Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Madeleine Beth McCann :: Photographs of Madeleine McCann's fateful holiday
Page 3 of 8 • Share
Page 3 of 8 • 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 
I've carefully read the explanation of Textusa's Last Photo theory of the composite of 3 images and I think...
willowthewisp- Posts : 3392
Activity : 4912
Likes received : 1160
Join date : 2015-05-07
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Guest 15.11.15 14:36
Yes that's what it looks like.willowthewisp wrote:Folds of skin
Guest- Guest
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Guest 15.11.15 14:37
BlueBag wrote:Another reason TextUsa is wrong:
The picture without the elbow was created FROM the "last photo" not the other way around.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
It's cleverly done with blurs and pastes from other parts of the picture. I've highlighted the obvious one.
Not only is TextUsa wrong, but 24 people who voted she is right are wrong.
Will they have the grace to admit it?
Guest- Guest
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by joyce1938 15.11.15 15:23
The pic with the elbow is more clear and colourful, so possibly original one? May have taken the one of Maddie out of that one, as there is one in a frame with just her in it, I believe. joyce1938
joyce1938- Posts : 890
Activity : 1013
Likes received : 124
Join date : 2010-04-20
Age : 85
Location : england
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Tony Bennett 15.11.15 15:58
Thank you very much @ BlueBag for this informative analysis.BlueBag wrote:BlueBag wrote:Another reason TextUsa is wrong:
The picture without the elbow was created FROM the "last photo" not the other way around.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
It's cleverly done with blurs and pastes from other parts of the picture. I've highlighted the obvious one.
Not only is TextUsa wrong, but 24 people who voted she is right are wrong.
Will they have the grace to admit it?
And contrary to the assertions of certain posters, this is precisely why I started this second thread - because I wanted members here to take a very hard and deeper look at Textusa's theory, and get to know it better.
I may use rather less blunt language than yourself, but you have just made as plain as a pikestaff that one key element of Textusa's theory - the main element, in fact - is totally wrong.
As you've shown, the picture of Madeleine was NOT of her on her own as Textusa claims. You have provided clear, forensic evidence that the picture of Madeleine on her own was taken FROM the master picture i.e. from the 'Last Photo' - and not the other way round.
Textusa, who reads here, will simply have to scrap her whole theory, undergirded as it is by the very soggy and dodgy ground of a vertical line on a pair of sunglasses, on which assumption (which a member here has soundly shown to be false in a YouTube video) she has built a massive edifice of sheer speculation.
I agree it would be very good if those who have voted 'Textusa is right' could come on the thread and give their opinion about some of the things you've brought up, like the alleged photoshopping-in of a FOURTH photo - the side of a pair of sunglasses.
She had obviously failed to notice, in her haste to assume that a pair of sunglasses tucked into Gerry's T-shirt had been flipped from one photo to another, that the photoshopper (if there was one) would have had to photoshop in an extra side to the glasses, the one tucked UNDER his T-shirt.
She made an excellent job in her 'Sagresman' article of demonstrating that Nuno Lourenco had told an obvious pack of lies about Polish man Wojchiech Krokowski trying to 'kidnap' his child - and I gave her full credit for it.
But she has made a complete pig's ear of analysing the 'Last Photo' - and I hope she will have the good grace to admit it.
As soon as possible
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 16906
Activity : 24770
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 76
Location : Shropshire
Textusa's 'Last Photo' theory - destroyed by BlueBag's analysis of the two 'Maddie' photos
by Tony Bennett 15.11.15 16:03
Yep, you're dead right, @ joyce1938 - that's exactly what BlueBag was telling us all.joyce1938 wrote:The pic with the elbow is more clear and colourful, so possibly original one? May have taken the one of Maddie out of that one, as there is one in a frame with just her in it, I believe. joyce1938
And that fact alone totally destroys Textusa's entire 'Last Photo' theory at a stroke.
