What Do Madeleine McCann’s Siblings Really Know About Her Disappearance?

by **Jill Havern** 02.10.24 22:35

What Do Madeleine McCann’s Siblings Really Know About Her Disappearance?

Published on : October 2, 2024 by Chelsea Hoffman

What Do Madeleine McCann’s Siblings Really Know About Her Disappearance? The-di10

Madeleine McCann vanished more than 17 years ago, after her parents recklessly left her and her infant siblings alone in an apartment while vacationing in Portugal. The likelihood of the girl ever being found, and the same can be said for any actual justice for what might have happened to her. Nonetheless, the public remains captivated to this case that has spanned across nearly two decades. Her siblings have gained media attention recently for making their own promise to find answers alongside their parents, but what do they truly know about her disappearance? Have they been kept sheltered from the unsavory details that paint their parents in a guilty light? Have they been kept sheltered from the police evidence in Portugal that implies their sister never made it out of their rental apartment alive?

Belfast Live reports that the young adult siblings of Madeleine McCann have made appearances alongside their parents in the effort to keep her name in the public eye. The younger siblings of the missing girl have long-been kept from the public spotlight ever since the night she vanished over 17-years-ago. That is clearly due to the high-profile nature of Maddie’s case, but it could also be heavily due to the circumstances of her disappearance and the fact that the entire planet knows that they were the young infants who were shamefully left alone with their toddler sister the night she vanished.

Over the course of the many years that Madeleine has been missing, her parents and their supporters have notoriously complained about the possibility of the twins seeing coverage that is critical of Kate and Gerry McCann. Now that they’re adults, and soon attending university, who’s going to keep them sheltered from all of those evil, evil details? Details such as the cadaver dog evidence which determined that Madeleine McCann possibly suffered some kind of fatal incident while in the rental apartment in Portugal. Evidence which also included the lack of proof of a break-in, but Kate McCann’s fingerprints on the window where it was implied that someone else came in and took the little girl.

Have Kate and Gerry McCann prepared their surviving adult children for the inevitable — that they will eventually have access to all the details and information that the rest of the world has known since 2007? The twin siblings of the long-missing girl have joined in the public spectacle of “never giving up hope,” but what do they really know about the case? Do they know that their parents were negligent at the very least? Do they realize that their parents were suspects in Madeleine’s disappearance?

These are all questions that will likely go unanswered, as the siblings of Madeleine McCann have been brought up in a very PR-controlled environment funded by the donations of a worried public, book sales and tax payer dollars. Meanwhile, investigators in the UK will continue draining every cent they can from the public in order to maintain the façade that Madeleine was taken by some random pervert that they’ll never find, or never have the evidence to truly convict.

https://thejusticevoice.com/news/what-do-madeleine-mccanns-siblings-really-know-about-her-disappearance/10/02/2024/

by **Bluebagthepirate** 03.10.24 8:29

They will have see and overheard some interesting stuff over the last 17 years.

by EaglesEye_ 03.10.24 9:18

I think that siblings have been well protected from the truth all these years, but they have for sure read things & seen things. The silence from the siblings specifically is quite telling in my opinion.

by **PeterMac** 03.10.24 9:39

And the break up of their parent's marriage may have also told them something. Children are not blind or deaf.
Nor are they stupid.
And they are adults now. 20-ish.
Probably been at University for a year, or even two, depending whether they did a Gap year - working in the creche in PdL

by EaglesEye_ 03.10.24 9:41

PeterMac wrote:And the break up of their parent's marriage may have also told them something. Children are not blind or deaf.
Nor are they stupid.
And they are adults now. 20-ish.
Probably been at University for a year, or even two, depending whether they did a Gap year - working in the creche in PdL

Spot on!

by **Silentscope** 03.10.24 11:07

Whatever they may or not know, they are super (inaudible) on the matter.

by Justice for Maddie 03.10.24 11:23

Yes, IMO the poiice should interview the twins (they are adults now!) and maybe they will remember something from their childhood.

What Do Madeleine McCann’s Siblings Really Know About Her Disappearance? 1_Madeleine-McCann-with-her-parents-and-twin-siblings

What Do Madeleine McCann’s Siblings Really Know About Her Disappearance? 1_Madeleine-McCann-with-her-parents-and-twin-siblings

by Amy Dean 03.10.24 11:27

I have never heard that the McCanns have split up.

by **Silentscope** 03.10.24 11:45

Which Police should Interview the Twins?

Portuguese, English or German?

And why was it not done the next morning on 4 May 2007?

by EaglesEye_ 03.10.24 11:58

Silentscope wrote:Which Police should Interview the Twins?

Portuguese, English or German?

And why was it not done the next morning on 4 May 2007?

The portugese police should interview them. They are the «owners» of this case and was first responders.

Main reason for no inteviews 4th of may is that of the abduction narrative. This narrative was provided so early that back then this was the most plausible theory to all of them based on the information given about the time of the events.

by Justice for Maddie 03.10.24 12:01

PJ should interview them, maybe together with Scotland Yard. I don't know why PJ is so silent right now (Bernt's book etc.). It's strange. Amaral is really missing here.

by **AnneCGuedes** 03.10.24 17:59

EaglesEye_ wrote:
Silentscope wrote:Which Police should Interview the Twins?

Portuguese, English or German?

And why was it not done the next morning on 4 May 2007?
The portugese police should interview them. They are the «owners» of this case and was first responders.

Main reason for no inteviews 4th of may is that of the abduction narrative. This narrative was provided so early that back then this was the most plausible theory to all of them based on the information given about the time of the events.

