People the McCanns have NOT sued

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

People the McCanns have NOT sued

Post  ufercoffy on Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:26 am

Maddie Killed And Dumped Claims Lawyer

Jan 12 2008 By Tom Pettifor

MADELEINE McCann was raped, murdered and dumped in a reservoir within 48 hours of going missing, it has been claimed.

Portuguese lawyer Marcos Aragao Correia said he was contacted by a gang who gave details of her death on May 6 - three days after she vanished.

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/2008/01/12/maddie-killed-and-dumped-claims-lawyer-86908-20282896/
----------------------

Why didn't the McCanns sue this lawyer instead of paying him to target Amaral?

Who else haven't the McCanns sued apart from the Gaspars who suggested that paedophilia was involved in this case?

Michael Shrimpton said Maddie died by lethal injection - has he been sued for damaging the search?

ufercoffy

Posts: 1597
Join date: 2010-01-04

Back to top Go down

Re: People the McCanns have NOT sued

Post  PeterMac on Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:41 pm

They have also not sued, nor apparently even tried to get their money back from
Metodo3
Halligen
and the rest.

Bearing in mind that this was FUND money, the Trustees bear a heavy responsibility, legally as well as morally, for lack of due diligence in selecting these people, and for failing to make proper efforts to secure the return of the funds.

Also of course, for 'damaging the search'...
• The bloke in Devon who heard people speaking 'fluent portuguese' though he spoke not a word himself
• The drunk businessman on the stag party in Barcelona, who reported the Beckham sighting 2 YEARS late
• The Berber family in Morocco, for daring to have a blond daughter in a public place without authority
• Edgar, for focusing the attention of the world on the semi circle of 10 miles from PdL, and refusing to back down or let people think a search was still worth while
• Mitchell, for just about everything he has said or done so far
• Tanner, ditto

This list is a long one. Their inactivity and silence is most telling. The book, with its particular "Version of the truth" will be most revealing.
Or not. Probably.

Oh, and not forgetting Carter-Ruck, for stepping in with their hobnailed boots, and making it clear by the very presence that there was something very important to hide. Without C-R we might just have thought this was about a little girl, missing in a foreign country. WITH them we Know, and are certain so that we are sure, that the McCanns have something to hide. Something big. Something which dares not speak its name.

Wouldn't it be ironical if C-R ultimately were shown to have provided the impetus which brought the whole edifice down. They personally won't care. They get paid anyway. They are lawyers.

PeterMac
Researcher

Posts: 1661
Join date: 2010-12-06

Back to top Go down

Re: People the McCanns have NOT sued

Post  Judge Mental on Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:26 pm

The McCanns would not have a leg to stand on if somebody were to stand up to their threats. One is still waiting to discover why the Daily Express were so passive winkwink

Judge Mental

Posts: 2766
Join date: 2010-03-17
Age: 75
Location: Chambers

Back to top Go down

Re: People the McCanns have NOT sued

Post  PeterMac on Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:58 pm

And we know that they are threats, and nothing more.
[I say 'nothing more' though the scale of the threat is enormous, and no normal person could be criticised for giving in in face of that threat.]

Ever since Mitchell used the words "assumption" and "working hypothesis" the cat has been out of the bag. Would it not be even more ironic if he turned out to be their very own 'Angel of Death'. The Nemesis for their Hubris
On another web site a significant article has been re-instated in its entirety, and is now available for anyone interested to read.
One hopes the press will now find themselves able to use words they had previously not, and perhaps even to frame questions they were previously to cowardly to put.
One hopes, but does not expect.

PeterMac
Researcher

Posts: 1661
Join date: 2010-12-06

Back to top Go down

Re: People the McCanns have NOT sued

Post  theolivebranch on Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:56 pm

PeterMac wrote:And we know that they are threats, and nothing more.
[I say 'nothing more' though the scale of the threat is enormous, and no normal person could be criticised for giving in in face of that threat.]

