IFLG and PACT

Page 1 of 4 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

IFLG and PACT

Post  PeterMac on Sun Jul 03, 2011 9:02 am

Within a day or so of the 'event' the International Family Law Group (IFLG) were involved and had sent out a representative.
Subsequently the McCanns got into the organisation Parents and Abducted Children Together, (PACT)

Both agencies talks about 'abducted children', but not in the sense of abduction by stranger, pae****, or anyone other than the natural father/mother who happens to live somethere else and usually outside the jurisdiction of the British Courts.

IFLG
"We resolve the financial aspects of relationship breakdown for all families. This includes expertise in high net worth individuals with global and complex assets. We also look after the distinctive aspects of international families and expatriates, working closely with many lawyers abroad.

Our work includes international child abduction as well as all other national and international disputes involving children.

We provide a full range of alternative dispute resolution services including a specialist mediation service. This includes both high conflict situations involving cross-border issues with children and complex financial circumstances. Our mediators have a wide range of experience and knowledge in dealing with relationship breakdown which extends across international borders. They understand the difficulties faced by parents wishing to live in different countries and cover Hague and non-Hague child abduction, international contact and child relocation dispute."


PACT
"Parental child abduction across borders

As a pioneer in this field, PACT has played a significant role in raising awareness of international parental child abduction and how it affects children. We have, for example, lobbied the House of Commons, the US Congress and EU institutions. PACT has produced a documentary which has been distributed worldwide. Although we are not a helpline, our website offers advice on steps for parents to take if their child has been abducted to a Hague Convention country. "


Again, just to bash it home, the taking of a child by one parent from the custody of the other parent, so that the child can live as part of the first parent's family.
NOT the unlawful removal of a child by someone outside the family.

It was reported that Katey first said words along the lines "They've taken her".
Other members of the group were reported to have said words along the lines 'We knew something might happen, but not this.'
And for the first few days both Katey and Gerry used the expression "...when IT happened". Does this imply that there was previous knowledge of an outcome ?
Some of these statements have been edited or denied subsequently.
Both parents insist Madeleine is alive and well, unharmed, and at one point even insisted she was living with a couple.

Was this a strategy which went wrong, and was subsequently dropped, perhaps on legal advice, in favour of the predatory Pae****, who had been watching for some time, taking notes (!) and so on ?
The problem with the change is that the insisting on Madeleine's safety canot be transferred from the first scenario to the second.

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts: 3955
Join date: 2010-12-06

Back to top Go down

IFLG and PACT

Post  No Fate Worse Than De'Ath on Sun Jul 03, 2011 9:35 am

Thanks for the information PeterMac on these two organisations, it's certainly strange that they became involved in a case which, with its theory of stranger abduction, does not come within their remit. I'm wondering if there is any relevance to the report that, at one time, there was talk of transferring the care of Madeleine to a relative.

No Fate Worse Than De'Ath

Posts: 2888
Join date: 2011-03-27
Location: Over the hills and far away

Back to top Go down

Re: IFLG and PACT

Post  candyfloss on Sun Jul 03, 2011 9:52 am

Jean wrote:Thanks for the information PeterMac on these two organisations, it's certainly strange that they became involved in a case which, with its theory of stranger abduction, does not come within their remit. I'm wondering if there is any relevance to the report that, at one time, there was talk of transferring the care of Madeleine to a relative.


I always thought that question 41 was a very strange thing to ask. What would prompt the PJ to ask such a question?

Question 41

41. Is it true that in England you even considered handing over Madeleine’s custody to a relative?


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1041635/The-48-questions-Kate-McCann-wouldnt-answer--did.html#ixzz1R1wkmcLk

____________________



candyfloss
Super duper Moderator

Posts: 11731
Join date: 2009-11-27
Age: 60

Back to top Go down

Re: IFLG and PACT

Post  PeterMac on Sun Jul 03, 2011 9:59 am

Indeed. I don't know of the source of that particular rumour, but good detectives, like good barristers, do not ask questions unless they already know the answer.
And add to that the otherwise extraordinary statement by Katey that Madeleine 'would be giving her 'abductor' her tuppenceworth', which is so unlikely and ludicrous in the case of a pred** paed***, but much more likely and possible in the case of a 'natural parent' with whom Madeleine had not previously lived.

