McCanns v Bennett: 153 alleged breaches reduced to 25

aiyoyo wrote:OH WOW, true colour at last from Kololi! It's mask off and open season now.
That's her longest post I've ever seen here, fully scathing of TB, nothing constructive in it at all.

.....CR work for them quietly behind the scenes, without payment,....

Kololi wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:OH WOW, true colour at last from Kololi! It's mask off and open season now.
That's her longest post I've ever seen here, fully scathing of TB, nothing constructive in it at all.

Do you really struggle with honesty that much Aiyoyo? I am guessing only when it doesn't agree with what you think and when you don't want to hear it.

Dig out your happy head and have a - the sun is shining outside.

ShuBob wrote:Anyone who admires a person who has actively hindered a police investigation cannot be honest in my opinion.

rainbow-fairy wrote:

ShuBob wrote:Anyone who admires a person who has actively hindered a police investigation cannot be honest in my opinion.

I'd say Shubob.
How anyone could admire a 'mother' who has 'admitted' to leaving three children under the age of four in an unlocked foreign apartment while they go out on their jollies must be slightly unhinged imo

Kololi wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:OH WOW, true colour at last from Kololi! It's mask off and open season now.
That's her longest post I've ever seen here, fully scathing of TB, nothing constructive in it at all.

Kololi, you were right. No use taking on a supertanker when your'e in a dinghy. Tanker will win, unless you managed to fix its steering wheel beforehand and its course was set inevitably, in advance.

Do you really struggle with honesty that much Aiyoyo? I am guessing only when it doesn't agree with what you think and when you don't want to hear it.

Dig out your happy head and have a - the sun is shining outside.

Miraflores wrote:

.....CR work for them quietly behind the scenes, without payment,....

Well, someone is paying them, they are just not going to work for nothing, whatever Kate naivly thinks!

Newintown wrote:

Miraflores wrote:

.....CR work for them quietly behind the scenes, without payment,....

Well, someone is paying them, they are just not going to work for nothing, whatever Kate naivly thinks!

Kate probably thinks that they're working for nothing because they haven't sent her their bill yet!!

If CR think they still have a few more years to squeeze out every last drop of blood out of this terrible tragedy (poor Madeleine's) they'll hang on to the bitter end and send a bill for about £20m!!!

Newintown wrote:

Miraflores wrote:

.....CR work for them quietly behind the scenes, without payment,....

Well, someone is paying them, they are just not going to work for nothing, whatever Kate naivly thinks!

Kate probably thinks that they're working for nothing because they haven't sent her their bill yet!!

aiyoyo wrote:

Newintown wrote:

Miraflores wrote:

.....CR work for them quietly behind the scenes, without payment,....

Well, someone is paying them, they are just not going to work for nothing, whatever Kate naivly thinks!

Kate probably thinks that they're working for nothing because they haven't sent her their bill yet!!

It's not what kate says or not says that is the crux of the matter here, because we know kate has proven herself to be a liar to suit her convenient.

Rather, the mystery here is why a reputable law firm assigned a full-time employee to spend countless hours monitoring this forum just so that they can tell tales to the mccanns then go for the kill to line their pocket?

It's the mccanns who are bothered by forumites' views so why not let them do their own cybersussing? Why do it for them?
Usually it is down to the client to come with an issue or to produce evidence for the lawyers; and abnormal for lawyers to get on their knees sweeping the place with anti-libel radar just so they have a case for the client and hence money to be made from it.

ShuBob wrote:

rainbow-fairy wrote:

ShuBob wrote:Anyone who admires a person who has actively hindered a police investigation cannot be honest in my opinion.

I'd say Shubob.
How anyone could admire a 'mother' who has 'admitted' to leaving three children under the age of four in an unlocked foreign apartment while they go out on their jollies must be slightly unhinged imo

I can excuse the neglect as a mistake (if you want to call it that cf. Kate) but it's the active hindering of the police investigation for nearly 5 years that I can't excuse. What's admirable about that?

Kololi wrote:

ShuBob wrote:

rainbow-fairy wrote:

ShuBob wrote:Anyone who admires a person who has actively hindered a police investigation cannot be honest in my opinion.

I'd say Shubob.
How anyone could admire a 'mother' who has 'admitted' to leaving three children under the age of four in an unlocked foreign apartment while they go out on their jollies must be slightly unhinged imo

I can excuse the neglect as a mistake (if you want to call it that cf. Kate) but it's the active hindering of the police investigation for nearly 5 years that I can't excuse. What's admirable about that?

Well Shubob I have not stated that I admire Mrs McCann for either of the reasons that Aiyoyo and Rainbow-fairy mention and nor for the reason that you said. Unlike you, I think the neglect issue was and remains inexcusable when considered with certain factors. I do not however, think that the colour of the shoes she is wearing or whether she is wearing the same cardigan as last time or fancy earrings will remotely help find either Madeleine or the truth of what happened that awful evening. And for carrying on with what she appears to believe in despite having everything, even tosh such as her appearance stuck under the microscope I admire her. Some people might argue that she deserves to be scrutinised for pushing herself into our lives via their media campaign. I suppose I would have to accept that as a fair point but it's a two way street and perhaps Mr Bennett would need to be as accepting as her when people criticise him using the same rationale.

Whether she is right or wrong for doing just that is a matter for people a lot more informed than myself to decide and until they enlighten us all, I will generally continue to hold my own counsel as to what I think may have happened that night.

PeterMac wrote:They claim £215,000 each for emotional distress
They say they suffer 'permanent anxiety, insomnia, lack of appetite, irritability and an indefinable fear'.
The writ also says Kate McCann is 'steeped in a deep and serious depression'.

The evidence is clear for all to see.


Incidentally that picture is STILL available for all to see in the Daily Mail archives
see
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-481485/Madeleines-mother-quizzed-Portuguese-police.html
Make your own copy before it is whooshed.

Me wrote:

Kololi wrote:

ShuBob wrote:

rainbow-fairy wrote:

ShuBob wrote:Anyone who admires a person who has actively hindered a police investigation cannot be honest in my opinion.

I'd say Shubob.
How anyone could admire a 'mother' who has 'admitted' to leaving three children under the age of four in an unlocked foreign apartment while they go out on their jollies must be slightly unhinged imo

I can excuse the neglect as a mistake (if you want to call it that cf. Kate) but it's the active hindering of the police investigation for nearly 5 years that I can't excuse. What's admirable about that?

Well Shubob I have not stated that I admire Mrs McCann for either of the reasons that Aiyoyo and Rainbow-fairy mention and nor for the reason that you said. Unlike you, I think the neglect issue was and remains inexcusable when considered with certain factors. I do not however, think that the colour of the shoes she is wearing or whether she is wearing the same cardigan as last time or fancy earrings will remotely help find either Madeleine or the truth of what happened that awful evening. And for carrying on with what she appears to believe in despite having everything, even tosh such as her appearance stuck under the microscope I admire her. Some people might argue that she deserves to be scrutinised for pushing herself into our lives via their media campaign. I suppose I would have to accept that as a fair point but it's a two way street and perhaps Mr Bennett would need to be as accepting as her when people criticise him using the same rationale.

Whether she is right or wrong for doing just that is a matter for people a lot more informed than myself to decide and until they enlighten us all, I will generally continue to hold my own counsel as to what I think may have happened that night.

Well Kate and her husband are claiming in their legal action against both Amaral & TB, that they have and continue to suffer:

"permanent anxiety, insomnia, lack of appetite, irritability and an indefinable fear"

And that Kate McCann is "steeped in a deep and serious depression".

So given the nature of those serious libel claims (which will require proving) it is entirely right that people should comment on her appearance and demeanour to determine if those serious accusations are in fact true.

Here’s the “banned” picture from Holland:



Doesn’t look much like deep and serious depression to me.

No wonder it was banned!

Me wrote:And leading on from my previous post a pertinent question.

If Gerry in particular is suffering in the way their libel writs describe why is the NHS allowing him to continue working as a Doctor / Surgeon?

Me wrote:Let's also look at their claims one by one:

permanent anxiety - I'm sure given the ongoing review and the court cases they are indeed suffering anxiety, but not in the way the libel writ infers.

insomnia - See above

lack of appetite - See above (although i can't see any evidence in recent pictures of weight loss)

irritability - Judging by that video on the bus before Maddie disappeared when Gerry claimed he wasn't there to enjoy himself, it seems "irritability" has been a condition he has suffered long before his daughter went missing

An indefinable fear - Again see above regarding the review

So whilst all these ailments may be accurate reflections of how they feel, i'd wager Amaral's book isn't the cause of all these conditions but the current events in the case overall.