The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Mm11

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Regist10
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Mm11

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Regist10

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Page 14 of 40 Previous  1 ... 8 ... 13, 14, 15 ... 27 ... 40  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Guest 08.10.13 17:15

All tweets from Mr Amaral's witnesses today are now in Libel trial UPDATE thread to read altogether.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Cristobell 08.10.13 17:21

plebgate wrote:
Cristobell wrote:So sorry I can't c/p - but saw a tweet that said Scotland Yard are only investigating abduction.  Did anyone capture it? Didn't like the sound of that at all.
Yes one of Mr. A.'s witnesses said it today apparently.

Edited to add:

Jerry Lawton@JerryLawton 1m
Flores says `prophetic and dogmatic vision' behind current SY #McCann probe. UK cops `only putting forward the hypothesis of abduction'
Thank you Plebgate - don't like the sound of that, especially combined with the filming in Spain.  Can they really persuade the world that the McCanns are innocent?
avatar
Cristobell

Posts : 2436
Activity : 2552
Likes received : 6
Join date : 2011-10-12

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Guest 08.10.13 17:25

Anne Guedes clapping  has added this in reply to this tweet from Jerry Lawton........




Jerry Lawton@JerryLawton 37m
judge says book cover says it contains `exclusive revelations'..`ok so then I have to conclude this is misleading advertising', #McCann




anne guedes@aacg 21m
@JerryLawton @xklamation And, getting no clear answer, she concluded firmly : Then there are no revelations !







So is the Judge saying if there are no revelations, then it is nothing new and all in the files????  Does anyone else read it that way?  Or have I got that wrong?
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by plebgate 08.10.13 17:26

Could it be Cristsobell that she is hoping that something from Monday's Crimewatch prog. will help during any questioning by the Judge?
avatar
plebgate

Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Newintown 08.10.13 17:28

Cristobell wrote:
plebgate wrote:
Cristobell wrote:So sorry I can't c/p - but saw a tweet that said Scotland Yard are only investigating abduction.  Did anyone capture it? Didn't like the sound of that at all.
Yes one of Mr. A.'s witnesses said it today apparently.

Edited to add:

Jerry Lawton@JerryLawton 1m
Flores says `prophetic and dogmatic vision' behind current SY #McCann probe. UK cops `only putting forward the hypothesis of abduction'
Thank you Plebgate - don't like the sound of that, especially combined with the filming in Spain.  Can they really persuade the world that the McCanns are innocent?
After the whole world has read GA's book and the PJ files thanks to all the advertising they've had at the trial I would say "no".  big grin

____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........

"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"

Newintown
Newintown

Posts : 1597
Activity : 1622
Likes received : 2
Join date : 2011-07-19

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Truthandjustice 08.10.13 17:29

candyfloss wrote:

So is the Judge saying if there are no revelations, then it is nothing new and all in the files????  Does anyone else read it that way?  Or have I got that wrong?
Yes that is what she meant.  I think the book was intended to be published before the publication of the files, maybe that's why it claimed exclusive on the cover
avatar
Truthandjustice

Posts : 237
Activity : 240
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2013-09-24

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by plebgate 08.10.13 17:29

candyfloss wrote:Anne Guedes clapping  has added this in reply to this tweet from Jerry Lawton........




Jerry Lawton@JerryLawton 37m
judge says book cover says it contains `exclusive revelations'..`ok so then I have to conclude this is misleading advertising', #McCann




anne guedes@aacg 21m
@JerryLawton @xklamation And, getting no clear answer, she concluded firmly : Then there are no revelations !







So is the Judge saying if there are no revelations, then it is nothing new and all in the files????  Does anyone else read it that way?  Or have I got that wrong?