Lee Rainbow adviced to interview the twins, it had been done successfully in Rachel Nickell's 'case, but it took about six months. Can you imagine the PJ doing that, even claiming they follow LR, given the horrors told about PT in the MSM ? I can't.

by **crusader** 03.10.24 21:54

Interview a 2 year old? good luck with that, all they would know is Madeleine wasn't there.
If I know anything about teenagers, Sean and Amalie would read everything they could get their hands on about their sister Madeleine.
Where is the proof the McCann's have split up?

by Amy Dean 03.10.24 22:18

Yes, I asked about the McCanns earlier. If they had split up, it would have been all over the tabloids, blaming vile trolls for harrassing them.

by **crusader** 03.10.24 22:31

Yes I'm sure they would, I wonder where this rumour came from.

by **Ladyinred** 03.10.24 22:33

We discussed their alleged split a few weeks ago on another thread. There are probably legal injunctions in place preventing media reporting on their private lives, IMO.

by **Ladyinred** 03.10.24 22:36

crusader wrote:Yes I'm sure they would, I wonder where this rumour came from.

Wasn't it PeterMac (presumably from Bernt)?

by **AnneCGuedes** 03.10.24 22:57

crusader wrote:Interview a 2 year old? good luck with that, all they would know is Madeleine wasn't there.
If I know anything about teenagers, Sean and Amalie would read everything they could get their hands on about their sister Madeleine.
Where is the proof the McCann's have split up?

Rachel's son was two and a half years old.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/may/27/rachel-nickell-son-husband-andre-alex

by Amy Dean 03.10.24 23:00

He was almost 3, his birthday being in August. He was apparently very bright for his age.

by EaglesEye_ 03.10.24 23:01

Just to clarify, I didn’t mean to suggest the children should’ve been interviewed at that age….but they should have been interviewed a few years later. A child picks up a lot more than what it shows…for all we know maddies siblings especially could have trauma from this event.

by **AnneCGuedes** 03.10.24 23:01

Amy Dean wrote:He was almost 3, his birthday being in August. He was apparently very bright for his age.

It took 6 months of patient relationship with him. He was alone, they were two.

by pinkgladioli 03.10.24 23:03

Ladyinred wrote:
crusader wrote:Yes I'm sure they would, I wonder where this rumour came from.
Wasn't it PeterMac (presumably from Bernt)?

Bernt mentioned it during his James English interview

by **CaKeLoveR** 03.10.24 23:03

Kate McCann suggested that the twins may have been drugged by the 'abductor'. Information from anybody who had been sedated would be unreliable at the very least, as she no doubt knows. It's an even more farcical situation when it involves a pair of two year toddlers. Kate McCann had two reasons for purporting that theory.

by **AnneCGuedes** 03.10.24 23:06

EaglesEye_ wrote:Just to clarify, I didn’t mean to suggest the children should’ve been interviewed at that age….but they should have been interviewed a few years later. A child picks up a lot more than what it shows…for all we know maddies siblings especially could have trauma from this event.

Contact should have been done in the following weeks, now it's much too late. At their age now, soon 20, the natural tendency would be to protect their parents.

by EaglesEye_ 03.10.24 23:53

AnneCGuedes wrote:
EaglesEye_ wrote:Just to clarify, I didn’t mean to suggest the children should’ve been interviewed at that age….but they should have been interviewed a few years later. A child picks up a lot more than what it shows…for all we know maddies siblings especially could have trauma from this event.

Contact should have been done in the following weeks, now it's much too late. At their age now, soon 20, the natural tendency would be to protect their parents.

Well, at the age of 2, you wouldn’t get any more out of them than you would now. They’d should’ve been interviewed between age 4-6……For all we know they can have early childhood trauma from what happened. Which in fact is likely.

by **Bluebagthepirate** 04.10.24 8:47

AnneCGuedes wrote:
EaglesEye_ wrote:Just to clarify, I didn’t mean to suggest the children should’ve been interviewed at that age….but they should have been interviewed a few years later. A child picks up a lot more than what it shows…for all we know maddies siblings especially could have trauma from this event.

Contact should have been done in the following weeks, now it's much too late. At their age now, soon 20, the natural tendency would be to protect their parents.

That's not a given.

Who knows what their frame of mind is.

Could be lots of reasons to throw them under the bus.

Maybe they didn't get on with their father.

Being such a likeable chap.

by **Bluebagthepirate** 04.10.24 8:48

EaglesEye_ wrote:
AnneCGuedes wrote:
EaglesEye_ wrote:Just to clarify, I didn’t mean to suggest the children should’ve been interviewed at that age….but they should have been interviewed a few years later. A child picks up a lot more than what it shows…for all we know maddies siblings especially could have trauma from this event.

Contact should have been done in the following weeks, now it's much too late. At their age now, soon 20, the natural tendency would be to protect their parents.
Well, at the age of 2, you wouldn’t get any more out of them than you would now. They’d should’ve been interviewed between age 4-6……For all we know they can have early childhood trauma from what happened. Which in fact is likely.

17 years of hearing things.

It's not about just that night.

by Justice for Maddie 04.10.24 9:44

https://www.hypnotherapy-directory.org.uk/memberarticles/how-hypnotherapy-can-help-to-heal-childhood-trauma

Maybe a hypnosis can help.

I'm sure they saw and heard a lot during their childhood.

by **crusader** 04.10.24 10:09

We don't know if they do or did suffer from childhood trauma.
Yes they knew Madeleine wasn't there anymore, there were no reports of them crying for Madeleine and they carried on going to the creche as normal.
They didn't hear Kate and Gerry crying and shouting that night, which would have been traumatic for them.
I believe they know nothing only what they have been told by their parents and what they have googled and read for themselves.

by **CaKeLoveR** 04.10.24 10:43

Perhaps the twins prefer to be left alone? If their mother refused to answer questions about something she was fully aware of, they have the same privilege.