The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Mm11

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Regist10
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Mm11

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Regist10

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Page 3 of 5 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by garfy 25.10.12 11:04

i know this is useless information really on here ..as it is more or less thought by most any way but ...

i thought when i read Tony's post what they say an what they do are two different things...it's obvious the fund is paying ...it's what it was intended for in the first place the only thing it has been use for is to pay lawyers pr suing people etc etc ...never to look for maddie...

ironically this is the excuse they use ..to warrant what they are doing....yet they are quite happy to aid and abet the sightings all over the world where maddie has been seen ...

if it was maddie it would forewarn so called abductor ..we know where you are ...any sighting should have had a complete news black out ....unless of course it was used for an ulterior motive....you could even say ...when SY got involved they hampered the search as in ...now they are involved ...there is no need for us to look etc etc etc etc





i know this is useless information really on here ..as it is more or less thought by most any way ...but surly it would be in the public interest just how the mccs are paying for all this ...and what they are actually doing with the fund mony ....the mony they have raised to look for maddie
avatar
garfy

Posts : 187
Activity : 248
Likes received : 55
Join date : 2010-07-08
Location : norton

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by Guest 25.10.12 11:18

Tony, your complaint seems to have gone unnoticed. The story is still saying the same namely..

[quote from article]

Gerry and Kate McCann want the High Court to jail Tony Bennett, 65, who has accused them of causing their daughter’s death, disposing of her body and covering up what they had done.



http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccanns-parents-in-court-bid-1397269

Notice it hasn't been whooshed, as quickly as when they make mistakes the other way around!!!!!
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by Guest 25.10.12 11:29

examples of articles being whooshed and changed very quickly.................



http://www.maxfarquar.com/2011/12/hush-up-the-hush-payment/

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t3709-lord-toby-harris-and-madeleine-mccann-s-death

http://gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/64aug12/LONDON_09_08_2012.htm - Headline changed.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by sammyc 25.10.12 12:48

Just checked the Mirror's website and the story is still the same.

I've looked for their 'contact us' section and found online editorial contact details for ben.rankin@mirror.co.uk. Think I'll send him an email asking him to correct the story. Anyone else up for it? There's a telephone number too if anyone wants to ring. +44 (0) 207 293 3396.
sammyc
sammyc

Posts : 268
Activity : 383
Likes received : 113
Join date : 2011-10-06
Location : UK

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by Tony Bennett 25.10.12 12:51

candyfloss wrote:Tony, your complaint seems to have gone unnoticed. The story is still saying the same namely..

[quote from article]

Gerry and Kate McCann want the High Court to jail Tony Bennett, 65, who has accused them of causing their daughter’s death, disposing of her body and covering up what they had done.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccanns-parents-in-court-bid-1397269

Notice it hasn't been whooshed, as quickly as when they make mistakes the other way around!!!!!
These things often take a very long time to resolve.

At the moment:

1. I've established that the original error was made by a press agency called 'StrandNews' - this was the source of the Mirror report

2. Mel at the Press Complaints Commission has been informed of the complaint and is investigating it

3. Dean Rousewell of the Mirror's editorial team is investigating and has referred the matter to the Mirror's legal adviser, Mr Partington.

____________________

Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"

Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".  

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
Researcher

Posts : 16906
Activity : 24770
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 76
Location : Shropshire

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by Tony Bennett 25.10.12 12:54

sammyc wrote:Just checked the Mirror's website and the story is still the same.

I've looked for their 'contact us' section and found online editorial contact details for ben.rankin@mirror.co.uk. Think I'll send him an email asking him to correct the story. Anyone else up for it? There's a telephone number too if anyone wants to ring. +44 (0) 207 293 3396.
OK, try sending an e-mail to that e-mail address and also to dean.rousewell@mirror.co.uk, saying:

Please tell me why you haven't yet corrected your false claim that Tony Bennett has ever claimed that the McCanns caused Madeleine's death.

____________________

Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"

Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".  

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
Researcher

Posts : 16906
Activity : 24770
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 76
Location : Shropshire

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by jamaljr 25.10.12 13:13

I have emailed them both asking this and saying an urgent response is required.
I will advise if a reply is received. smilie
jamaljr
jamaljr

Posts : 43
Activity : 57
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2012-10-05

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by garfy 25.10.12 13:16

sammyc wrote:Just checked the Mirror's website and the story is still the same.

I've looked for their 'contact us' section and found online editorial contact details for ben.rankin@mirror.co.uk. Think I'll send him an email asking him to correct the story. Anyone else up for it? There's a telephone number too if anyone wants to ring. +44 (0) 207 293 3396.

great idea sammyc ...

haven't rang but sent email ...hope a few are up for it too
avatar
garfy

Posts : 187
Activity : 248
Likes received : 55
Join date : 2010-07-08
Location : norton

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by Tony Bennett 25.10.12 13:21

Just heard from Mirror that their Head of Legal Dept, Charles Collier-White, is now dealing with my complaint.

More short e-mails from you all would show that I have support

____________________

Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"

Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".  

