Joanna's blog today.

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2013/10/pj-searches-for-maddies-body-again.html

by sallypelt 29.10.13 10:41

sweetex wrote:
sallypelt wrote:Have they found the body *thinking out loud*
I keep on having the same thought. Especially with Joanna's blog today.

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2013/10/pj-searches-for-maddies-body-again.html

Sweetex, the spanner in the works of this case was the absence of a body. With all this sudden printing of the "unthinkable" it's telling me that they have found the missing piece of the jigsaw. But as I've stated, it's only me thinking out loud;)

by KellyLennon 29.10.13 10:57

Update from findmadeleine.com

24TH OCT

Gerry and Kate will not be giving any comments regarding the progress of the investigation unless there is a significant breakthrough.

Would have thought hidden evidence is deemed as significant.

by rainbow1 29.10.13 11:03

nailofwit wrote:

Thanks for posting this and yes it is odd to see this on today's web page. Interesting article and can't imagine this being there even weeks ago. Something is happening in the media circles as once they would have been afraid to present any thing like this .
This is will most likely be your cookies and the telegraph website actually serving you page suggestions based on previous articles you may of read on their and other news organisations websites. When you click a link on website you'll often see the link as something like 'traffic.outbrain.com'

http://www.outbrain.com/

'Outbrain is a content recommendation service whose widget offers to help internet publishers increase web traffic at their websites. It does so by presenting them with links to articles and other content. Outbrain uses behavioral targeting to recommend interesting articles, blog posts, photos or videos to a reader, rather than relying on a more basic 'related items' widget.'

nailofwit
Thanks for the explanation. It was just odd as most older articles giving other outcomes to the Madeleine story seemed to have disappeared into thin air about this case when searching the web.

by SchrodingersBody 29.10.13 11:08

added the quote - see below post.

by SchrodingersBody 29.10.13 11:09

KellyLennon wrote:Update from findmadeleine.com

24TH OCT

Gerry and Kate will not be giving any comments regarding the progress of the investigation unless there is a significant breakthrough.

Would have thought hidden evidence is deemed as significant.

and how ironic if that comment is "no comment"

by jozi 29.10.13 11:17

SchrodingersBody wrote:
KellyLennon wrote:Update from findmadeleine.com

24TH OCT

Gerry and Kate will not be giving any comments regarding the progress of the investigation unless there is a significant breakthrough.

Would have thought hidden evidence is deemed as significant.
and how ironic if that comment is "no comment"

Well they never speak only through their paid GOB piece.....Where is he by the way ???

by Praiaaa 29.10.13 11:19

I suspect that people are conveniently absent for half-term...

by KellyLennon 29.10.13 11:28

jozi wrote:
SchrodingersBody wrote:
KellyLennon wrote:Update from findmadeleine.com

24TH OCT

Gerry and Kate will not be giving any comments regarding the progress of the investigation unless there is a significant breakthrough.

Would have thought hidden evidence is deemed as significant.
and how ironic if that comment is "no comment"
Well they never speak only through their paid GOB piece.....Where is he by the way ???

Probably thinking of a completly innocent explanation......

http://clarencemitchell.webs.com/

by sallypelt 29.10.13 11:39

RT @GaeMar01: The 8 employees at #McCann Tappas bar, were **gagged**/injuncted for a year & their contracts were not renewed. http://t.co/v…

by DurhamGuy1967 29.10.13 11:42

sallypelt wrote:Have they found the body *thinking out loud*

I don't think they could keep that quiet

by Wcr 29.10.13 11:53

Seek truth wrote:Every evidence is being ignored.

The Smiths point to Gerry
The sniffer dogs are ignored
Mrs Fenn (the closest to the scene) mentions she spoke to Gerry after 10.30 outside. Which makes Mr Smith right.
The police were called at 10.40pm but no newspaper here in uk have printed this. They Only print it was 10pm Kate found her missing, and police were called 10.10pm instead.

Stop wasting tax payers money on lies.

Wasn't the first person that G/KM rang (even before the Police) a contact within Sky News?

That seems incredibly strange if true

by Mirage 29.10.13 12:03

sweetex wrote:
sallypelt wrote:Have they found the body *thinking out loud*
I keep on having the same thought. Especially with Joanna's blog today.

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2013/10/pj-searches-for-maddies-body-again.html

I'm beginning to think so. Joanna's blog is very reliable. The only doubt is the judicial secrecy.

by Woburn_exile 29.10.13 12:03

Wcr wrote:
Seek truth wrote:Every evidence is being ignored.

The Smiths point to Gerry
The sniffer dogs are ignored
Mrs Fenn (the closest to the scene) mentions she spoke to Gerry after 10.30 outside. Which makes Mr Smith right.
The police were called at 10.40pm but no newspaper here in uk have printed this. They Only print it was 10pm Kate found her missing, and police were called 10.10pm instead.

Stop wasting tax payers money on lies.
Wasn't the first person that G/KM rang (even before the Police) a contact within Sky News?

That seems incredibly strange if true

This is why this case needs to be treated as a homicide. Too well prepared. in my view to be just a tragic accident.

-------

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/viewtopic.forum?t=8395

WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1