Re: Pedro do Carmo: "Maddie's parents are not suspects. Period."

by **Jill Havern** 03.05.17 10:49

I suppose the Police also have to keep in mind Kate's "Push the button and we're all gone" quote.

Their stress levels must be at an all time high, losing finally in Portugal, contemplating GA counter-suing, no money left in the fund, Tracey K writing articles which attract revulsion,
several papers writing nonsense but allowing un-moderated comments, and leaving them on line, hundreds at a time, with almost none supportive at any level . . .
Two children now reaching an age when they can read and begin to research, and ask questions, and detect untruths when told by their parents - as we all did
(Father Christmas, tooth fairy, where babies come from etc etc, we all worked it out, though it was the elephant in the room, and we never let on that we knew)
They LOST their first born child. They are undoubtedly grieving, but have never allowed themselves 'closure'.

So for the Police in either country to say they are suspects might well push the fragile Kate (on her own admission capable of physically violent outrage) over the edge.

by jeanmonroe 03.05.17 11:13

by Get'emGonçalo Today at 10:49 am

I suppose the Police also have to keep in mind Kate's "Push a button and we're ALL gone"
------------------------------------------

And her 'ALL wiped out in a car crash'

just to 'quote' correctly:

Kate McCann 'I just want to press a button, and we're all gone, and it's all finished, and we're all together and gone, whatever'

KM said: "I used to have thoughts like, we'll get wiped out in the car on the motorway. So it would just happen, we'd all be gone, and the pain would be away."

Read more at: http://www.scotsman.com/news/uk/kate-mccann-i-fantasised-we-would-all-be-wiped-out-in-a-car-crash-1-802272

Q51: How would you be 'all together' if Madeleine's still 'alive' in her secret 'lair' and you've 'pressed a button and GONE' Kate?

A: 'Whatever'

by tara 03.05.17 15:41

If OG's remit is to prove the McCann's innocent and stick with the abduction only theory, then surely the McCann's know that. There couldn't be a cover-up without their knowledge IMO. How else can they be so confident, and castigate all those who dare to disbelieve them? I can't help thinking that they are all 'working' together to their own agreed resolution of the case which will be tailored to fit whatever their favourite story is. however ridiculous it may be, and it will, doubtless be just that: ridiculous. All in my opinion.

by Keitei 05.05.17 10:39

Oh dear

Pedro do Carmo: "Maddie's parents are not suspects. Period." - Page 2 Screen29

by Patience 05.05.17 10:52

To be a 'suspect' in Portugal, do you not have to have Arguido status?

I will never forget how Olgario de Sousa of the PJ publicly stated the McCanns were not suspects, only for them to be declared suspects shortly thereafter!

by nglfi 05.05.17 15:13

His comments are a lot clearer in the panorama documentary. He kept referring back to the initial investigation and said the parents 'were ' not suspects repeatedly. When Bilton pressed him on it, and said do you consider them suspects now, he was quiet for quite a while before answering, and basically said at the moment there is no fact or evidence which proves their involvement. So after watching the panorama documentary I'm a lot more encouraged. It sounded to me like he was choosing his words very carefully.

by jeanmonroe 05.05.17 16:13

@ nglfi

"When Bilton pressed him on it, and said 'do you consider them suspects now?', he was quiet for quite a while before answering, and basically said at the moment there is no fact or evidence which proves their involvement."
----------------------------------------

Everyone loves a 'trier' don't they, Bilton?

Can we 'imagine' what the headlines would have been, if, IF, the PJ chap had 'said' " No, NO, they are not suspects NOW"

(doesn't bear thinking about!)

Bilton has, imo, damaged his reputation, significantly, imo, with his almost sycophantic erm, 'desire' to have the McCan'ts, in the 'clear', at all costs!

Maybe his 'last throw of the dice' before he's 'pensioned' off, for a younger 'model'!

WHY would he have done that for two non-descript 'doctors' he does not 'know'?

There's 'fame and fortune' for the first real 'reporter' that does a 'proper job' and takes the gloves off, with the McCan'ts and their T7 'friends'.

Log in for more topics