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
Researcher

Posts : 16906
Activity : 24770
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 76
Location : Shropshire

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by garfy 25.10.12 13:29

can anyone explain what this means ..or...what i am doinfg wrong ..[i have tried it twice]

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Delivery to the following recipients failed.

dean.rousewell@mirror.co


This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Delivery to the following recipients failed.

ben.rankin@mirror.co


This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Delivery to the following recipients failed.

ben.rankin@mirror.co
avatar
garfy

Posts : 187
Activity : 248
Likes received : 55
Join date : 2010-07-08
Location : norton

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by Newintown 25.10.12 13:38

Tony Bennett wrote:Just heard from Mirror that their Head of Legal Dept, Charles Collier-White, is now dealing with my complaint.

More short e-mails from you all would show that I have support

Hello Tony

I have sent an email to Mr Rousewell as follows:

Dear Mr Rousewell



I am writing to you in respect of your headline in today’s Daily Mirror “Madeleine McCann’s parents in court bid to jail retired lawyer accusing them of causing girl’s death”.



This statement is completely untrue and is misleading to the general public as to the true details of this case. At no time has Mr Tony Bennett accused Kate and Gerry McCann of causing Madeleine’s death.



I suggest your journalists do some reading up on the true facts of the “disappearance” of Madeleine McCann starting with the Portugese police files, which are available on the internet, and stop printing such one sided facts, always in favour of the McCanns.



No doubt you will print a front page apology to Mr Bennett, I look forward to seeing it.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I will let you know if I get a reply.

____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........

"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"

Newintown
Newintown

Posts : 1597
Activity : 1622
Likes received : 2
Join date : 2011-07-19

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by sammyc 25.10.12 13:41

Third attempt at posting a reply, hope it gets through.

Emailed both addresses and will post their replies if and when I receive them. I requested the articles be corrected and the true facts be reported as Mr Bennett has never claimed the McCanns were responsible for Madeleine's death.
sammyc
sammyc

Posts : 268
Activity : 383
Likes received : 113
Join date : 2011-10-06
Location : UK

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by sammyc 25.10.12 13:48

Garfy, are you sending your emails from your own email account or via this site somehow because mine were successfully sent.
sammyc
sammyc

Posts : 268
Activity : 383
Likes received : 113
Join date : 2011-10-06
Location : UK

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by Newintown 25.10.12 13:58

sammyc wrote:Garfy, are you sending your emails from your own email account or via this site somehow because mine were successfully sent.

Mine has gone through from my Google account, well it hasn't bounced back so far.

____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........

"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"

Newintown
Newintown

Posts : 1597
Activity : 1622
Likes received : 2
Join date : 2011-07-19

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by Tony Bennett 25.10.12 14:00

garfy,

the address is:

dean.rousewell@mirror.co.uk

Don't use the above link, just type the above in when you compose your email

____________________

Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"

Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".  

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
Researcher

Posts : 16906
Activity : 24770
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 76
Location : Shropshire

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by garfy 25.10.12 14:11

Tony Bennett wrote:garfy,

the address is:

dean.rousewell@mirror.co.uk

Don't use the above link, just type the above in when you compose your email

thanks tony ...managed it now ...will do like others let you know if i get a reply ...
avatar
garfy

Posts : 187
Activity : 248
Likes received : 55
Join date : 2010-07-08
Location : norton

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by PeterMac 25.10.12 14:40

Done
PeterMac
PeterMac
Investigator

Posts : 13589
Activity : 16578
Likes received : 2065
Join date : 2010-12-06

http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by Nina 25.10.12 14:52

Me too.

____________________
Not one more cent from me.
Nina
Nina

Posts : 2862
Activity : 3218
Likes received : 344
Join date : 2011-06-16
Age : 81

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by espeland 25.10.12 15:06

And me.

____________________

espeland
espeland

Posts : 205
Activity : 211
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2010-10-31

Back to top Go down

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by pennylane 25.10.12 15:53

and me too! MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 1710420815
avatar
pennylane

Posts : 2770
Activity : 4406
Likes received : 1638
Join date : 2009-12-07

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by listener 25.10.12 16:26

Mine has been delivered too - Hope his mailbox is filling up!
listener
listener

Posts : 643
Activity : 681
Likes received : 18
Join date : 2010-01-10

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by bristow 25.10.12 16:49

Me too.
bristow
bristow

Posts : 823
Activity : 1007
Likes received : 8
Join date : 2011-11-24

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Re: MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12

Post by Ciawoman 25.10.12 16:58

Me too big grin
Ciawoman
Ciawoman

Posts : 62
Activity : 77
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2012-06-02
Age : 56
Location : Belfast

Back to top Go down

MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT'S JUDGMENT IN MCCANNS v BENNETT issued 10.10 on 24.10.12 - Page 3 Empty Clarification

Post by Tony Bennett 25.10.12 17:39

Thank you all very much indeed, you can all stop though now, because I've just received this:

+++++++++++++

Mr Bennett,

I have asked for the clarification you require to be included in tomorrow's paper.


If you have any further issues on this matter please contact our legal department, headed by Charles Collier-Wright.

He can be reached at [SNIPPED]

Regards,

Dean Rousewell


____________________

Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"

Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".  

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
Researcher

Posts : 16906
Activity : 24770
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 76
Location : Shropshire

Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 5 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum