Dog alerts in the car - "meaningless" explanation

by Guest 16.06.13 22:48

This is indeed the most meaningless explanation I've ever seen ...

"
Doesn't have to be that complicated. It is not unlikely that one of the policemen who handled the clothes and drove the car had been in touch with a dead body .The PJ failed to wear protective clothing when examining the crime scene and driving the car so it is highly likely they contaminated the scene themselves. That's why the dog's reactions are meaningless
"

by Ollie1 16.06.13 22:56

Châtelaine wrote:This is indeed the most meaningless explanation I've ever seen ...

"
Doesn't have to be that complicated. It is not unlikely that one of the policemen who handled the clothes and drove the car had been in touch with a dead body .The PJ failed to wear protective clothing when examining the crime scene and driving the car so it is highly likely they contaminated the scene themselves. That's why the dog's reactions are meaningless
"

The policeman also crawled around in the boot of the Scenic for good measure! Yeah ok!

by bobbin 16.06.13 23:01

Châtelaine wrote:This is indeed the most meaningless explanation I've ever seen ...

"
Doesn't have to be that complicated. It is not unlikely that one of the policemen who handled the clothes and drove the car had been in touch with a dead body .The PJ failed to wear protective clothing when examining the crime scene and driving the car so it is highly likely they contaminated the scene themselves. That's why the dog's reactions are meaningless
"

Blood was found where the dogs marked, blood which demonstrated 15 out of 19 of Maddie's blood alleles.
This makes the dogs' reactions valid.
Was this a 'pinkie pie' quote or one of Gerry's or Kate's. spin

by ShuBob 16.06.13 23:09

It sounds like the sort of comment one would expect from the self-proclaimed child protection expert Mark Williams-Thomas roll

by lj 17.06.13 0:13

Ollie1 wrote:
Châtelaine wrote:This is indeed the most meaningless explanation I've ever seen ...

"
Doesn't have to be that complicated. It is not unlikely that one of the policemen who handled the clothes and drove the car had been in touch with a dead body .The PJ failed to wear protective clothing when examining the crime scene and driving the car so it is highly likely they contaminated the scene themselves. That's why the dog's reactions are meaningless
"
The policeman also crawled around in the boot of the Scenic for good measure! Yeah ok!

No but he had sea bass for lunch (with a bottle of wine of course).