  

Yes I think that is what she is saying CF.
avatar
plebgate

Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Cristobell 08.10.13 17:31

Hi Candyfloss, I think the Judge is trying to establish if the conclusions of the book are the same as the conclusions of the file, is that what you are thinking too?  Or perhaps, she means any revelations that would stop people searching?
avatar
Cristobell

Posts : 2436
Activity : 2552
Likes received : 6
Join date : 2011-10-12

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Newintown 08.10.13 17:32

candyfloss wrote:Jerry Lawton@JerryLawton 5m
Port police organised crime unit head Luis Neves said Amaral's conclusion Madeleine was dead was accepted early on by parents



 Jerry Lawton@JerryLawton 9m
Contrary to #McCann claim Paiva says publication of Amaral's book did not hinder the `flow of information' coming in to police




Jerry Lawton@JerryLawton 11m
Paiva: the book `contains the professional and personal opinions of Goncalo Amaral as a police officer' #McCann
It's been mentioned on this forum a few times by different people that very early on the McCanns have stated that they accept that Madeleine could be dead (although I can't remember if it was printed in an article or said in an interview) so I've always wondered why they started the Fund and the libel trial knowing full well they have said that in the past.

____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........

"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"

Newintown
Newintown

Posts : 1597
Activity : 1622
Likes received : 2
Join date : 2011-07-19

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Cristobell 08.10.13 17:36

Apologies Candyfloss, I didn't see AG's follow up tweet.

No revelations - they have no case!
avatar
Cristobell

Posts : 2436
Activity : 2552
Likes received : 6
Join date : 2011-10-12

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by tiny 08.10.13 17:47

A big thank you Anne.

 

anne guedes@aacg 21m
@JerryLawton @xklamation And, getting no clear answer, she concluded firmly : Then there are no revelations !
tiny
tiny

Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by aiyoyo 08.10.13 17:48


Cursing Kate must now curse ID for accepting their case!big grin 

They didn't take small mercies when the case was shelved and walked into the sunset.
Brought this recurring negative news on themselves.
Let's see what the Review they pushed for and got has in store for them!
aiyoyo
aiyoyo

Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by ultimaThule 08.10.13 17:50


  1. Rothley Pillowcase™@RothleyPillow 36m
    @JerryLawton HILARIOUS stuff > Keep it coming now! Don't put your usual @carterruck slant on this court report! Give it us straight #McCann
    Details

  2. 8:46 AM - 8 Oct 13 · Details
  3. LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 C8twye5in7ju1h56z4by_normalpippa@PippaBrownp29 33m
    @JerryLawton or maybe Gonc trying to mislead his readers #moreappropriate #McCann
    Details
    8:49 AM - 8 Oct 13 · Details
  4. LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Photo_normalJoana Morais@xklamation 29m
    @JerryLawton Marketing by the book publisher, in any case book were exclusive at the time of the book publication.
    Details
    8:52 AM - 8 Oct 13 · Details
  5. LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Photo_normalJoana Morais@xklamation 28m
    @JerryLawton Public Ministry hadn't yet released the files, that only happened in August 4, 2008.
    Details
  6. LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 5de4703304b8ee9a00c509babdb33c8d_normalanne guedes@aacg 24m
    @JerryLawton @xklamation The judge asked whether she had to conclude this. She embarassed the witness 3 times, repeating the question.
    Details
  7. LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 5de4703304b8ee9a00c509babdb33c8d_normalanne guedes@aacg 23m
    @JerryLawton @xklamation And, getting no clear answer, she concluded firmly : Then there are no revelations !
    Details
  8. LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Photo_normalJoana Morais@xklamation 19m
    @aacg Which witnness? And she should have posed thar question to the book publishers imo.
    Details
  9. LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Vroom-twitter-logo_normalGareth Bouch@garethbouch 18m
    @JerryLawton It *does* - revelations are not the same as conclusions. Probably things like this… http://twitpic.com/dgk7hq 
    Details
  10. LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Photo_normalJoana Morais@xklamation 16m
    @aacg :) obrigada, parece ter sido uma excelente sessão para a defesa.
    Details
  11. LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 5de4703304b8ee9a00c509babdb33c8d_normalanne guedes@aacg 15m
    @xklamation Paiva. It was extremely well done ! I wish you could hear their voices !
    Details
  12. LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 18032010047_normaldeborah butler@IWILLNOTGOAWAY 12m
    @xklamation @aacg THANK YOU PORTUGAL . THANK YOU AMARAL . For Madeleine #mccann
    Details
  13. LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Photo_normalJoana Morais@xklamation 11m
    @aacg :D damn you're making me jealous, wish I'd been there. No issues with you know whom, after that ridiculous threat in here last week?
    Details