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 16906
Activity : 24770
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 76
Location : Shropshire
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Joss 15.11.15 16:29
If you're talking to me then i don't know exactly what it is.BlueBag wrote:Here we go again.
What do you think it is?
Joss- Posts : 1960
Activity : 2154
Likes received : 196
Join date : 2011-09-19
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Guest 15.11.15 16:30
Yes indeed. The one with the most clearest detail is the "last photo".joyce1938 wrote:The pic with the elbow is more clear and colourful, so possibly original one? May have taken the one of Maddie out of that one, as there is one in a frame with just her in it, I believe. joyce1938
A double whammy.
Guest- Guest
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Joss 15.11.15 16:32
I don't think it is. Children don't have folds of skin on their necks like that as far as i know. I guess if the child was quite fat then maybe, but MBM was not a fat or chubby child.willowthewisp wrote:Folds of skin
Joss- Posts : 1960
Activity : 2154
Likes received : 196
Join date : 2011-09-19
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Guest 15.11.15 16:38
But do you think TextUsa is wrong?Joss wrote:I don't think it is. Children don't have folds of skin on their necks like that as far as i know. I guess if the child was quite fat then maybe, but MBM was not a fat or chubby child.willowthewisp wrote:Folds of skin
Guest- Guest
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by skyrocket 15.11.15 16:46
Just a point re: Textusa's theory and the sunglasses.
Her theory doesn't involve frames; arms; etc being photoshopped. What she is saying is that the lenses have been photoshopped i.e. taken from the hanging sunglasses photo and put into the worn sunglasses photo. I can see no reason why this would be done at all.
One other thought - is it possible that the pink in the reflection is the photographer's knee (kneeling at edge of pool) and that the shadow seen is actually the photographer's shadow? We can't assume that it is AM's hat. Someone already mentioned that GM was looking at the camera as well and I didn't really register the point but if we look at GM's body angle in relation to MBM's is it possible that they are both actually looking at least in the general direction of the photographer?
Her theory doesn't involve frames; arms; etc being photoshopped. What she is saying is that the lenses have been photoshopped i.e. taken from the hanging sunglasses photo and put into the worn sunglasses photo. I can see no reason why this would be done at all.
One other thought - is it possible that the pink in the reflection is the photographer's knee (kneeling at edge of pool) and that the shadow seen is actually the photographer's shadow? We can't assume that it is AM's hat. Someone already mentioned that GM was looking at the camera as well and I didn't really register the point but if we look at GM's body angle in relation to MBM's is it possible that they are both actually looking at least in the general direction of the photographer?
skyrocket- Posts : 755
Activity : 1537
Likes received : 732
Join date : 2015-06-18
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Joss 15.11.15 16:47
Possibly. I also don't agree with Textusa's swinging theory either though.BlueBag wrote:But do you think TextUsa is wrong?Joss wrote:I don't think it is. Children don't have folds of skin on their necks like that as far as i know. I guess if the child was quite fat then maybe, but MBM was not a fat or chubby child.willowthewisp wrote:Folds of skin
Joss- Posts : 1960
Activity : 2154
Likes received : 196
Join date : 2011-09-19
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Guest 15.11.15 16:49
Possibly?Joss wrote:Possibly. I also don't agree with Textusa's swinging theory either though.BlueBag wrote:But do you think TextUsa is wrong?Joss wrote:I don't think it is. Children don't have folds of skin on their necks like that as far as i know. I guess if the child was quite fat then maybe, but MBM was not a fat or chubby child.willowthewisp wrote:Folds of skin
Do you think there is something wrong about the elbowless photo analysis?
Guest- Guest
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Guest 15.11.15 16:52
I know.skyrocket wrote:Just a point re: Textusa's theory and the sunglasses.
Her theory doesn't involve frames; arms; etc being photoshopped. What she is saying is that the lenses have been photoshopped i.e. taken from the hanging sunglasses photo and put into the worn sunglasses photo. I can see no reason why this would be done at all.