Ever since Mitchell used the words "assumption" and "working hypothesis" the cat has been out of the bag. Would it not be even more ironic if he turned out to be their very own 'Angel of Death'. The Nemesis for their Hubris
On another web site a significant article has been re-instated in its entirety, and is now available for anyone interested to read.
One hopes the press will now find themselves able to use words they had previously not, and perhaps even to frame questions they were previously to cowardly to put.
One hopes, but does not expect.


Good afternoon PeterMac, the threat is indeed enormous and I for one am affraid though getting less so as each day passes.
You have mentioned a significant article on another web site. Any chance of you giving more information please?

theolivebranch

Posts: 558
Join date: 2010-09-19

Back to top Go down

Re: People the McCanns have NOT sued

Post  HiDeHo on Thu Feb 10, 2011 5:37 pm

Judge Mental wrote:The McCanns would not have a leg to stand on if somebody were to stand up to their threats. One is still waiting to discover why the Daily Express were so passive
''

Richard Desmond using Carter-Ruck to defend him a year later.

If the McCanns run out of money can he use C-R to get his money back WHEN they are convicted?

I always felt he had something up his sleeve

http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=42991

Sunday Express pays damages for investment fund libel



3 February 2009
By Paul McNally


The Sunday Express has agreed to pay 'substantial' but undisclosed libel damages after falsely alleging fund management executives had dishonestly kept £1bn of their clients' money.

The paper printed an apology this weekend to Pentagon Capital Management, its chief executive Lewis Chester, managing director Jafar Omid and founder David Chester, over claims made in a July 2008 story headlined: "David Cameron’s friend and £1bn he won’t give back."

Libel lawyers Carter Ruck represented Express Newspapers, proprietor Richard Desmond, Sunday Express editor Martin Townsend and journalist David Parsley.

(...)

HiDeHo
Researcher

Posts: 816
Join date: 2010-05-07

Back to top Go down

Re: People the McCanns have NOT sued

Post  Judge Mental on Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:11 pm

PeterMac wrote:And we know that they are threats, and nothing more.
[I say 'nothing more' though the scale of the threat is enormous, and no normal person could be criticised for giving in in face of that threat.]

Ever since Mitchell used the words "assumption" and "working hypothesis" the cat has been out of the bag. Would it not be even more ironic if he turned out to be their very own 'Angel of Death'. The Nemesis for their Hubris
On another web site a significant article has been re-instated in its entirety, and is now available for anyone interested to read.
One hopes the press will now find themselves able to use words they had previously not, and perhaps even to frame questions they were previously to cowardly to put.
One hopes, but does not expect.


A normal person, without chattels and wherewithal has yet to take them on, but are said to be considering it. More power to their elbow ay? big grin


Judge Mental

Posts: 2766
Join date: 2010-03-17
Age: 75
Location: Chambers

Back to top Go down

Re: People the McCanns have NOT sued

Post  PeterMac on Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:54 pm

If I am not stepping on toes, the article to which I referred is on the MF site,
1.0 How did the alleged abductor snatch Madeleine in a time slot of no more than 3-4 minutes? by Barbara Nottage
Very interesting read. Try being devil's advocate. Try acting as defence lawyer. Try destroying it thorough logic or evidence.
You may find the only way anyone could attack it would be by 'argumentum ad baculum', or 'ad hominem, abusive'. The first of those Carter-Ruck tried, the second will be found on other sites.

PeterMac
Researcher

Posts: 1661
Join date: 2010-12-06

Back to top Go down

Re: People the McCanns have NOT sued

Post  Judge Mental on Thu Feb 10, 2011 7:10 pm

laughat

They are stuffed.

Judge Mental

Posts: 2766
Join date: 2010-03-17
Age: 75
Location: Chambers

Back to top Go down

GASPARS

Post  Magpie on Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:18 am

Good Evening Everyone,
I don't know if this was posted, I wrote it down in my new vid info (video description, You Tube, Madeleine McCann - A Sabotaged Investigation): with all the reputation-bleaching means they've got, why didn't they ram into the GASPARS?

imo cause... they can't!!!

Ah I'm in a good mood People, I am!

Nice being here, this is my 2nd post just. Greetings to All! Mag

Magpie

Posts: 37
Join date: 2010-12-05

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum