Operation Grange Update

Tony Bennett wrote:

aiyoyo wrote:
The modus operandi of a whitewash is surely for it to be done clandestinely ensuring no one will be any wiser about the shadow hands involved in it.

aiyoyo, the reverse is often the case.

A cover-up, or whitewash, is often accomplished in the most high profile of circumstances and in the full glare of publicity.

The 'trick' is to bury all the embarrassing details about the case whilst at the same time giving every appearance of having done an honest and thorough investigation.

Take the initial enquiries into 'Bloody Sunday' which blamed Irish republicans for starting the shooting. It needed the Savile enquiry some 40 years later to establish the truth, when TWO previous and very public enquiries had whitewashed/covered up the role of the police (then the Royal Ulster Constabulary) in preciptating the killings.

Also look at the cover-up of the Dunblane killings of 15 children and a teacher. The very public Cullen report blamed the availability of hand guns for the murder of those children, and recommended it be illegal to hold them, whilst at the very same time covering up the fact that paedophile Thomas Hamilton had been allowed to keep his firearms, against the recommendation of a police Firearms Officer who filed an official report saying that he was unsuitable to retain his firearms certtificate.   

Because Hamilton provided boys for perverted senior police officers, senior members of the Scottish political establishment and others, Lord Cullen sealed the records for an almost unprecedented 100 years - and minimised (and all but eliminated all mention nof) the corruption which had allowed him to carry on his paedophilia unmolested by the Scottish police.

Likewise, Redwood's endless procession of almost unbelieveable statistics: thousands of actions, hundreds of lines of enquiry, tens of thousands of mobile phones, dozens of countires, hundreds of sex offenders to eliminate, tens of thousands of documents examined, dozens of suspects etc. etc. will allow the Met (if they can get away with it) to say, at the end of the day, that they have 'left no stone unturned' to find out the truth.

AndyB wrote:And don't forget it would have been an entirely clandestine cover-up had the Portuguese not published the case files.

AndyB wrote:

Gillyspot wrote:Agreed.  Just look at Hillsborough & Bryn Estyn etc  if you need any more evidence that UK PLC do "coverups" - when it suits the establishment = NOT the victims!  

So again I'm back to wondering what on earth it could be that the establishment want covered up

jeanmonroe wrote:

 ready to 'identify' the 'pot bellied' man, lined up by the 'elites' at their ID 'parade' after they have 'cleared the beach' of all the sunbathing 'pot bellied' PERVERTS, in PDL?

plebgate wrote:I don't understand why a 10 yr old girl would not tell her parents about an attempted sexual assault on her by a smelly pot bellied man (or any other person).  She would have been so frightened, I am surprised her parents would  not have noticed and asked what had frightened/upset her.

How can arrests expect to be made shortly when they haven't even traced where the offender lives and as others have said, will have scarpered by now without leaving a forwarding address.   Like eveything else we have read thus far, it doesn't make sense.

russiandoll wrote:

plebgate wrote:I don't understand why a 10 yr old girl would not tell her parents about an attempted sexual assault on her by a smelly pot bellied man (or any other person).  She would have been so frightened, I am surprised her parents would  not have noticed and asked what had frightened/upset her.

How can arrests expect to be made shortly when they haven't even traced where the offender lives and as others have said, will have scarpered by now without leaving a forwarding address.   Like eveything else we have read thus far, it doesn't make sense.

  Plebgate.... according to Sky news yesterday this girl did tell her parents, this was iirc the incident which was reported to the holiday rep but not the police and as I have posted earlier one Portuguese news outlet has said that this was a rape.

 Whoever reported what at the time and to whom....[ confusion is good] ,  it is clear that since the incident, there was no additional report to police until approx. 9 years later.

Dee Coy wrote:A rhetorical question. Why is the patsy the Met has finally plumped for a paedophile? As opposed to a disturbed burglar, a bitter ex-OC employee or a freelance British cleaner?

Dee Coy wrote:A rhetorical question. Why is the patsy the Met has finally plumped for a paedophile? As opposed to a disturbed burglar, a bitter ex-OC employee or a freelance British cleaner?

Bishop Brennan wrote:

Dee Coy wrote:A rhetorical question. Why is the patsy the Met has finally plumped for a paedophile? As opposed to a disturbed burglar, a bitter ex-OC employee or a freelance British cleaner?