I said so today in this thread after I finally understood what her convoluted theory really was.
I also said why that was nonsense as well.
Guest- Guest
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Guest 15.11.15 18:03
Really?Joss wrote:I don't think it is. Children don't have folds of skin on their necks like that as far as i know. I guess if the child was quite fat then maybe, but MBM was not a fat or chubby child.willowthewisp wrote:Folds of skin
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Guest- Guest
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Dr What 15.11.15 19:52
Now, I think we can all agree that those sunglasses have been very badly photoshopped.
Dr What- Posts : 249
Activity : 286
Likes received : 35
Join date : 2012-10-26
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Guest 15.11.15 20:01
Hilarious.
Posters - stay on topic, please. Mod.
Posters - stay on topic, please. Mod.
Guest- Guest
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Guest 15.11.15 20:28
TextUsa is using the wrong glasses for her theory as well!!!!!
Gerry has worn several pairs, but these flatter ones are the ones in the last photo (there is a mini logo in the left eye lens) AND this was taken 7th May.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Her argument against Darren Ware is completely bogus.
They are not the same glasses he wears when driving.
What a crock.
Gerry has worn several pairs, but these flatter ones are the ones in the last photo (there is a mini logo in the left eye lens) AND this was taken 7th May.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Her argument against Darren Ware is completely bogus.
They are not the same glasses he wears when driving.
What a crock.
Guest- Guest
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by notlongnow 15.11.15 20:32
Afraid i'm not very well read up on the PS pictures,as i find the threads a bit tedious.
But,Why would they bother to PS this picture?
Is the reason suggested to prove that it was after buying the sunglasses.
Would be extremely high risk if it was/is.
But,Why would they bother to PS this picture?
Is the reason suggested to prove that it was after buying the sunglasses.
Would be extremely high risk if it was/is.
notlongnow- Posts : 482
Activity : 541
Likes received : 47
Join date : 2013-10-16
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by hogwash 15.11.15 22:18
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
The Last Photo was said to be taken on 3 May so why are they not suntanned in the photo but a few hours later, when Madeleine disappears, they are - despite the weather not being great all week?
The Last Photo was said to be taken on 3 May so why are they not suntanned in the photo but a few hours later, when Madeleine disappears, they are - despite the weather not being great all week?
hogwash- Posts : 209
Activity : 472
Likes received : 197
Join date : 2015-09-20
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Tony Bennett 15.11.15 22:36
@ hogwash - Exactly the right question.hogwash wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
The Last Photo was said to be taken on 3 May so why are they not suntanned in the photo but a few hours later, when Madeleine disappears, they are - despite the weather not being great all week?
(Or one of the right questions)
TWO PHOTOS:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Thursday 3rd May...OR Friday 4th May
Sunday 29th April?
YOU DECIDE
(Oh, and just by the way, according to Textusa's 'Last Photo' theory, the photo on the left was probably taken on or about Friday 18th May)
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 16906
Activity : 24770
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 76
Location : Shropshire
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Verdi 15.11.15 22:38
I recall asking much the same question some while back - after reading an opinion that the three subjects in the last photograph all looked tanned !?! Can't remember what the reply was, if indeed there was one.hogwash wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
The Last Photo was said to be taken on 3 May so why are they not suntanned in the photo but a few hours later, when Madeleine disappears, they are - despite the weather not being great all week?
No doubt something to do with the spring equinox or the strength of the sun bleaching the colour from their skin or the absence of a tanning salon in the area. No, hang on - must have been photoshopped to make it look as though they weren't actually there on the afternoon of 3rd May as recorded by the time/date stamp but were actually there on Sunday 29th April - that was the last photograph!!!