Personally I do not yet go for this particular conspiracy theory, but I am having difficulty resolving this issue.

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts: 3955
Join date: 2010-12-06

Back to top Go down

IFLG and PACT

Post  Marian on Sun Jul 03, 2011 1:36 pm

I've just seen a short-lived topic in January about our old friend Jim Gamble being on the board of PACT though not I think in 2007. Still, he gets around, doesn't he?

Marian

Posts: 1071
Join date: 2010-12-19
Location: England

Back to top Go down

Re: IFLG and PACT

Post  lj on Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:21 pm

I know the non=profit circuit in 2 countries and it is a little happy group of people, given each other jobs, appointing each other at the boards, giving grands to each other.
An ideal environment for laundering money and paying people off with, amongst other things, outrageous reimbursements for expenses.

____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?"
Gerry, (this man is a doctor!!)

lj

Posts: 785
Join date: 2009-12-01

Back to top Go down

Re: IFLG and PACT

Post  alison on Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:59 am

I thought it might be worth raising this issue again, as Tony B enquired about the IFLG in another post. PeterMac has raised an interesting point here. Why would this group be involved?

____________________


alison
Researcher

Posts: 143
Join date: 2010-10-21

Back to top Go down

Re: IFLG and PACT

Post  tigger on Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:17 pm

From google search on IFLG
quote:
Managing Partner: Ann Thomas
Number of partners: 6
Assistant solicitors: 4
Other fee-earners: 3
Consultants: 2
THE FIRM Ann Thomas and David Hodson founded The International Family Law Group LLP (“iFLG”) in 2007 each having a wealth of experience in international family law cases. They are both Fellows of the IAML. Carolynn Usher, Punam Denley, Lucy Greenwood and Helen Blackburn are fellow partners, and have huge experience in international and national family law cases.Consultants, Patrick Parkinson A.M. and Denise Carter OBE (former Director of Reunite and mediator) are Consultants of iFLG.

PRINCIPAL AREAS OF WORK iFLG deal with all issues arising from relationship breakdown for national and international families/expatriates, including all disputes involving children (including child abduction, relocation and adoption), marriage/separation agreements, jurisdiction and finance work. iFLG provides a full range of alternative dispute resolution services.

INTERNATIONAL iFLG is associated with Watts McCray of Sydney and Canberra, Australia. unquote

So how on earth did the McCanns know about the IFLG or indeed did the IFLG concern itself with what was supposed to be an abduction by pedophiles?
And they had been in existence for no more than four months!
Besides, their verdict on the parenting of the anointed two would be INADMISSIBLE in court, since they are not qualified to give such an assurance. It must be solely an opinion. Only the social services are empowered to make such judgements surely? Otherwise any tin pot solicitor can set himself up to distribute 'get out of jail free' cards to all and sundry.

____________________
What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account? Macbeth Act V

tigger

Posts: 4967
Join date: 2011-07-20

Back to top Go down

Re: IFLG and PACT

Post  jd on Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:27 pm

Someone involved in the coverup knew them which is why they were sent over.....Question is who?

____________________
Who pulled the strings?...THE SYMINGTONS..And the Scottish connections...Look no further if you dare

jd

Posts: 3652
Join date: 2011-07-22

Back to top Go down

Re: IFLG and PACT

Post  tigger on Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:35 pm

I've lifted this from the topic by Getem: Ex-CEOP Chief Jim Gamble joins board of kids charity PACT
theolivebranch on Thu Jan 27, 2011 9:13 pm

Cherry wrote:
Patrons, Cherie Blair and Laura Bush

Hon. Chairs include Hilary Clinton, Henry Kissinger, Sir David Veness and actor Michael York.

also see

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parents_and_Abducted_Children_Together
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parents_and_Abducted_Children_Together[/quote[/url]] unquote.


The above link to wiki no longer works. Lady Meyer joined that january as well, so didn't stay long did she?
The website for Pact mentions Amber Alert, etc. Imo it's all one web, anybody who's likely to make lots of money out of devising a control over children such as microchipping?

What annoys me immensely is that a bunch of jumped up solicitors and doctors get together to organize 'child protection'.


____________________
What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account? Macbeth Act V

tigger

Posts: 4967
Join date: 2011-07-20

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 4 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum