Christian Brueckner: To be or not to be

i see i forgot the poolboy, not named, only told us as material.

the one who had worked years for the ocean club for pool maintenance and repairs, he told cb had often worked at the place= ocean club, had been hanging blinds, doing repairs on properties, i think they mean the shutters, and that cb with his back ground of car mechanics could easily open the locks like the one on the wooden door with a screwdriver in about 20 seconds. 

it was told in a suggesting tone, as that cb had hanged the shutters on 5a by himself. 

so i asked from a not ver willing person, because of the time, who actually had experience in unlocking doors when the law thinks that would be needed and the answer was clear in modern dutch; bullshit.
and really as the dutch say, we at least have the pictures, you can see for yourself there is no sign of a screwdriver used on that lock. 

this lock is a type that is not build into the door, but on the door, this lock has two latches to bolt the door, one we call over here the day lock, the other night lock, the day lock in this door is placed in a way, if you just use a creditcard, you can open te door, if that door only was on the day lock position. you do not have to be a partly trained car mechanic with a screwdriver to get this door onlocked in this state. but....

if you get a handyman in, and let him turn the day latch, not always easy but my expert informed me there are hardly been door locks in almost a century, where that action is not possible. 
if this lock was on night lock, the trick can not be used, not with the creditcard, not with a very lean screwdriver. only at the night lock a door is properly bolted.

on the night lock it would not be possible to open this door in 20 seconds without ruining the lock itself, or the door, or the door frame, of just all of them. 

and there is also the simple reality, that an burglar does not care a s..t if he left some damage. 

the use of this manner to install the day locks was always the practice in places as hotels and other places people often lost a key, or would locked themselves out. 

we can't see how much the side of the door on the outside is covered over by the door frame, that will make the easy trick with something flat and very small impossible, without leaving damages.

my expert in locks and opening doors, or break open doors, has 45 years of experience in the city of amsterdam, in repair the damage to locks, doors and door frames, or other ways of entry burglars or just nasty people prefer. but hey my experts was at will to declare he would know nothing of pool maintenance. 

but if this witness without a name is that same person who already is in the files, it is very understandable, he wants to stay out another round about the same bushes, but now with the bka. 

this could be just a bravery statement, meaning making or taking 'a midge out of an elephant' story, but if it is not and this person becomes an official witness to this case it means every trace related to cb in direct connection to 5a become useless, because he had perfectly legal business to access the place on an earlier time. 
and the bka would not like that, but it looks like they won't go all the way, because the bka let shine through the portuguese does not want to surrender their evidence, so they must have already a way to work around that ahum, very minor point in this case. 

so it could be a witness for the defense, and the bka would certainly tries to discriminate the witness, so the point is not made already. 

it is indeed not easy if a lot is filmed with voice over, dubbing is a bit easier, but is still awkward if you heard the people speak before in their own language, but it is a german standard approach, someone once upon a time thought germans would not being able to read subtitles and view what they see. and it stayed that way. 

yeah and that clarke story once started with two sisters on a balcony, they told first in many papers they saw two men doing something they made into something shady. at least one of them was said to be blond, the other also but he was a bit curly. 
and the second sighting of a light haired man was the carole tranmer sighting, but that one was not so shure where exactly her blondy was accessing an apartment from the back alley through a gate. 
the officer who take on that statement was able to figure out in the end, it was not the first, known as the mccanns 5a, or the last. so that blondy did something in 5b, 5c, or 5d. but not 5a or 5e. 

in the dutch opsporings verzocht program redwood talked that sighting as been to 5c. 

and the messing up is happened fully under the lead of the british services. 
the jensen sisters needed 11 hours!!! to tell they had seen two men, one at least blond. 
it is a bit complicated, but clarke fused both into one man, who could be cb. it is a bit better to morf 2 into one, then ask a public to think two very different pictures in to one man. 

i think the chances there are still sane british police officers left, who got the guts to ask the 3 ladies if it could be maybe cb is very reduced to non existent. 

even the daily mail needed 3 reporters for that story; https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-504950/British-witnesses-We-saw-blond-men-balcony-Madeleine-apartment.html

jutta also found the man behind the nick panikspatz 66, who had around 2013 some internet conversation with wahnsintheholger, that nick is told to be cb. 
it ended with the man telling jutta by phone he had no interest in talking to her. 

jutta and co also got a little bit into the why cb would have done it, if he did it. a sebastian fiedler, talked some about organized sexual child abuse. 

the all over conclusion about all those things was mostly cb has a profile that fits and there is very little proof to say he did it.
and jon clarke thinks he will get to trial in this case. 
the overall line is the old one, just following the mccanns have not dunnit story. 

most people they took into the story was certainly not the jutta only show, you see lines from the adventures in a book by some jon clarke shining through.

most of these people are pretty well known for who follows the case, and when they already did speak to the media under their own identity, i have no problem to use the full name. 

the mystery of the anja's is solved, the anja p, is the wife of bernard p, the scrapyard/ garage owner, who was the owner of the vw camper van cb used a time. they are in origine german, but lived for years in the algarve. 

shining in luz, i already had that idea it was actually you. even your statement is usable for the defense, you can be very near the ocean club, and just be fishing on the ocean within the tower range. in 2007 we, as in overhere, could not filter an exact position  from a mobile phone after it was made.
we have seen in the case of jeroen denis, a father who took his two boys, made a mad drive from the center of the netherlands into the south, and traveled up more eastern of that line. that case happened in 2013, they had his phone number and tried to get to follow him live from the pings on his route. on the trip to the south they had only one. before he put off his phone. and at that time the netherlands already had very good covering of the mobile networks.

they are truly pings, i had my mobile for many years on my desk, and have still pretty old audio boxes, and it taken me years to figure out where that ping noise came from. in the end i did noted the times down, they could be heard every 4 hours, and the gimmick was, it was always 4 hours and 1 extra minute. so even when you are not using your mobile there are still pings from the tower communicating to your phone. 

these are the ones you could use if you do a live follow up, i never seen them being used in a criminal case as the full history of a certain number, only the pings from actually calls are used. 
shining in luz, are you able to tell if these just contact pings are kept and archived at all? 

phone pings have their uses in criminal cases, but it is still like with all others no hard science. it helps, but it is rarely exact enough if you have to look with the hindsight of a case. it is far more in the same range as the dog findings and dna you find, you still have to get all and every thing together. 
if you want to see an investigation as a puzzle, phone pings, the dog findings and dna are to be viewed as the side pieces, but you still have to get then in the right places to form that picture. 

phones and dna has joint communal problem, they are transportable. and the defense would certainly make use of that fact. 

shining in luz, are you able to clear up about the 6 km range of the tower, if you meant diametrical like 3 km to each side, or straight line 6 km around the tower. there was a little picture, but i was writing at that time, and missed it.

jutta rabe things there will probably be a indizen process, based on indications, not so much evidence. these kind of trials have a large chance of misscarriages of justice. most legal systems would not be very open to that kind of processes. and it will be unthinkable we can not lay that puzzle easily also for the parents with the same pieces.

What I found suspect last night.

1. The pixelated Witness sitting next to Jon Clarke must have been Bernard Piro, whose Son is called Flavio. He claimed he never used Brückner’s phone that night, and that any such claims are rubbish.

2. The Telephone expert has a Portuguese name, but speaks English with what sounded like a Northern accent? He thinks Brückner was only 5 minutes away from the OC at the time.

3. Dieter F has now changed his story and claims that there were TWO different colour Winnebagos, or that Brückner had Painted one over, he is not sure. He thought one has long since been scrapped.

4. Panikspatz66 was not exactly ready to talk about his previous life chatting to Brückner.

5. Only three Questions got put to the experts on Maddie.
None of them asked anything about the PJ’s version of Events. The rest of the Talk was taken up with a Mother who is clearly suffering still from the loss of her Daughter, and a Security expert who trains Children on how to react to approaches by ‘Strangers’.

6. Sandra F talked about how the theft occurred, but failed to mention that the ‘Natürlich’ phone call from Nicole F was made on a different number to the one Hans Wolters gave out as belonging to Brückner.
This number was shown on her own Sextá as 9 program last year as she had obtained Court documents through her Contacts.

silent scope, are you able to get a screenshot from the 6 pages of the cb letters to jutta, that was in the last parts of this docu?

@onehand

No, but here is a clip of the Phone call expert Iago Delgado speaking in English. I think he sounds Scottish or Northern English from his accent?

Source:
https://www.sat1.de/tv/sat-1-investigativ/video/12-das-raetsel-um-das-telefon-von-christian-b-clip

silentscope i think you missed out of a post earlier. i only mist half of that post.

so it is 6 km to each side you want, taken from the tower, except in the north another one will take over. 

5 minutes must be by car, km on foot or other means would be olympic i think. 

a lot of stories about the phone call of cb do forget, the other phone was not in pdl! 

so it could be nicole f. but all other options i have seen every were of people working in the ocean club, who called cb his phone, to tell the mccanns do this, or that never could work. 

the other caller was outside this tower, and could not have been anywhere near the ocean club.

the scenario of a live conversation that would give a go ahead to the person who had cb's phone in hand is plain rubbish.

Unless the PJ give out a searchable version of the entire Phone dump, which is over 7,400 calls, no Private Investigation is possible.

Ik weet Niet wat U bedoel? / I do not know what you mean?

onehandcan someone grab the text of the article silent hope is mentioning in the post above this, it is behind a paywall.

Paedophile suspected of abducting Madeleine McCann had worked at apartments where she vanished, documentary claims
Christian Brueckner, a 45-year-old German, has continued to insist he had no involvement in the disappearance of the child in 2007
The German paedophile suspected of abducting Madeleine McCann “repeatedly worked” at the holiday apartments in Portugal where the child vanished, documentary makers can reveal.
Christian Brueckner was said to have been employed by a company that carried out repairs at the Ocean Club in Praia da Luz shortly before the three-year-old British girl disappeared in 2007.
An anonymous but “reliable” witness has told reporters at German TV channel SAT.1 that the convicted sex attacker “repeatedly carried out repair work” at the apartments where Kate and Gerry McCann were staying with their children.
Producers of the show have handed police a file following “extensive research” in the Algarve resort.
In a statement to the media, the makers of ‘SAT.1 investigativ: Neue Spuren im Fall Maddie’ to be broadcast on Monday, said Brueckner was “very familiar” with the Ocean Club and the town where the McCanns stayed.
A spokesman for the channel said: “A reconstruction of the evening of the crime and extensive research in Portugal and Germany found that Christian B was very familiar with the Ocean Club area in Praia da Luz.
“Prior to Maddie’s disappearance, he repeatedly carried out repair work at the place where the three-year-old disappeared in 2007.”
It adds how Christian Wolters, the public prosecutor leading the German side of the investigation, said: “We are grateful to the SAT.1 team for sharing certain findings with the public prosecutor's office.
“There are witnesses who might prefer to speak to the media than to us or the police. If this produces any ideas we will of course follow these up.”
The holiday complex could not be contacted last night for a response.
Brueckner, the 45-year-old sex offender, has also written letters in which he continues to insist he had no involvement in the three-year-old child’s abduction.

Attack on a pensioner

He is in jail in his native Germany for raping a pensioner in 2005 in the resort.
He was living nearby in a camper van when Madeleine disappeared in 2007. Police first became aware of him as a suspect in 2017, but did not publicly name him until 2020.
That year, it emerged his Portuguese mobile phone received a half-hour phone call in Praia da Luz around an hour before Madeleine vanished.
But the TV crew claim “on-site analysis of phone records showed that Christian B and his cell phone must have been no more than five minutes away from the Ocean Club [apartments] on the night of the disappearance.”
In a series of bizarre letters sent from his prison cell to the programme makers, Brueckner insisted he had no involvement in the girl’s abduction, in part because he wanted to avoid attracting the police because he was operating as a drug dealer in the area.
“I was never caught [for drug dealing] by the police because I followed a few key principles.
“Where possible, only drive during the day so my battered ‘hippy bus’ didn’t attract attention, only driving on roads I needed to and, most importantly, never provoking the police.
“So, that means not committing any crimes, certainly not abducting anyone.
“Having said that, this was just as absurd to me at the time as starting a nuclear war or slaughtering a chicken.”
Back in 2020, prosecutors in Braunschweig, the city where Brueckner lived, said they believed Madeleine had been killed.
Asked by the documentary team about the German police belief that he was responsible for the British girl’s abduction and murder, Brueckner wrote: “I see no reason to comment on the accusations made by the Braunschweig public prosecutor’s office. In theory, I could sit back and relax and just wait for the findings.”
Last year, the German newspaper Bild obtained letters from Brueckner in which he said the investigation into him was “scandalous”, insisting prosecutors had “brought shame to the legal system.”
Brueckner has been repeatedly convicted for horrific sex crimes against both children and adults.
He is believed to have arrived in Portugal in 1995 as a backpacker where he made money peddling drugs and carried out scores of burglaries in the area. He flitted regularly between Germany and Portugal.
In 2005, he subjected a 72-year-old American female tourist to a violent sexual attack in Praia Da Luz, just 18 months before Madeleine went missing from the apartment her family were staying in.
Brueckner was said to have told a friend he “knew all about” Madeleine’s abduction as the men sat in a bar in Germany watching a television appeal broadcast on the 10-year anniversary of her disappearance. The paedophile was then said to have shown his friend a video on his phone of him raping a woman.
The following year, he was jailed for the rape of the American tourist after DNA identified him as the attacker.
The documentary programme will be broadcast on SAT.1 and Joyn on Monday at 7.15pm (GMT).
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/01/30/paedophile-suspected-abducting-madeleine-mccann-had-worked-apartments/

silentscope,look back at post #471 , page 19 of this topic. and you will understand.

If anyone wants to watch this SAT1 production again, it is available on the following link:

https://www.sat1.de/tv/sat-1-investigativ/video/12-sat-1-investigativ-neue-spuren-im-fall-maddie-ist-der-deutsche-christian-b-der-taeter-ganze-folge

You will have to register, with your Email addresse, they will send you an Email with a code. Supply your first name and Date of Birth, and it should work even outside Germany. I will try and get some Screenshots and translation done soon as possible ok?

to keep it nice and short;

https://www.braunschweiger-zeitung.de/braunschweig/article234458631/Fall-Maddie-Fernseh-Doku-fuer-Ermittlungen-bedeutungslos.html

it is behind a paywall, but the only readable sentence is enough;

BRAUNSCHWEIG.  Der Sender SAT.1 hatte neue Indizien als Ergebnis investigativer Recherche angekündigt. Staatsanwalt reagiert: „Es wurde nichts Neues präsentiert.“


BRAUNSCHWEIG.  The broadcaster SAT.1 had announced new circumstantial evidence as the result of investigative research. Public prosecutor reacts: "Nothing new was presented."

onehand wrote:to keep it nice and short;

https://www.braunschweiger-zeitung.de/braunschweig/article234458631/Fall-Maddie-Fernseh-Doku-fuer-Ermittlungen-bedeutungslos.html

it is behind a paywall, but the only readable sentence is enough;

BRAUNSCHWEIG.  Der Sender SAT.1 hatte neue Indizien als Ergebnis investigativer Recherche angekündigt. Staatsanwalt reagiert: „Es wurde nichts Neues präsentiert.“


BRAUNSCHWEIG.  The broadcaster SAT.1 had announced new circumstantial evidence as the result of investigative research. Public prosecutor reacts: "Nothing new was presented."

The article 

Maddie case: TV documentary meaningless for investigations
BRAUNSCHWEIG. The broadcaster SAT.1 had announced new evidence as a result of investigative research. Prosecutor reacts: "Nothing new was presented." New traces in the maddie case had promised the television channel SAT.1 on Monday evening in an investigative documentary about the case of three-year-old Madeleine McCann, who disappeared from a holiday resort in Portugal in 2007. After the broadcast, disillusionment sets in. "After the full-bodied praises of the television station, we expected the documentary with great interest," explains Christian Wolters, spokesman for the responsible Braunschweig public prosecutor's office, on request. His conclusion, however, is: "Nothing new was presented. The broadcast therefore has virtually no significance for our investigations." The presumption that the broadcaster's research would not contain any significant news had been confirmed.

The station had advertised that his research had already caused an international sensation. Work in hotel complex was known to investigators That the suspectEd German, who is currently serving a seven-year prison sentence for the rape of a 72-year-old, had once worked in the hotel complex in the resort of Praia da Luz, from which Maddie disappeared, according to a witness quoted in the program, is not a new indication for the investigating authority. "That is well known," says Wolters, but there is no temporal connection with the disappearance of the little British woman.

During the period of the crime, however, the mobile phone of the German emigrant, who had a criminal record for sexual, property and drug offences, is said to have been located within the radius of the hotel complex. Thus, the Federal Criminal Police Office and braunschweig public prosecutor's office had already gone public in 2020 in their call for witnesses. The question: Who had spoken to the suspect on the phone that evening? SAT.1 speculates about whether it could have been an acquaintance of the suspect (already questioned by the BKA). However, this does not express itself to the reporters. Suspect: "Perfect crime or innocent" In addition to the preparation already publicly in the known facts, was quoted from a correspondence of the reporter with the murder suspect in the case of Maddie, in which he sees himself, among other things, as a victim of false reporting. He also writes:

Either it was the perfect crime – or he was innocent. However, according to the journalist's summary, he did not provide a credible alibi in the letters. On the suspect's accusation that the public prosecutor's office does not let him speak, Wolters says: "The accused can comment at any time directly or through his defense lawyer. This has not happened so far."

https://www.braunschweiger-zeitung.de/braunschweig/article234458631/Fall-Maddie-Fernseh-Doku-fuer-Ermittlungen-bedeutungslos.html

It looks like SAT1 is now available in YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/sat1

It might be possible to have the closed caption function CC translated into another language of your choice?

