Messages from Steve Marsden about something a police officer is supposed to have said to him in 2009
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Latest News and Debate :: Debate Section - for purporting theories
Page 1 of 1 • Share
Messages from Steve Marsden about something a police officer is supposed to have said to him in 2009
by NickE 09.07.15 18:51
I do not know if this has been discussed in some other treads but Steve Marsden posted a couple of messages on Facebook a couple of days ago in which he claims he spoke,2009 with a retired police officer,a man close to Amaral outside Lisbon, the police officer told him how Madeleine died.
Snipped:
Steve states: "I have no reason to doubt what he told me." >>>I do not post the message<<<......he expand...
"I am only pointing out what was said in my conversation with the cop near Lisbon. I cannot vouch for the veracity but I know for sure he and Amaral are close and worked together."
IF true, How can the police know about this and kept quiet? and why?
Steve Marsden: "Having ENOUGH evidence to secure a charge of murder doesn't mean they have no evidence of something happening. It has to be cast iron to get a conviction. Amaral told the cop I spoke with near Lisbon Veronica. Remember that the PJ wanted to introduce the text messages as evidence but were denied by the judge. If Amaral were to reveal the content of the texts via a leak it would prejudice the case and the McCanns would walk free and there would never be a case. Plus he'd be jailed for contempt. This is why the McCanns pursue him so much. Why do you think his dog was killed. I just hope Amaral has the texts saved somewhere very secure if he has a copy".
So the withheld evidence Goncalo refers to could include these texts? Which are now admissable under the new law. Or are they, as they are old evidence?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Snipped:
Steve states: "I have no reason to doubt what he told me." >>>I do not post the message<<<......he expand...
"I am only pointing out what was said in my conversation with the cop near Lisbon. I cannot vouch for the veracity but I know for sure he and Amaral are close and worked together."
IF true, How can the police know about this and kept quiet? and why?
Steve Marsden: "Having ENOUGH evidence to secure a charge of murder doesn't mean they have no evidence of something happening. It has to be cast iron to get a conviction. Amaral told the cop I spoke with near Lisbon Veronica. Remember that the PJ wanted to introduce the text messages as evidence but were denied by the judge. If Amaral were to reveal the content of the texts via a leak it would prejudice the case and the McCanns would walk free and there would never be a case. Plus he'd be jailed for contempt. This is why the McCanns pursue him so much. Why do you think his dog was killed. I just hope Amaral has the texts saved somewhere very secure if he has a copy".
So the withheld evidence Goncalo refers to could include these texts? Which are now admissable under the new law. Or are they, as they are old evidence?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
____________________
Goncalo Amaral: "Then there's the window we found Kate's finger prints.
She said she had never touched that window and the cleaning lady assured that she had cleaned it on the previous day....it doesn't add up"
NickE- Posts : 1404
Activity : 2151
Likes received : 499
Join date : 2013-10-27
Age : 49
Re: Messages from Steve Marsden about something a police officer is supposed to have said to him in 2009
by lj 09.07.15 20:00
Was that on his own facebook page?
____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?" Gerry
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
lj- Posts : 3329
Activity : 3590
Likes received : 208
Join date : 2009-12-01
Re: Messages from Steve Marsden about something a police officer is supposed to have said to him in 2009
by NickE 09.07.15 21:28
You find some here.lj wrote:Was that on his own facebook page?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
He also claim in one of his comments that this Police officer told him who was responsible for her death.
____________________
Goncalo Amaral: "Then there's the window we found Kate's finger prints.
She said she had never touched that window and the cleaning lady assured that she had cleaned it on the previous day....it doesn't add up"
NickE- Posts : 1404
Activity : 2151
Likes received : 499
Join date : 2013-10-27
Age : 49
Re: Messages from Steve Marsden about something a police officer is supposed to have said to him in 2009
by Richard IV 09.07.15 21:28
No.lj wrote:Was that on his own facebook page?
There was a link to the specific Facebook page posted on another forum, but it`s too horrendous to go posting up in full. Like NickE says, it seems odd that the PJ would even know about it without a body. I`m sure everyone has seen it now and doubtless the mods here don`t want it posted up as its extremely libellous.