SY have basically run several "straw men" in the media and all of them were rightly ridiculed. The motives they tried to pin on the burglars or ex-employees were absurd.  The only one that got traction with the red tops and the public was the paedo patsy. Nobody could question it, the press could have a field day with it.  

Having discovered the correct "motive" and profile, there was a brief attempt to link it the dead tractorman, but that again was just too ridiculous for the public. So now we have a serial sex attacker - a string of crimes to convince everyone, and the hunt is on.  

Of course the chances are this smellyman doesn't exist at all.  Or if he does, he will almost certainly be untraceable. For that reason we have the increase in anti PJ rhetoric, so that SY can bow out in a few months time, complaining that they could not make progress because of the bungling and obstructive PJ.   Patsy identified but not caught; parents exonerated; politicians safe; PJ to blame. Job done. £10m well spent...  

MILLIE wrote:

Bishop Brennan wrote:

Dee Coy wrote:A rhetorical question. Why is the patsy the Met has finally plumped for a paedophile? As opposed to a disturbed burglar, a bitter ex-OC employee or a freelance British cleaner?

SY have basically run several "straw men" in the media and all of them were rightly ridiculed. The motives they tried to pin on the burglars or ex-employees were absurd.  The only one that got traction with the red tops and the public was the paedo patsy. Nobody could question it, the press could have a field day with it.  

Having discovered the correct "motive" and profile, there was a brief attempt to link it the dead tractorman, but that again was just too ridiculous for the public. So now we have a serial sex attacker - a string of crimes to convince everyone, and the hunt is on.  

Of course the chances are this smellyman doesn't exist at all.  Or if he does, he will almost certainly be untraceable. For that reason we have the increase in anti PJ rhetoric, so that SY can bow out in a few months time, complaining that they could not make progress because of the bungling and obstructive PJ.   Patsy identified but not caught; parents exonerated; politicians safe; PJ to blame. Job done. £10m well spent...  

They may think it will work out like that. However, if the Smelly and unshaven bur nevertheless aftershave-favouring (?) paedophile does actually exist at all, and indeed, if all the recently publicised crimes are going to be attributed to him, then surely his defence barrister is going to have a field day with all the anomalies apparent between the other alleged crimes and that relating to Madeleine. It won't be over til the fat man (or at least the fat man's barrister) sings and is heard.

aquila wrote:

MILLIE wrote:

Bishop Brennan wrote:

Dee Coy wrote:A rhetorical question. Why is the patsy the Met has finally plumped for a paedophile? As opposed to a disturbed burglar, a bitter ex-OC employee or a freelance British cleaner?

SY have basically run several "straw men" in the media and all of them were rightly ridiculed. The motives they tried to pin on the burglars or ex-employees were absurd.  The only one that got traction with the red tops and the public was the paedo patsy. Nobody could question it, the press could have a field day with it.  

Having discovered the correct "motive" and profile, there was a brief attempt to link it the dead tractorman, but that again was just too ridiculous for the public. So now we have a serial sex attacker - a string of crimes to convince everyone, and the hunt is on.  




Of course the chances are this smellyman doesn't exist at all.  Or if he does, he will almost certainly be untraceable. For that reason we have the increase in anti PJ rhetoric, so that SY can bow out in a few months time, complaining that they could not make progress because of the bungling and obstructive PJ.   Patsy identified but not caught; parents exonerated; politicians safe; PJ to blame. Job done. £10m well spent...  

They may think it will work out like that. However, if the Smelly and unshaven bur nevertheless aftershave-favouring (?) paedophile does actually exist at all, and indeed, if all the recently publicised crimes are going to be attributed to him, then surely his defence barrister is going to have a field day with all the anomalies apparent between the other alleged crimes and that relating to Madeleine. It won't be over til the fat man (or at least the fat man's barrister) sings and is heard.

The show's not over 'til the fat belly sings.

   

Bishop Brennan wrote: 
Of course the chances are this smellyman doesn't exist at all.  Or if he does, he will almost certainly be untraceable. For that reason we have the increase in anti PJ rhetoric, so that SY can bow out in a few months time, complaining that they could not make progress because of the bungling and obstructive PJ.   Patsy identified but not caught; parents exonerated; politicians safe; PJ to blame. Job done. £10m well spent...