I wish I'd been there too  

Wouldn't it be sublime if ID's non-appearance today is due to her having been banned from the Court after her insane ranting at Anne Guedes last week?
ultimaThule
ultimaThule

Posts : 3355
Activity : 3376
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2013-09-18

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Guest 08.10.13 18:00

Jerry Lawton@JerryLawton 9m
#McCann libel hearing adjourned until Nov 5. If allowed Madeleine's parents & Amaral expected to speak on same day on or after Nov 27
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by ultimaThule 08.10.13 18:01

aiyoyo wrote:
Cursing Kate must now curse ID for accepting their case!big grin 

They didn't take small mercies when the case was shelved and walked into the sunset.  
Brought this recurring negative news on themselves.
Let's see what the Review they pushed for and got has in store for them!
In the absence of either of the gruesome twosome I wonder if any of their plethora of British lawyers were present in Court today, or if they are entirely reliant on Jerry Lawton updates from ID who was also conspicuous by her absence?
ultimaThule
ultimaThule

Posts : 3355
Activity : 3376
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2013-09-18

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Cristobell 08.10.13 18:02

Wasn't Isabel there?
avatar
Cristobell

Posts : 2436
Activity : 2552
Likes received : 6
Join date : 2011-10-12

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Guest 08.10.13 18:05

Cristobell wrote:Wasn't Isabel there?
No, according to what was posted here earlier, she sent her assistant.

ETA.....strange that Jerry Lawton never mentioned it though.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Daily Mail latest

Post by Sceptic 08.10.13 18:05

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2449861/Kate-McCann-mother-Madeleine-tells-libel-hearing-wants-defend-court-smears-Portuguese-police-over.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
avatar
Sceptic

Posts : 198
Activity : 311
Likes received : 35
Join date : 2013-09-28

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by loopzdaloop 08.10.13 18:14

Sceptic wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2449861/Kate-McCann-mother-Madeleine-tells-libel-hearing-wants-defend-court-smears-Portuguese-police-over.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
Oh dear oh dear - for the Mccann's,
Wait til Carter Ruck See that! The first balanced news article for a long time!!



Kate McCann tells libel hearing she wants to defend herself in court against ‘smears’ made against her by Portuguese police


  • Kate McCann has requested permission to defend herself in libel case



  • Gerry McCann has also expressed a wish to speak during trial



  • Family is suing Goncaro Amaral over book The Truth of the Lie


  • Police chief claimed the McCanns hid Madeleine's body after she died in an accident then faked her abduction



By Gerard Couzens
PUBLISHED:17:12, 8 October 2013| UPDATED:17:12, 8 October 2013








0

View
comments



The tormented mother of Madeleine McCann has said she wants to defend herself in open court for the first time against Portuguese police 'smears' over her daughter's disappearance.

Kate McCann has asked a judge for permission to address a libel trial brought after a controversial book suggested the McCanns may have hidden their daughter's body and staged an abduction.

The author of The Truth Of The Lie is ex-police chief Goncalo Amaral, 56, who was tasked with investigating Madeleine's May 2007 disappearance.


LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Article-0-03CD3FC700000514-403_634x744
Kate McCann attended the opening day of the trial but has since stayed away, leaving it to friends and family to represent her, until Mr Armal began his defense


LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Article-2441552-1875F02600000578-867_634x555
Hearing: Gerry McCann has also expressed a wish to testify against police chief Goncaro Amaral
Kate's husband Gerry and Mr Amaral have already applied to speak in the Portuguese court.