Example: https://youtu.be/Q8Sq9r50gc0

Give it a try.

Silentscope wrote:It looks like SAT1 is now available in YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/sat1

It might be possible to have the closed caption function CC translated into another language of your choice?

Example: https://youtu.be/Q8Sq9r50gc0

Give it a try.

I did but without  getting a result .

I am sure there must be a Program or Software available.

Sorry it did not work for you.

Give it time, I am sure someone will Post a solution.

Hi Here is the solution 

Click Settings for subs


After that select German Subs




finally auto translate German to Eng

PeterMac wrote:
In translation this is
" That evening I saw the parents up close for the first time and realised how traumatised they were and how much they were grieving." 

Why would they be so traumatized and be grieving so much when their child was only missing for a few hours? Sounds almost as if their child wasn't missing, but rather... dead?

To be fair, if my 3 year old went missing for a few hours late at night I'd be traumatized aswell.

'Grieving' might be a bit premature though.

I certainly wouldn't be busy deleting phone records or waiting for daylight.

On the other hand, when the child had really died 4 days earlier and her death was being covered up by a staged abduction, what would be the point of pretending to search in the dark when no one can see you doing it? Best wait for daylight, at least you'll be seen

MaxHeadroom wrote:

PeterMac wrote:
In translation this is
" That evening I saw the parents up close for the first time and realised how traumatised they were and how much they were grieving." 

Why would they be so traumatized and be grieving so much when their child was only missing for a few hours? Sounds almost as if their child wasn't missing, but rather... dead?

If my 3 year old gone missing I'd be anxious, stressed but not traumatised and certainly not grieving, you only grieve after a death person .

Just watched Part 1 with subtitles (thanks to Silentscope & Vera Krista).

Pointless 20 minutes of my life I'll never get back again!

Quite difficult to watch and read as the images change too fast and the subtitles flash up too quickly, but the program may flow and make more sense to a German speaker.
 
Certainly plenty of incorrect information on there which could be challenged if there was any point, but unless someone tells me the rest is worth watching for some reason, I won't bother.

The only point in watching it in entirety is to see through their attempts to mislead the German public, who are most likely to be unaware of the Evidence held within the PJ Files.

Which is probably why the only File mentioned was the one that supports their ‘Kidnapping’ alive fantasy Agenda.

Christian Brückner has charged Jutta Rabe, from SAT1 for making False reports about him, which damaged his Reputation, and are seen to be making him look Reprehensible.

Christian B., who was arrested for rape, has filed a criminal complaint against journalist Jutta Rabe "on suspicion of qualified defamation".

The letter from his lawyer Friedrich Fülscher to the public prosecutor's office in Kiel is available to "Spiegel". The background is a TV documentary followed by a talk show about B., the suspect in the Madeleine McCann kidnapping case . Fülscher writes that the program contained "false factual allegations" intended to make his client "contemptible".

Rabe said in the documentary that B. allegedly starved two dogs. In fact, according to Fülscher, one of the dogs escaped, the other was euthanized due to an incurable cancer, which he also communicated when asked by Sat.1. During the TV talk, Rabe also said that in two other cases against B. for raping an Irish woman and abusing a child, the public prosecutor's office probably had fingerprints and DNA traces. According to an e-mail from the public prosecutor's office, from which Fülscher quotes, these details are "inaccurate". Rabe did not want to comment on the matter when asked, the presumption of innocence applies.

Source:

https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/panorama/kriminalitaet/id_91606732/maddie-mccann-verdaechtiger-entfuehrer-klagt-gegen-tv-journalistin.html

(I seem to remember Norbert M making these comments about his Dogs in a previous Interview with Spiegel TV, and it was the Olive Press that mentioned a Fingerprint having been found)

‘Immature Strategy is the cause of downfall’- (Musashi)