Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1

by chillyheat 27.10.13 1:00

Can this be classed as perverting the course of justice ? Not sure how it works.

by Woofer 27.10.13 1:02

AND ........ this is from the Murdoch press !

by MaryB 27.10.13 1:02

Madeleine could easily have got out of bed and left the apartment. There is nothing to suggest she didn't. Or have I missed something.

by bristow 27.10.13 1:04

Would the Lawyers be CR? And would their actions actually be legal??

by suzyjohnson 27.10.13 1:05

Okeydokey wrote:And this is clearly a claim that Redwood knowingly misled the British people!:

"One of the Oakley investigators said last week: “I was absolutely stunned when I watched the programme . . . It most certainly wasn’t a new timeline and it certainly isn’t a new revelation. It is absolute nonsense to suggest either of those things . . . And those E-Fits you saw on Crimewatch are ours,” he said."

We know it was Redwood who claimed it was a "revelation moment". So that is a very serious charge.

When Redwood read this report I expect it was a revelation moment

by chillyheat 27.10.13 1:05

There simply cannot be spin put out on this revelation....McCanns, your effed. If not by law yet, but by all those around the world whom are seeing you as the definite McScams

Madeleine....It seems Justice is near friends

by worriedmum 27.10.13 1:07

How your information will be used:
Our investigation team greatly appreciate all the information being sent through to them by email & phone. It is vital in helping them to find Madeleine. All information will be used in any way and shared with such relevant third parties as may be required in order to find Madeleine, support her family and bring her abductors to justice. We take our data protection requirements seriously and will treat any personal data we receive in line with these obligations. If you require any limitations on the use if the information you provide or the people with whom we will share the information, please let us know at the time you provide us with the information or as soon as you want these limitations put in place.
Due to the large volume of information that our investigation team receive, they will only re-contact people if additional information is needed. Please be assured that all information is looked at, evaluated and prioritised. Thank you so much for your help.
Contact details when providing information:

Investigation Line:	+44 845 838 4699
Email:	investigation@findmadeleine.com
Post:	Madeleine's Fund: Leaving No Stone Unturned Limited P.O. Box 9880 Leicester LE7 7UJ

( FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES)

by Okeydokey 27.10.13 1:07

Is this the biggest development since release of the PJ files? I would say it is. yes

Fortress McCann hasn't come crashing down but this will have blasted a very big hole through their credibility. And we know they don't have an answer.

by Woofer 27.10.13 1:08

You can understand Exton being angry particularly when Halligen didn't pay him.

by chillyheat 27.10.13 1:10

No wonder Tannerman is still on their website......Bitter till the end, the narcisstic evilites. Not an ounce of care for their daughter. Just a continued charade.

by Okeydokey 27.10.13 1:11

ChillyHeat wrote:There simply cannot be spin put out on this revelation....McCanns, your effed. If not by law yet, but by all those around the world whom are seeing you as the definite McScams

Madeleine....It seems Justice is near

Seconded. This is unspinnable info. The best Clarrie can say is Oakley were being critical of the people involved... I bet they were.

by Okeydokey 27.10.13 1:13

Woofer wrote:You can understand Exton being angry particularly when Halligen didn't pay him.

Oh right! Well he's had his payday now!!

by suzyjohnson 27.10.13 1:13

Woofer wrote:You can understand Exton being angry particularly when Halligen didn't pay him.

Yes you certainly can.

This news, about the report, is good for Amaral and the libel trial isn't it?

by bristow 27.10.13 1:16

suzyjohnson wrote:
Woofer wrote:You can understand Exton being angry particularly when Halligen didn't pay him.
Yes you certainly can.

This news, about the report, is good for Amaral and the libel trial isn't it?

Big time Suzy Johnson, there is no way the Mcs can say his book hindered the search for Madeleine when all the time they were the biggest hinderers!
No wonder they want to become assistants with the opening of the Portuguese investigation!

by Okeydokey 27.10.13 1:16

What are the implications for the libel trial? Highly significant I would have thought... big grin

by worriedmum 27.10.13 1:17

by Okeydokey 27.10.13 1:22

worriedmum wrote:

"I was only taking orders."

"I wasn't carrying a pen at the time and so couldn't be expected to make a note of what the detectives had found."

"It's all ludicrous, though true."

by bristow 27.10.13 1:23

Be sure your sins will find you out is very relevant at this moment in time!

by Okeydokey 27.10.13 1:25

suzyjohnson wrote:
Woofer wrote:You can understand Exton being angry particularly when Halligen didn't pay him.
Yes you certainly can.

This news, about the report, is good for Amaral and the libel trial isn't it?

That's what I was thinking...how could any judge now find against Amaral on the basis that he had impeded the inquiry when they impeded the inquiry themselves so clearly.

by Guest 27.10.13 1:25

I have deleted my earlier post and the reply, I think I may have misread, as I said rather tired, so will re-read tomorrow.

by bristow 27.10.13 1:30

worriedmum wrote:

"We only withheld this much information, so don't get cross with me!"

by chillyheat 27.10.13 1:31

So in a week or so, by reading the report.....SY come on CW and say that Tannerman has come forward after 6 years. That's insane. The investigators never mentioned this, so SY are either fabricating or reeling in....

by Guest 27.10.13 1:32

You still up as well Bristow big grin

by chillyheat 27.10.13 1:33

ChillyHeat wrote:So in a week or so, by reading the report.....SY come on CW and say that Tannerman has come forward after 6 years. That's insane. The investigators never mentioned this, so SY are either fabricating or reeling in....

One of the Oakley investigators said last week: “I was absolutely stunned when I watched the programme . . . It most certainly wasn’t a new timeline and it certainly isn’t a new revelation. It is absolute nonsense to suggest either of those things . . . And those E-Fits you saw on Crimewatch are ours,” he said

Like I said....How did SY find this Tannerman after 6 years....Oh, and with the pyjamas too big grin

by worriedmum 27.10.13 1:35

quote''The report, delivered to the McCanns in November 2008, recommended that the revised timeline should be the basis for future investigations and that the Smith E-Fits should be released without delay.'' unquote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iZ4PLUPOjE

Madeleine McCann - Christmas 2008 Appeal NEW OFFICIAL VIDEO!!!

SPEECHLESS sad1

WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1