Her application, revealed at the libel trial today as former police colleagues of Mr Amaral spoke in his defence, paves the way for an emotional finale to the case.

It comes just days ahead of a new appeal by the McCanns for information on their missing daughter on BBC's Crimewatch which will feature a reconstruction of events in Praia da Luz on May 3 2007.

It is thought Gerry and Kate, 45, will appeal directly to a kidnapper during the programme.

Madeleine's mother flew to Portugal for the start of the libel trial last month - but had left it to friends and relatives to testify before Mr Amaral's side launched its defence.


More...

  • Libyan extremists threaten to kidnap Westerners and attack pipelines in revenge for capture of Al Qaeda boss by U.S. forces


  • 'Death would have been better': How Elizabeth Smart was told her family had stopped looking for her during her rape hell as she details why she wrote her memoir



Judge Maria Emilia Melo e Castro, referring to Kate by her maiden name as she revealed her change of heart, said: 'On October 2 Kate Healy made an application to make a statement to this court.

'The court will decide on this application once evidence has been heard by both sides as only then will it be it able to judge on the need for and the pertinence of this application.'

If given the go-ahead, the McCanns and Mr Amaral are expected to speak on the same day on or after November 27 when the last hearing in the trial at Lisbon's Palace of Justice is scheduled.

Former colleagues of Mr Amaral's turned up the heat on the McCanns today by insisting nothing he wrote in his July 2008 book was new.

The book was published just three days after the McCanns had their status as suspects over Madeleine's disappearance officially lifted.

Around 120,000 copies were sold before it was withdrawn when the McCanns won an injunction against the ex-police chief.



LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Article-2441552-1875F17F00000578-487_634x607
Proceedings: Mr McCann in the court building, where the case against Mr Amaral is being heard


LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Article-2441552-1875F26900000578-450_634x827
Anger: Mr McCann claims the allegations made it harder to search for his daughter, who vanished in 2007
Portuguese TV station TVI, also being sued by the McCanns along with Mr Amaral's book publishers, broadcast a controversial documentary based on the book in April 2009.

Former family liaison officer Ricardo Paiva told the court: 'What is in the book is based on our investigation and contains the professional and personal opinions of Goncalo Amaral as a police officer.

'Everything that is there can be found in the case files.'

Contradicting earlier claims by the McCanns' family and friends that Mr Amaral's book had hindered their search for their daughter by turning the Portuguese public against them, he added: 'The flow of information continued to come in regularly.

'Neither this book or any other book affected the flow of information.'

Luis Neves, head of a national police unit tasked with investigating organised crime, including kidnappings, said Mr Amaral's conclusion Madeleine was dead was an idea accepted early on by her parents.

He insisted Kate was the driving force behind a failed July 2007 search for Madeleine by controversial ex-south African detective Danie Krugel, who claimed to have invented a machine which could locate a body if provided with a DNA sample.

Neves said the reservations he felt over Mr Krugel were shared by colleagues about sniffer dogs supplied by British police which went on to smell the 'scent of death' in the McCanns' holiday apartment and place a huge question mark over the hypothesis Madeleine was kidnapped.

The performance of the dogs was later called into question after they also reacted to remains at Haut de la Garenne orphanage in Jersey, which were later found to be animal bones.



LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Article-2441552-1876007400000578-947_634x454
Battle: Mr McCann and his family are still looking for Madeleine, who was aged three when she disappeared


Mr Neves told the court: 'The McCanns convinced us we should bring in the south African man with his equipment.

'We didn't want to place any obstacles in the way and so the investigating officers eventually allowed it.

'It was during this part of the investigation our British colleagues said there was a team made up of dogs and their handlers that could help us to find out where the child could be buried.

'It was from then on that the Algarve police division decided to allow the dogs to come and the idea of Madeleine's death began to form and things took another direction.