Richard IV- Posts : 552
Activity : 825
Likes received : 265
Join date : 2015-03-06
Re: Messages from Steve Marsden about something a police officer is supposed to have said to him in 2009
by NickE 09.07.15 21:45
Yes it´s odd,but what bothers me is,this comes from Steve Marsden, my opinion is that he is not that kind of person who just throws out the cruel rumors without any substance at all.Richard IV wrote:No.lj wrote:Was that on his own facebook page?
There was a link to the specific Facebook page posted on another forum, but it`s too horrendous to go posting up in full. Like NickE says, it seems odd that the PJ would even know about it without a body. I`m sure everyone has seen it now and doubtless the mods here don`t want it posted up as its extremely libellous.
____________________
Goncalo Amaral: "Then there's the window we found Kate's finger prints.
She said she had never touched that window and the cleaning lady assured that she had cleaned it on the previous day....it doesn't add up"
NickE- Posts : 1404
Activity : 2151
Likes received : 499
Join date : 2013-10-27
Age : 49
Re: Messages from Steve Marsden about something a police officer is supposed to have said to him in 2009
by Tony Bennett 09.07.15 21:54
NickE wrote:I do not know if this has been discussed in some other treads but Steve Marsden posted a couple of messages on Facebook a couple of days ago in which he claims he spoke,2009 with a retired police officer,a man close to Amaral outside Lisbon, the police officer told him how Madeleine died.
Snipped:
Steve states: "I have no reason to doubt what he told me." >>>I do not post the message<<<......he expand...
"I am only pointing out what was said in my conversation with the cop near Lisbon. I cannot vouch for the veracity but I know for sure he and Amaral are close and worked together."
IF true, How can the police know about this and kept quiet? and why?
Steve Marsden: "Having ENOUGH evidence to secure a charge of murder doesn't mean they have no evidence of something happening. It has to be cast iron to get a conviction. Amaral told the cop I spoke with near Lisbon Veronica. Remember that the PJ wanted to introduce the text messages as evidence but were denied by the judge. If Amaral were to reveal the content of the texts via a leak it would prejudice the case and the McCanns would walk free and there would never be a case. Plus he'd be jailed for contempt. This is why the McCanns pursue him so much. Why do you think his dog was killed. I just hope Amaral has the texts saved somewhere very secure if he has a copy".
So the withheld evidence Goncalo refers to could include these texts? Which are now admissable under the new law. Or are they, as they are old evidence?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Reading through this post I have the following observations:
1. ‘Stevo’ has been right about a number of things and has done some original research BUT (@ NickE) has often been quite wrong as well
2. We are asked to believe the word of someone who says he spoke to an unnamed policeman who on an unspecified date said some words which ‘Stevo’ has not recorded. He may not have even made contemporaneous notes on this alleged ’phone call. If he has, AFAIK he has never produced them, either in full, or redacted where appropriate
3. We are then told that “If Amaral were to reveal the content of the texts via a leak it would prejudice the case and the McCanns would walk free and there would never be a case”.
4. So according to this, Amaral personally knows the content of these texts. Yet in the very next breath we are told: “I just hope Amaral has the texts saved somewhere very secure if he has a copy”. So, according to this, then, Amaral may or may not have the texts saved somewhere and, well, he may or may not have kept a copy.
5. We are told about this unnamed policemen: “I know for sure he and Amaral are close and worked together”. Has ‘Stevo’ onfirmed that with Amaral. Incidentallly, one would hope that as the investigation co-ordinator he would have worked ‘closely’ with ALL the senior members of this team.
6. We know from what has been reported elsewhere that Stevo’s claim is that his policeman contact told him that Madeleine died during an act of sexual abuse against her. Supposing the doubters are right - and that Madeleine did die n Praia da Luz and her body hidden. How, under those circumstances, would the police officer KNOW what happened? And in the unlikely event that these tales by ‘Stevo’ and the policeman are true, why were the McCanns or the perpetrator of these alleged acts not charged and prosecuted?
7. ‘Stevo’ says he has ‘no reason to doubt’ what he was told, but adds (which is self-evident) “I cannot vouch for the veracity…” I’m afraid this really doesn’t amount to evidence of any kind.
8. I think Richard IV is right, this is sheer speculation, and very graphic at that, and I think this thread ought to be wound up before we go on another fevered exploration down Stevo’s latest rabbit warren.
[re: "I think this thread ought to be wound up...". AGREED, and thread locked - Mod.]
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 16906
Activity : 24770
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 76
Location : Shropshire
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Latest News and Debate :: Debate Section - for purporting theories
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