____________________
“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi- ex forum manager
- Posts : 34684
Activity : 41936
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Verdi 15.11.15 23:08
Earlier I had another bash at reading Textusa getting all physical. Seriously - I don't wish to be rude but is her first language English or is her native tongue gobbledy gook? How anyone can create such a complicated explanation for the reflexion in the lens of a cheap pair of sunglasses is quite beyond me. What in the name of sanity is she banging on about?
The emphasis placed on this photograph by the McCanns, in terms of time and date, indicates the need to place either Gerry and/or Madeleine at the Ocean Club on the afternoon of 3rd May. Nothing to do with playing happy families, that serves no purpose, so why the need to go to such lengths to fabricate a scene that didn't exist a la Textusa, after the event just to make it look as though they were all having a jolly good time together. The very idea is so farcical it should be stored in the annals along side the Crimewatch reconstruction video. Even if it was the aim to create a happy family snap shot, wouldn't it be simpler to paste bodies in a scene without reflective surfaces, sunglasses, flowering shrubbery, ghostly images, passing flying saucers, black cats and black holes?
Leave it to the experts who know what they're talking about.
The emphasis placed on this photograph by the McCanns, in terms of time and date, indicates the need to place either Gerry and/or Madeleine at the Ocean Club on the afternoon of 3rd May. Nothing to do with playing happy families, that serves no purpose, so why the need to go to such lengths to fabricate a scene that didn't exist a la Textusa, after the event just to make it look as though they were all having a jolly good time together. The very idea is so farcical it should be stored in the annals along side the Crimewatch reconstruction video. Even if it was the aim to create a happy family snap shot, wouldn't it be simpler to paste bodies in a scene without reflective surfaces, sunglasses, flowering shrubbery, ghostly images, passing flying saucers, black cats and black holes?
Leave it to the experts who know what they're talking about.
____________________
“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi- ex forum manager
- Posts : 34684
Activity : 41936
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Joss 16.11.15 2:09
Obviously if someone was "elbowless" in a photo it wouldn't seem right.BlueBag wrote:Possibly?Joss wrote:Possibly. I also don't agree with Textusa's swinging theory either though.BlueBag wrote:But do you think TextUsa is wrong?Joss wrote:I don't think it is. Children don't have folds of skin on their necks like that as far as i know. I guess if the child was quite fat then maybe, but MBM was not a fat or chubby child.willowthewisp wrote:Folds of skin
Do you think there is something wrong about the elbowless photo analysis?
Joss- Posts : 1960
Activity : 2154
Likes received : 196
Join date : 2011-09-19
Re: Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion
by Joss 16.11.15 2:28
That neck don't look right to me all the same, but whatever.BlueBag wrote:Really?Joss wrote:I don't think it is. Children don't have folds of skin on their necks like that as far as i know. I guess if the child was quite fat then maybe, but MBM was not a fat or chubby child.willowthewisp wrote:Folds of skin
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Joss- Posts : 1960
Activity : 2154
Likes received : 196
Join date : 2011-09-19
Page 3 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Similar topics» 60 Reasons why the McCanns should never have published THAT photo (the 'MAKE-UP '/ Lolita photo)
» 60 Reasons why the McCanns should never have published THAT photo (the 'MAKE-UP '/ Lolita photo)
» 60 Reasons why the McCanns should never have published THAT photo (the 'MAKE-UP '/ Lolita photo)
» The Theory that Smithman = Gerry McCann – CAREFULLY EXPLAINED
» Madeleine McCann "Last Photo": Reflection in sunglasses explained
» 60 Reasons why the McCanns should never have published THAT photo (the 'MAKE-UP '/ Lolita photo)
» 60 Reasons why the McCanns should never have published THAT photo (the 'MAKE-UP '/ Lolita photo)
» The Theory that Smithman = Gerry McCann – CAREFULLY EXPLAINED
» Madeleine McCann "Last Photo": Reflection in sunglasses explained
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Madeleine Beth McCann :: Photographs of Madeleine McCann's fateful holiday
Page 3 of 8
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