'I know the suggestion of the dogs was not accepted lightly.

'We had no experience of it in Portugal and the cost was another factor.'

Retired police officer Francisco Moita Flores, now a TV commentator, described the Madeleine McCann investigation as one of the 'most complex and well-investigated cases' he had had ever seen and called Mr Amaral 'competent.'

He insisted the Tapas Nine - the McCanns and the friends dining with them at a tapas bar near their apartment the night Madeleine disappeared - should have had their phones tapped because of 'inconsistencies' in their statements.

Attacking the ongoing Home Office-funded Met Police investigation into Madeleine's disappearance, called Operation Grange, he told the court: 'There's a prophetic and dogmatic vision behind it.

'These detectives are only putting forward the hypothesis of abduction.'

Judge Maria Emilio Melo e Castro stopped lawyers on both sides asking Mr Amaral's former police colleagues what they thought about his conclusions on Madeleine and her parents in his book because they were 'opinions' and not 'facts.'



LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Article-2441552-049901FC000005DC-385_634x740
Victim: Madeleine's disappearance sparked a worldwide police search, but she has not yet been found


LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Article-2441552-03CD407400000514-381_634x453
Couple: Gerry and Kate McCann say they were extremely distressed by Mr Amaral's book, published in 2008

She waved the book in her hand as she demanded to know from Ricardo Paiva: 'The back cover says it contains exclusive revelations.

'What's new in the book that's not in the police files?'

Told by Mr Paiva, 'Nothing', she replied: 'Ok, so then I have to conclude this is misleading advertising.'

Another defence witness, Mr Amaral's ex-number two Vitor Tavares de Almeida, was bizarrely dismissed after being asked just one question.

The police chief, still a serving officer despite being convicted in January of torturing a crime suspect and receiving a two and a half suspended jail sentence, has previously claimed he believes the McCanns concealed Madeleine's body.

He was overheard on a video link muttering: 'What am I doing here?' before being sent away after admitting he had only read the final two pages of Mr Amaral's book.

Mr Amaral denies defamation. The case continues.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2449861/Kate-McCann-mother-Madeleine-tells-libel-hearing-wants-defend-court-smears-Portuguese-police-over.html#ixzz2h9SYwUI2
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Have copy/pasted it before Carter Ruck tries to get it whooshed.

That contains some very unhelpful relevations that have not been printed in the UK media for a very long time!!

I'm really happy after reading that!

Not only does it mention DOGS, but it mentions INCONSISTENCIES of statements and also highlights the Mccann's interests in the occult detectives with the magic detecting machine of death!
loopzdaloop
loopzdaloop

Posts : 389
Activity : 481
Likes received : 60
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by aiyoyo 08.10.13 18:14

candyfloss wrote:
Cristobell wrote:Wasn't Isabel there?
No, according to what was posted here earlier, she sent her assistant.

ETA.....strange that Jerry Lawton never mentioned it though

THINK about it!

Someone has to question the witnesses from ID side!
aiyoyo
aiyoyo

Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Guest 08.10.13 18:16

And now we know what all the media/pr panic has been all about in the past few days.  I think the British public are entitled to know why Scotland Yard only want to investigate an abduction and nothing else?  Worldwide we are entitled to know why, if the McCann's accepted she was dead, did they not halt the fund.  Clarence Mitchell would surely have known of this acceptance.  Did Esther Mcvey know too?  Is this the reason for her quick departure from the fund's board?
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Guest 08.10.13 18:24

This is not very helpful at all....










.



Former family liaison officer Ricardo Paiva told the court: 'What is in the book is based on our investigation and contains the professional and personal opinions of Goncalo Amaral as a police officer.

'Everything that is there can be found in the case files.'

Contradicting earlier claims by the McCanns' family and friends that Mr Amaral's book had hindered their search for their daughter by turning the Portuguese public against them, he added: 'The flow of information continued to come in regularly.

Luis Neves, head of a national police unit tasked with investigating organised crime, including kidnappings, said Mr Amaral's conclusion Madeleine was dead was an idea accepted early on by her parents.


He insisted Kate was the driving force behind a failed July 2007 search for Madeleine by controversial ex-south African detective Danie Krugel, who claimed to have invented a machine which could locate a body if provided with a DNA sample


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2449861/Kate-McCann-mother-Madeleine-tells-libel-hearing-wants-defend-court-smears-Portuguese-police-over.html#ixzz2h9V3gBjB
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by sharonl 08.10.13 18:25

candyfloss wrote:All tweets from Mr Amaral's witnesses today are now in Libel trial UPDATE thread to read altogether.
And here is a convenient summary, witness by witness:

The evidence of Amaral’s witnesses as recorded by Jerry Lawton’s tweets ............

Ricardo Paiva

Former Portuguese police family liaison officer Ricardo Paiva tells McCann libel trial Amaral's book was `based on our investigation'…Paiva says: the book `contains the professional and personal opinions of Goncalo Amaral as a police officer…contrary to McCann claim Paiva says publication of Amaral's book did not hinder the `flow of information' coming in to police….Paiva says everything in Amaral's book `can be found in the case files' which have been made public #McCann

Port police organised crime unit head Luis Neves

Said Amaral's conclusion ‘Madeleine was dead’ was accepted early on by parents…Neves said: Kate driving force behind failed July 2007 search by controversial ex-South African cop Danie Krugel with body-finding machine…Neves said: Brit police suggested bringing in sniffer dogs..`not accepted lightly' due to `cost' and `no experience of it in Portugal'

Retired cop Francisco Moita Flores

Said McCann probe was one of `most complex and well-investigated cases' he'd seen…Amaral was `competent'…Flores said: McCann and Tapas 7 friends should have had their ‘phones tapped because of `inconsistencies' in their statements. Flores says `prophetic and dogmatic vision' behind current Scotland Yard probe. UK cops `only putting forward the hypothesis of abduction'

Judge

Judge stops lawyers on both sides asking Amaral's former cop colleagues their conclusions on McCann case because `opinions' not `facts'

Judge to Paiva: `What's new in the book that's not in the police files?'

Paiva answers: `Nothing'

Judge says book cover says it contains `exclusive revelations'…OK so then I have to conclude this is misleading advertising'

________________

As worriedmum said: How much of this will the British press report? Where will be the screaming headlines to match: 'Arrests soon' and 'Maddie still alive'?

What about: 'Met wrong to claim Maddie was abducted'
sharonl
sharonl
Forum Owner

Posts : 8561
Activity : 11200
Likes received : 1397
Join date : 2009-12-29

http://www.cold2012.org.uk

Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Guest 08.10.13 18:25

As taxpayers we have the right to know that Scotland Yard is approaching the investigation we are paying for into Madeleine's disappearance in a balanced way. If Scotland Yard is deliberately avoiding one line of investigation based on prejudice – as has just been claimed in an EU court – I would expect our newspapers to quickly pick up on this and demand to know whether or not all lines of investigation are being properly followed. Isn't that what this press freedom they are currently supposedly fighting for is supposed to be about? Or is it just about spying on distraught families like the Dowlers and minor celebs like Sienna Miller?
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE   - Page 14 Empty Re: LIBEL TRIAL DISCUSSION HERE

Post by Guest 08.10.13 18:26

Attacking the ongoing Home Office-funded Met Police investigation into Madeleine's disappearance, called Operation Grange, he told the court: 'There's a prophetic and dogmatic vision behind it.

'These detectives are only putting forward the hypothesis of abduction.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2449861/Kate-McCann-mother-Madeleine-tells-libel-hearing-wants-defend-court-smears-Portuguese-police-over.html#ixzz2h9VloeFU
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Page 14 of 40 Previous  1 ... 8 ... 13, 14, 15 ... 27 ... 40  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum